AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative Nausea and VomitingPhase 3NCT01122459

Evaluation of the Effect of Two Types of Fluid in the Recovery From Anaesthesia. Voluven 6% v Hartmanns

A Phase 3 study testing fluid administration in people with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, run by The Rotunda Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Avoiding nausea and vomiting is one of the most important for patient comfort and satisfaction, and preventing unplanned overnight stays in hospital following surgery. Studies have shown that increased amounts of intravenous fluid during surgery prevent nausea and vomiting after operations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
What is being tested?
fluid administration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteIreland
Study dates
Jan 2010to Jan 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • American Society of Anaesthesiology classification 1 \& 2
  • Minor laparoscopic gynaecological surgery
  • Age 18-45

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 or > 45
  • Cardio-respiratory disease
  • Obesity: BMI >30
  • Relevant drug allergy to medication used in the protocol

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ireland1 site
  • Rotunda Hospital

    Dublin, Dublin, 1

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Effects of Two Types of Fluid in the Recovery From Anaesthesia.

Avoiding nausea and vomiting is one of the most important for patient comfort and satisfaction, and preventing unplanned overnight stays in hospital following surgery. Studies have shown that increased amounts of intravenous fluid during surgery prevent nausea and vomiting after operations. This effect lasted for up to 48 hours after the surgery. Other unpleasant side effects of dehydration that delay recovery including headaches and dizziness can be prevented with fluid treatment during the operation. It is unclear if this effect happens with all types of fluid. The investigators propose to examine the effect of 2 types of intravenous fluids on recovery from anaesthesia. Each group will be given a different fluid while using our usual anaesthetic technique. The investigators will ask questions about nausea and vomiting after surgery (primary outcomes), and other factors relating to patient comfort such as headache and dizziness (secondary outcomes)

Read the detailed description

Treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is extremely important for patient comfort and satisfaction after surgery.1 There has been a recent change in emphasis from inpatient to day care surgery and anaesthesia with attendant increased interest in the problem of PONV. The incidence of PONV following day case gynaecologic surgery is 40% to 90%.2,3 Postoperative nausea and vomiting has the potential to cause delays in meeting discharge criteria both from the recovery room to ward, and from the day ward to home. On rare occasions, it may lead to unanticipated overnight hospital admission which leads to an increased emotional cost to the patient and economic cost to the healthcare provider. The efficacy of routine use of prophylactic antiemetics remains controversial.4 Pharmacologic prophylaxis has limited effect and increases the risk of adverse drug effects for the patient in addition to increasing overall cost of care.5,6

Studies suggest that increased crystalloid infusion for day case gynaecologic procedures in healthy patients reduces the incidence of nausea, vomiting and antiemetic use.7,8 The suggested mechanism is an improvement in gastrointestinal mucosal perfusion that mitigates the both the deleterious effects of preoperative fasting and consequent dehydration,9 and those of raised intra-abdominal pressure and surgical manipulation of bowel during laparoscopic procedures. However, excessive fluid administration in major surgery has been shown to have a negative effect on postoperative gastrointestinal function (causing an increased incidence of postoperative ileus) due to bowel oedema.10 It has been demonstrated that colloid causes less bowel oedema than equivalent volumes of crystalloid.11 Moretti et al showed that intraoperative colloid administration reduces PONV and improves the quality of postoperative recovery versus crystalloid solutions.¹² Clearly, there is an optimum perioperative fluid balance to reduce PONV without the risk of additional gastrointestinal side effects.

An arbitrary perioperative fluid load measured in ml.kg-1 does not take account of the individual fasting period and resultant preoperative fluid deficit for each patient, which can vary substantially depending on early or late (morning or afternoon) operating time.

We propose to prospectively examine the effect of intravenous fluids on PONV in a double-blind study, utilizing a standardised anaesthetic technique as normally carried out in this hospital. We hypothesise that replacement of preoperative fluid deficit with colloid will reduce the incidence of PONV versus crystalloid solution. We further propose to examine secondary outcomes relating to patient wellbeing such as headache and dizziness which are symptoms of dehydration.

Healthy patients should not experience any cardiorespiratory effects associated with administration of intravenous fluids to correct dehydration due to preoperative fasting. There may however be subclinical effects which can be detected by sensitive pulmonary function testing. Patients will be asked to perform a simple bedside lung function test before surgery and 2 hours after surgery. This will be done with a portable spirometer (Micromedical Micro Lab Spirometer), which is used routinely in our anaesthesia preoperative assessment clinic to evaluate lung function. Forced expiratory volume in the first second (litre) (FEV1), forced vital capacity (litre) (FVC) and peak flow rates (l/min) will be measured at a 45 degree position of recumbency. The best of three attempts will be chosen for further analysis as recommended by the British Thoracic Society.

Methods

LOCATION · Rotunda Hospital, operating theatres, recovery room and gynaecology ward

STUDY DESIGN

  • Prospective, randomised, double-blind

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • ASA I-II female patients
  • Age 18-45 years
  • Undergoing minor elective gynaecological surgery (elective laparoscopy)

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Age <18 or > 45
  • Cardio-respiratory disease
  • Excessive intraoperative blood loss
  • Obesity: BMI >30
  • Relevant drug allergy to medication used in the protocol

INFORMED WRITTEN CONSENT · Informed written consent will be obtained from all patients (see appendix 1)

RANDOMISATION

  • Patient group will be determined by randomisation with a computer program random number generator

GROUPS

  • Patients will be allocated to one of two groups according to randomisation
  • Group 1 will receive 1.5 ml.kg.hr-1 of fasting time of intravenous Hartmann's solution perioperatively (Crystalloid solution)
  • Group 2 will receive 1.5 ml.kg.hr-1 of fasting time of intravenous Voluven® (6% Hydroxy Ethyl Starch) solution perioperatively (Colloid solution)

