Unresectable Stage IIIPhase 2NCT01136967
An Open-Label, 2-Cohort, Multicenter, Study of Lenvatinib in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma
A Phase 2 study testing Lenvatinib in people with Unresectable Stage III and Stage IV Melanoma, run by Eisai Inc. at 95 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the objective response rate of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Unresectable Stage III, Stage IV Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- Lenvatinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 182 participants
- Where
- 95 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2010to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma.
- Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma.
- Evidence of disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 on prior regimen.
- Participants with brain metastases will be eligible if they have undergone complete surgical excision and are more then 1 month post surgery with no radiographic evidence of disease recurrence in the brain or have undergone stereotactic radio surgery (gamma knife procedure) and are more then 1 month post procedure and with no radiographic evidence of disease progression in the brain; and are asymptomatic, and discontinued corticosteroid treatment at least 30 days prior starting treatment.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Adequately controlled blood pressure.
- Adequate renal function, bone marrow function, blood coagulation function, and liver function, as defined in the study protocol.
Who cannot join
- Melanoma of intraocular origin.
- Leptomeningeal metastases or brain metastases except as for participants with brain metastases will be eligible if they have undergone complete surgical excision and are more then 1 month post surgery with no radiographic evidence of disease recurrence in the brain or have undergone stereotactic radio surgery (gamma knife procedure) and are more then 1 month post procedure and with no radiographic evidence of disease progression in the brain; and are asymptomatic, and discontinued corticosteroid treatment at least 30 days prior starting treatment.
- More than 2 prior systemic anticancer regimen treatments including immunotherapies for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV disease (if BRAF V600E mutation negative) or not previously treated with BRAF V600E-targeted therapy or received in the past more than 2 prior systemic anticancer regimen treatments, including immunotherapies, in addition to a BRAF-V600E-targeted therapy (if BRAF V600E mutation positive).
- Significant cardiovascular impairment.
- Bleeding disorder or a thrombotic disorder requiring anticoagulant therapy.
- Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Prolongation of QTc interval to greater than 480 msec.
- 24 hour urine protein greater than or equal to 1 gm.
- Active hemoptysis within 3 wks prior to the first dose of study drug.
Trial locations and contacts
95 sites in 4 countries.
95 sites in 4 countries
United States79 sites
Study site
Arlington, Virginia
Study site
Aurora, Colorado
Study site
Bartlett, Tennessee
Study site
Bedford, Texas
Study site
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Bonita Springs, Florida
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Boulder, Colorado
Study site
Bradenton, Florida
Study site
Burnsville, Minnesota
Study site
Cape Coral, Florida
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Clearwater, Florida
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Denver, Colorado
Study site
Detroit, Michigan
Study site
Edina, Minnesota
Study site
Englewood, Florida
Study site
Eugene, Oregon
Study site
Fairfax, Virginia
Study site
Fort Myers, Florida
Study site
Franklin, Tennessee
Study site
Fridley, Minnesota
Study site
Gainesville, Florida
Study site
Gainesville, Virginia
Study site
Gallatin, Tennessee
Study site
Germantown, Tennessee
Study site
Grapevine, Texas
Study site
Henderson, Nevada
Study site
Hermitage, Tennessee
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Lakewood, Colorado
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Study site
Lebanon, New Hampshire
Study site
Lebanon, Tennessee
Study site
Leesburg, Virginia
Study site
Littleton, Colorado
Study site
Lone Tree, Colorado
Study site
Longmont, Colorado
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Madison, Wisconsin
Study site
Maplewood, Minnesota
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee
Study site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Study site
Morristown, New Jersey
Study site
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Study site
Naples, Florida
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
North Port, Florida
Study site
Orlando, Florida
Study site
Palm Harbor, Florida
Study site
Parker, Colorado
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Port Charlotte, Florida
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Saint Paul, Minnesota
Study site
San Francisco, California
Study site
Sarasota, Florida
Study site
Sebring, Florida
Study site
Smyrna, Tennessee
Study site
Southaven, Mississippi
Study site
Springfield, Oregon
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Thornton, Colorado
Study site
Tualatin, Oregon
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
Vancouver, Washington
Study site
Venice, Florida
Study site
Winchester, Virginia
Study site
Woodbridge, Virginia
Study site
Woodbury, Minnesota
Australia6 sites
Study site
Adelaide
Study site
Malvern
Study site
Newcastle
Study site
North Sydney
Study site
Perth
Study site
Westmead
Germany6 sites
Study site
Essen
Study site
Hanover
Study site
Heidelberg
Study site
Kiel
Study site
Mainz
Study site
Tübingen
United Kingdom4 sites
Study site
Glasgow
Study site
London
Study site
Nottingham
Study site
Surrey
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, 2-Cohort, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of E7080 (Lenvatinib) in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma
The purpose of this study is to assess the objective response rate of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression.
