Macular DegenerationPhase 2NCT01134055
Dose Ranging Study of Pazopanib to Treat Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
A Phase 2 study testing pazopanib eye drops and ranibizumab intravitreal injection in people with Macular Degeneration, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 77 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of different dosage regimens of pazopanib eye drops for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- pazopanib eye drops and ranibizumab intravitreal injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 510 participants
- Where
- 77 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2010to 1 Oct 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women aged ≥50 years.
- Active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion secondary to AMD in study eye: Total lesion area ≤12 disc areas with CNV ≥50% total lesion area.
- Anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injection experienced and in need of re-treatment.
- Best-corrected visual acuity of at least 24 letters (equates to approximately 20/320 Snellen equivalents or better).
Who cannot join
- Prior ocular investigational drug/device for choroidal neovascularization, photodynamic therapy, radiation, subfoveal or juxtafoveal focal laser photocoagulation.
- Prior failure to anti-VEGF intravitreal injection therapy.
- Recent ocular investigational drug/device for non-CNV condition.
- Prior ocular surgeries (vitrectomy, scleral buckle, or glaucoma filtering/shunt surgery). Cataract surgery permitted if ≥3 months and has posterior chamber intraocular lens.
- Center-fovea involvement of any of the following: fibrosis, atrophy, serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment, or retinal pigment epithelial tear.
- CNV in either eye due to other causes.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema.
- Recent myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident.
- Uncontrolled hypertension in spite of antihypertensive medications.
Trial locations and contacts
77 sites in 9 countries.
77 sites in 9 countries
United States37 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803
GSK Investigational Site
Ashland, Oregon, 97520
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78705
GSK Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
GSK Investigational Site
Beachwood, Ohio, 44122
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
GSK Investigational Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
GSK Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44130
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
GSK Investigational Site
Golden, Colorado, 80401
GSK Investigational Site
Irvine, California, 92697
GSK Investigational Site
Leawood, Kansas, 66211
GSK Investigational Site
Loma Linda, California, 92354
GSK Investigational Site
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10003
GSK Investigational Site
Paducah, Kentucky, 42001
GSK Investigational Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020
GSK Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97239
GSK Investigational Site
Poway, California, 92064
GSK Investigational Site
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
GSK Investigational Site
Santa Ana, California, 92705
GSK Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98104
GSK Investigational Site
Silverdale, Washington, 98383
GSK Investigational Site
Traverse City, Michigan, 49686
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85710
GSK Investigational Site
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880
Japan10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, 460-0011
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, 462-0825
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, 466-8560
GSK Investigational Site
Chiba, 279-0021
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 812-8582
GSK Investigational Site
Fukushima, 960-1295
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 001-0016
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 060-8604
GSK Investigational Site
Kagawa, 761-0793
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 101-8309
Germany7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53127
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
GSK Investigational Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106
GSK Investigational Site
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 80336
GSK Investigational Site
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076
Canada6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2
GSK Investigational Site
Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 1W9
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
GSK Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 3N9
GSK Investigational Site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 4X3
Italy5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20132
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20157
GSK Investigational Site
Padova, Veneto, 35128
GSK Investigational Site
Turin, Piedmont, 10122
GSK Investigational Site
Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33100
Australia4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Melbourne, Victoria
GSK Investigational Site
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
GSK Investigational Site
Sydney, New South Wales, 2000
GSK Investigational Site
Sydney, New South Wales, 2150
Sweden4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Linköping, SE-581 85
GSK Investigational Site
Örebro, SE-701 85
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-112 82
GSK Investigational Site
Uppsala, SE-751 85
Belgium2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1020
GSK Investigational Site
Liège, 4000
Denmark2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aarhus, DK-8000
GSK Investigational Site
Glostrup Municipality
About this study
Official title: MD7110852, A Phase 2b Dose-Ranging Study of Pazopanib Eye Drops Versus Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of different dosage regimens of pazopanib eye drops for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Read the detailed description
MD7110852 is a Phase 2b dose-ranging study designed to demonstrate the 1 year efficacy and safety of pazopanib eye drops for the treatment of neovascular age related macular degeneration (AMD) in subjects whose disease is currently managed with anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) injection therapy. Eye drop regimens are double-masked with placebo eye drops and will have access to open-label ranibizumab intravitreal (IVT) injection if needed. The ranibizumab IVT injection every 4 weeks control arm is open-label.
