ADHDPhase 4NCT01127607
Does Pharmacological Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adults Enhance Parenting Performance?
A Phase 4 study testing lisdexamfetamine in people with ADHD, run by Florida International University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
It is now well recognized that Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a chronic disorder of childhood that extends into adulthood for many individuals. A number of impairments in daily life functioning have been identified in adults with ADHD, including marital distress, risky driving, and using less… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- ADHD
- What is being tested?
- lisdexamfetamine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Parents with a diagnosis of ADHD, who also have a child with an ADHD between the ages of 5-16
Who cannot join
- Parents with any of the following: any identified structural heart abnormality or other health condition that significantly affects heart performance (e.g., hypertension), a resting systolic blood pressure ≥140 and diastolic blood pressure ≥90, pregnant or breast feeding, significant psychiatric problems other than ADHD that currently require medication or any emergent psychiatric treatment, medical/psychiatric illness that could be worsened by stimulants (such as a seizure disorder, Tourette's Disorder or hyperthyroidism), or alcohol or substance abuse problems in the past 6 months.
- Children with any of the following: any psychiatric problem other than ADHD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), or Conduct Disorder (CD) that requires medication or any emergent psychiatric treatment, either parent or child has participated in the same parent-child interaction task used in this study in the last 6 months, either as part of a study or a clinical treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Florida International University
Miami, Florida, 33199
About this study
It is now well recognized that Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a chronic disorder of childhood that extends into adulthood for many individuals. A number of impairments in daily life functioning have been identified in adults with ADHD, including marital distress, risky driving, and using less effective parenting practices (e.g., Barkley, 2006).
Specifically, some parents with ADHD have been found to use inconsistent discipline, less parental involvement, and less positive reinforcement with their children compared to parents without ADHD (e.g., Chen \& Johnston, 2007; Chronis-Tuscano, Clarke, Rooney, Diaz, \& Pian, 2008). While there is some evidence that stimulant medication improves parental functioning for adults with ADHD, only one study has specifically explored the use of stimulant medication and parenting(Chronis-Tuscano, Seymour, Stine, Jones, Jiles, Rooney, et al., 2008).
The purpose of this study is to explore whether or not the stimulant medication, lisdexamfetamine, improves parent functioning. Measures of parenting behavior, parental psychosocial functioning, and child psychosocial functioning will be collected. It is hypothesized that lisdexamfetamine will be associated with some improvement in these assessments.
Read the detailed description
Seventy families with at least one parent (either mother or father who will serve as the identified subject) and a school-aged child (ages 5-16) with ADHD will be recruited to participate in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lisdexamfetamine to assess the acute and prolonged effects of medication usage on parent-child interactions. The protocol will employ traditional self-report measures of parental competency and functioning used in other studies, but will supplement them with one of the most widely used observational laboratory tasks.
Families will be recruited on a rolling basis and the length of the study will be approximately 8 weeks. In the first three weeks of the study, parents will complete the dose optimization phase to find the optimal dose of lisdexamfetamine. Lisdexamfetamine will be initiated at a dose of 30mg and increased to 50mg for week 2 and 70mg for week 3. During week 4, measures of the acute effects of lisdexamfetamine will be collected, and parents will complete the observational laboratory parent child interaction tasks two times (i.e., on lisdexamfetamine and on placebo- phase I). In the remaining four weeks of the study (phase 2) a between subjects comparison will be conducted. Half of the parents will be randomized to receive lisdexamfetamine and half will receive a placebo. Measures of parent functioning will once again be collected at the end of phase 2 and parents will complete the observational laboratory task, which will allow for exploration of prolonged lisdexamfetamine treatment on parent-child interactions.
