Liver Transplant RecipientPhase 3NCT01150097
Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients
A Phase 3 study testing Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus), Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus) and Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination) in people with Liver Transplant Recipient, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 57 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The reason for this extension is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of two concentration-controlled everolimus regimen in de novo liver transplant recipients. The most important long-term safety assessments include evaluation of renal function, progression of HCV related allograft fibrosis, and other… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Transplant Recipient
- What is being tested?
- Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus), Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus) and Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 284 participants
- Where
- 57 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2010to 3 May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent
- Ability and willingness to adhere to study regimen
- Completed core study with assigned regimen;
Who cannot join
- Patients fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study:
- Severe hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia.
- Low platelet count.
- Low white blood cell count.
- Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Systemic infection requiring active use of IV antibiotics.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patients in a critical care setting.
- Use of prohibited medication.
- Use of immunosuppressive agents not utilized in the protocol.
- Hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or similar drugs.
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
- Women of child-bearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
57 sites in 16 countries.
57 sites in 16 countries
United States15 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Novartis Investigative Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Novartis Investigative Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Novartis Investigative Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77030-2400
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Novartis Investigative Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10016
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10032
Novartis Investigative Site
Newark, New Jersey, 07101
Novartis Investigative Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Novartis Investigative Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Novartis Investigative Site
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Novartis Investigative Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007-2197
Germany7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45147
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 20246
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, 69120
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04103
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, 55131
Novartis Investigative Site
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053
France6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, 33076
Novartis Investigative Site
Clichy, 92110
Novartis Investigative Site
Créteil, 94010
Novartis Investigative Site
Marseille, 13385
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, 34295
Novartis Investigative Site
Villejuif, 94805
Italy5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20162
Novartis Investigative Site
Modena, MO, 41124
Novartis Investigative Site
Pisa, PI, 56124
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00161
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, 10126
Spain5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46026
Australia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5041
Novartis Investigative Site
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Belgium3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, 9000
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Novartis Investigative Site
Liège, 4000
Argentina2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1118AAT
Novartis Investigative Site
San Martín, Buenos Aires, C1107BEA
Brazil2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21041-030
Colombia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bogotá
Novartis Investigative Site
Cali, Valle del Cauca Department
Russia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 123182
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 129010
About this study
Official title: Extension Study to the Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study CRAD001H2304 to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Concentration-controlled Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipient
The reason for this extension is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of two concentration-controlled everolimus regimen in de novo liver transplant recipients. The most important long-term safety assessments include evaluation of renal function, progression of HCV related allograft fibrosis, and other treatment related effects at Month 36 post-transplantation compared to extension baseline (Months 24 post-transplantation).
- Conditions
- Liver Transplant Recipient
- Being tested
- Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus), Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus), Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination), Everolimus (tacrolimus elimination), Tacrolimus (tacrolimus control)
- Keywords
- Liver transplantation, Everolimus, Calcineurin inhibitors, Tacrolimus, Renal function, Progression of HCV related allograft fibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus)Drug
Also called FK-506,, fujimycin,, Prograf,, Advagraf,
After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization, a level which was maintained for the duration of the study.
Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus)Drug
Also called RAD001,, Zortress,, Certican,, Afinitor
Everolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL for the duration of the study.
Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination)Drug
Also called FK-506,, fujimycin,, Prograf,, Advagraf,
After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization. Tacrolimus elimination was started beginning at Month 4. Tacrolimus was tapered after everolimus whole blood trough levels were within the target range of 6-10 ng/mL. Tacrolimus was completely eliminated by the end of Month 4.
Everolimus (tacrolimus elimination)Drug
Also called RAD001,, Zortress,, Certican,, Afinitor
Everolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL until Month 4; beginning with Month 4, the dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 6-10 ng/mL.
Tacrolimus (tacrolimus control)Drug
Also called FK-506,, fujimycin,, Prograf,, Advagraf,
Tacrolimus trough levels were targeted to be maintained at 8-12 ng/mL until Month 4. At Month 4, tacrolimus whole blood trough levels were decreased to a target trough level of 6-10 ng/mL for the remainder of the study.
CorticosteroidsDrug
For patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6. The corticosteroids were not specified in the protocol because they were adminsitered to the participants according to local practice as part of standard of care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus + reduced tacrolimus | Experimental | Participants were maintained on whole blood trough levels of 3 - 8 ng/mL everolimus and 3 - 5 ng/mL tacrolimus. Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus); Drug: Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus); Drug: Corticosteroids |
| Tacrolimus elimination | Experimental | Participants were maintained on a whole blood trough level of 6 - 10 ng/mL everolimus. Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination); Drug: Everolimus (tacrolimus elimination); Drug: Corticosteroids |
| Tacrolimus control | Active comparator | Participants were maintained on a whole blood trough level of 6 - 10 ng/mL tacrolimus. Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus (tacrolimus control); Drug: Corticosteroids |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death
The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
Measured: from months 24 to 36
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death
The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
Measured: from months 36 to 48
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death
The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
Measured: from months 24 to 36
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death
The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
Measured: from months 36 - 48
Change in Renal Function
Change in renal function was assessed by the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the abbreviated (4 variables) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) formula which was developed by the MDRD Study Group and has been validated in patients with chronic kidney disease. The MDRD-4 formula used for the eGFR calculation is: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R, where C is the serum concentration of creatinine (mg/dL), A is age (years), G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1.
