Spinal FracturesPhase 3KASTNCT01123512
The Kiva® System as a Vertebral Augmentation Treatment
A Phase 3 study testing Vertebral augmentation in people with Spinal Fractures and Fractures, Compression, run by Benvenue Medical, Inc. at 21 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Kiva VCF Treatment system in comparison to balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Fractures, Fractures, Compression, Back Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Vertebral augmentation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 21 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2010to May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria below to be included as research subjects:
- The patient is at least 50 years of age
- The patient has a score on the back pain visual analog scale (VAS) of ≥70 mm after 2 to 6 weeks of conservative care OR a VAS of ≥ 50 mm after 6 weeks of conservative care
- The patient has an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 30%
- The patient has radiographic evidence of one or two (1-2) A 1.1, A 1.2, A 1.3. fractures as classified by the AO Spine Fracture classification, due to primary or secondary osteoporosis in the thoracic and / or lumbar spine. Note that patients are eligible if they have had treatment of or healed VCF(s) at any non-index level
- The patient has central pain over the spinous process(es) upon palpation at the Index level(s)
Show all 12Show fewer
- The Index fracture(s) is / are acute or persistent (not healed), as demonstrated by T2 weighted STIR MRI (or bone scan if patient is contraindicated for MRI
- The Index fracture(s) has / have failed conservative care of at least 2 weeks but no longer than 6 months
- The Index fracture(s) shows radiographic evidence of at least 5% vertebral collapse
- The pedicle identified for access to the index fracture has a diameter that is ≥ 6 mm
- The patient is mentally capable and willing to sign a study-specific informed consent as documentation of the informed consent process prior to any study procedures
- The patient is willing and able to comply with all study requirements including follow-up visits and radiographic assessments
Who cannot join
- Patients will not be allowed to participate in the study if they meet any of the exclusion criteria below:
- The index fracture(s) has/have been caused by high-energy trauma
- The index fracture(s) has / have known tumor involvement
- The index fracture(s) is/are diagnosed as an osteonecrotic fracture(s) by the treating physician
- The Index fracture(s) is a/are translational force fracture(s) (A2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
- The index fracture(s) is a/are burst fracture(s) (A 3.3., B or C type) or pedicle fracture(s) with posterior cortical wall disruption
Show all 38Show fewer
- The index fracture(s) has / have posterior vertebral wall displacement occupying more than 20% of the cross sectional area of the spinal canal
- The index fracture(s) has / have severe deformity with reduction of >75% in any height and accompanying area, using adjacent level as comparison
- The index level(s) has / have undergone previous surgical treatment for a vertebral body compression fracture or other surgical procedure at the index level(s)
- Angulation of index fracture(s) makes treatment with Kiva System impossible (at discretion of surgeon)
- The pedicle identified for access to the index fracture has a diameter less than 6 mm
- The patient has Paget's disease
- The patient has a BMI > 35
- The patient has uncontrolled diabetes as characterized by hemoglobin HbA1c >7% and/or blood sugar >180mg/dL
- The patient has severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
- The patient has myelopathy
- The patient is on long-term steroid therapy (steroid dose ≥ 30 mg /day for > 3 months)
- A medical contraindication to spinal surgery and/or general anesthesia, such as coagulopathy (with a threshold for normal being INR ≤ 1.5, PTT within lab normal range, and platelet count > 100,000)
- The patient has spinal canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level(s) to be treated;
- The patient has neurologic symptoms or deficits or radiculopathy related to the VCF
- The patient has pain based on clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus palposus or severe spinal stenosis (progressive weakness or paralysis)
- The patient has indications of instability related to the index fracture (≥ 30 degrees of kyphosis, translation >4mm, interspinous process widening, > Grade 1 spondylolisthesis and/or > 25 degrees of scoliosis if the index level is included in the curve)
- The patient has planned spine surgery for any disorder during or up to 30 days after the study treatment
- The patient has had spine surgery for any disorder in the 30 days prior to enrollment
- The patient has a documented active systemic or local infection, such as osteomyelitis or discitis, with a WBC > 15.0 x 10^3/µL and a temperature > 101.5°F
- The patient has a known allergy to the investigational device materials and / or acrylics / polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or a hypersensitivity to monomers
- The patient has been diagnosed with hemorrhagic diathesis
- The patient has uncontrolled psychiatric illness or severe dementia
- The patient has a baseline back pain visual analog scale (VAS) of <50 mm if patient has at least 6 weeks of conservative care or <70 mm if patient has 2-6 weeks conservative care
- The patient has a baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of <30%
- The patient is currently on anti-cancer therapy or anti-HIV therapy
- Patient has autoimmune or inflammatory rheumatic disease
- Patient's life expectancy is less than the study duration or undergoing palliative care
- The patient is known to be a current alcohol or drug abuser
- The patient is known to be involved in medical litigation including Workmen's Compensation
- The patient is a prisoner
- The patient is participating in another investigational study that has a potential for effect to the study treatment or the study endpoints
- The patient is pregnant or considering getting pregnant during study participation
Trial locations and contacts
21 sites in 5 countries.
21 sites in 5 countries
United States15 sites
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma
Edmond, Oklahoma, 73013
CORE Orthopaedic Medical Center
Encinitas, California, 92021
Radiology Imaging Associates
Englewood, Colorado, 80112
Evanston Hospital
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Adventist Hospital
Hinsdale, Illinois, 60521
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
El Camino Hospital
Mountain View, California, 94040
Sierra Regional Spine Institute
Reno, Nevada, 89509
Mayo Clinic-Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Radiological Associates of Sacramento
Sacramento, California, 95816
St. Mary's Spine Center
San Francisco, California, 94117
Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
Canada2 sites
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
Germany2 sites
Universitatsklinikum Bonn
Bonn
Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gGmbH
Potsdam
About this study
Official title: The Kiva® System as a Vertebral Augmentation Treatment - A Safety and Effectiveness Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Kiva VCF Treatment system in comparison to balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine.