- Conditions
- Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- pazopanib eye drops, placebo, ranibizumab intravitreal injection
- Keywords
- ranibizumab, wet AMD, MD7110852, age related macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, macular degeneration, pazopanib
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pazopanib eye dropsDrug
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors.
placeboDrug
placebo eye drops
ranibizumab intravitreal injectionBiological
Humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody fragment targeted against human vascular endothelial growth factor A
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| investigational arm 1 | Experimental | 5 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops TID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection Receives: Drug: pazopanib eye drops |
| investigational arm 2 | Experimental | 5 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection Receives: Drug: pazopanib eye drops |
| investigational arm 3 | Experimental | 10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops BID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection Receives: Drug: pazopanib eye drops |
| investigational arm 4 | Experimental | 10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops TID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection Receives: Drug: pazopanib eye drops |
| investigational arm 5 | Experimental | 10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection Receives: Drug: pazopanib eye drops |
| placebo control arm | Placebo comparator | Placebo eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection Receives: Drug: placebo |
| active open-label control arm | Active comparator | Ranibizumab intravitreal injection every 4 weeks Receives: Biological: ranibizumab intravitreal injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by the Number of Letters Read on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Grading Charts at a Starting Distance of 4 Meters at Week 52
BCVA was measured in the study eye using the ETDRS grading charts starting at a test distance of 4 meters. The ETDRS grading chart was of at least 24 to 78 letters. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. There were seven cut off points in change from baseline visual acuity on ETDRS grading chart which are, 15 to 29, 10 to 14, 5 to 9, -4 to 4, -5 to -9, -10 to -14 and -15 to -29 letters. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study.
Measured: Day 1 and 52 weeks
Secondary outcomes (17)
Percentage of Ranibizumab Re-injections Received Over 28 and 52 Weeks
The investigator interpreted each Week 4 to Week 52 Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan, BCVA score, and available Fluorescein angiography (FA)/Fundus photography (FP) and re-injected if one or more criteria were met. The criteria were: Evidence of Intraretinal (IR) (with or without cysts) fluid or Subretinal (SR) fluid, a serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment, a notable decline in Visual Acuity, new SR or IR macular hemorrhage that the investigator judges is associated with Choroidal neovascularization, increased lesion size on FA relative to the last angiogram as judged by the investigator or leakage on FA that the investigator judges would benefit from re-injection. Injection rate over 52 weeks was computed by taking the number of injections received divided by the number of visits for the participant. Likewise for 28 weeks it was estimated as the number of post baseline injections received divided by the number of post baseline visits at or before the week 28 visit.
Measured: Up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With BCVA Over Time
BCVA was measured in the study eye using the ETDRS grading charts starting at a test distance of 4 meters. The ETDRS grading chart was of at least 24 to 78 letters. There were seven cut off points in change from baseline visual acuity on ETDRS grading chart which are, 15 to 29, 10 to 14, 5 to 9, -4 to 4, -5 to -9, -10 to -14 and -15 to -29 letters.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants Analyzed for Visual Acuity (VA) Response Over Time
VA was measured in the study eye using the ETDRS grading charts starting at a test distance of 4 meters.The ETDRS grading chart was of at least 24 to 78 letters. There were seven cut off points in change from baseline visual acuity on ETDRS grading chart which are, 15 to 29, 10 to 14, 5 to 9, -4 to 4, -5 to -9, -10 to -14 and -15 to -29 letters. This outcome measure contains the number of participants who were analyzed for VA response.
Measured: Week 52
Change From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) Over Time
CPT was the inner limiting membrane to the beginning of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) inclusive of SR fluid. The outer boundary included the outer segment of the photoreceptors and not included the RPE. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study. In amendment 3, inclusion criterion number 5 was revised to remove the required quantitative OCT component. OCT examination was used to supplement FA findings and provided qualitative (presence of SR and/or IR fluid) and quantitative (a CPT that is at least 250 microns) evidence of an active subfoveal lesion. Hence data for pre and post amendment have been provided separately.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants That Met Criteria for Re-injection
The investigator interpreted each Week 4 to Week 52 Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan, BCVA score, and available Fluorescein angiography (FA)/Fundus photography (FP) and re-injected if one or more criteria were met. The criteria were: Evidence of Intraretinal (IR) (with or without cysts) fluid or Subretinal (SR) fluid, a serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment, a notable decline in Visual Acuity, new SR or IR macular hemorrhage that the investigator judges is associated with Choroidal neovascularization, increased lesion size on FA relative to the last angiogram as judged by the investigator or leakage on FA that the investigator judges would benefit from re-injection.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of Choroidal Neovascularisation (CNV)
Choroidal neovascularisation is progressive worsening of vision that can cause hemorrhage and exudation, and finally disciform scarring and retinal atrophy. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study.
