AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV-1 InfectionPhase 3NCT01145417

Pregabalin Trial In HIV Neuropathic Pain

A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin (Lyrica) in people with HIV-1 Infection and Neuropathic Pain, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 29 sites in 7 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study examines the safety of pregabalin over a 6 month period in patients with neuropathic pain associated with HIV infection as an extension of another trial that tests the efficacy of pregabalin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
HIV-1 Infection, Neuropathic Pain
What is being tested?
pregabalin (Lyrica)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
217 participants
Where
29 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
Jul 2010to May 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects who participated in the preceding A0081244 double-blind trial and completed at least through Visit 9 of that trial.
  • Subjects with painful distal sensory polyneuropathy (DSP) interested in treatment based on investigator's clinical judgment.
  • Subjects who had acceptable tolerability of study drug in A0081244.

Who cannot join

  • Clinically significant or unstable conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise participation in the study. This includes, for example, medical conditions such as, but not limited to: hepatic, renal, respiratory, hematological, immunological, cardiovascular diseases, arrhythmia, inflammatory or rheumatologic disease, active infections, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, psychiatric illness, and untreated endocrine disorders.
  • Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Active Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)- defining Opportunistic Infection (OI) that requires hospitalization.

Trial locations and contacts

29 sites in 7 countries.

29 sites in 7 countries

United States10 sites
  • Neuroscience Consultants, LLC

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • South Florida Medical Research

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Providence Clinical Research

    Burbank, California, 91505

  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Desert Medical Group, Inc., dba Desert Oasis Healthcare Medical Group

    Palm Springs, California, 92262

  • Desert Medical Group, Inc., dba Desert Oasis Helathcare Medical Group

    Palm Springs, California, 92262

  • Southwest Center for HIV/AIDS

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85006

  • Arizona Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85023

  • University of California San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Stanford University Medical Center

    Stanford, California, 94305

Other trials in United States

South Africa10 sites
  • Worthwhile Clinical Trials (WWCT), Lake View Hospital

    Benoni, Gauteng, 1500

  • University of Cape Town

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925

  • Synapta Clinical Research Centre

    Durban, 4001

  • Toga Laboratory

    Johannesburg, Gauteng, 1610

  • Drs Essack and Mitha

    Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2113

  • Dr J. Reddy's Surgery

    KwaDukuza, KwaZulu-Natal, 4450

  • Paarl Research Center

    Paarl, 7626

  • Be Part Yoluntu Centre

    Paarl, 7646

  • MediSynergy

    Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, 6065

  • Pretoria West Hospital

    Pretoria West, Gauteng, 0117

Other trials in South Africa

India3 sites
  • Infectious Disease Clinic

    Ahemdabad, Gujarat, 380 009

  • Surakshaka Multispeciality Hospital

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 072

  • Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre

    Pune, Maharashtra, 411 004

Other trials in India

Colombia2 sites
  • Asistencia Cientifica de Alta Complejidad

    Bogota, Cundinamarca, 0000

  • Riesgo de Fractura S.A.

    Bogota D.C., Cundinamarca

Other trials in Colombia

Thailand2 sites
  • South East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii

    Bangkok, 10330

  • Neurology unit, Department of Medicine,

    Bangkok, 10400

Other trials in Thailand

Peru1 site
  • Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo

    Lima, L 01

Other trials in Peru

Puerto Rico1 site
  • RCMI-Clinical Research Center

    Rio Piedras, 00935

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Extension Safety Trial Of Pregabalin In Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy (Pregabalin A0081251)

This study examines the safety of pregabalin over a 6 month period in patients with neuropathic pain associated with HIV infection as an extension of another trial that tests the efficacy of pregabalin.

Read the detailed description

The parent double blind study was stopped at interim analysis due to lack of efficacy and therefore this open label extension study was also terminated simultaneously on April 2, 2012; the termination was unrelated to any safety findings that could impact patient health.

Being tested
pregabalin (Lyrica)
Keywords
peripheral neuropathic pain, pregabalin, safety
Medical subject headings
Neuralgia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pregabalin (Lyrica)Drug

    150 mg-600 mg/day (twice daily)

Study groups in NCT01145417
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pregabalin (Lyrica)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: pregabalin (Lyrica)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain. Number of participants who responded "Yes/No" to Question 1: Are you currently employed (working for pay)? are reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 2 and 3 assesses absenteeism as: Hours of work missed in past 7 days due to leg/foot pain or other reason, respectively. Question 4 assesses presenteeism as: Hours of work performed in past 7 days.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  3. Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

    WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 5 and 6 assesses: How much leg/foot pain affect productivity and daily activity, respectively in past 7 days? on 11-point scale, where 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  4. 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social (So) functioning (Fn), physical and emotional role (role-physical [R-P], role-emotional [R-E]) limitations, bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (Vit), mental health (MnH). Two summary scores include Physical Component (Ph C) and Mental Component (Mn C). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores. Score range for domain scores and summary scores: 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  5. Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS-pain)

    Participants rated the severity of HIV neuropathy pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  6. Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

    PGI-C: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status since the start of the study, on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category are reported.

    Measured: Week 24

  7. Number of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories

    S-STS:8-item clinician/participant administered prospective rating scale to assess TE suicidal(Su) ideation(ID),behavior(BHV).Items 1a,2-6,7a,8 scored on 5-point Likert scale 0(not at all) to 4(extremely). Items 1,1b,7 require yes/no response. S-STS total score range 0-30. Lower score=reduced Su tendency. Responses on S-STS were mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment(C-CASA) as 1:Completed Su; 2: Su attempt; 3: Preparatory acts; 4: Su ID; 5: Self-injurious (SI) BHV, intent unknown; 6: Not enough information; 7: SI BHV, no Su intent; 8: Other, no deliberate self harm.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 25

  8. Number of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)

    PHQ-8: 8-item self-administered validated subset of PHQ-9, which comprises first 8 items of measure. Participant rated "Over past 2 weeks, how often bothered by any of following problems?": little interest in doing things(1); feeling down(2); trouble falling or staying asleep/sleeping too much(3); feeling tired(4); poor appetite/overeating(5); feeling bad about self(6); trouble concentrating(7); moving or speaking slowly or being so fidgety/moving around more than usual(8). Each item scored on scale of 0(not at all)-3(nearly every day). Total score range: 0-24, higher score=greater severity.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionMay 2012

Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
217 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01145417
Sponsor's protocol ID
A0081251
Status last verified
May 2013
First submitted
7 Jun 2010
Last updated
28 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Simpson DM, Rice AS, Emir B, Landen J, Semel D, Chew ML, Sporn J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and open-label extension study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with human immunodeficiency virus neuropathy. Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

    PubMed 24907403

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin (Lyrica) in people with HIV-1 Infection and Neuropathic Pain, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 29 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 29 sites in United States, South Africa, India, Colombia, Thailand and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jun 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01145417, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in