Breast CancerPhase 3NCT01131195
Metronomic Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer.
A Phase 3 study testing bevacizumab, Paclitaxel and Bevacizumab, Cyclophosphamide, Capecitabine in people with Breast Cancer, run by Swiss Cancer Institute at 23 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- bevacizumab, Paclitaxel and Bevacizumab, Cyclophosphamide, Capecitabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 139 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 19 Jul 2010to 28 Feb 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast
- Locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease
- HER2-negative disease
- Measurable or evaluable disease
- Candidate for taxane-based chemotherapy
- No presence or history of CNS metastasis
- Clinical suspicion of CNS metastasis must be confirmed by CT or MRI scan
- Hormone receptor status not specified
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Menopausal status not specified
- WHO performance status 0-2
- Neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 x 10^9/L
- Platelet count ≥ 100 x 10^9/L
- Hemoglobin ≥ 80 g/L
- Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST ≤ 5 times ULN
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 times ULN (≤ 5 times ULN in case of liver metastases or ≤ 10 times ULN in case of bone metastases)
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
- Urine protein < 2+ by dipstick OR ≤ 1 g by 24-hour urine collection
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 12 months after completion of study therapy
- Patients with INR > 1.5 (or Quick ≤ 70%) OR aPTT > 1.5 times ULN within 7 days prior to expected first trial treatment must be receiving anticoagulant medication
- Patients receiving full-dose oral or parental anticoagulants may be included in the trial provided anticoagulant dosing has been stable for at least 2 weeks prior to trial entry and the appropriate coagulation monitoring tests are within local therapeutic limits
- Must be compliant and geographically proximal for staging and follow-up
- No previous malignancy within the past 5 years except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or localized nonmelanoma skin cancer
- No known hypersensitivity to trial drugs or its active compound (e.g., fluoropyrimidine), any other components of the trial drugs, or drugs formulated with cremophor EL including hypersensitivity to Chinese hamster ovary cell products or any other humanized recombinant antibodies
- No preexisting peripheral motor or sensory neuropathy > NCI CTCAE grade 2 (i.e., moderate symptoms or limiting instrumental activities of daily living)
- No history or evidence of inherited bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy with the risk of bleeding, serious nonhealing wound, active peptic ulcer, nonhealing bone fracture, or bleeding metastases
- No history of abdominal fistula, grade 4 bowel obstruction, or gastrointestinal perforation or intra-abdominal abscess within the past 6 months
- No evidence of other medical conditions that would impair the ability of the patient to participate in the trial or might preclude therapy with trial drugs, including any of the following:
- DPD deficiency
- Severe respiratory, cardiac, hepatic, or renal disease
- Active infection
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Uncontrolled hypertension ≥ 140/100 mm Hg
- Myocardial infarction within the past 12 months
- Cerebrovascular accident or stroke within the past 6 months
- History of hemorrhagic disorders
- No psychiatric disorder precluding understanding of information on trial-related topics, giving informed consent, filling out quality-of-life forms, or interfering with compliance for oral drug intake
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No prior chemotherapy for metastatic or locally recurrent breast cancer
- No prior radiotherapy for metastatic disease
- Prior radiotherapy for the relief of metastatic bone pain allowed provided no more than 30% of marrow-bearing bone was irradiated
- At least 12 months since prior bevacizumab or other anti-VEGF therapy
- At least 12 months since prior capecitabine, continuous (> 24 hours) fluorouracil infusion, or other oral fluoropyrimidine (e.g., eniluracil/fluorouracil, uracil/tegafur, S1, or emitefur)
- At least 12 months since prior taxane-based chemotherapy
- At least 6 months since other prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy
- At least 30 days since prior treatment in another clinical trial
- At least 24 hours since prior minor surgical procedures
- At least 28 days since prior and no concurrent major surgical procedures (including open biopsy) and no anticipation of the need for major surgery during the first course of this trial
- At least 10 days since prior hormone therapy for metastatic disease
- No continuous daily treatment with corticosteroid except for inhaled steroids
- No concurrent chronic daily aspirin > 325 mg/day
- No concurrent chronic daily clopidogrel > 75 mg/day
- No other concurrent anticancer treatments
- No other concurrent investigational treatments or experimental drugs
- No other concurrent drug therapy contraindicated for use with the trial drugs
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 1 country.
