Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis +- AsthmaPhase 2NCT01144429
Dose Finding Study for Depigoid Birch: 4 Doses in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis +-Asthma
A Phase 2 study testing Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% Birch in people with Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Asthma and Immunotherapy, Allergen, run by Leti Pharma GmbH at 39 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Specific immunotherapy for subcutaneous application: Dose finding study to evaluate the correct dose. 4 concentrations of a birch pollen allergen extract are applied in this study. Duration of therapy 20 weeks. Primary criterion is the Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT), i.e. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Asthma, Immunotherapy, Allergen
- What is being tested?
- Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% Birch
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 344 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to May 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients have provided an appropriately signed and dated informed consent prior to any study specific examination,
- Patients must be ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years of age at Visit 1,
- Patients must have a perception of disease activity of at least 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS),
- Patients must have an FEV1 or PEF value > 80% of the predicted normal value (for PEF: highest result of 3 measurements),
- Patients must complain about allergic rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms for at least 2 years with or without intermittent asthma symptoms, caused by clinical sensitization against birch pollen,
- IgE-mediated sensitization has to be verified by:
Show all 14Show fewer
- suggestive medical history, and
- specific IgE against birch pollen (CAP-Rast ≥ 2), and
- a positive SPT to birch pollen (the SPT is considered positive if it results in a wheal diameter of at least 3 mm and at least the size of histamine reference), and
- a positive CPT with a birch pollen concentration of up to 10,000 SQ-units/mL.
- Special criteria for patients with co-allergies
- Patients do not suffer from typical symptoms against co-allergens,
- Specific CAP-RAST against co-allergens < CAP-RAST against birch pollen (the difference has to be ≥ 2), patients with co-allergens against animal dander can be randomized even if the CAP RAST difference is < 2, but must not be exposed to the specific allergen,
- Result of SPT against co-allergens < result of SPT against birch pollen.
Who cannot join
- Acute and chronic conjunctivitis,
- Infectious conjunctivitis,
- History of significant clinical manifestations of allergy as a result of sensitization against grass or weed pollen and perennial allergens (e.g. house dust mites),
- Symptoms due to co-allergies,
- Persistent asthma, according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guidelines,
- Acute or chronic inflammatory or infectious airway diseases including recurrent acute or chronic sinusitis,
Show all 29Show fewer
- Chronic structural diseases of the lung (e.g. emphysema or bronchiectasis),
- Diseases of the immune system including autoimmune and immune deficiencies,
- Any disease, which prohibits the use of adrenaline (e.g. hyperthyroidism),
- Severe uncontrolled diseases that could increase the risk for the patients participating in the study, which include but are not limited to the following: cardiovascular insufficiency, any severe or unstable lung diseases, endocrine diseases, clinically significant renal or hepatic diseases, or hematological disorders,
- Any malignant disease during the previous 5 years,
- Any significant abnormal laboratory parameter or alteration in the vital signs that could increase the risk for the study patient,
- Alcohol, drug, or medication abuse within the past year,
- Severe psychiatric, psychological, or neurological disorders,
- Use of immunotherapy against birch pollen within the last 5 years,
- Topical and systemic treatment with β-blockers,
- Treatment with substances interfering with the immune system within 1 week prior to Visit 2,
- Use of tranquillizers or psychoactive drugs within 1 week prior to Visit 1,
- Use of systemic corticosteroids within 3 months prior to Visit 1,
- Immunization with vaccines within 7 days prior to Visit 2,
- Patients with hypersensitivity to excipients of the investigational medicinal product,
- Patients expected to be non-compliant and/or not co-operative,
- Exposure to any investigational drug within one month or 6 half lives,
- Patients who have already participated in this study,
- Patients who are employees of the institution, or 1st grade relatives, or partners of the investigator,
- Any donation of germ cells, blood, organs, or bone marrow during the course of the study,
- Patients who are not contractually capable,
- Nursing (lactating) women or a positive pregnancy test at Visit 1.
- Persons who are jurisdictional or governmentally institutionalized.
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 3 countries.
