AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical RadiculopathyNCT01144923

Conservative Therapy Versus Epidural Steroids for Cervical Radiculopathy

A study testing Gabapentin and/or Nortriptyline, Physical therapy, Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) and Combination treatment in people with Cervical Radiculopathy, run by Johns Hopkins University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of this study is to determine whether interventional treatment (i.e. epidural steroids), conservative therapy, or the combination, is superior for cervical radiculopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Radiculopathy
What is being tested?
Gabapentin and/or Nortriptyline, Physical therapy, Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) and Combination treatment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
169 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2010to Nov 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Cervical radicular pain based on history and physical exam (e.g. pain radiating into one or both extremities, sensory loss, muscle weakness, Spurling's test etc.)
  • NRS arm pain score > 3
  • MRI evidence of disc pathology consistent with symptoms

Who cannot join

  • Untreated coagulopathy
  • Previous spine surgery
  • No MRI study
  • Arm pain > 4 years duration
  • Epidural steroid injection within past 3 years
  • Radiculopathy not resulting from disc pathology (e.g. foraminal stenosis or tumor)
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Signs or symptoms or myelopathy or spinal cord compression
  • Previous failed trials with gabapentin or pregabalin, and nortriptyline or amitriptyline
  • Allergic reactions to gabapentin or nortriptyline
  • Referrals from surgery for diagnostic injections for surgical evaluation
  • Serious medical (e.g. congestive heart failure) or psychiatric (untreated depression) condition that might preclude optimal outcome
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

  • Walter Reed Army Medical Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Comparative-effectiveness Study Comparing Epidural Steroid Injections to Conservative Management With Medications and Physical Therapy in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy

The main objective of this study is to determine whether interventional treatment (i.e. epidural steroids), conservative therapy, or the combination, is superior for cervical radiculopathy. One hundred and sixty eight patients with radicular neck pain will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either cervical epidural steroid injections (CESI), non-interventional management with physical therapy and medications, or a combination of the two. The first follow-up visit will be at 1-month. In patients who obtain some benefit but continue to report significant pain, either a 2nd CESI can be done, the patient's medications can be adjusted, or both in the combination group. Those patients who fail to obtain any benefit will exit the study to receive another treatment or alternative care. The second follow-up visit will be at 3-months. Similar to the 1-month follow-up, the doctor may elect to change nothing in patients who are satisfied, adjust medications, schedule the patient for another CESI, or do both in the combination group. Patients who fail to obtain any benefit can exit the study to receive alternative treatment. The final follow-up visit will be at 6 months.

Being tested
Gabapentin and/or Nortriptyline, Physical therapy, Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI), Combination treatment
Keywords
epidural steroid injection, neck pain, pharmacotherapy, radiculopathy
Medical subject headings
Radiculopathy, Neck Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Gabapentin and/or Nortriptyline, Physical therapyOther

    Nortriptyline up to 125 mg po qhs, and / or Gabapentin up to 1200 mg po q8h, Physical therapy (e.g. range of motion, strengthening, therapeutic massage, TENS)

  • Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI)Procedure or surgery

    Series of up to 3 cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI) with depo-methylprednisolone

  • Combination treatmentOther

    Series of up to 3 cervical epidural steroid injections with depo- methylprednisolone plus Nortriptyline up to 125 mg po qhs and /or Gabapentin up to 1200 mg po q8h, and Physical therapy (e.g. TENS, exercise, range of motion)

Study groups in NCT01144923
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conservative treatmentActive comparatorPharmacotherapy with nortriptyline and/ or gabapentin, physical therapy (e.g. range of motion, therapeutic massage, strengthening exercises), and possibly others (e.g. acupuncture)
Receives: Other: Gabapentin and/or Nortriptyline, Physical therapy
Epidural SteroidsExperimentalA series of up to 3 epidural steroid injections (ESI)with depo-methylprednisolone
Receives: Procedure: Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI)
Combination TreatmentExperimentalThese patients will receive both treatments. They can have up to 3 epidural steroid injections (ESI) with depo-methylprednisolone, and conservative treatment (i.e. pharmacotherapy with nortriptyline and/ or gabapentin, and physical therapy)
Receives: Other: Combination treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. numerical rating scale (NRS) arm pain scores

    arm pain on a 0-10 scale

    Measured: 1 month after treatment

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. NRS Arm pain

    0-10 scale

    Measured: 3 months

  2. NRS arm pain

    0-10 scale

    Measured: 6 months

  3. NRS neck pain

    0-10 scale

    Measured: 1- month

  4. NRS neck pain

    0-10 scale

    Measured: 3 months

  5. NRS neck pain

    0-10 scale

    Measured: 6 months

  6. medication reduction

    Cessation of non-opioid analgesic and/ or > 20% decrease in opioid consumption

    Measured: 1-6 months

  7. Global perceived effect

    categorical variable assessing "satisfaction" with treatment

    Measured: 1-6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionNov 2013
  4. Study completionNov 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
169 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01144923
Sponsor's protocol ID
NA_00036062
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
14 Jun 2010
Last updated
24 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy JD, Guzman J, Cote P, Haldeman S, Ammendolia C, Carragee E, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso P; Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S39-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816454c8.

    PubMed 18204398
  • Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Cheng I, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Guzman J, Peloso P, Holm LW, Cote P, Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S; Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Treatment of neck pain: injections and surgical interventions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S153-69. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816445ea.

    PubMed 18204388
  • Hurwitz EL, Carragee EJ, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Guzman J, Peloso PM, Holm LW, Cote P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S; Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Treatment of neck pain: noninvasive interventions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S123-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181644b1d.

    PubMed 18204386

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Gabapentin and/or Nortriptyline, Physical therapy, Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) and Combination treatment in people with Cervical Radiculopathy, run by Johns Hopkins University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

numerical rating scale (NRS) arm pain scores (time frame: 1 month after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01144923, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in