AzTrials
AzTrials

Malignant Hilar StrictureNCT01141088

Two Bilateral Metal Stenting in Hilar Malignancy

A study testing Bilateral stent-in-stent insertion and Bilateral side-by-side insertion in people with Malignant Hilar Stricture and Bilateral Stent Insertion, run by Soon Chun Hyang University at 2 sites in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall median survival of nonresectable malignant hilar obstruction in most series has been less than 6 months. Most patients with malignant hilar obstruction present with advanced disease, making allative endoscopic drainage the principal therapeutic option. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Bilateral stent-in-stent insertion and Bilateral side-by-side insertion
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
2 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Apr 2016to 30 Sep 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient over 18 years old
  • patient with malignant hilar obstruction

Who cannot join

  • refuse to participate in this study
  • refuse to provide informed consent
  • Karnofsky score < 60%
  • physically unfit for endoscopic procedure

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Jong Ho Moon, MD, PhD contact

+82-32-621-5083

jhmoon@schbc.ac.kr

Tae Hoon Lee, MD contact

+82-41-570-3662

thlee9@lycos.co.kr

South Korea2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Soon Chun Hyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital

    Bucheon-si, 420-767

    Jong Ho Moon, MD, PhD, +82-32-621-5083, jhmoon@schbc.ac.kr

    Recruiting
  • Soon Chun Hyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital

    Cheonan, 330-721

    Tae Hoon Lee, MD, +82-41-570-3662, thlee9@lycos.co.kr

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Bilateral Stent-in-stent Placement Versus Side-by-side Method With Newly Designed Metallic Stent for Malignant Hilar Biliary

The overall median survival of nonresectable malignant hilar obstruction in most series has been less than 6 months. Most patients with malignant hilar obstruction present with advanced disease, making allative endoscopic drainage the principal therapeutic option. However, the optimal endoscopic management strategy is contentious. In malignant hilar obstruction, exclusively endoscopic placement of bilateral metal stents has been considered very difficult and complex, and it may require multiple procedures, with an increased risk of complications and mortality. To overcome this difficulty and strategize plan of management, the investigators evaluated the technical and clinical efficacy of endoscopic bilateral placement of newly designed stents, Y-configuration, followed by side-by-side insertion in failure of stent-in-stent method for the management of malignant hilar obstruction.

Read the detailed description
  1. Stent-in-stent (SIS) placement Following negotiation of both intrahepatic bile ducts (IHD) by two guidewires, inserted 1st stent to left IHD side. The central portion of the 1st stent was crossed over the right-side guide wire to access the contralateral ductal system across the central cross-wired portion using the right-side guide wire as a target. After deployment of the 1st stent across the hilar stricture, the remaining guide wire across the 1st stent was carefully withdrawn using an ERCP catheter without pulling it back completely. Then that guidewie was inserted under fluoroscopic guidance into the undrained right IHD through the central portion of the 1st stent. The 2nd cross-wired stent was then introduced over a guidewire through the central open mesh and then was deployed into the right IHD, so that the central portion of the 2nd stent overlapped the central portion of the 1st stent, forming a Y-shape. If selective insertion of a guide wire into the left IHD was difficult at first, the guidewire and the 1st stent were inserted into the right IHD first and then attempts were made to insert the guide wire and a stent into the left IHD. If contralateral guide wire cannulation failed after the 1st stent placement, the stricture was dilated up to 4 or 6 mm using a balloon catheter (Hurricane biliary balloon dilatation catheter; Boston Scientific) over the guide wire. Alternatively, a second intervention for contralateral stent placement was allowed 2-3 days after expansion of the 1st endoscopic stent.
  2. Side-by-side (SBS) placement Bilateral SBS stent placement was performed as follows. The stricture was first negotiated by inserting a guidewire into both IHD using the same method. Following the introduction of these two guidewires, the first stent was pushed and deployed into the left hepatic duct as possible, and then subsequently the second stent was pushed and deployed into the right hepatic duct, using the same method. During the deployment of the first stent, the second stent was preloaded on a guidewire to facilitate the bilateral SBS stent placement. Endoscopic dilatation of stricture before deployment of stents has not been routinely performed in primary procedures. In tight stricture during a guidewire manipulation, pneumatic biliary balloon dilation prior to insertion of first stent was performed. All stents were positioned above the level of the papilla, with their distal ends at the same level as possible. The diameter of the stent used in each case (8 or 10 mm) depended on the maximum diameter of the common bile duct (CBD).
Being tested
Bilateral stent-in-stent insertion, Bilateral side-by-side insertion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bilateral stent-in-stent insertionProcedure or surgery

