GastroscopyNCT01154530
Chlorhexidine Mouthwash and Bacterial Contamination During Endoscopy
A study testing Chlorhexidine in people with Gastroscopy, run by Herlev Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Background: Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is a surgical technique that has been rapidly evolving over the last five years. The technique probably has a great potential in surgical gastroenterology, urology and gynaecology. The technique is based on the idea of minimally invasive surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastroscopy
- What is being tested?
- Chlorhexidine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult men and women over 18 years referred to gastroscopy in an outpatient setting.
- Danish speaking.
- Written informed consent after verbal and written information.
Who cannot join
- Feeding tube, or the use of a gastric or duodenal tube in the week prior to inclusion.
- Gastroscopy in the week prior to inclusion.
- Removable prosthetic teeth.
- Use of antiseptic mouthwash in the week prior to inclusion.
- Gastroenteroanastomosis.
- Gastrocystotomy.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Stents in oesophagus / stomach / duodenum / pancreatic or hepatic ducts.
- Known cancer in esophagus / stomach / duodenum / pancreas.
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy / Percutaneous Ultrasonic Gastrostomy
- Known infection or in antibiotic treatment.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Herlev Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterology
Herlev, 2730
About this study
Official title: Chlorhexidine Mouthwash and Bacterial Contamination During Endoscopy. Implementation of Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Before Transgastric NOTES
Background:
Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is a surgical technique that has been rapidly evolving over the last five years. The technique probably has a great potential in surgical gastroenterology, urology and gynaecology.
Read more
The technique is based on the idea of minimally invasive surgery. The human organism is affected by a stress response when exposed to surgery. This stress response can be minimized by reducing the size of the openings whereby the surgeon gains access to the organs. This affects how quickly a patient recovers after surgery and can be discharged and resumes daily life and work. The same principal have been responsible for the surgical evolution in the last 15-20 years where many procedures have gone from traditional open operations with large incisions in the abdominal wall to laparoscopic surgery with cameras through small holes in the abdominal wall.
The latest addition to minimal invasive surgery is NOTES. Here the surgeon gains access to the abdominal organs with flexible endoscopes through the body's natural openings i.e. the mouth and stomach. With this technique the surgeon avoids cutting through skin and muscle of the abdominal wall, thus minimizing the surgical stress response. This minimizes postoperative pain, the incidence of incisional hernias, eliminates wound infection, and properly prevents scar tissue formation inside the abdominal cavity which way lead to ileus. The end result is a quicker discharge and a better cosmetic result.
It has been shown in numerous animal studies that NOTES is feasible and in recent years a rapidly increasing number of published patient series.
However, there is a risk of infection associated with accessing the abdominal cavity through a natural body opening, which initially is unclean and can not be disinfected in the same way as the skin of the abdominal wall.
Numerous microbiological pig studies have shown that there is transfer of bacteria from the body opening (i.e. mouth) to the abdominal cavity when performing NOTES, but this contamination have no correlation to infection after surgery, neither in terms of healing or survival.
It is unclear from the literature whether patients should be offered proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to reduce the acidity of the stomach before NOTES interventions. The rationale has been that such a treatment can make the gastric juices less acidic and thereby reduce the incidence of chemical peritonitis, which can occur when acidic juices flows from the stomach and into the abdominal cavity. It is known however that the acidic environment of the stomach provides a natural barrier for bacteria. Making the gastric juices less acidic could potentially increase the risk of bacterial peritonitis.
It is known that the bacterial content of the stomach is low due the acidic environment but bacteria passed down from the mouth and throat with the endoscope could potentially result in bacterial peritonitis.
That bacteria from the throat can lead to infections due to instrumentation is known from intensive care units. Ventilated patients may risk getting pneumonia with bacteria from the throat. Several studies have shown that using mouthwash with a chlorhexidine solution can reduce the risk of ventilator associated pneumonia.
Hypothesis:
Mouthwash with 2 cl 0,2% chlorhexidine solution before a gastroscopy reduces the bacterial content in cultures taken from the stomach and the endoscope after a gastroscopy.
Simultaneous PPI treatment gives higher bacterial counts in the cultures.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is a surgical technique that has been rapidly evolving over the last five years. The technique probably has a great potential in surgical gastroenterology, urology and gynaecology.