23 sites in 1 country
Switzerland23 sites
Hirslanden Klinik Aarau
Aarau, CH-5001
Kantonspital Aarau
Aarau, CH-5001
Kantonsspital Baden
Baden, CH-5404
Universitaetsspital-Basel
Basel, CH-4031
Spitalzentrum Biel
Biel, CH-2501
RSV-GNW Spitalzentrum Oberwallis
Brig, 3900
Kantonsspital Graubuenden
Chur, CH-7000
Kantonsspital Frauenfeld
Frauenfeld, 8501
Kantonsspital Freiburg
Fribourg, 1708
Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve
Geneva, CH-1211
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, CH-1011
Kantonsspital Luzern
Luzerne, CH-6000
Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland - IOSI Ticino
Mendrisio, CH-6850
Kantonsspital Olten
Olten, CH-4600
Kantonsspital - St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, CH-9007
Hopital Regional de Sion-Herens-Conthey
Sion, CH -1951
Regionalspital Thun
Thun, 3600
Spital Uster
Uster, 8610
Kantonsspital Winterthur
Winterthur, 8401
Onkozentrum - Klinik im Park
Zurich, 8002
Onkozentrum Hirslanden
Zurich, CH-8008
City Hospital Triemli
Zurich, CH-8063
UniversitaetsSpital Zuerich
Zurich, CH-8091
About this study
Official title: Safety and Tolerability of Bevacizumab Plus Paclitaxel vs. Bevacizumab Plus Metronomic Cyclophosphamide and Capecitabine as First-Line Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer - A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial.
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether bevacizumab is more effective when given together with paclitaxel or cyclophosphamide and capecitabine in treating patients with breast cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying the side effects of giving bevacizumab together with paclitaxel and to see how well it works compared with giving bevacizumab together with cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in treating women with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- To determine if bevacizumab and paclitaxel versus bevacizumab, metronomic cyclophosphamide, and capecitabine as first-line therapy causes less medication-related adverse events in women with HER2-negative metastatic, locally advanced, or recurrent breast cancer.
- To compare quality of life (QOL) in patients treated with these regimens.
- To replicate previous findings of better QOL in patients with complete response or partial response versus stable disease for 6 months or greater.
- To determine the predictive value of baseline QOL for the duration of a meaningful change in QOL of patients treated with chemotherapy.
- To determine the associations between the QOL endpoints, selected health economics, and clinical endpoints.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to tumor response (measurable vs evaluable disease), WHO performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), and center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15, oral cyclophosphamide once daily on days 1-28, and oral capecitabine 3 times a day on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients complete quality-of-life questionnaire (BL-QA) and health economics questionnaires (BL-HEA and EQ-5D) at baseline, during, and after completion of study therapy.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for 1 year.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- bevacizumab, Paclitaxel, Bevacizumab, Cyclophosphamide, Capecitabine
- Keywords
- HER2-negative breast cancer, recurrent breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer, stage IIIC breast cancer, stage IV breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bevacizumab, PaclitaxelBiological
Also called Avastin
Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) i.v. is given every two weeks. Paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) i.v. is given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4 week cycle.