39 sites in 3 countries
Germany25 sites
Dermatology Weber
Augsburg, 86163
Licca Klinik Dermatologie
Augsburg, 86179
Allergie-Centrum-Charité
Berlin, 10117
Klinische Froschung Berlin Mitte
Berlin, 10117
Hippke, Ear-Nose-Throat Specialist and Allergy
Berlin, 13057
Universität Bonn, Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie
Bonn, 53127
Klinikum Carl-Gustav Carus, Klinik+Poliklinik für HNO
Dresden, 01307
Thieme, Ear-Nose-Throat Specialist and Allergology
Duisburg, 47051
Dominicus Hautzentrum
Dülmen, 48249
Spaeth, Ear-Nose-Throat Specialist and Allergy
Düren, 52351
Klinische Forschung Hamburg GmbH
Hamburg, 20253
Clinical Research Hamburg GmbH
Hamburg, 22143
Stefan, Dermatology and Allergy
Hennef (Sieg), 53773
Feussner, Pulmology and Allergology
Kassel, 34121
Tagesklinik für Allergie und Hautkrankheiten Brüning
Kiel, 24148
Zentrum für Therapiestudien der Innomed Leipzig GmbH
Leipzig, 04103
Medamed GmbH Studienambulanz
Leipzig, 04109
Amann, Ear-Nose-Throat Specialist and Allergy
Lingen, 49809
CRC Universitätsklinikum Mainz
Mainz, 55131
Universität, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hautkrankheiten
Münster, 48149
Ear-Nose-Throat Specialist Schaefer
Pirna, 01796
Palm, Ear-Nose-Throat, Allergology
Röthenbach, 90552
Steinborn Dermatology
Straubing, 94315
Zentrum für Rhinologie und Allergie
Wiesbaden, 65183
Hautarztpraxis Allergie Hoffmann
Witten, 58453
Poland11 sites
Zakład Alergologii, SPZOZ Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie
Krakow, 31531
Klinika Pulmonologii i Alergologii, SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1 im. N. Barlickiego UM w Łodzi
Lodz, 90153
NZOZ Centrum Alergologii
Lodz, 90553
CSK UM w Łodzi, Klinika Immunologii, Reumatologii i Alergii, Zakład Immunologii Klinicznej
Lodz, 92213
Centrum Alergologii
Poznan, 60214
Alergologia Plus, Specjalistyczny NZOZ, Ośrodek Diagnostyki i Terapii Uczuleń
Poznan, 60693
NZOZ Alergo-Med.
Poznan, 60823
Alergo-Med. Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Lekarska Sp. z o. o.
Tarnów, 33100
Poradnia Alergologiczna, Gabinet Lekarski
Tomaszów Mazowiecki, 97200
NZOZ Almed Specjalistyczna Opieka Medyczna
Wroclaw, 50445
NZOZ Lekarze Specjaliści J. Małolepszy i Partnerzy
Wroclaw, 54239
Lithuania3 sites
Kaunas Distric Hospital
Kaunas, 45130
Kaunas Medical University Clinics
Kaunas, 50009
ENT Clinic "Trirema Medica"
Vilnius, 1113
About this study
Official title: Randomized, DB, Parallel Group, MC Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Four Doses of Depigmented Glutaraldehyde Polymerized Birch Pollen Allergenic Extract (Depigoid Birch) in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Intermittent Asthma
Specific immunotherapy for subcutaneous application: Dose finding study to evaluate the correct dose.
4 concentrations of a birch pollen allergen extract are applied in this study. Duration of therapy 20 weeks. Primary criterion is the Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT), i.e. comparison between treatment arms of increased amount of quantities of allergen to provoke a positive CPT at the end of treatment.
Read the detailed description
This is a dose finding study and no therapeutic study. Patients will receive in 4-weekly intervals 5x injections of 0,5 ml of a solution of modified birch pollen extract outside the pollen season. The primary endpoint therefore is not the therapeutic effect of the specific immunotherapy (effect on symptoms of allergy during the birch pollen season) but the effect on the CPT. Acc. to the EMEA "Guideline on clinical development of products for specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic diseases" provocation tests are accepted as primary outcomes for dose-finding studies.
For the CPT increasing doses of birch pollen solutions are applied to the eye and characteristic symptoms (eye redness, weeping, itching or burning and nose dripping/blockage) are assessed: 0 = absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). At a score value of >= 5/concentration the test is considered positive and finished.
It is expected that at the end of the study higher doses are necessary to provoke a positive CPT.
Furthermore comparative evaluation of the safety data (AEs) in the different dosage groups is a very important parameter for the evaluation of the outcome of the study.
- Being tested
- Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% Birch
- Keywords
- Allergic Rhinitis +- intermittent asthma, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis +- intermittent asthma, Specific Immunotherapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% BirchBiological
Also called Depigoid (R), Depigmented, glutaraldehyd-polymerized allergenic extract of
Subcutaneous injections Build-up = 1 day: 0,1mL + 0,2mL + 0,2mL s.c. in intervals on 30 minutes; Maintenance = 5 x single injection of 0,5 mL s.c. every 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 100 DPP/mL | Active comparator | Concentration of solution fo s.c. injection: 100 DPP/mL Receives: Biological: Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% Birch |
| 1000 DPP/mL | Active comparator | Concentration of solution fo s.c. injection: 1000 DPP/mL Receives: Biological: Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% Birch |
| 5000 DPP/mL | Active comparator | Concentration of solution fo s.c. injection: 5000 DPP/mL Receives: Biological: Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% Birch |
| 10000 DPP/mL | Active comparator | Concentration of solution fo s.c. injection: 10000 DPP/mL Receives: Biological: Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% Birch |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Conjunctival Provocation Test
Comparison between dosage groups of percentage of patients who need an increased amount of allergen to provoke a positive CPT at the end of the treatment (comparison of slope of efficacy) It is expected that at the end of the study higher doses are necessary to provoke a positive CPT.