Measured: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of the CNV Lesion Complex (i.e. CNV, Blood, PED, and Fibrosis)
CNV is progressive worsening of vision that can cause hemorrhage and exudation, and finally disciform scarring and retinal atrophy. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study.
Measured: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of Fluorescein Leakage
Fluorescein angiograms was performed at the Screening, Week 12, Week 28, and Week 52 Visits. All images, including any that were performed at the investigator's medical discretion, were transferred to the FPRC. Fluorescein was injected intravenously according to usual clinic procedures. Dose response was also examined under different aspects of re-injection, such as time to first injection, the percentage of participants that required an injection by Week 28, as well as the estimation of the probability of reinjection. FA assessments of area of fluorescein leakage, CNV area and area of CNV lesion complex were also examined for dose differentiation.
Measured: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change in Area of Serous Sensory Retinal Detachment (SSRD)
This is an Optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameter used to manually measure thickness along any scan. OCT was performed at week 28 and week 52.
Measured: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: Up to 52 Weeks
Summary of Potentially Clinically Important Findings for Ophthalmic Examinations
Opthalmicexaminations were done on Ocular alignment and motility, pupillary function, and visual fields by confrontation. Slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination of the anterior segment structure was performed. Fundus slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination, including use of accessory diagnostic lenses, to view the vitreous, retina (including posterior pole and periphery), macula, vasculature, and optic nerve was also performed. These examinations were performed on the study eye (SE) and the Fellow eye (FE). Participants with abnormal findings are listed here.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Summary of Intraocular Pressure Exam Findings
Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement was done with Goldmann tonometer. Intraocular pressure was measured prior to dilating the pupil and, to account for diurnal variation, at approximately the same time of day for every visit.
Measured: Up to week 52
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Outside of Clinical Concern Range
Vital signs including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured throughout the study. Number of participants with vital signs outside of clinical concern Range were summarized. 'High' denotes above normal range and 'Low' denotes below normal range for all the categories. The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters were for systolic blood pressure (<85 and >160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), diastolic blood pressure (<45 and >100 mmHg) and heart rate (<40 and >110 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Summary of Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
12-Lead ECGs were performed in triplicate and were obtained on Weeks 4 to Week 28 and Week 52. The on-treatment ECGs were used to ascertain any risk of QTc interval prolongation at extremely low pazopanib exposures compared to what was routinely observed in participants with cancer. The on-treatment ECG data collected from participants assigned to one of the control arms also provided ECG background rate data for participants not exposed to pazopanib. Participants with Clinically significant abnormal ECGs are included here.
Measured: Week 4, Week 28, Week 44 and Week 52
Summary of Hematology and Clinical Chemistry Parameters Data of Clinical Concern
The Laboratory Parameters included Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Calcium, Bicarbonate, Creatinine, Glucose, Hemoglobin, Lymphocytes, Platelet count, Potassium, Sodium, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Total Bilirubin, Total Neutrophils, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and White Blood Cell count (WBC). Number of participants with Laboratory outside of clinical concern Range were summarized here. Data of high and low from the clinical concern range has been provided here. Here 'High' denotes above normal range and 'Low' denotes below normal range for all the categories.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Laboratory Data of Clinical Concern for Urine Protein
Urine Samples were collected from Day 1 to Week 28 and Week 52 for analyses. In this dipstick test, the level of protein in urine samples was recorded as negative (Neg), trace (tr), 1+, 2+, and 3+ (the plus sign increases with a higher level of proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive). Neg indicated no proteinuria and 3+(high positive) indicated worst proteinuria.
Measured: Day 1 to Week 28 and Week 52
Plasma Concentrations of Pazopanib
All participants in the eye drop containing arms had a single blood sample drawn for assessment of pazopanib plasma concentration at the Week 4, Week 24 and Week 24. The sample was drawn without restriction for the time interval between blood draw and the last dose of IP eye drops.