Bevacizumab, Cyclophosphamide, CapecitabineBiological
Also called Avastin, Xeloda
Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) i.v. is given every two weeks. Cyclophosphamide (50 mg) and capecitabine (3x 500 mg) p.o. are given daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: bevacizumab and paclitaxel | Active comparator | Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) i.v. is given every two weeks. Paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) i.v. is given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4 week cycle. Both medications are given until PD, unacceptable adverse event, or consent withdrawal. If an unacceptable adverse event to any of the drugs in this treatment arm occurs the remaining tolerated drug is given until PD, consent withdrawal, or unacceptable adverse event according to local investigators opinion. Receives: Biological: bevacizumab, Paclitaxel |
| Arm B: bevacizumab, cyclophosphamide and capecitabine | Active comparator | Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) i.v. is given every two weeks. Cyclophosphamide (50 mg) and capecitabine (3x 500 mg) p.o. are given daily. All three medications are given until PD, unacceptable adverse event, or consent withdrawal. If an unacceptable adverse event to any of the drugs in this treatment arm occurs the remaining tolerated drug(s) is (are) given until PD, consent withdrawal, or unacceptable adverse event according to local investigators opinion Receives: Biological: Bevacizumab, Cyclophosphamide, Capecitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events
Patients who have experienced at least one of the adverse event grade ≥ 3 according to the NCI CTCAE criteria 4.0 are considered for the primary endpoint.
Measured: Documentation of AE observed during trial treatment and in follow-up until resolution
Secondary outcomes (5)
Objective response (OR)
OR is the best response under trial treatment, defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by RECIST v1.1.
Measured: the best response under trial treatment
Disease control (DC)
DC is the best response under trial treatment, defined as CR + PR + stable disease.
Measured: best response under trial treatment at 24 weeks after randomization
Progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS is calculated from randomization until documented tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death of any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: from randomization until documented tumor progression
Overall survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause
Measured: the time from randomization to death from any cause
Time to specific grade 3-5 adverse events
Time from randomization until the first occurrence of the predefined grade 3-5 adverse events for the primary endpoint.
Measured: Time from randomization until the first occurrence of the predefined grade 3-5 adverse events for the primary endpoint.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study start19 Jul 2010
- Primary completion14 Dec 2012
- Study completion28 Feb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Swiss Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christoph Rochlitz, MD, Study chair, Universitaetsspital-BaselRalph Winterhalder, MD, Study chair, Luzerner Kantonsspital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01131195
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SAKK 24/09
- Other IDs
- SWS-SAKK-24-09, EU-21025, CDR0000669252
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 25 May 2010
- Last updated
- 15 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rochlitz C, Bigler M, von Moos R, Bernhard J, Matter-Walstra K, Wicki A, Zaman K, Anchisi S, Kung M, Na KJ, Bartschi D, Borner M, Rordorf T, Rauch D, Muller A, Ruhstaller T, Vetter M, Trojan A, Hasler-Strub U, Cathomas R, Winterhalder R; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial. BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 10;16(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2823-y.
PubMed 27724870Hoon SN, Lau PK, White AM, Bulsara MK, Banks PD, Redfern AD. Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 26;5(5):CD011220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011220.pub2.
PubMed 34037241
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Tolerability of Bevacizumab Plus Paclitaxel vs. Bevacizumab Plus Metronomic Cyclophosphamide and Capecitabine as First-Line Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer - A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01131195
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAKK 24/09
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- HER2-negative breast cancer, recurrent breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer, stage IIIC breast cancer, stage IV breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Swiss Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Jul 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether bevacizumab is more effective when given together with paclitaxel or cyclophosphamide and capecitabine in treating patients with breast cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying the side effects of giving bevacizumab together with paclitaxel and to see how well it works compared with giving bevacizumab together with cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in treating women with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic breast cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- To determine if bevacizumab and paclitaxel versus bevacizumab, metronomic cyclophosphamide, and capecitabine as first-line therapy causes less medication-related adverse events in women with HER2-negative metastatic, locally advanced, or recurrent breast cancer.
- To compare quality of life (QOL) in patients treated with these regimens.
- To replicate previous findings of better QOL in patients with complete response or partial response versus stable disease for 6 months or greater.