Acc. to the EMEA "Guideline on clinical development of products for specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic diseases" provocation tests are accepted as primary outcomes for dose-finding studies.
Measured: At screening and after approx 22 weeks (EoS)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Laboratory parameters (immunology)
specific IgE (Birch), specific IgG1 and IgG4 (Birch). Comparison pre-post will be evaluated
Measured: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Conjunctival Provocation Test
Analysis of individual results for allergen amount
Measured: after approx. 22 weeks
Laboratory (hematological, clinical chemistry, immunological) as a measure of safety
Clinically relevant changes need to be documented as AE. Comparison pre-post will be displayed descriptively.
Measured: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Overall assessment of safety (tolerability)at the end of the study
At the end of the study investigator and patient will give their general overall impression on the safety of the study treatment on the following scale: excellent (no side effects at all), good (some minor local side effects), moderate (major local side effects or mild systemic side effects) or unaccaptable (anaphylactic reaction).
Results will be compared between dosage groups
Measured: after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
AEs are recorded at the study visits (patients are questioned and the patient diary - where allergy specific symptoms should be recorded by the patients during 48 hrs after each injection of IMP - is assessed by the investigator and AEs recorded in the CRF if applicable) and at any time of the study when site becomes aware of an AE/SAE.
AE/SAE rate is compared between the treatment groups (safety profile). Also rates of local and systemic reactions will be calculated
Measured: at 4-weekly intervals (retrospectively at study visits)
Vital signs: Blood pressure and Heart rate as a measure of safety
Vital signs are measured a screening and every study visit. Clinically abnormal values must be assessed by the investigator and - if applicable - documented as AE. Vital signs will be evaluated descriptively
Measured: At screening and every study visit (4-weekly)
Patient diary: Allergy specific symptoms and concomitant medication (rescue m.) for 48 hrs after application of study medication
Symptoms: urticaria, sneezing, runny nose, cough, dizziness, asthma symptoms, swelling/pain at the injection site.
Symptoms documented in the diary will be judged and assessed by the investigator and transcribed as AE into the CRF if applicable Medication: Antihistaminics (Eye drops, nose spray), Sultanol, oral corticosteroids, other Intake of medication documented by the patients has to be transcribed to the CRF (Concomitant medication section)
Measured: 48 hrs every 4 weeks after each application of study medication
Physical examination acc to local procedures as a measure of safety
A PE has to be performed at screening and end of study visit (22 weeks). Clinically abnormal findings must be assessed by the investigator and documented as AE if applicable. Data will be evaluated descriptively
Measured: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionFeb 2011
- Study completionMay 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis +- AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 344 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leti Pharma GmbH
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Laboratorios LETI SL (Study Medication), Pierrel Research Europe GmbH, Labor Dr. Spranger (Central lab)
- Investigators
- Margitta Worm, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Charite University, Berlin, GermanyAngelika Sager, Dr., Study chair, Leti Pharma GmbH, Witten, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01144429
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 603-PG-PSC-173
- Other IDs
- 2008-008448-26, 2008
- Status last verified
- Jun 2011
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, DB, Parallel Group, MC Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Four Doses of Depigmented Glutaraldehyde Polymerized Birch Pollen Allergenic Extract (Depigoid Birch) in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Intermittent Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01144429
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 603-PG-PSC-173
- Keywords
- Allergic Rhinitis +- intermittent asthma, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis +- intermittent asthma, Specific Immunotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 344 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Leti Pharma GmbHIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Laboratorios LETI SL (Study Medication), Pierrel Research Europe GmbH, Labor Dr. Spranger (Central lab)
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- Feb 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Specific immunotherapy for subcutaneous application: Dose finding study to evaluate the correct dose.
4 concentrations of a birch pollen allergen extract are applied in this study. Duration of therapy 20 weeks. Primary criterion is the Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT), i.e. comparison between treatment arms of increased amount of quantities of allergen to provoke a positive CPT at the end of treatment.