- Conditions
- ADHD
- Being tested
- lisdexamfetamine
- Keywords
- parenting
- Medical subject headings
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
lisdexamfetamineDrug
Also called vyvanse
3 week with-in subject lead in phase to find optimal dose ranging from 30 mg to 70mg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| stimulant medication | Experimental | blinded lisdexamfetamine at the optimal dose for the individual participant as previously determined during the med optimization portion of the study Receives: Drug: lisdexamfetamine |
| placebo pill | Placebo comparator | placebo medication identical in appearance to active med Receives: Drug: lisdexamfetamine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Counts
Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors. Average number of behaviors per group were computed. Three subjects dropped prior to completing this assessment and one participant completed the other endpoint measures but not the DPICS, which is why the total N for this outcome is 23 at study endpoint. At end of period II (study endpoint), the medication group (n=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Percentages
Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors. Percentages of behaviors as a function of total verbalizations (for praise, negative talk, demanding) or as a function of commands and questions (for impatient and responsive) were computed.Three subjects dropped prior to completing this assessment and one participant completed the other endpoint measures but not the DPICS, which is why the total N for this outcome is 23 at study endpoint. At end of period II (study endpoint), the medication group (n=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Secondary outcomes (25)
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
measures change in parenting practices.The APQ is a 42-item measure (each item ranges from 1/always to 5/never) on which parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which they implement the following parenting practices: involvement (10 items range 10-50- higher scores mean more parental involvement), positive parenting (6 items with range of 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater use of praise), poor monitoring/supervision (10 items with range of 10 to 50 and higher scores indicate less supervision/monitoring), inconsistent discipline(6 items with range of 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater problems with inconsistent discipline), and corporal punishment (3 items with range of 3-15 and greater scores indicate more use of corporal punishment). Items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 ("never") to 5 ("always"). Items summed into composite scales.
Within subject comparison of no medication baseline vs. optimal dose medication.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (DBD)
Parent ratings of their child's symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and conduct disorder (CD). Measure consists of 45 items each rated on a Likert scale that ranges from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). Items are averaged to form adhd-inattention, adhd-hyperactive/impulsive, ODD, and CD scores.Within subject comparison of no medication baseline vs. optimal dose medication. ADHD subscale consists of 20 items with range of 0 to 60. ODD subscale consists of 9 items with range of 0 to 27. CD subscale consists of 15 items with range of 0 to 45. For all subscales, higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
Parent ratings of their child's functioning and need for treatment in developmentally important domains. Ratings are completed using visual-analogue scales that are anchored at the low end by "no problems / no need for treatment" and at the high end by "extreme problem / definitely needs treatment." Visual analogue ratings for each subscale were converted to 0 to 6 scales with higher values indicating greater impairment and lower values indicating less impairment for each subscale.Within subject comparison of no medication baseline vs. optimal dose medication.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
The SDS consists of 3 self rated items assessing the degree to which symptoms affect work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities. Items are rated on a 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) scale. Items were averaged into an overall disability score with range of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more severe disability.Within subject comparison of no medication baseline vs. optimal dose medication.
Measured: baseline and week 4
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS)
Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors with each parent-child dyad counted as one participant. Average number of behaviors per group were computed.This outcome was part of period I- the within subject comparison of all participating subjects once on placebo (n=26) and once with all subjects on active medication (N=26). (the 27th participant completed this phase but partial data was lost due to mechanical failure with video equipment so their data was not included). All adult participants received both placebo and active medication in this phase that comprised all of period 1.
Measured: weeks 4 and weeks 5 (period I within subjects trial)
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Percentages
Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors with each parent-child dyad counted as one participant. Percentages of behaviors as a function of total verbalizations (for praise, negative talk, demanding) or as a function of commands and questions (for impatient and responsive) were computed. This outcome was part of period I- the within subject comparison of all participating subjects once on placebo (n=26) and once with all subjects on active medication (N=26). (the 27th participant completed this phase but partial data was lost due to mechanical failure with video equipment so their data was not included). All adult participants received both placebo and active medication in this phase that comprised all of period 1.
Measured: weeks 4 and weeks 5 (period I within subjects trial)
Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale
rates 13 potential adverse events of central nervous system stimulant medications on a 0-3 likert scale with 0=none 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe severity. Form completed by participants at end of med optimization phase. Mean severity rating then averaged across 13 categories. This compares mean side effect severity at unmedicated baseline state vs. on optimal dose at week 3. Analysis includes all participants completing medication optimization.