BLINDING

  • All fluid administration will be completed in theatre
  • Neither the patient or the investigator will be aware of group assignment

ANAESTHETIC TECHNIQUE The anaesthetic technique will be standardised as follows: Intravenous access will be obtained after local anaesthetic infiltration of the skin. Once the fluid has been started all patients will undergo a standardised induction of anaesthesia, consisting of Fentanyl 1.5 mcg.kg-1, Propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 and Atracurium 0.35 mg.kg-1 to facilitate airway control. All patients will be mechanically ventilated via a laryngeal mask airway LMA Supreme™ to maintain isocapnia with tidal volume (Vt) 4-6 ml.kg-1, maximum airway pressure (P max) 30 cm H2O and a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O. Anaesthesia will be maintained with Sevoflurane 1-3% in a mixture of O2 and air to achieve a FiO2 of 0.5. Muscle relaxation will be antagonised with Neostigmine 2.5 mg and Glycopyrrolate 0.5 mg at the end of surgery. Before discontinuation of anaesthesia, each patient will receive rectal Diclofenac 100mg and 1000mg Paracetamol i.v.

Postoperative care will also be standardised. Patients complaining of pain will be given 25 mcg of Fentanyl intravenously as required (in PACU), Pethidine 50mg intramuscularly or simple oral analgesics (Paracetamol/Codeine 500-1000mg/8-16mg) every 6 hours in the ward area. Rescue antiemetics in the form of boluses of Ondansetron 4mg intravenously (to a maximum total dose of 16mg) and Cyclizine 50mg intramuscularly every 8 hours can be given. Patients will be prescribed oral Paracetamol/Codeine 500-1000mg/8-16mg every 6 hours and Diclofenac 50mg every 8 hours to take at home if required.

MEASUREMENTS (assessed by a single data collector @ 30 mins, 2 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively)

  1. Nausea: using a standard verbal analogue scale (VAS 0 - 10)
  2. Vomiting: Y/N, number of episodes
  3. Rescue antiemetics administered
  4. Dizziness: Y/N
  5. Sore throat: Y/N
  6. Headache: Y/N
  7. Wellbeing: assessment of general wellbeing on a scale from 0 - 10
  8. Pulmonary Function Tests

TREATMENT OF DATA The data will be collected by a single investigator at the specified time points and documented on a patient data collection sheet (see appendix 2). Once data collection is complete, all data of the patient sheets will be transferred onto a spreadsheet and anonymised.

USE OF DATA The data will be presented at a national or international meeting and in peer-reviewed medical journals.

STORAGE OF DATA All data will be stored for five years and only Dr. Conan McCaul and Dr. Ivan Hayes will have access to them.

STATISTICAL PROCEDURES Statistics will be performed using a standard statistical program (Sigma Stat, Jandel Scientific). Demographic data will be analysed using Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Repeated measures ( VAS scores) will be analysed by repeated measures analysis of variance with further paired comparisons at each time interval performed using the t-test, with corrections for multiple comparisons where appropriate. Categorical data will be analysed using χ² analysis or the Fisher's exact test where applicable. Normally distributed data will be presented as means +/-SEM, non-normally distributed data will be presented as medians +/- quartiles (interquartile range), and categorical data will be presented as raw data and as frequencies.

SAMPLE SIZE Postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence from day case laparoscopic gynaecologic procedures (primary outcome) both with and without single agent antiemetic prophylaxis varies from 40 -90%.2,3,7 To detect a clinically significant difference of 25% reduction in mean nausea scores based on a PONV incidence of 40% without antiemetic prophylaxis, we calculate a sample size of 60 patients per group (a = 0.05, β = 0.2).

Being tested
fluid administration
Keywords
Perioperative intravenous fluids
Medical subject headings
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • fluid administrationOther

    1.5mls/kg/hr fasting

Study groups in NCT01122459
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HartmannsActive comparatorThese patients will receive Hartmanns during anaesthesia
Receives: Other: fluid administration
Voluven 6%Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: fluid administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of nausea and vomiting

    Measured: 120 mins

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Incidence of Headache

    Measured: 30 mins

  2. Incidence of headache

    Measured: 120 mins

  3. Incidence of headache

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Incidence of headache

    Measured: 48 hours

  5. Incidence of nausea and vomiting

    Measured: 30 mins

  6. Incidence of nausea and vomiting

    Measured: 24 hours

  7. Incidence of nausea and vomiting

    Measured: 48 hours

  8. Incidence of sore throat

    Measured: 30 mins

  9. Incidence of sore throat

    Measured: 120mins

  10. Incidence of sore throat

    Measured: 24 hours

  11. Incidence of sore throat

    Measured: 48 hours

  12. Incidence of dizzyness

    Measured: 30 mins

  13. Incidence of dizzyness

    Measured: 120 mins

  14. Incidence of dizzyness

    Measured: 24 hours

  15. Incidence of dizzyness

    Measured: 48 hours

  16. Verbal analogue scale of general wellbeing

    Measured: 30 mins

  17. Verbal analogue scale of general wellbeing

    Measured: 120 mins

  18. Verbal analogue scale of general wellbeing

    Measured: 24 hours

  19. Verbal analogue scale of general wellbeing

    Measured: 48 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 May 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2011
  4. Study completionJan 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01122459
Sponsor's protocol ID
RotAnaesFluid1
Status last verified
May 2010
First submitted
11 May 2010
Last updated
21 Jul 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing fluid administration in people with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, run by The Rotunda Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of nausea and vomiting (time frame: 120 mins). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in