- Conditions
- Spinal Fractures, Fractures, Compression, Back Injuries
- Being tested
- Vertebral augmentation
- Keywords
- Vertebral Compression Fracture, Kyphoplasty, Spine, Vertebral Body Compression Fracture, Back Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Fractures, Fractures, Compression, Back Injuries, Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vertebral augmentationDevice
Vertebral augmentation for one or two osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Kiva VCF Treatment System | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Vertebral augmentation |
| Balloon Kyphoplasty | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Vertebral augmentation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Participants With Study Success
Patient success will be defined as:
- Reduction in VCF fracture-related pain at 12 months by >15 mm from baseline as measured by a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS),
- Maintenance or improvement in function at 12 months from baseline as measured by the 100 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and
- Absence of device-related serious adverse events, defined as device-related adverse events requiring surgical reintervention or retreatment at the index level, including revision, removal, reoperation, and/or supplemental fixation
Measured: 12 Month Post-op
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2010
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Benvenue Medical, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Steven R. Garfin, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Diego, CASean M. Tutton, MD, FSIR, Principal investigator, Medical College of Wisconsin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01123512
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BEN005
- Acronym
- KAST
- Status last verified
- Oct 2014
- First submitted
- 11 May 2010
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Beall DP, Coe JD, McIlduff M, Bloch D, Hornberger J, Warner C, Tutton S. Serious Adverse Events Associated with Readmission Through One Year After Vertebral Augmentation with Either a Polyetheretherketone Implant or Balloon Kyphoplasty. Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):521-528.
PubMed 28934783
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Kiva® System as a Vertebral Augmentation Treatment - A Safety and Effectiveness Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01123512
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KAST / BEN005
- Conditions
- Spinal Fractures, Fractures, Compression, Back Injuries
- Keywords
- Vertebral Compression Fracture, Kyphoplasty, Spine, Vertebral Body Compression Fracture, Back Pain
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Benvenue Medical, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Aug 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Kiva VCF Treatment system in comparison to balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Kiva VCF Treatment System | Experimental | Device: Vertebral augmentation |
| Balloon Kyphoplasty | Active comparator | Device: Vertebral augmentation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria below to be included as research subjects:
- The patient is at least 50 years of age
- The patient has a score on the back pain visual analog scale (VAS) of ≥70 mm after 2 to 6 weeks of conservative care OR a VAS of ≥ 50 mm after 6 weeks of conservative care
- The patient has an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 30%
- The patient has radiographic evidence of one or two (1-2) A 1.1, A 1.2, A 1.3. fractures as classified by the AO Spine Fracture classification, due to primary or secondary osteoporosis in the thoracic and / or lumbar spine. Note that patients are eligible if they have had treatment of or healed VCF(s) at any non-index level
Key exclusion criteria (38 listed)
- Patients will not be allowed to participate in the study if they meet any of the exclusion criteria below:
- The index fracture(s) has/have been caused by high-energy trauma
- The index fracture(s) has / have known tumor involvement
- The index fracture(s) is/are diagnosed as an osteonecrotic fracture(s) by the treating physician
- The Index fracture(s) is a/are translational force fracture(s) (A2.1, 2.2, 2.3)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vertebral augmentationVertebral augmentation for one or two osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures | Device | Balloon Kyphoplasty, Kiva VCF Treatment System |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Participants With Study Success
Time frame: 12 Month Post-op
Patient success will be defined as: 1. Reduction in VCF fracture-related pain at 12 months by >15 mm from baseline as measured by a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 2. Maintenance or improvement in function at 12 months from baseline as measured by the 100 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 3. Absence of device-related serious adverse events, defined as device-related adverse events requiring surgical reintervention or retreatment at the index level, including revision, removal, reoperation, and/or supplemental fixation
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28934783Beall DP, Coe JD, McIlduff M, Bloch D, Hornberger J, Warner C, Tutton S. Serious Adverse Events Associated with Readmission Through One Year After Vertebral Augmentation with Either a Polyetheretherketone Implant or Balloon Kyphoplasty. Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):521-528.
Related trials for Spinal Fractures
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Evaluation of Therapeutic Combination in Treating Vertebral Compression Fractures
Vertebral Compression Fractures, Pathological Fracture
Active, not recruiting
Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block Plus Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery
Femoral Neck Fractures, Nerve Block
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Cement Augmentation in Preventing Vertebral Body Compression Fracture Following Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Solid Tumors and Spinal Metastases
Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Spine, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Controlled Reduction of AO Spine B3 Fractures in Ankylosing Spinal Disorders Using an Inflatable Positioning Device: Technical Note and Retrospective Single-centre Case Series
Spine Fracture, Osteoporosis
Active, not recruiting
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Bone Pain Study
Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steven R. Garfin, MD principal investigator
University of California, San Diego, CA
Sean M. Tutton, MD, FSIR principal investigator
Medical College of Wisconsin
21 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Vertebral augmentation in people with Spinal Fractures and Fractures, Compression, run by Benvenue Medical, Inc. at 21 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 38 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 21 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, Belgium, France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Aug 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Participants With Study Success (time frame: 12 Month Post-op). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01123512, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2014.