    Also called SIS

    Following negotiation of both IHD by two guidewires, inserted 1st stent to left IHD side. After deployment of the 1st stent across the hilar stricture, the remaining guide wire across the 1st stent was carefully withdrawn using an ERCP catheter without pulling it back completely. Then that guidewie was inserted under fluoroscopic guidance into the undrained right IHD through the central portion of the 1st stent. The 2nd cross-wired stent was then introduced over a guidewire through the central open mesh and then was deployed into the right IHD, so that the central portion of the 2nd stent overlapped the central portion of the 1st stent, forming a Y-shape.

  • Bilateral side-by-side insertionProcedure or surgery

    Also called SBS

    Following the introduction of two guidewires, the first stent was pushed and deployed into the left hepatic duct as possible, and then subsequently the second stent was pushed and deployed into the right hepatic duct, using the same method. In tight stricture during a guidewire manipulation, pneumatic biliary balloon dilation prior to insertion of first stent was performed. All stents were positioned above the level of the papilla, with their distal ends at the same level as possible. The diameter of the stent used in each case (8 or 10 mm) depended on the maximum diameter of the common bile duct (CBD).

Study groups in NCT01141088
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bilateral stent-in-stent insertionExperimentalThe passage of the bilateral metal stent across the stricture, stent-in-stent method.
Receives: Procedure: Bilateral stent-in-stent insertion; Procedure: Bilateral side-by-side insertion
Bilateral side-by-side insertionActive comparatorThe passage of the bilateral metal stent across the stricture, side-by-side method.
Receives: Procedure: Bilateral stent-in-stent insertion; Procedure: Bilateral side-by-side insertion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Technical success

    Passage of the double stent across the stricture,along with flow of contrast medium and/or bile through the stent.

    Adequate expansion: 70% of maximal expanded diameter was dilated within 24 hr.

    Measured: within 24 hr

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Early complications

    Early complications such as pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, jaundice, or external or internal stent migration within 30 days after stent insertion.

    Measured: within 30 days after stent insertion

  2. Late complications

    Late complications were defines as complications such as pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, jaundice, or stent migration after 30 days following stent insertion.

    Measured: after 30 days following stent insertion

  3. Median stent patency

    Measured: up to 1 year, from stent insertion to the occlusion of the stent

  4. Median survival

    Measured: 1 year, from stent insertion to the death of the patient

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Apr 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01141088
Sponsor's protocol ID
SCH-2010-02
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
8 Jun 2010
Last updated
19 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lee TH, Moon JH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Lee YN, Paik WH, Jang DK, Cho BW, Yang JK, Hwangbo Y, Park SH. Prospective comparison of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent versus stent-by-stent deployment for inoperable advanced malignant hilar biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Aug;90(2):222-230. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

    PubMed 30905729

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bilateral stent-in-stent insertion and Bilateral side-by-side insertion in people with Malignant Hilar Stricture and Bilateral Stent Insertion, run by Soon Chun Hyang University at 2 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jong Ho Moon, MD, PhD (+82-32-621-5083, jhmoon@schbc.ac.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Technical success (time frame: within 24 hr). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01141088, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in