Read the detailed description
This was a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, 2-cohort, 2-stage study that assessed the ORR of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with AJCC unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression. Cohort 1 enrolled participants not harboring the V600E BRAF mutation with disease progression following up to 2 prior systemic anticancer regimens (excluding anti-VEGF) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma, and is referred to as Cohort 1 or V600E BRAF negative. Other less common BRAF activating mutations were allowed as long as the participant did not receive a BRAF-targeted therapy. Cohort 2 enrolled participants harboring the activating BRAF mutations (mainly the V600E mutation) with disease progression following BRAF V600E-targeted therapy, and is referred to as Cohort 2 or V600E BRAF positive. Eligible participants had measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1.
- Conditions
- Unresectable Stage III, Stage IV Melanoma
- Being tested
- Lenvatinib
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LenvatinibDrug
Also called E7080
Participants received lenvatinib 24 mg orally, once daily continuously in 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative) | Experimental | Cohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative) enrolled participants not harboring the V600E BRAF mutation with disease progression following up to 2 prior systemic anticancer regimens (excluding anti-VEGF) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib |
| Cohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive) | Experimental | Cohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive) enrolled participants harboring the activating BRAF mutations (mainly the V600E mutation) with disease progression following BRAF V600E-targeted therapy. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR, (ORR = CR + PR) was defined as the percentage of participants in each cohort who had a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 for target lesions assessed by magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography (MRI/CT) scans and independent radiologic review (IRR). A BOR of CR required confirmation by a subsequent CR assessment at least 4 weeks later. A BOR of PR required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of CR or PR at least 4 weeks later. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Measured: From date of treatment start until all participants completed a minimum of 6 cycles (28-day cycles) or discontinued treatment prior to end of Cycle 6 (up to 24 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was measured as the time from the date of first administration of study treatment until the date of first documentation of disease progression or date of death from any cause (whichever occurred first), as determined by IRR and Investigator based on RECIST v1.1. Disease progression per RECIST v1.1 was defined as at least a 20% relative increase and 5 mm absolute increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (1958) product-limit estimates. Data were presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) when an adequate number of at risk participants warranted the estimates in the table below.
Measured: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the length of time in months from the date of first administration of study drug until the date of death from any cause, and was based on the data cutoff date for each cohort. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (1958) product-limit estimates. Data were presented with 2-sided 95% CI when an adequate number of at risk participants warranted the estimates in the table below.
Measured: From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR, (DCR = CR + PR + SD) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR or PR or stable disease (SD) based on RECIST v1.1 for target lesions assessed by MRI/CT and IRR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm.; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. SD defined as reduction in tumor volume of < 30% or an increase in the volume of 1 or more measurable lesions of < 25% without the appearance of any new lesions which was neither tumor shrinkage corresponding to PR nor tumor expansion corresponding to disease progression. BOR of SD, time from first administration of study drug until date of documented SD needed to be >=7 weeks based on IRR and Investigator's assessment.
Measured: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
CBR, (CBR = CR + PR + durable SD rate) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR or PR or durable SD (dSD, SD lasting >=23 weeks) based on RECIST v1.1 for target lesions assessed by MRI/CT, IRR and Investigator's assessment. A BOR of CR required confirmation by a subsequent CR assessment at least 4 weeks later. A BOR of PR required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of CR or PR at least 4 weeks later. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; OR = CR + PR. A BOR of dSD, the time from the first administration of study drug until the date of documented dSD needed to be ≥23 weeks based on IRR and Investigator's assessment.
Measured: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)/ Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability of Lenvatinib
Safety was assessed by monitoring and recording all AEs including all Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades and SAEs; regular monitoring of hematology, clinical chemistry, and urine values; physical examinations; and regular measurement of vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans or echocardiogram.
Measured: From date of treatment start up to 30 days after the last dose, or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 9 months
Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Clinical Biomarkers in Whole Blood
Blood samples were drawn at specific time points. Utilizing a standard protocol, the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from whole blood was extracted and analyzed for specific biomarkers of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of lenvatinib. Some of the biomarkers analyzed included; Angiopoietin, Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), FMS Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Ligand (Flt3l) Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), Granulocyte Macro Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA), Interferon (IFN), Macrophage Inflammatory Protein (MIP) 1 alpha, Platelet Derived Growth Factor (PDGF), Stromal Cell Derived Factor (SDF) 1 alpha, Interleukin (IL), Transforming Growth Factor (TGF), Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF).
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1 D15), Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2 D1), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3 D1), Off-Treatment/Phase Visit 98 (V98)
Summary of Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib
Blood samples for the quantification of lenvatinib in plasma were obtained and processed using a standardized protocol. The lower limit of quantification was 0.25 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize lenvatinib plasma concentration data.
