AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerPhase 3NCT01134861

Radiation Therapy Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, Etoposide and Vinblastine in people with Lung Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and combining chemotherapy with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
cisplatin, Etoposide and Vinblastine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
610 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 1994to Mar 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Locoregionally advanced, inoperable, non-small cell lung cancer with no evidence of distant metastases, i.e.: Stage II/IIIA medically inoperable disease Stage IIIA/IIIB unresectable disease No pleural effusion Appearance after an invasive thoracic procedure allowed No more than 5% weight loss within 3 months prior to diagnosis Confirmed N2 disease should first be evaluated for protocol RTOG-9309

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: At least 18 Performance status: Karnofsky 70%-100% Hematopoietic: AGC at least 2,000 Platelets at least 100,000 Hemoglobin at least 8.0 g/dL Hepatic: (unless abnormality caused by benign disease) Bilirubin no more than 1.5 times normal AST no more than 1.5 times normal Renal: Creatinine no more than 1.5 mg/dL Cardiovascular: No myocardial infarction within the past 6 months No angina No congestive heart failure No uncontrolled arrhythmia Other: No synchronous or prior invasive malignancy within 3 years except nonmelanomatous skin cancer No pregnant women Effective contraception required of fertile patients

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior thoracic or neck radiotherapy Surgery: No prior complete or nearly complete tumor resection

About this study

Official title: A Three-Arm Phase III Study of Concomitant Versus Sequential Chemotherapy and Thoracic Radiotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Inoperable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and combining chemotherapy with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of various schedules of radiation therapy and combination chemotherapy using vinblastine and cisplatin or cisplatin and etoposide in treating patients with stage II or stage III non-small cell lung cancer that cannot be removed surgically.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the survival rate of patients with locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer randomized to concomitant vinblastine/cisplatin (VBL/CDDP) and thoracic radiotherapy versus sequential VBL/CDDP and once-daily thoracic radiotherapy. II. Compare the survival rate of such patients randomized to 2 courses of concomitant etoposide/cisplatin and hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy versus sequential VBL/CDDP and once-daily thoracic radiotherapy. III. Assess the frequency of treatment-related esophageal and hematologic toxicity/morbidity in patients on concomitant versus sequential chemoradiation treatment arms.

OUTLINE: Randomized study. The following acronyms are used: CDDP Cisplatin, NSC-119875 VBL Vinblastine, NSC-49842 VP-16 Etoposide, NSC-141540 Arm I: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy. CDDP/VBL; followed by thoracic irradiation using photons of at least 6 MV (electrons may be used to boost the supraclavicular lymph nodes). Arm II: Radiotherapy plus 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. Thoracic irradiation using equipment as in Arm I; plus CDDP/VBL. Arm III: Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy plus 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. Thoracic irradiation using equipment as in Arm I; plus CDDP/VP-16.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 597 patients will be entered over 3.1-4.2 years. If fewer than 6 patients/month are accrued, the feasibility of the study will be re-evaluated.

Conditions
Lung Cancer
Being tested
cisplatin, Etoposide, Vinblastine, Radiation therapy
Keywords
stage II non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cisplatinDrug

    100 mg/m2 i.v. over 30-60 minutes, days 1 \& 29

  • EtoposideDrug

    Also called VP-16

    Oral etoposide given 50 mg b.i.d. X 10 only on RT treatment days 1-5, 8-12, 29-33, and 36-40. 75 mg/day if body surface area < 1.7 m2