Measured: baseline and end of dose optimization phase/week 4
Adult ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD RS)
measures change in all DSM (Diagnostic and Statistics Manual) IV ADHD symptoms on a 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe) scale. Inattention and hyperactive/impulsive subscales each consist of 9 items with range of 0 to 27. Total Score consists of all 18 items rated 0 to 3 with range of 0 to 54. For all, higher scores indicate more symptoms. All information obtained during clinician interview of patient. At endpoint, the medication group (N=11) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Parenting Stress Index (PSI)--Total Stress
measures change in stress of parent child interactions and completed by the participant. The PSI is a measure of the source and degree of parenting stress (Abidin, 1995), which contains 120 items which are rated on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) scale. 101 of these items are used to compute a total stress score (reported below) as the other 19 report on specific life stressors. Range is 101 to 505, for which higher scores indicate higher levels of stress. At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Parenting Locus of Control (PLC)
self completed parenting measure of the degree to which parents feel they can influence their child's behavior. Measure consists of 25 items each rated using a Likert scales that ranges from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). Range is 25 to 125 with higher scores indicating greater parental control over their child's behavior (desired outcome). At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Brown Attention Deficit Scale (BAADS)
Measures executive functioning using 40 items each rated using a Likert Scale that ranges from 0 ("never") to 3 ("almost daily"). Activation, Attention and effort subscales are 9 items each with range of 0-27. Affect scale is 7 items (range 0-21), memory is 6 items (range 0-18) and total score is 40 items (range 0-120). All raw scores are then reported as T scores based on normative data with higher T scores indicating worse executive functioning. At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)
Measures child's interactions with peers and adults. Items rated using Likert scales that range from 0 ("never") to 2 ("often").At week 8, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=11). There are two subscales: Problem Behaviors (18 items rated between 0-2 for total score range of 0 to 36) and Social Skills (40 items rated 0-2 with range for total score of 0-80). The total scores for these scales are reported as standard scores, with a population mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. For problem behavior higher scores indicate worse behavior whereas for social skills, higher scores indicate more social (or better behavior).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale (DBD)
measures externalizing symptoms in children.measures externalizing symptoms in children completed by their primary caretaker who was a participant in the study. The DBD (Pelham et al., 1992) assessed DSM symptoms of ADHD, ODD, and CD from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The DBD includes symptoms of DSM-III and DSM-IV ADHD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder (CD).At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=12).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
measures global functioning of child rated by the parent who was the participant in the study. The IRS is a 7 item measure that uses visual-analogue scales to evaluate the child's problem level and need for treatment in developmentally important areas, such as peer relationships, adult-child relationships, academic performance. Each subscale including overall severity is scored from 0 (no problem) to 6 (extreme problem) with higher scores indicating more impairment. At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
The SDS consists of 3 self rated items assessing the degree to which symptoms affect work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities. Items are rated on a 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) scale. Items were averaged into an overall disability score with range of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more severe disability. At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
ADHD Severity Clinical Global Impressions Severity Subscale
clinician rated measure of ADHD symptom severity in adult participants. The severity subscale is scored from 1 (normal) to 7 (extremely ill).At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Barkley Home Situations Questionnaire (HSQ)
Self completed by adult participants. Measures their child's functioning in the evening by asking them to report whether or not their child had problems in developmentally important areas. Number of problems per child are counted and counts are then averaged for each group with higher numbers representing more problems. At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=10).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale Mean Severity Rating.
rates 13 potential adverse events of Central Nervous System (CNS) stimulants on a 0-3 likert scale with 0=none 1=mild severity, 2=moderate severity, 3=severe severity. Form completed by participants. Mean severity rating then averaged across 13 categories.At endpoint, the medication group (N=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Resting Blood Pressure
Measured at rest at last assessment visit using an automated blood pressure machine; results reported in mmHG. At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=10).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
measures change in parenting practices.The APQ is a 42-item measure (each item ranges from 1/always to 5/never) on which parents are asked to indicate the frequency with which they implement the following parenting practices: involvement (10 items range 10-50- higher scores mean more parental involvement), positive parenting (6 items with range of 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater use of praise), poor monitoring/supervision (10 items with range of 10 to 50 and higher scores indicate less supervision/monitoring), inconsistent discipline(6 items with range of 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater problems with inconsistent discipline), and corporal punishment (3 items with range of 3-15 and greater scores indicate more use of corporal punishment). Items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 ("never") to 5 ("always"). Items summed into composite scales.
At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
self rated measure of global impairment of adult participants derived from the child IRS. The IRS-A assesses impairment overall and in specific domains, including interpersonal relationships, academic performance, and self-esteem, and includes adult-specific domains of functioning, such as employment and romantic relationships. The IRS-A assesses current problems and need for treatment. Each subscale is rated from 0 (no problem) to 6 (extreme problem).At endpoint, the medication group (N=11) was compared to the placebo group (N=13). Overall Impairment is its own subscale and not a composite score of the others.
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Weight
Weight measured on calibrated scale; participant measured without shoes or heavy clothing (jackets, sweaters, etc...). reported in kilograms.At endpoint, the medication group (N=9) was compared to the placebo group (N=11).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Resting Pulse
measured at last assessment visit when at rest using an automated blood pressure machine; results reported in beats per minute. At endpoint, the medication group (N=8) was compared to the placebo group (N=9).