Measured: Predose and 2 to 12 hours postdose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2010
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Unresectable Stage IIIStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Eisai Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eisai US Medical Services, Study director, Eisai Limited
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01136967
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E7080-G000-206
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, 2-Cohort, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of E7080 (Lenvatinib) in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01136967
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E7080-G000-206
- Conditions
- Unresectable Stage III, Stage IV Melanoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Mar 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the objective response rate of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression.
Detailed description
This was a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, 2-cohort, 2-stage study that assessed the ORR of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with AJCC unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression. Cohort 1 enrolled participants not harboring the V600E BRAF mutation with disease progression following up to 2 prior systemic anticancer regimens (excluding anti-VEGF) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma, and is referred to as Cohort 1 or V600E BRAF negative. Other less common BRAF activating mutations were allowed as long as the participant did not receive a BRAF-targeted therapy. Cohort 2 enrolled participants harboring the activating BRAF mutations (mainly the V600E mutation) with disease progression following BRAF V600E-targeted therapy, and is referred to as Cohort 2 or V600E BRAF positive. Eligible participants had measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative) | Experimental | Drug: LenvatinibCohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative) enrolled participants not harboring the V600E BRAF mutation with disease progression following up to 2 prior systemic anticancer regimens (excluding anti-VEGF) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma. |
| Cohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive) | Experimental | Drug: LenvatinibCohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive) enrolled participants harboring the activating BRAF mutations (mainly the V600E mutation) with disease progression following BRAF V600E-targeted therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma.
- Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma.
- Evidence of disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 on prior regimen.
- Participants with brain metastases will be eligible if they have undergone complete surgical excision and are more then 1 month post surgery with no radiographic evidence of disease recurrence in the brain or have undergone stereotactic radio surgery (gamma knife procedure) and are more then 1 month post procedure and with no radiographic evidence of disease progression in the brain; and are asymptomatic, and discontinued corticosteroid treatment at least 30 days prior starting treatment.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Melanoma of intraocular origin.
- Leptomeningeal metastases or brain metastases except as for participants with brain metastases will be eligible if they have undergone complete surgical excision and are more then 1 month post surgery with no radiographic evidence of disease recurrence in the brain or have undergone stereotactic radio surgery (gamma knife procedure) and are more then 1 month post procedure and with no radiographic evidence of disease progression in the brain; and are asymptomatic, and discontinued corticosteroid treatment at least 30 days prior starting treatment.
- More than 2 prior systemic anticancer regimen treatments including immunotherapies for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV disease (if BRAF V600E mutation negative) or not previously treated with BRAF V600E-targeted therapy or received in the past more than 2 prior systemic anticancer regimen treatments, including immunotherapies, in addition to a BRAF-V600E-targeted therapy (if BRAF V600E mutation positive).
- Significant cardiovascular impairment.
- Bleeding disorder or a thrombotic disorder requiring anticoagulant therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LenvatinibAlso: E7080Participants received lenvatinib 24 mg orally, once daily continuously in 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. | Drug | Cohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative), Cohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive) |
Primary outcome
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: From date of treatment start until all participants completed a minimum of 6 cycles (28-day cycles) or discontinued treatment prior to end of Cycle 6 (up to 24 weeks)
ORR, (ORR = CR + PR) was defined as the percentage of participants in each cohort who had a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 for target lesions assessed by magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography (MRI/CT) scans and independent radiologic review (IRR). A BOR of CR required confirmation by a subsequent CR assessment at least 4 weeks later. A BOR of PR required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of CR or PR at least 4 weeks later. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
7 secondary outcomes
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)/ Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability of Lenvatinib
Time frame: From date of treatment start up to 30 days after the last dose, or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 9 months
Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Clinical Biomarkers in Whole Blood
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1 D15), Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2 D1), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3 D1), Off-Treatment/Phase Visit 98 (V98)
Summary of Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib
Time frame: Predose and 2 to 12 hours postdose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Unresectable Stage III
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study With Combinations of Anti-LAG-3 and Anti-PD-1 Antibodies in Adult Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma (Harmony Head-to-Head)
Melanoma
Recruiting
CREO - Microwave Ablation Feasibility Study
Pancreatic Cancer, Liver Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic)
Not yet recruiting
Moderately Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy With Consolidation Immunotherapy in Patients With Unresectable, Non-Targetable Stage III Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Stage III NSCLC
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Cabozantinib to the Immunotherapy Drug Cemiplimab (REGN2810), in Adolescents and Adults With Advanced Adrenocortical Cancer
Locally Advanced Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma, Metastatic Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eisai US Medical Services study director
Eisai Limited
95 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lenvatinib in people with Unresectable Stage III and Stage IV Melanoma, run by Eisai Inc. at 95 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 95 sites in United States, Australia, Germany, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Mar 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (time frame: From date of treatment start until all participants completed a minimum of 6 cycles (28-day cycles) or discontinued treatment prior to end of Cycle 6 (up to 24 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2019.