  • VinblastineDrug

    5 mg/m2 i.v. bolus weekly first 5 weeks of RT

  • Radiation therapyRadiation

    63 Gy/7 wks/34 daily fractions (1.8 Gy X 25 fx then 2.0 Gy X 9 fX) beginning day 50 of protocol treatment

  • CisplatinDrug

    50 mg/m2 i.v. over 30-60 minutes on days 1, 8, 29, and 36

  • Radiation therapyRadiation

    63 Gy/7 wks/34 daily fractions (1.8 Gy X 25 fx then 2.0 Gy X 9 fx) beginning day 1 of protocol treatment

  • Radiation therapyRadiation

    69.6 Gy/6 wks/58 X 1.2 Gy twice daily fractions (at least 6 hours apart) beginning day 1 of protocol therapy

Study groups in NCT01134861
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: Sequential ChemoRTActive comparatorVinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. bolus weekly first 5 weeks Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. over 30-60 minutes, days 1 \& 29 RT: 63 Gy/7 wks/34 daily fractions (1.8 Gy X 25 fx then 2.0 Gy X 9 fx) beginning day 50
Receives: Drug: cisplatin; Drug: Vinblastine; Radiation: Radiation therapy
Arm 2: Concurrent STD RTExperimentalVinblastine 5 mg/m2 i.v. bolus weekly first 5 weeks Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. over 30-60 minutes, days 1 \& 29 RT: 63 GY/7 wks/34 daily fractions (1.8 Gy X 25 fx then 2.0 Gy X 9 fx) beginning day 1
Receives: Drug: cisplatin; Drug: Vinblastine; Radiation: Radiation therapy
Arm 3: Concurrent HFX RTExperimentalOral VP-16 50 mg b.i.d. X 10 only on RT treatment days 1-5, 8-12, 29-33, and 36-40 (76 mg/day if BSA < 1.7m2) Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 i.v. over 30-60 minutes on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 RT: 69.6 Gy/6 wks/58 X 1.2 Gy twice daily fractions (at least 6 hours apart) beginning day 1
Receives: Drug: Etoposide; Drug: Cisplatin; Radiation: Radiation therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival

    Measured: from date of randomization to date of death or last follow-up for patients still alive

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 1994
  3. Primary completionOct 1998
  4. Study completionMar 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
610 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01134861
Sponsor's protocol ID
RTOG-9410
Other IDs
U10CA021661, CDR0000063640
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
28 May 2010
Last updated
27 Mar 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Siddiqui F, Bae K, Langer CJ, Coyne JC, Gamerman V, Komaki R, Choy H, Curran WJ, Watkins-Bruner D, Movsas B. The influence of gender, race, and marital status on survival in lung cancer patients: analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 May;5(5):631-9. doi: 10.1097/jto.0b013e3181d5e46a.

    PubMed 20432520

  • Konski AA, Bhargavan M, Owen J, et al.: "Less is not always more": an economic analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-10. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69 (3 Suppl): A-1080, S182, 2007.

  • Choy H, Swann S, Nabid A, et al.: Comparison of 5-year survival between RTOG-94-10 and a phase 2 study of induction chemotherapy followed by efaproxiral + radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (3 Suppl 1): A-49, S28-9, 2006.

  • Bradley J. A review of radiation dose escalation trials for non-small cell lung cancer within the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Semin Oncol. 2005 Apr;32(2 Suppl 3):S111-3. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.03.020.

    PubMed 16015546

  • Langer CJ, Swann S, Curran W, et al.: Reassessing prognostic factors in the era of combined modality therapy for locally advanced NSCLC: a retrospective analysis of RTOG 9410 and 9801. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 (2 Suppl 1): A-65, S39, 2005.

  • Machtay M, Hsu C, Komaki R, Sause WT, Swann RS, Langer CJ, Byhardt RW, Curran WJ. Effect of overall treatment time on outcomes after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 1;63(3):667-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.037. Epub 2005 May 31.

    PubMed 15927409

  • Machtay M, Swann S, Komaki R, et al.: Overall treatment time during concurrent chemoradiotherapy and outcomes: an RTOG secondary analysis. [Abstract] Lung Cancer 50 (Suppl 2): A-O-042, S17, 2005.

  • Machtay M, Swann S, Komaki R, et al.: What is the meaning of local-regional control after chemoradiation for locally advanced NSCLC? An RTOG analysis. [Abstract] Lung Cancer 50 (Suppl 2): A-O-041, S17, 2005.

  • Swann RS, Machtay M, Komaki R, et al.: Impact of overall treatment time during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC: an RTOG secondary analysis. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-7061, 635s, 2005.

  • Werner-Wasik M, Scott C, Curran WJ, et al.: Correlation between acute esophagitis and late pneumonitis in patients (pts) with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) receiving concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy: a multivariate analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) database. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-1192, 2002.

  • Sause W, Scott C, Byhardt R, et al.: Combined chemotheray radiation therapy treatment in unresected non-small cell lung cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) experience. Lung Cancer 29(suppl 2): 2000.

  • Curran WJ, Scott CB, Langer CJ, et al.: Long-term benefit is observed in a phase III comparison of sequential vs concurrent chemo-radiation for patients with unresected stage III nsclc: RTOG 9410. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-2499, 2003.

  • Langer CJ, Hsu C, Curran WJ, et al.: Elderly patients (pts) with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) benefit from combined modality therapy: secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94-10. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-1193, 2002.

  • Langer CJ, Hsu C, Curran W, et al.: Do elderly patients (pts) with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) benefit from combined modality therapy? A secondary analysis of RTOG 94-10. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51(3 suppl 1): A-36, 20-21, 2001.

  • Movsas B, Scott C, Curran W, et al.: A quality-adjusted time without symptons or toxicity (QTWiST) analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94-10. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-1247, 313a, 2001.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, Etoposide and Vinblastine in people with Lung Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (time frame: from date of randomization to date of death or last follow-up for patients still alive). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01134861, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2015.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in