ExerciseNCT01129219
Observation and Progressive Strength Training After Hip Fracture
A study testing Strength training in people with Exercise, run by Oslo University Hospital.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, controlled; single-blind parallel group trial carried out with hip fracture patients, starting at 12 weeks post fracture. Patients were approached during their acute stay in hospital, followed without any extra intervention for 12 weeks, and then randomized in a 2:1 manner to either intervention… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Exercise
- What is being tested?
- Strength training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2007to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age at least 65 years
- not living in nursing home
- were able to undergo physical therapy for the hip fracture
- scoring of 23 or more (out of 30) on the Mini Mental State Examination
Who cannot join
- permanently institutionalized
- had metastatic cancer
- suffered from multi-trauma.
About this study
This is a randomized, controlled; single-blind parallel group trial carried out with hip fracture patients, starting at 12 weeks post fracture. Patients were approached during their acute stay in hospital, followed without any extra intervention for 12 weeks, and then randomized in a 2:1 manner to either intervention or control for the next 12 weeks. After the first 12 weeks intervention the intervention group were divided into two groups and randomized to an new single-blind parallel group trial for further intervention.
- Conditions
- Exercise
- Being tested
- Strength training
- Keywords
- Strength, Function, Mobility
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Strength trainingOther
Strength training for 24 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | Experimental | Subjects in the control group were asked to maintain their current lifestyle. No restrictions were placed on their exercise activities. Receives: Other: Strength training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bergs Balance scale
Bergs Balance Scale: The Berg balance scale (BBS) measures "functional balance," which has three dimensions: maintenance of a position, postural adjustment to voluntary movements, and reaction to external disturbance, scored 0-56 (Berg K. 1995).
Measured: 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Strength
Secondary outcomes was the results on the Sit to Stand-test,which measure strength of lower limbs.
Measured: 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2007
- Primary completionJun 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ExerciseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oslo University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Diakonhjemmet Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01129219
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1.2007.347
- Status last verified
- Mar 2007
- First submitted
- 18 May 2010
- Last updated
- 24 May 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Helen H Host, David R Sinacore, Kathryn L Bohnert, Karen Steger-May, Marybeth Brown and Ellen F Binder. Training-Induced Strength and Functional Adaptations After Hip Fracture. PHYS THER Vol. 87, No. 3, March 2007, pp. 292-303 Ellen F. Binder, MD; Marybeth Brown, PT, PhD; David R. Sinacore, PT, PhD; Karen Steger-May, MA; Kevin E. Yarasheski, PhD; Kenneth B. Schechtman. Effects of Extended Outpatient Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture. A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA. 2004;292:837-846. Kathleen K Mangione, Rebecca L Craik, Susan S Tomlinson and Kerstin M Palombaro. Can Elderly Patients Who Have Had a Hip Fracture Perform Moderate- to High-Intensity Exercise at Home? PHYS THER Vol. 85, No. 8, August 2005, pp. 727-739 Klaus Hauer, Norbert Specht, Matthias Schuler, Peter Bärtsch1 and Peter Oster. Intensive physical training in geriatric patients after severe falls and hip surgery. Age and Ageing 2002; 31: 49-57 2002. David Moher1 , Kenneth F Schulz2 and Douglas G Altman. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2001, 1:2doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Mar;27(1):27-36. Bohannon RW. Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Feb;80(1):163-6. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed
Fairhall NJ, Dyer SM, Mak JC, Diong J, Kwok WS, Sherrington C. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5.
PubMed 36070134
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 May 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Observation and Progressive Strength Training After Hip Fracture
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01129219
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1.2007.347
- Conditions
- Exercise
- Keywords
- Strength, Function, Mobility
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Diakonhjemmet Hospital
- Study start
- Jun 2007
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, controlled; single-blind parallel group trial carried out with hip fracture patients, starting at 12 weeks post fracture. Patients were approached during their acute stay in hospital, followed without any extra intervention for 12 weeks, and then randomized in a 2:1 manner to either intervention or control for the next 12 weeks. After the first 12 weeks intervention the intervention group were divided into two groups and randomized to an new single-blind parallel group trial for further intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | Experimental | Other: Strength trainingSubjects in the control group were asked to maintain their current lifestyle. No restrictions were placed on their exercise activities. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age at least 65 years
- not living in nursing home
- were able to undergo physical therapy for the hip fracture
- scoring of 23 or more (out of 30) on the Mini Mental State Examination
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- permanently institutionalized
- had metastatic cancer
- suffered from multi-trauma.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Strength trainingStrength training for 24 weeks | Other | Usual care |
Primary outcome
Bergs Balance scale
Time frame: 24 weeks
Bergs Balance Scale: The Berg balance scale (BBS) measures "functional balance," which has three dimensions: maintenance of a position, postural adjustment to voluntary movements, and reaction to external disturbance, scored 0-56 (Berg K. 1995).
1 secondary outcome
Strength
Time frame: 24 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 May 2010.
- Results publicationHelen H Host, David R Sinacore, Kathryn L Bohnert, Karen Steger-May, Marybeth Brown and Ellen F Binder. Training-Induced Strength and Functional Adaptations After Hip Fracture. PHYS THER Vol. 87, No. 3, March 2007, pp. 292-303 Ellen F. Binder, MD; Marybeth Brown, PT, PhD; David R. Sinacore, PT, PhD; Karen Steger-May, MA; Kevin E. Yarasheski, PhD; Kenneth B. Schechtman. Effects of Extended Outpatient Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture. A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA. 2004;292:837-846. Kathleen K Mangione, Rebecca L Craik, Susan S Tomlinson and Kerstin M Palombaro. Can Elderly Patients Who Have Had a Hip Fracture Perform Moderate- to High-Intensity Exercise at Home? PHYS THER Vol. 85, No. 8, August 2005, pp. 727-739 Klaus Hauer, Norbert Specht, Matthias Schuler, Peter Bärtsch1 and Peter Oster. Intensive physical training in geriatric patients after severe falls and hip surgery. Age and Ageing 2002; 31: 49-57 2002. David Moher1 , Kenneth F Schulz2 and Douglas G Altman. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2001, 1:2doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Mar;27(1):27-36. Bohannon RW. Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Feb;80(1):163-6. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36070134Fairhall NJ, Dyer SM, Mak JC, Diong J, Kwok WS, Sherrington C. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5.
Related trials for Exercise
Enrolling by invitation
Exercise Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients With Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia, Breast Cancer
Recruiting
Effect of a Fermented Dairy Protein With Prebiotic Fiber on GI Complaints
Digestive Health, Quality of Life
Recruiting
The Effectiveness of Structured Swallowing Exercise Therapy in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Assessment of Swallowing Function and Quality of Life
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
Active, not recruiting
Group Exercise Program Supported By Audiovisual Media During Hemodialysis
Chronic Kidney Failure, Hemodialysis
Recruiting
Sustainability of the Effects of an Adapted Physical Activity Program on Physical Fitness and Psycho-behavioral Factors in Patients With Chronic Diseases
Adapted Physical Activity, Smartwatches
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Strength training in people with Exercise, run by Oslo University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bergs Balance scale (time frame: 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01129219, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2010.