Pathological GamblingNCT01135264
Cognitive-Motivational Behavior Therapy for Pathological Gamblers
A study testing CBT and CMBT in people with Pathological Gambling, run by New York State Psychiatric Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In the proposed two-arm randomized controlled trial, 200 patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for PG will be randomized to 12 sessions of Cognitive-Motivational Behavior Therapy (CMBT) or to Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pathological Gambling
- What is being tested?
- CBT and CMBT
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 170 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2009to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- pathological gambling
- be able to read, understand and sign an informed consent form prior to any procedure and must be willing to comply with all study procedures and timelines
Who cannot join
- to meet DSM-IV criteria for comorbid substance use disorders in the last six months
- current comorbid psychiatric conditions which require treatment and are not clearly secondary to pathological gambling
- psychotropic medication
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
New York Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, 10032
About this study
Official title: Gambling Addiction: Treatment Mediators and Moderators
In the proposed two-arm randomized controlled trial, 200 patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for PG will be randomized to 12 sessions of Cognitive-Motivational Behavior Therapy (CMBT) or to Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT).
Read the detailed description
CMBT has been developed by our team over the last five years, and has shown very promising results in a small, NIMH-funded randomized pilot trial (R21 MH 064568). We will assess patients biweekly during the active treatment phase and follow them for 12 months after the end of treatment to obtain data on long-term treatment outcome. We hypothesize that CMBT will show higher efficacy and retention than CBT in the treatment phase, and that gains will be maintained at a higher rate during follow-up.
A second major purpose of the proposed study is to elucidate the presumed mechanisms of change by examining potential mediators (readiness to change, irrational beliefs about gambling, coping skills, therapeutic alliance) and moderators (psychiatric comorbidity with Axis I and II disorders, family history of PG, impulsivity, and baseline motivation to change) of treatment response. A better understanding of how the proposed interventions work will help advance the science and treatment of PG and will be helpful in the future refinement and adaptation of CMBT. Identifying patient subgroups for which the intervention is particularly effective is essential for rational treatment selection. Thus, the immediate goal of the project is to compare CBMT versus CBT for the treatment of PG. A long-term goal of the proposed research is to establish effective treatment procedures that reduce the considerable individual and social costs of PG.
- Conditions
- Pathological Gambling
- Being tested
- CBT, CMBT
- Medical subject headings
- Gambling
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CBTBehavioural
The CBT treatment developed by Ladouceur (Consultant) will serve as control condition (outline of published treatment manual by Ladouceur \& Lachance, 2006. This treatment served as a model for the cognitive-behavioral component in CMBT and has received empirical support in two studies from Ladouceur's lab (Sylvain et al., 1997; Ladouceur et al., 2004). It places strong emphasis on cognitive correction of erroneous beliefs about gambling and also focuses on coping skills training and relapse prevention. CBT also lasts 12 weekly sessions.
CMBTBehavioural
We used the NIMH-funded R21 mechanism to develop and test the CMBT intervention (Wulfert et al., 2003, 2005; 2006). Treatment will be implemented in 12 weekly sessions (3 motivational enhancement sessions, 8 sessions of cognitive-behavioral treatment, 1 session of relapse prevention)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CBT | Active comparator | The CBT treatment developed by Ladouceur (Consultant) will serve as control condition (outline of published treatment manual by Ladouceur \& Lachance, 2006. This treatment served as a model for the cognitive-behavioral component in CMBT and has received empirical support in two studies from Ladouceur's lab (Sylvain et al., 1997; Ladouceur et al., 2004). It places strong emphasis on cognitive correction of erroneous beliefs about gambling and also focuses on coping skills training and relapse prevention. CBT also lasts 12 weekly sessions. Receives: Behavioral: CBT |
| CMBT | Experimental | We used the NIMH-funded R21 mechanism to develop and test the CMBT intervention (Wulfert et al., 2003, 2005; 2006). Treatment will be implemented in 12 weekly sessions (3 motivational enhancement sessions, 8 sessions of cognitive-behavioral treatment, 1 session of relapse prevention) Receives: Behavioral: CMBT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
patient retention
Retention will be measured by the number of treatment sessions attended
Measured: 60 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
gambling behavior
Our primary measure will be money lost gambling. Secondary measures will include days gambled; scores on the PG-YBOCS, proportion of patients meeting diagnosis of PG and of those having achieved abstinence.