The technique is based on the idea of minimally invasive surgery. The human organism is affected by a stress response when exposed to surgery. This stress response can be minimized by reducing the size of the openings whereby the surgeon gains access to the organs. This affects how quickly a patient recovers after surgery and can be discharged and resumes daily life and work. The same principal have been responsible for the surgical evolution in the last 15-20 years where many procedures have gone from traditional open operations with large incisions in the abdominal wall to laparoscopic surgery with cameras through small holes in the abdominal wall.
The latest addition to minimal invasive surgery is NOTES. Here the surgeon gains access to the abdominal organs with flexible endoscopes through the body's natural openings i.e. the mouth and stomach. With this technique the surgeon avoids cutting through skin and muscle of the abdominal wall, thus minimizing the surgical stress response. This minimizes postoperative pain, the incidence of incisional hernias, eliminates wound infection, and properly prevents scar tissue formation inside the abdominal cavity which way lead to ileus. The end result is a quicker discharge and a better cosmetic result.
It has been shown in numerous animal studies that NOTES is feasible and in recent years a rapidly increasing number of published patient series.
However, there is a risk of infection associated with accessing the abdominal cavity through a natural body opening, which initially is unclean and can not be disinfected in the same way as the skin of the abdominal wall.
Numerous microbiological pig studies have shown that there is transfer of bacteria from the body opening (i.e. mouth) to the abdominal cavity when performing NOTES, but this contamination have no correlation to infection after surgery, neither in terms of healing or survival.
It is unclear from the literature whether patients should be offered proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to reduce the acidity of the stomach before NOTES interventions. The rationale has been that such a treatment can make the gastric juices less acidic and thereby reduce the incidence of chemical peritonitis, which can occur when acidic juices flows from the stomach and into the abdominal cavity. It is known however that the acidic environment of the stomach provides a natural barrier for bacteria. Making the gastric juices less acidic could potentially increase the risk of bacterial peritonitis.
It is known that the bacterial content of the stomach is low due the acidic environment but bacteria passed down from the mouth and throat with the endoscope could potentially result in bacterial peritonitis.
That bacteria from the throat can lead to infections due to instrumentation is known from intensive care units. Ventilated patients may risk getting pneumonia with bacteria from the throat. Several studies have shown that using mouthwash with a chlorhexidine solution can reduce the risk of ventilator associated pneumonia.
Hypothesis:
Mouthwash with 2 cl 0,2% chlorhexidine solution before a gastroscopy reduces the bacterial content in cultures taken from the stomach and the endoscope after a gastroscopy.
Simultaneous PPI treatment gives higher bacterial counts in the cultures.
Trial Participants:
Trial Participants will be recruited among patients referred to gastroscopy in an outpatient setting, at Herlev, Gentofte and Bispebjerg Hospital.
Participants must be over 18 years old regardless of gender. The participants are included after oral and written information about the trial and with written consent. The request for participation and written information about the trial is send to the patient by conventional mail. The oral information is given on the day of the gastroscopy. Inclusion in the trial has no consequences for the purpose of the gastroscopy, or on any further diagnostic procedures or treatments. Trial Participants may at any time withdraw from the trial without consequences.
Method:
Included participants are randomized by drawing a random envelope with a continuous registration number containing information on whether the patient is allocated to the intervention or control group.
Enclosed in the envelope is a registration form where the following is recorded: sex, age, weight, height, indication for gastroscopy, number of instrumentations during gastroscopy, the use of rinse and suction, and PPI treatment.
Participants in the intervention group perform a mouthwash with 2 cl 0,2% chlorhexidine for 30 seconds immediately before the gastroscopy.
Participants in the control group perform no mouthwash before the gastroscopy.
The gastroscopy is performed in accordance with the indication.
A total of 2 culture samples will be taken from each participant. The culture samples are sent to the department of clinical microbiology, Herlev Hospital for cultivation, bacterial count and typing.
The first culture sample is taken by instilling 50ml sterile saline through the instrumentation channel with the gastroscope located in the fundus of the stomach . Approximately 10ml is aspirated through the same channel in the antrum of the stomach.
The second culture sample is taken from the gastroscope after the procedure by rinsing the instrumentation channel with sterile saline. A sample of approximately 10 ml is collected at the distal end of the gastroscope.