Measured: Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jun 2010
- Primary completion1 Oct 2012
- Study completion1 Oct 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 510 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01134055
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 110852
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 27 May 2010
- Last updated
- 8 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MD7110852, A Phase 2b Dose-Ranging Study of Pazopanib Eye Drops Versus Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01134055
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 110852
- Conditions
- Macular Degeneration
- Keywords
- ranibizumab, wet AMD, MD7110852, age related macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, macular degeneration, pazopanib
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 510 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jan 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of different dosage regimens of pazopanib eye drops for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Detailed description
MD7110852 is a Phase 2b dose-ranging study designed to demonstrate the 1 year efficacy and safety of pazopanib eye drops for the treatment of neovascular age related macular degeneration (AMD) in subjects whose disease is currently managed with anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) injection therapy. Eye drop regimens are double-masked with placebo eye drops and will have access to open-label ranibizumab intravitreal (IVT) injection if needed. The ranibizumab IVT injection every 4 weeks control arm is open-label.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 7
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| investigational arm 1 | Experimental | Drug: pazopanib eye drops5 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops TID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection |
| investigational arm 2 | Experimental | Drug: pazopanib eye drops5 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection |
| investigational arm 3 | Experimental | Drug: pazopanib eye drops10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops BID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection |
| investigational arm 4 | Experimental | Drug: pazopanib eye drops10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops TID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection |
| investigational arm 5 | Experimental | Drug: pazopanib eye drops10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection |
| placebo control arm | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboPlacebo eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection |
| active open-label control arm | Active comparator | Biological: ranibizumab intravitreal injectionRanibizumab intravitreal injection every 4 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Men and women aged ≥50 years.
- Active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion secondary to AMD in study eye: Total lesion area ≤12 disc areas with CNV ≥50% total lesion area.
- Anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injection experienced and in need of re-treatment.
- Best-corrected visual acuity of at least 24 letters (equates to approximately 20/320 Snellen equivalents or better).
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Prior ocular investigational drug/device for choroidal neovascularization, photodynamic therapy, radiation, subfoveal or juxtafoveal focal laser photocoagulation.
- Prior failure to anti-VEGF intravitreal injection therapy.
- Recent ocular investigational drug/device for non-CNV condition.
- Prior ocular surgeries (vitrectomy, scleral buckle, or glaucoma filtering/shunt surgery). Cataract surgery permitted if ≥3 months and has posterior chamber intraocular lens.
- Center-fovea involvement of any of the following: fibrosis, atrophy, serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment, or retinal pigment epithelial tear.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pazopanib eye dropsA tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. | Drug | investigational arm 1, investigational arm 2, investigational arm 3, investigational arm 4, investigational arm 5 |
| placeboplacebo eye drops | Drug | placebo control arm |
| ranibizumab intravitreal injectionHumanized recombinant monoclonal antibody fragment targeted against human vascular endothelial growth factor A | Biological | active open-label control arm |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by the Number of Letters Read on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Grading Charts at a Starting Distance of 4 Meters at Week 52
Time frame: Day 1 and 52 weeks
BCVA was measured in the study eye using the ETDRS grading charts starting at a test distance of 4 meters. The ETDRS grading chart was of at least 24 to 78 letters. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. There were seven cut off points in change from baseline visual acuity on ETDRS grading chart which are, 15 to 29, 10 to 14, 5 to 9, -4 to 4, -5 to -9, -10 to -14 and -15 to -29 letters. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study.
17 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Ranibizumab Re-injections Received Over 28 and 52 Weeks
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With BCVA Over Time
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants Analyzed for Visual Acuity (VA) Response Over Time
Time frame: Week 52
Change From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) Over Time
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants That Met Criteria for Re-injection
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of Choroidal Neovascularisation (CNV)
Time frame: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of the CNV Lesion Complex (i.e. CNV, Blood, PED, and Fibrosis)
Time frame: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of Fluorescein Leakage
Time frame: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change in Area of Serous Sensory Retinal Detachment (SSRD)
Time frame: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to 52 Weeks
Summary of Potentially Clinically Important Findings for Ophthalmic Examinations
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Summary of Intraocular Pressure Exam Findings
Time frame: Up to week 52
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Outside of Clinical Concern Range
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Summary of Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Week 4, Week 28, Week 44 and Week 52
Summary of Hematology and Clinical Chemistry Parameters Data of Clinical Concern
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Laboratory Data of Clinical Concern for Urine Protein
Time frame: Day 1 to Week 28 and Week 52
Plasma Concentrations of Pazopanib
Time frame: Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jan 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of 36-Week Refill Exchanges of Port Delivery System (PDS) With Ranibizumab in nAMD
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Pivotal Trial of an Automated AI-based System for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Late Age-related Macular Degeneration
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Safety Study For Patients In B4711001
Age Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
National Ophthalmic Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (Registered Trademark)), Stage 3 - Expansion of DNA and Data Repositories for Rare Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases
Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases, Hypopigmentation Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
77 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing pazopanib eye drops and ranibizumab intravitreal injection in people with Macular Degeneration, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 77 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 77 sites in United States, Japan, Germany, Canada, Italy and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by the Number of Letters Read on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Grading Charts at a Starting Distance of 4 Meters at Week 52 (time frame: Day 1 and 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2018.