AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal NeoplasmsNCT01151839

A Trial to Compare Preoperative Chemoradiation and Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Oesophagus

A study testing Esophagectomy and Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery in people with Esophageal Neoplasms, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Carcinoma of the esophagus is the among the most common cancers in Indian population. While adenocarcinoma is more common in western countries, in India squamous cell carcinoma is the more frequent form. Surgery is the standard treatment in resectable lesions, but survival is poor. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Esophageal Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Esophagectomy and Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
Jun 2010to Jul 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age < 65 years
  • Squamous cell carcinoma
  • Good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] grades 0, 1 and 2)
  • Contrast enhanced computerized tomographic (CECT) scan suggesting a potentially resectable lesion. The features of resectability assessed on CECT scan will include - no evidence of infiltration of mediastinal structures such as the aorta (angle of contact <900, no obliteration of the triangular fat space between the esophagus, aorta, and spine), and pericardium20, and no evidence of tracheobronchial fistula or tumor extension into the airway lumen.
  • No evidence of distant metastasis on CECT.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refused consent for the study
  • Comorbid conditions which would preclude oesophagectomy
  • Poor performance status (ECOG > 2)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV
  • Metastatic disease detected on evaluation
  • Involvement of mediastinal structures except
  • Carcinoma involving cervical esophagus
  • Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Nikhil -, MS contact

91-9654055630

drnkhl@gmail.com

India1 site, 1 recruiting
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110029

    Nikhil, MS, 91-9654055630, drnkhl@gmail.com

    Nikhil -, MS

    Recruiting

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Preoperative Chemoradiation and Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Oesophagus - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Carcinoma of the esophagus is the among the most common cancers in Indian population. While adenocarcinoma is more common in western countries, in India squamous cell carcinoma is the more frequent form. Surgery is the standard treatment in resectable lesions, but survival is poor. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment therapy is used with an aim to improve the results. Though few randomized trials have addressed the issue of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the methodology was inhomogeneous and the populations studied were different. The investigators will be conducting a randomized controlled trial in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery will be compared with surgery alone.

Being tested
Esophagectomy, Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery
Keywords
Esophagus, squamous cell carcinoma, neoadjuvant chemoradiation
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EsophagectomyProcedure or surgery

    Patient with squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus will be treated with surgery alone

  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Patient with squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus will be treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery

Study groups in NCT01151839
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Surgery AloneActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Esophagectomy
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgeryActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Resectability rate

    To compare the resectability rate of carcinoma esophagus between patients randomized to surgery alone and neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery

    Measured: 2 years

  2. postoperative morbidity

    To compare the postoperative morbidity between patients of carcinoma esophagus randomized to surgery alone versus chemoradiation followed by surgery

    Measured: 2 Years

  3. operative mortality

    To compare the operative mortality between patients randomized to surgery alone and neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery.

    Measured: 2 Years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Early disease control

    To compare the early disease control in patients randomized to receive either neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery or surgery alone.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Treatment toxicity

    This study will also assess the treatment toxicity of preoperative chemoradiation

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionJul 2012 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01151839
Sponsor's protocol ID
IESC/T-186/2010
Status last verified
Jun 2010
First submitted
25 Jun 2010
Last updated
12 Jul 2010
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Esophagectomy and Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery in people with Esophageal Neoplasms, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Nikhil -, MS (91-9654055630, drnkhl@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Resectability rate (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in