Measured: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale - Percent Present for All Reported Adverse Events Occurring at a Rate of 5% or More
Self report of side effects measured during dose titration using the Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale. Consists of 13 items each rated using 0(none) to 3 (severe) scales. Items endorsed as 1 (mild) or above were counted as present. Information on additional adverse events not part of the PSERS was collected by direct interview of the participants. All side effects occurring at a frequency of 5% or more are reported. Initial side effect data is reported for all participants entering pre-randomization med optimization phase who took medication (n=36) vs those formally enrolled (N=27). Also, side effect data for the med titration phase is entered per dose rather than per participant. For example, a person trying the 30, 50 and 70mg dose is entered is entered 4 times (no med as well) vs. just once. This is why baseline N is higher than for other outcomes collected at weeks 4 and 8 where data was only available for those completing the pre-randomization med optimization phase (N=27).
Measured: end of medication optimization phase/week 4
Adult ADHD Rating Scale Completed at the End of the Med Optimization Phase
Measures change in all DSM IV ADHD symptoms on a 0 (least severe) to 3 (most severe) scale. All information obtained during clinician interview of patient. Inattention and hyperactive/impulsive subscales each consist of 9 items with range of 0 to 27. Total Score consists of all 18 items (sum of two subscales) rated 0 to 3 with range of 0 to 54. For all, higher scores indicate more symptoms.
Measured: baseline and end of med optimization phase/week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionJul 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ADHDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Florida International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- James G Waxmonsky, M.D., Principal investigator, Florida International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01127607
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IITWW#2
- Status last verified
- Jun 2014
- First submitted
- 19 May 2010
- Last updated
- 13 Jun 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Babinski DE, Waxmonsky JG, Waschbusch DA, Humphery H, Pelham WE Jr. Parent-Reported Improvements in Family Functioning in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Lisdexamfetamine for Treatment of Parental Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 Apr;27(3):250-257. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0129. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
PubMed 27991835Waxmonsky JG, Waschbusch DA, Babinski DE, Humphrey HH, Alfonso A, Crum KI, Bernstein M, Slavec J, Augustus JN, Pelham WE. Does pharmacological treatment of ADHD in adults enhance parenting performance? Results of a double-blind randomized trial. CNS Drugs. 2014 Jul;28(7):665-77. doi: 10.1007/s40263-014-0165-3.
PubMed 24796970
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jun 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Pharmacological Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adults Enhance Parenting Performance?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01127607
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IITWW#2
- Conditions
- ADHD
- Keywords
- parenting
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Florida International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jun 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It is now well recognized that Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a chronic disorder of childhood that extends into adulthood for many individuals. A number of impairments in daily life functioning have been identified in adults with ADHD, including marital distress, risky driving, and using less effective parenting practices (e.g., Barkley, 2006).
Specifically, some parents with ADHD have been found to use inconsistent discipline, less parental involvement, and less positive reinforcement with their children compared to parents without ADHD (e.g., Chen \& Johnston, 2007; Chronis-Tuscano, Clarke, Rooney, Diaz, \& Pian, 2008). While there is some evidence that stimulant medication improves parental functioning for adults with ADHD, only one study has specifically explored the use of stimulant medication and parenting(Chronis-Tuscano, Seymour, Stine, Jones, Jiles, Rooney, et al., 2008).
The purpose of this study is to explore whether or not the stimulant medication, lisdexamfetamine, improves parent functioning. Measures of parenting behavior, parental psychosocial functioning, and child psychosocial functioning will be collected. It is hypothesized that lisdexamfetamine will be associated with some improvement in these assessments.
Detailed description
Seventy families with at least one parent (either mother or father who will serve as the identified subject) and a school-aged child (ages 5-16) with ADHD will be recruited to participate in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lisdexamfetamine to assess the acute and prolonged effects of medication usage on parent-child interactions. The protocol will employ traditional self-report measures of parental competency and functioning used in other studies, but will supplement them with one of the most widely used observational laboratory tasks.