- To determine the predictive value of baseline QOL for the duration of a meaningful change in QOL of patients treated with chemotherapy.
- To determine the associations between the QOL endpoints, selected health economics, and clinical endpoints.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to tumor response (measurable vs evaluable disease), WHO performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), and center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel IV on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15, oral cyclophosphamide once daily on days 1-28, and oral capecitabine 3 times a day on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients complete quality-of-life questionnaire (BL-QA) and health economics questionnaires (BL-HEA and EQ-5D) at baseline, during, and after completion of study therapy.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for 1 year.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: bevacizumab and paclitaxel | Active comparator | Biological: bevacizumab, PaclitaxelBevacizumab (10 mg/kg) i.v. is given every two weeks. Paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) i.v. is given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4 week cycle. Both medications are given until PD, unacceptable adverse event, or consent withdrawal. If an unacceptable adverse event to any of the drugs in this treatment arm occurs the remaining tolerated drug is given until PD, consent withdrawal, or unacceptable adverse event according to local investigators opinion. |
| Arm B: bevacizumab, cyclophosphamide and capecitabine | Active comparator | Biological: Bevacizumab, Cyclophosphamide, CapecitabineBevacizumab (10 mg/kg) i.v. is given every two weeks. Cyclophosphamide (50 mg) and capecitabine (3x 500 mg) p.o. are given daily. All three medications are given until PD, unacceptable adverse event, or consent withdrawal. If an unacceptable adverse event to any of the drugs in this treatment arm occurs the remaining tolerated drug(s) is (are) given until PD, consent withdrawal, or unacceptable adverse event according to local investigators opinion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bevacizumab, PaclitaxelAlso: AvastinBevacizumab (10 mg/kg) i.v. is given every two weeks. Paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) i.v. is given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4 week cycle. | Biological | Arm A: bevacizumab and paclitaxel |
| Bevacizumab, Cyclophosphamide, CapecitabineAlso: Avastin, XelodaBevacizumab (10 mg/kg) i.v. is given every two weeks. Cyclophosphamide (50 mg) and capecitabine (3x 500 mg) p.o. are given daily | Biological | Arm B: bevacizumab, cyclophosphamide and capecitabine |
Primary outcome
Incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events
Time frame: Documentation of AE observed during trial treatment and in follow-up until resolution
Patients who have experienced at least one of the adverse event grade ≥ 3 according to the NCI CTCAE criteria 4.0 are considered for the primary endpoint.
5 secondary outcomes
Objective response (OR)
Time frame: the best response under trial treatment
Disease control (DC)
Time frame: best response under trial treatment at 24 weeks after randomization
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time frame: from randomization until documented tumor progression
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: the time from randomization to death from any cause
Time to specific grade 3-5 adverse events
Time frame: Time from randomization until the first occurrence of the predefined grade 3-5 adverse events for the primary endpoint.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 27724870Rochlitz C, Bigler M, von Moos R, Bernhard J, Matter-Walstra K, Wicki A, Zaman K, Anchisi S, Kung M, Na KJ, Bartschi D, Borner M, Rordorf T, Rauch D, Muller A, Ruhstaller T, Vetter M, Trojan A, Hasler-Strub U, Cathomas R, Winterhalder R; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial. BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 10;16(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2823-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34037241Hoon SN, Lau PK, White AM, Bulsara MK, Banks PD, Redfern AD. Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 26;5(5):CD011220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011220.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christoph Rochlitz, MD study chair
Universitaetsspital-Basel
Ralph Winterhalder, MD study chair
Luzerner Kantonsspital
23 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing bevacizumab, Paclitaxel and Bevacizumab, Cyclophosphamide, Capecitabine in people with Breast Cancer, run by Swiss Cancer Institute at 23 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events (time frame: Documentation of AE observed during trial treatment and in follow-up until resolution). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01131195, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2019.