Measured: 60 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2009
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pathological GamblingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Carlos Blanco, M.D., Principal investigator, New York Psychiatric Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01135264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- #5946/6970R
- Other IDs
- 1R01MH082773-01A1, 1R01MH082733-01A1
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Blanco C, Potenza MN, Kim SW, Ibanez A, Zaninelli R, Saiz-Ruiz J, Grant JE. A pilot study of impulsivity and compulsivity in pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res. 2009 May 15;167(1-2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.04.023. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
PubMed 19339053Blanco C, Hasin DS, Petry N, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Sex differences in subclinical and DSM-IV pathological gambling: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol Med. 2006 Jul;36(7):943-53. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706007410. Epub 2006 May 2.
PubMed 16650342Okuda M, Balan I, Petry NM, Oquendo M, Blanco C. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gambling: cultural considerations. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;166(12):1325-30. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08081235.
PubMed 19952084Wulfert E, Blanchard EB, Freidenberg BM, Martell RS. Retaining pathological gamblers in cognitive behavior therapy through motivational enhancement: A pilot study. Behav Modif. 2006 May;30(3):315-40. doi: 10.1177/0145445503262578.
PubMed 16574817Wulfert E, Maxson J, Jardin B. Cue-specific reactivity in experienced gamblers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Dec;23(4):731-5. doi: 10.1037/a0017134.
PubMed 20025381Wulfert E, Franco C, Williams K, Roland B, Maxson JH. The role of money in the excitement of gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;22(3):380-390. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.380.
PubMed 18778131
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Gambling Addiction: Treatment Mediators and Moderators
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01135264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- #5946/6970R
- Conditions
- Pathological Gambling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- New York State Psychiatric InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Study start
- Aug 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the proposed two-arm randomized controlled trial, 200 patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for PG will be randomized to 12 sessions of Cognitive-Motivational Behavior Therapy (CMBT) or to Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT).
Detailed description
CMBT has been developed by our team over the last five years, and has shown very promising results in a small, NIMH-funded randomized pilot trial (R21 MH 064568). We will assess patients biweekly during the active treatment phase and follow them for 12 months after the end of treatment to obtain data on long-term treatment outcome. We hypothesize that CMBT will show higher efficacy and retention than CBT in the treatment phase, and that gains will be maintained at a higher rate during follow-up.
