Human PapillomavirusNCT01143142
Vax Facts Human Papillomavirus (HPV): Study of a Computer-based Tailoring System and Mothers' Intentions to Vaccinate Their Daughters Against HPV
A study testing Computer-based tailoring system in people with Human Papillomavirus and Prevention, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to determine whether a two-page print brochure that delivers individually tailored educational messages about the Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine increases HPV vaccine-hesitant mothers' intentions to have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against HPV. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Human Papillomavirus, Prevention
- What is being tested?
- Computer-based tailoring system
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Mother is greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Mother has a daughter who is between the ages of 11-15 years
- Daughter has not received any doses of the HPV vaccine
- When asked to describe how she feels about getting her daughter vaccinated against HPV in the next six months, mother responds "I don't want her to get vaccinated" or "I'm unsure if I want her vaccinated."
Who cannot join
- Cannot read/speak English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UMHS Outpatient Pediatrics
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104
About this study
Official title: Vax Facts HPV: Study of a Computer-based Tailoring System and Mothers' Intentions to Vaccinate Their Daughters Against HPV
The goal of this study is to determine whether a two-page print brochure that delivers individually tailored educational messages about the Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine increases HPV vaccine-hesitant mothers' intentions to have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against HPV.
Read the detailed description
This will be a randomized controlled intervention trial for HPV vaccine-hesitant mothers of adolescent (ages 11-15 years old) girls. Mothers will complete a three-item measure that assesses their baseline intentions for having their adolescent daughter vaccinated against HPV. Mothers will then fill out a short, computer-based survey that assesses demographic factors, prior experience with HPV-associated illnesses and views about a variety of potential barriers to HPV vaccination. Following the survey, the intervention group (40 mothers) will receive a two-page print brochure that uses their survey data to generate the brochure such that it addresses each mother's top three concerns about the HPV vaccine. The control group (40 mothers) will receive a generic, two-page brochure that is similar in appearance to the intervention, but contains only untailored, generic information about the vaccine. HPV vaccination intention will be assessed a second time after reading the brochure, using the same three-item measure as before the survey. The vaccine administration records of the adolescent daughters of these mothers will be accessed three months after mothers' participation in the study to assess whether any HPV vaccine doses were provided.
- Conditions
- Human Papillomavirus, Prevention
- Being tested
- Computer-based tailoring system
- Keywords
- Human papillomavirus, HPV, Prevention, Tailoring, Persuasive communication, Adolescent
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Computer-based tailoring systemBehavioural
Both the intervention and control groups will use a computer-based tailoring system to respond to survey questions. The computer-based tailoring system will produce messages for a two-page educational brochure based on participants' responses to survey questions. Only the intervention group will receive this brochure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tailoring | Experimental | Individuals assigned to the experimental group will receive a two-page brochure tailored based on their responses to the survey. Receives: Behavioral: Computer-based tailoring system |
| Untailored information | Active comparator | Individuals assigned to the control group will receive the CDC vaccine information sheet that is standardly provided. Receives: Behavioral: Computer-based tailoring system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mother's Intention to Vaccinate Daughter Against HPV
Mother will rate her intention to have her daughter vaccinated against HPV using a Likert scale before and after the intervention. The scale ranges from 0-11 with higher numbers representing more positive intentions to vaccinate against HPV, and 5 being neutral intentions (i.e. neither positive nor negative). In this assessment we use this 11-point scale to assess vaccination before and after viewing the educational materials. The difference pre and post intervention in vaccination intention is calculated (min 0, max 11) and the mean of these differences are calculated for the control and intervention groups.
Measured: Date of intervention (one day)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Vaccination of Daughter
With mother's consent, daughter's University of Michigan vaccination record will be accessed to determine whether daughter has received any doses of the HPV vaccine. If the University of Michigan vaccination record does not document a visit three months after the intervention, with mother's consent, research staff will call mother at home to determine whether daughter has received any doses of the HPV vaccine.
Measured: Less than or equal to three months from the date of the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionOct 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Human PapillomavirusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amanda Dempsey, University of Colorado, Denver
- Investigators
- Amanda Dempsey, MD, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01143142
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 149891
- Other IDs
- P50CA101451
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 22 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years--United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Sep 18;58(36):997-1001.
PubMed 19763075Chesson HW, Blandford JM, Gift TL, Tao G, Irwin KL. The estimated direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases among American youth, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):11-9. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.11.04.
PubMed 14982672Dempsey AF, Abraham LM, Dalton V, Ruffin M. Understanding the reasons why mothers do or do not have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against human papillomavirus. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):531-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
PubMed 19394865Dempsey A, Cohn L, Dalton V, Ruffin M. Patient and clinic factors associated with adolescent human papillomavirus vaccine utilization within a university-based health system. Vaccine. 2010 Jan 22;28(4):989-95. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.133. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
PubMed 19925899Dempsey AF, Zimet GD, Davis RL, Koutsky L. Factors that are associated with parental acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccines: a randomized intervention study of written information about HPV. Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1486-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1381.
PubMed 16651301Gust D, Brown C, Sheedy K, Hibbs B, Weaver D, Nowak G. Immunization attitudes and beliefs among parents: beyond a dichotomous perspective. Am J Health Behav. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):81-92. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.29.1.7.
PubMed 15604052Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):454-66. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn004. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
PubMed 18349033Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Lawson HW, Chesson H, Unger ER; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007 Mar 23;56(RR-2):1-24.