Families will be recruited on a rolling basis and the length of the study will be approximately 8 weeks. In the first three weeks of the study, parents will complete the dose optimization phase to find the optimal dose of lisdexamfetamine. Lisdexamfetamine will be initiated at a dose of 30mg and increased to 50mg for week 2 and 70mg for week 3. During week 4, measures of the acute effects of lisdexamfetamine will be collected, and parents will complete the observational laboratory parent child interaction tasks two times (i.e., on lisdexamfetamine and on placebo- phase I). In the remaining four weeks of the study (phase 2) a between subjects comparison will be conducted. Half of the parents will be randomized to receive lisdexamfetamine and half will receive a placebo. Measures of parent functioning will once again be collected at the end of phase 2 and parents will complete the observational laboratory task, which will allow for exploration of prolonged lisdexamfetamine treatment on parent-child interactions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| stimulant medication | Experimental | Drug: lisdexamfetamineblinded lisdexamfetamine at the optimal dose for the individual participant as previously determined during the med optimization portion of the study |
| placebo pill | Placebo comparator | Drug: lisdexamfetamineplacebo medication identical in appearance to active med |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Parents with a diagnosis of ADHD, who also have a child with an ADHD between the ages of 5-16
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Parents with any of the following: any identified structural heart abnormality or other health condition that significantly affects heart performance (e.g., hypertension), a resting systolic blood pressure ≥140 and diastolic blood pressure ≥90, pregnant or breast feeding, significant psychiatric problems other than ADHD that currently require medication or any emergent psychiatric treatment, medical/psychiatric illness that could be worsened by stimulants (such as a seizure disorder, Tourette's Disorder or hyperthyroidism), or alcohol or substance abuse problems in the past 6 months.
- Children with any of the following: any psychiatric problem other than ADHD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), or Conduct Disorder (CD) that requires medication or any emergent psychiatric treatment, either parent or child has participated in the same parent-child interaction task used in this study in the last 6 months, either as part of a study or a clinical treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| lisdexamfetamineAlso: vyvanse3 week with-in subject lead in phase to find optimal dose ranging from 30 mg to 70mg | Drug | placebo pill, stimulant medication |
Primary outcome
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Counts
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors. Average number of behaviors per group were computed. Three subjects dropped prior to completing this assessment and one participant completed the other endpoint measures but not the DPICS, which is why the total N for this outcome is 23 at study endpoint. At end of period II (study endpoint), the medication group (n=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Percentages
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Observations of parents and children as they interact with each other during a five minute homework task and during a 10 minute non-academic task. Interactions were recorded and later coded by trained observers. Observers counted number of parent and child behaviors. Percentages of behaviors as a function of total verbalizations (for praise, negative talk, demanding) or as a function of commands and questions (for impatient and responsive) were computed.Three subjects dropped prior to completing this assessment and one participant completed the other endpoint measures but not the DPICS, which is why the total N for this outcome is 23 at study endpoint. At end of period II (study endpoint), the medication group (n=10) was compared to the placebo group (N=13).
25 secondary outcomes
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (DBD)
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS)
Time frame: weeks 4 and weeks 5 (period I within subjects trial)
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Percentages
Time frame: weeks 4 and weeks 5 (period I within subjects trial)
Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale
Time frame: baseline and end of dose optimization phase/week 4
Adult ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD RS)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Parenting Stress Index (PSI)--Total Stress
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Parenting Locus of Control (PLC)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Brown Attention Deficit Scale (BAADS)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale (DBD)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
ADHD Severity Clinical Global Impressions Severity Subscale
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Barkley Home Situations Questionnaire (HSQ)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale Mean Severity Rating.
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Resting Blood Pressure
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Weight
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Resting Pulse
Time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)
Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale - Percent Present for All Reported Adverse Events Occurring at a Rate of 5% or More
Time frame: end of medication optimization phase/week 4
Adult ADHD Rating Scale Completed at the End of the Med Optimization Phase
Time frame: baseline and end of med optimization phase/week 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jun 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27991835Babinski DE, Waxmonsky JG, Waschbusch DA, Humphery H, Pelham WE Jr. Parent-Reported Improvements in Family Functioning in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Lisdexamfetamine for Treatment of Parental Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 Apr;27(3):250-257. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0129. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24796970Waxmonsky JG, Waschbusch DA, Babinski DE, Humphrey HH, Alfonso A, Crum KI, Bernstein M, Slavec J, Augustus JN, Pelham WE. Does pharmacological treatment of ADHD in adults enhance parenting performance? Results of a double-blind randomized trial. CNS Drugs. 2014 Jul;28(7):665-77. doi: 10.1007/s40263-014-0165-3.
Related trials for ADHD
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of Solriamfetol in Children and Adolescents With ADHD
ADHD
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Augmenting Parent Management Training for Child Temper Outbursts Using a Digital Tool
Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Conduct Disorder
Recruiting
Micronutrient Supplementation and Chronotherapy in Children With ADHD
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Forward Treatment of Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Using Solriamfetol (FOCUS-2)
ADHD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James G Waxmonsky, M.D. principal investigator
Florida International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing lisdexamfetamine in people with ADHD, run by Florida International University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jun 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) - Behavior Counts (time frame: study endpoint- end of period II (between subjects trial)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01127607, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2014.