Measured: from months 24 to 36
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence Rate of tBPAR
The number of participants who had a tBPAR was analyzed. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection.
Measured: from months 24 - 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study start31 Mar 2010
- Primary completion3 May 2013
- Study completion3 May 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Liver Transplant RecipientStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 284 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01150097
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRAD001H2304E1
- Other IDs
- 2009-017311-15, 2009
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 23 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Extension Study to the Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study CRAD001H2304 to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Concentration-controlled Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipient
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01150097
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRAD001H2304E1
- Conditions
- Liver Transplant Recipient
- Keywords
- Liver transplantation, Everolimus, Calcineurin inhibitors, Tacrolimus, Renal function, Progression of HCV related allograft fibrosis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 284 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The reason for this extension is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of two concentration-controlled everolimus regimen in de novo liver transplant recipients. The most important long-term safety assessments include evaluation of renal function, progression of HCV related allograft fibrosis, and other treatment related effects at Month 36 post-transplantation compared to extension baseline (Months 24 post-transplantation).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Everolimus + reduced tacrolimus | Experimental | Drug: Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus), Drug: Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus), Drug: CorticosteroidsParticipants were maintained on whole blood trough levels of 3 - 8 ng/mL everolimus and 3 - 5 ng/mL tacrolimus. |
| Tacrolimus elimination | Experimental | Drug: Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination), Drug: Everolimus (tacrolimus elimination), Drug: CorticosteroidsParticipants were maintained on a whole blood trough level of 6 - 10 ng/mL everolimus. |
| Tacrolimus control | Active comparator | Drug: Tacrolimus (tacrolimus control), Drug: CorticosteroidsParticipants were maintained on a whole blood trough level of 6 - 10 ng/mL tacrolimus. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Written informed consent
- Ability and willingness to adhere to study regimen
- Completed core study with assigned regimen;
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study:
- Severe hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia.
- Low platelet count.
- Low white blood cell count.
- Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus)Also: FK-506,, fujimycin,, Prograf,, Advagraf,After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization, a level which was maintained for the duration of the study. | Drug | Everolimus + reduced tacrolimus |
| Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus)Also: RAD001,, Zortress,, Certican,, AfinitorEverolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL for the duration of the study. | Drug | Everolimus + reduced tacrolimus |
| Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination)Also: FK-506,, fujimycin,, Prograf,, Advagraf,After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization. Tacrolimus elimination was started beginning at Month 4. Tacrolimus was tapered after everolimus whole blood trough levels were within the target range of 6-10 ng/mL. Tacrolimus was completely eliminated by the end of Month 4. | Drug | Tacrolimus elimination |
| Everolimus (tacrolimus elimination)Also: RAD001,, Zortress,, Certican,, AfinitorEverolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL until Month 4; beginning with Month 4, the dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 6-10 ng/mL. | Drug | Tacrolimus elimination |
| Tacrolimus (tacrolimus control)Also: FK-506,, fujimycin,, Prograf,, Advagraf,Tacrolimus trough levels were targeted to be maintained at 8-12 ng/mL until Month 4. At Month 4, tacrolimus whole blood trough levels were decreased to a target trough level of 6-10 ng/mL for the remainder of the study. | Drug | Tacrolimus control |
| CorticosteroidsFor patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6. The corticosteroids were not specified in the protocol because they were adminsitered to the participants according to local practice as part of standard of care. | Drug | Everolimus + reduced tacrolimus, Tacrolimus control, Tacrolimus elimination |
Primary outcome
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death
Time frame: from months 24 to 36
The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death
Time frame: from months 36 to 48
The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death
Time frame: from months 24 to 36
The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death
Time frame: from months 36 - 48
The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.
Change in Renal Function
Time frame: from months 24 to 36
Change in renal function was assessed by the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the abbreviated (4 variables) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) formula which was developed by the MDRD Study Group and has been validated in patients with chronic kidney disease. The MDRD-4 formula used for the eGFR calculation is: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R, where C is the serum concentration of creatinine (mg/dL), A is age (years), G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1.
1 secondary outcome
Incidence Rate of tBPAR
Time frame: from months 24 - 36
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Liver Transplant Recipient
Active, not recruiting
Leveraging Technology to Improve Medication Adherence in Youth With Kidney or Liver Transplant
Transplant;Failure,Kidney, Transplant; Failure, Liver
Recruiting
Peer Support for Liver Transplant Recipients With History of ALD
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol Related Liver Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Biomarker-guided Reduction of Immunosuppression in Liver Transplant Recipients (BRITRE)
Liver Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Semaglutide vs Sitagliptin
Liver Transplant; Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
Multidisciplinary Non-Pharmacological Intervention to Improve Quality of Life in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Heart Transplant Patients, Kidney Transplant Patients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
57 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus), Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus) and Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination) in people with Liver Transplant Recipient, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 57 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 57 sites in United States, Germany, France, Italy, Spain and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death (time frame: from months 24 to 36). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2018.