PubMed 17380109
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vax Facts HPV: Study of a Computer-based Tailoring System and Mothers' Intentions to Vaccinate Their Daughters Against HPV
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01143142
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 149891
- Conditions
- Human Papillomavirus, Prevention
- Keywords
- Human papillomavirus, HPV, Prevention, Tailoring, Persuasive communication, Adolescent
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Dec 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to determine whether a two-page print brochure that delivers individually tailored educational messages about the Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine increases HPV vaccine-hesitant mothers' intentions to have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against HPV.
Detailed description
This will be a randomized controlled intervention trial for HPV vaccine-hesitant mothers of adolescent (ages 11-15 years old) girls. Mothers will complete a three-item measure that assesses their baseline intentions for having their adolescent daughter vaccinated against HPV. Mothers will then fill out a short, computer-based survey that assesses demographic factors, prior experience with HPV-associated illnesses and views about a variety of potential barriers to HPV vaccination. Following the survey, the intervention group (40 mothers) will receive a two-page print brochure that uses their survey data to generate the brochure such that it addresses each mother's top three concerns about the HPV vaccine. The control group (40 mothers) will receive a generic, two-page brochure that is similar in appearance to the intervention, but contains only untailored, generic information about the vaccine. HPV vaccination intention will be assessed a second time after reading the brochure, using the same three-item measure as before the survey. The vaccine administration records of the adolescent daughters of these mothers will be accessed three months after mothers' participation in the study to assess whether any HPV vaccine doses were provided.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tailoring | Experimental | Behavioral: Computer-based tailoring systemIndividuals assigned to the experimental group will receive a two-page brochure tailored based on their responses to the survey. |
| Untailored information | Active comparator | Behavioral: Computer-based tailoring systemIndividuals assigned to the control group will receive the CDC vaccine information sheet that is standardly provided. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Mother is greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Mother has a daughter who is between the ages of 11-15 years
- Daughter has not received any doses of the HPV vaccine
- When asked to describe how she feels about getting her daughter vaccinated against HPV in the next six months, mother responds "I don't want her to get vaccinated" or "I'm unsure if I want her vaccinated."
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Cannot read/speak English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Computer-based tailoring systemBoth the intervention and control groups will use a computer-based tailoring system to respond to survey questions. The computer-based tailoring system will produce messages for a two-page educational brochure based on participants' responses to survey questions. Only the intervention group will receive this brochure. | Behavioural | Tailoring, Untailored information |
Primary outcome
Mother's Intention to Vaccinate Daughter Against HPV
Time frame: Date of intervention (one day)
Mother will rate her intention to have her daughter vaccinated against HPV using a Likert scale before and after the intervention. The scale ranges from 0-11 with higher numbers representing more positive intentions to vaccinate against HPV, and 5 being neutral intentions (i.e. neither positive nor negative). In this assessment we use this 11-point scale to assess vaccination before and after viewing the educational materials. The difference pre and post intervention in vaccination intention is calculated (min 0, max 11) and the mean of these differences are calculated for the control and intervention groups.
1 secondary outcome
Vaccination of Daughter
Time frame: Less than or equal to three months from the date of the intervention
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Dec 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19763075Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years--United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Sep 18;58(36):997-1001.
- Background: PubMed 14982672Chesson HW, Blandford JM, Gift TL, Tao G, Irwin KL. The estimated direct medical cost of sexually transmitted diseases among American youth, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):11-9. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.11.04.
- Background: PubMed 19394865Dempsey AF, Abraham LM, Dalton V, Ruffin M. Understanding the reasons why mothers do or do not have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against human papillomavirus. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):531-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 19925899Dempsey A, Cohn L, Dalton V, Ruffin M. Patient and clinic factors associated with adolescent human papillomavirus vaccine utilization within a university-based health system. Vaccine. 2010 Jan 22;28(4):989-95. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.133. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
- Background: PubMed 16651301Dempsey AF, Zimet GD, Davis RL, Koutsky L. Factors that are associated with parental acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccines: a randomized intervention study of written information about HPV. Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1486-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1381.
- Background: PubMed 15604052Gust D, Brown C, Sheedy K, Hibbs B, Weaver D, Nowak G. Immunization attitudes and beliefs among parents: beyond a dichotomous perspective. Am J Health Behav. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):81-92. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.29.1.7.
- Background: PubMed 18349033Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):454-66. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn004. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 17380109Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Lawson HW, Chesson H, Unger ER; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007 Mar 23;56(RR-2):1-24.
Related trials for Human Papillomavirus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of a 10 Valent Human Papillomavirus Virus (10vHPV) Vaccine
Human Papillomavirus Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Comparing Immune Response of 2 vs 3 HPV Doses (27-45 Years Old)
Immunization, HPV Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Combination Bevacizumab and PRGN-2012 in Adults With Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis (RRP)
Respiratory Recurrent Papillomatosis (RRP), Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of the Preliminary Efficacy of DARE-HPV to Treat High-risk Persistent Human Papillomavirus (hrHPV)
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), High-risk Human Papillomavirus Infection
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single Arm Phase II Trial in p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer of Selective Dose De-escalation of nodAl VolumEs at Minimal Risk and Primary Site Disease (SAVED)
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amanda Dempsey, MD, PhD, MPH principal investigator
Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Computer-based tailoring system in people with Human Papillomavirus and Prevention, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mother's Intention to Vaccinate Daughter Against HPV (time frame: Date of intervention (one day)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01143142, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2014.