Detailed description
This is a dose finding study and no therapeutic study. Patients will receive in 4-weekly intervals 5x injections of 0,5 ml of a solution of modified birch pollen extract outside the pollen season. The primary endpoint therefore is not the therapeutic effect of the specific immunotherapy (effect on symptoms of allergy during the birch pollen season) but the effect on the CPT. Acc. to the EMEA "Guideline on clinical development of products for specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic diseases" provocation tests are accepted as primary outcomes for dose-finding studies.
For the CPT increasing doses of birch pollen solutions are applied to the eye and characteristic symptoms (eye redness, weeping, itching or burning and nose dripping/blockage) are assessed: 0 = absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). At a score value of >= 5/concentration the test is considered positive and finished.
It is expected that at the end of the study higher doses are necessary to provoke a positive CPT.
Furthermore comparative evaluation of the safety data (AEs) in the different dosage groups is a very important parameter for the evaluation of the outcome of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 100 DPP/mL | Active comparator | Biological: Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% BirchConcentration of solution fo s.c. injection: 100 DPP/mL |
| 1000 DPP/mL | Active comparator | Biological: Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% BirchConcentration of solution fo s.c. injection: 1000 DPP/mL |
| 5000 DPP/mL | Active comparator | Biological: Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% BirchConcentration of solution fo s.c. injection: 5000 DPP/mL |
| 10000 DPP/mL | Active comparator | Biological: Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% BirchConcentration of solution fo s.c. injection: 10000 DPP/mL |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patients have provided an appropriately signed and dated informed consent prior to any study specific examination,
- Patients must be ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years of age at Visit 1,
- Patients must have a perception of disease activity of at least 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS),
- Patients must have an FEV1 or PEF value > 80% of the predicted normal value (for PEF: highest result of 3 measurements),
- Patients must complain about allergic rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms for at least 2 years with or without intermittent asthma symptoms, caused by clinical sensitization against birch pollen,
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Acute and chronic conjunctivitis,
- Infectious conjunctivitis,
- History of significant clinical manifestations of allergy as a result of sensitization against grass or weed pollen and perennial allergens (e.g. house dust mites),
- Symptoms due to co-allergies,
- Persistent asthma, according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guidelines,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% BirchAlso: Depigoid (R), Depigmented, glutaraldehyd-polymerized allergenic extract ofSubcutaneous injections Build-up = 1 day: 0,1mL + 0,2mL + 0,2mL s.c. in intervals on 30 minutes; Maintenance = 5 x single injection of 0,5 mL s.c. every 4 weeks | Biological | 100 DPP/mL, 1000 DPP/mL, 10000 DPP/mL, 5000 DPP/mL |
Primary outcome
Conjunctival Provocation Test
Time frame: At screening and after approx 22 weeks (EoS)
Comparison between dosage groups of percentage of patients who need an increased amount of allergen to provoke a positive CPT at the end of the treatment (comparison of slope of efficacy) It is expected that at the end of the study higher doses are necessary to provoke a positive CPT. Acc. to the EMEA "Guideline on clinical development of products for specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic diseases" provocation tests are accepted as primary outcomes for dose-finding studies.
8 secondary outcomes
Laboratory parameters (immunology)
Time frame: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Conjunctival Provocation Test
Time frame: after approx. 22 weeks
Laboratory (hematological, clinical chemistry, immunological) as a measure of safety
Time frame: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Overall assessment of safety (tolerability)at the end of the study
Time frame: after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time frame: at 4-weekly intervals (retrospectively at study visits)
Vital signs: Blood pressure and Heart rate as a measure of safety
Time frame: At screening and every study visit (4-weekly)
Patient diary: Allergy specific symptoms and concomitant medication (rescue m.) for 48 hrs after application of study medication
Time frame: 48 hrs every 4 weeks after each application of study medication
Physical examination acc to local procedures as a measure of safety
Time frame: At screening and after approx. 22 weeks (EoS)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2011.
Related trials for Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of SLIT in Patients With Rhinitis/RC With/Without Mild-moderate Asthma, Due to Dpt and/or Df
Rhinitis, Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of the Treatment of Allergy Against Cupressaceae and Grasses.
Rhinitis, Allergic, Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation for the Treatment of Allergy Against Mites
Rhinitis, Allergic, Rhinoconjunctivitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Polymerized, Mannan-Conjugated Dermatophagoides Allergen Extract
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Margitta Worm, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Angelika Sager, Dr. study chair
Leti Pharma GmbH, Witten, Germany
39 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Allergoid, allergenic extract of 100% Birch in people with Allergic Rhinitis and/or Rhinoconjunctivitis +- Asthma and Immunotherapy, Allergen, run by Leti Pharma GmbH at 39 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in Germany, Poland, Lithuania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Conjunctival Provocation Test (time frame: At screening and after approx 22 weeks (EoS)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2011.