A second major purpose of the proposed study is to elucidate the presumed mechanisms of change by examining potential mediators (readiness to change, irrational beliefs about gambling, coping skills, therapeutic alliance) and moderators (psychiatric comorbidity with Axis I and II disorders, family history of PG, impulsivity, and baseline motivation to change) of treatment response. A better understanding of how the proposed interventions work will help advance the science and treatment of PG and will be helpful in the future refinement and adaptation of CMBT. Identifying patient subgroups for which the intervention is particularly effective is essential for rational treatment selection. Thus, the immediate goal of the project is to compare CBMT versus CBT for the treatment of PG. A long-term goal of the proposed research is to establish effective treatment procedures that reduce the considerable individual and social costs of PG.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CBT | Active comparator | Behavioral: CBTThe CBT treatment developed by Ladouceur (Consultant) will serve as control condition (outline of published treatment manual by Ladouceur \& Lachance, 2006. This treatment served as a model for the cognitive-behavioral component in CMBT and has received empirical support in two studies from Ladouceur's lab (Sylvain et al., 1997; Ladouceur et al., 2004). It places strong emphasis on cognitive correction of erroneous beliefs about gambling and also focuses on coping skills training and relapse prevention. CBT also lasts 12 weekly sessions. |
| CMBT | Experimental | Behavioral: CMBTWe used the NIMH-funded R21 mechanism to develop and test the CMBT intervention (Wulfert et al., 2003, 2005; 2006). Treatment will be implemented in 12 weekly sessions (3 motivational enhancement sessions, 8 sessions of cognitive-behavioral treatment, 1 session of relapse prevention) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- pathological gambling
- be able to read, understand and sign an informed consent form prior to any procedure and must be willing to comply with all study procedures and timelines
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- to meet DSM-IV criteria for comorbid substance use disorders in the last six months
- current comorbid psychiatric conditions which require treatment and are not clearly secondary to pathological gambling
- psychotropic medication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CBTThe CBT treatment developed by Ladouceur (Consultant) will serve as control condition (outline of published treatment manual by Ladouceur \& Lachance, 2006. This treatment served as a model for the cognitive-behavioral component in CMBT and has received empirical support in two studies from Ladouceur's lab (Sylvain et al., 1997; Ladouceur et al., 2004). It places strong emphasis on cognitive correction of erroneous beliefs about gambling and also focuses on coping skills training and relapse prevention. CBT also lasts 12 weekly sessions. | Behavioural | CBT |
| CMBTWe used the NIMH-funded R21 mechanism to develop and test the CMBT intervention (Wulfert et al., 2003, 2005; 2006). Treatment will be implemented in 12 weekly sessions (3 motivational enhancement sessions, 8 sessions of cognitive-behavioral treatment, 1 session of relapse prevention) | Behavioural | CMBT |
Primary outcome
patient retention
Time frame: 60 weeks
Retention will be measured by the number of treatment sessions attended
1 secondary outcome
gambling behavior
Time frame: 60 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2017.
- Background: PubMed 19339053Blanco C, Potenza MN, Kim SW, Ibanez A, Zaninelli R, Saiz-Ruiz J, Grant JE. A pilot study of impulsivity and compulsivity in pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res. 2009 May 15;167(1-2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.04.023. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 16650342Blanco C, Hasin DS, Petry N, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Sex differences in subclinical and DSM-IV pathological gambling: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol Med. 2006 Jul;36(7):943-53. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706007410. Epub 2006 May 2.
- Background: PubMed 19952084Okuda M, Balan I, Petry NM, Oquendo M, Blanco C. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gambling: cultural considerations. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;166(12):1325-30. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08081235.
- Background: PubMed 16574817Wulfert E, Blanchard EB, Freidenberg BM, Martell RS. Retaining pathological gamblers in cognitive behavior therapy through motivational enhancement: A pilot study. Behav Modif. 2006 May;30(3):315-40. doi: 10.1177/0145445503262578.
- Background: PubMed 20025381Wulfert E, Maxson J, Jardin B. Cue-specific reactivity in experienced gamblers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Dec;23(4):731-5. doi: 10.1037/a0017134.
- Background: PubMed 18778131Wulfert E, Franco C, Williams K, Roland B, Maxson JH. The role of money in the excitement of gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;22(3):380-390. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.380.
Related trials for Pathological Gambling
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin AsSisted pSychotherapy for the treatmENt of Gambling disordER : a Pilot Study
Gambling Disorder
Recruiting
Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Gambling Disorder
Gambling Disorder, Gambling
RecruitingObservational study
Is Craving a Central Criterion for Diagnosing a Behavioral Addiction?
Addictive Behaviors, Internet Addiction Disorder
Not yet recruiting
COMpulsive Gambling: Efficacy of DEEP Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With H7 COIL
Gambling Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carlos Blanco, M.D. principal investigator
New York Psychiatric Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CBT and CMBT in people with Pathological Gambling, run by New York State Psychiatric Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
patient retention (time frame: 60 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01135264, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2017.