Far Infrared Therapy on AV Fistula Flow, Endothelial Function and Echocardiography in ESRD Patients

For patients with end stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis (HD) treatment, a well-functioning vascular access is necessary for achieving adequate dialysis and improving the quality of life. Among several types of vascular access, the long-term technical survival is best for the native arteriovenous fistula (AVF), which accounts for more than 80% of vascular access in HD patients in Taiwan. Vascular access complications accounted for about 20% of HD patient hospitalizations in the United States with a cost of $1 billion annually (1). Malfunction of vascular access usually presents with inadequate blood flow because of stenosis or thrombosis of the venous outflow tract (2). About 80 to 85% of AV access failures arise from AV access thromboses, of which more than 80% result from AVF stenoses (3). An access flow (Qa) less than 500 ml/min was associated with an increased risk of access failure and predictive of poorer unassisted patency of native AVF (4). The pathological features of stenosis of vascular access are composed of intimal hyperplasia; proliferation of smooth muscle cells in the media with subsequent migration to intima, and excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (5). In spite of the above findings, little information is available on how to effectively prevent the stenoses of vascular access in HD patients.

Infrared radiation is an invisible electromagnetic wave with a longer wavelength than that of the visible light. According to the difference in wavelength, infrared radiation can be divided into three categories: near-infrared radiation (0.8-1.5μm), middle-infrared radiation (1.5-5.6μm) and far-infrared (FIR) radiation (5.6-1000μm) (6). Infrared radiation transfers energy that is perceived as heat by thermo- receptors in the surrounding skin (7). The application of FIR radiation includes food preservation (8) and health promotion (9-10). Animal studies also demonstrated that FIR improves skin blood flow(11-12), leading to the use of FIR in the treatment of ischemic lesions and necrosis of skin tissue due to trauma, diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. In addition, some studies indicate that FIR therapy may improve endothelial function and reduce the frequency of some cardiovascular diseases (13-15). The thermal effect of FIR results in vasodilatation and may increase access flow of AV fistula. According to the report by Vaupel et al., the temperature can be increased up to 4°C in 10 mm depth of tissue (16). In addition, infrared therapy may allow multiple energy transfer as deep as 2-3 cm into subcutaneous tissue without irritating or overheating the skin like unfiltered heat radiation (17). The skin temperature steadily increased to a plateau around 38~39 °C during the treatment of FIR for 30 to 60 minutes as long as the distance between the ceramic plate and the skin was more than 20 cm (11). Therefore, infrared therapy can be free of the disadvantages or side effects (such as burn injury, infection, risk of access failure or prolonged bleeding from the previous venopuncture site) of some traditional methods of thermal therapy.

In addition to the thermal effect, three possible non-thermal effects of infrared therapy were reported in the literature, including (1) improving endothelial function, (2) inhibiting intimal hyperplasia, and (3) decreasing oxidative stress. FIR may improve endothelial function which is observed not only in animal studies (11,12,14) but also in one clinical study (13). Yu et al. suggest that the beneficial effect of FIR therapy on skin blood flow may be related to L-arginine/NO pathway (11). In this respect, Akasaki et al. found that repeated FIR therapy could up-regulate eNOS expression and augment angiogenesis in an apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse model of unilateral hind limb ischemia (12). Moreover, Ikeda et al. reported that 4 weeks of sauna therapy significantly increased the serum nitrate concentrations as well as the expression of mRNA and protein of eNOS in the aortas of TO-2 hamsters (14). In addition, Imamura et al. showed that two weeks of repeated sauna therapy significantly improved vascular endothelial function, resulting in an increase in flow-mediated endothelium-dependent dilatation of the brachial artery from 4% to 5.8% in patients with coronary risk factors (13).

In addition to enhancing eNOS expression, Kipshidze et al. found that nonablative infrared laser (NIL) therapy inhibited neointimal hyperplasia after PTCA in cholesterol-fed rabbits for up to 60 days (18). According to their report, the nonablative doses of NIL decreased the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), but it did not decrease the growth rate of endothelial cells. As the proliferation of VSMCs in the media is an important pathological finding of the vascular wall of HD patients with vascular access stenosis (5), slowing down the growth of VSMCs may reduce the frequency of access stenosis. According to the report by Masuda et al. (19), the systolic blood pressure and the increased urinary 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α levels were significantly lower in the patients receiving an FIR dry sauna for 45 minutes per day for two weeks. F2-isoprostanes, namely 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α, are chemically stable products of lipid peroxidation and the level has been suggested as a reliable marker of oxidative stress in vivo (20). These results suggest that repeated sauna therapy may reduce oxidative stress, which leads to protection against the progression and complications of atherosclerosis. Since HD patients are also exposed to heavy oxidative stress from both inward uremic status and outward HD-related technology, the application of FIR therapy may be considered as an alternative therapeutic modality for decreasing oxidative stress.

Nakhoul et al. have shown a high incidence of unexplained pulmonary hypertension (PHT) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on chronic haemodialysis (HD) therapy via arterio-venous (A-V) access [21]. Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was evaluated using Doppler echocardiography. Levels of ET-1 and NO metabolites in plasma were determined before and after the HD procedure and were compared between subgroups of patients with and without PHT. Out of 42 HD patients studied, 20 patients (48%) had higher PHT (PAP = 46+/-2 mmHg) while the rest had a normal PAP (29+/-1 mmHg) (P<0.0001). In comparison with HD patients without PHT, HD patients with PHT had higher cardiac output (6.0+/-1.2 vs 5.2+/-0.9 l/min, P<0.034), similar plasma ET-1 levels (1.6+/-0.7 vs. 2.4+/-0.8 fmol/ml), lower basal plasma levels of NO2 + NO3 (14.3+/-2.3 μM vs. 24.2+/-5.2μM, P<0.05), and a lower HD-induced increase of plasma NO metabolites (from 14.3+/-2.3 to 39.9+/-11.4 microM, P<0.007 vs. from 24.2+/-5.2 to 77.1+/-9.6μM, P<0.0001, respectively). Temporary closure of the A-V access by a sphygmomanometer in eight patients with PHT resulted in a transient decrease in CO (from 6.4+/-0.6 to 5.3+/- 0.5 l/min, P = 0.18) and systolic PAP (from 47.2+/-3.8 to 34.6+/-2.8 mmHg, P<0.028). In summary, their study demonstrated a high prevalence of PHT among patients with ESRD on chronic HD via a surgical A-V fistula. In view of the vasodilatory and antimitogenic properties of NO, it is possible that the attenuated basal and HD-induced NO production in patients with PHT contributes to the increased pulmonary vascular tone. Furthermore, the partial restoration of normal PAP and CO in HD patients that underwent either temporal A-V shunt closure or successful transplantation indicates that excessive pulmonary blood flow is involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Importance of this study:

AV fistula may impose a significant impact on cardiac function and echocardiographic parameters. FIR has been demonstrated to increase access flow of AV fistula in prevalent HD patients. However, its role on newly-created AV fistula is not known. This study will reveal the effect of FIR therapy on echocardiographic parameters, access flow of AVF and endothelial function in patients with end stage renal disease. If FIR therapy is associated with beneficial hemodynamic effect in ESRD patients, it may be considered as a therapeutic modality for improving endothelial function and cardiac performance in ESRD patients.