Samples are marked with the respective continuous registration numbers according to the randomization.
Side effects, discomfort and risks:
There are no side effects associated with the use chlorhexidine mouthwash.
There is some discomfort associated with the gastroscopy. This is not a result of participation in the trial.
Many patients feel slight discomfort when the gastroscope passes through the throat. The passage can stimulate the vomiting reflex. For this reason a gastroscopy is always performed with the patient in a left lateral position to ensure free airways. There may be mild soreness and irritation in the throat during and in the first few days after the gastroscopy.
The only discomfort that is directly linked to participation in the trial is the taste of chlorhexidine mouthwash for half of the participants.
There are no risks associated with participation in the trial, although there are some risks associated with the gastroscopy itself. These are bleeding from the stomach wall and perforation of the stomach or duodenum. These complications are very rare.
Ethics:
Since the participants are recruited after referral to gastroscopy from a general practitioner the indication for the gastroscopy has already been assessed and outweighs the above mentioned rare risks.
The only discomfort that is directly related to the trail is a brief sensation of bad taste in the mouth for half of the participants.
The results gained from the trial greatly overshadow the mild discomfort associated with the taste of chlorhexidine mouthwash.
Economy:
The above mentioned trial is a part of a PhD project which tries to bridge the gap between animal studies and the implementation of NOTES in daily clinical practice.
Salaries are funded through grants from the University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital Research Council and the Capitol Region of Denmark Research Foundation for Health Research. Operating costs are founded through grants from private foundations. There is no commercial interest in or support for the project.
- Conditions
- Gastroscopy
- Being tested
- Chlorhexidine
- Keywords
- Gastroscopy, Bacteria, Chlorhexidine, General surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ChlorhexidineOther
Mouthwash with a 0,2 % chlorhexidine solution for 30 seconds
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine mouthwash | Active comparator | Participants randomized to chlorhexidine mouthwash prior to gastroscopy Receives: Other: Chlorhexidine |
| No mouthwash | No intervention | Mouthwash is not performed prior to gastroscopy as is the standard today. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quantification of culture samples
Bacterial count in the culture samples. Quantified with colony forming units (CFU).
Measured: 1 week
Secondary outcomes (2)
The influence of PPI treatment on bacterial count
To study whether ongoing PPI treatment gives higher bacterial counts in the culture samples
Measured: 1 week
Bacteria species
Classification of bacteria species in the culture samples
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completionAug 2011
- Study completionAug 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GastroscopyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Herlev Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bispebjerg Hospital, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Investigators
- Anders Meller Donatsky, MD, Principal investigator, Herlev Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterologyJacob Rosenberg, MD DSc Prof, Study director, Herlev Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterologySøren Meisner, MD, Study director, Bispebjerg Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterologyLars Nannestad Jørgensen, MD DSc prof, Study director, Bispebjerg Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterologyPeter Vilmann, MD DSc Prof, Study director, Gentofte Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01154530
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NOTES01
- Status last verified
- Dec 2010
- First submitted
- 29 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Chlorhexidine Mouthwash and Bacterial Contamination During Endoscopy. Implementation of Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Before Transgastric NOTES
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01154530
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NOTES01
- Conditions
- Gastroscopy
- Keywords
- Gastroscopy, Bacteria, Chlorhexidine, General surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Herlev HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bispebjerg Hospital, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is a surgical technique that has been rapidly evolving over the last five years. The technique probably has a great potential in surgical gastroenterology, urology and gynaecology.
The technique is based on the idea of minimally invasive surgery. The human organism is affected by a stress response when exposed to surgery. This stress response can be minimized by reducing the size of the openings whereby the surgeon gains access to the organs. This affects how quickly a patient recovers after surgery and can be discharged and resumes daily life and work. The same principal have been responsible for the surgical evolution in the last 15-20 years where many procedures have gone from traditional open operations with large incisions in the abdominal wall to laparoscopic surgery with cameras through small holes in the abdominal wall.
The latest addition to minimal invasive surgery is NOTES. Here the surgeon gains access to the abdominal organs with flexible endoscopes through the body's natural openings i.e. the mouth and stomach. With this technique the surgeon avoids cutting through skin and muscle of the abdominal wall, thus minimizing the surgical stress response. This minimizes postoperative pain, the incidence of incisional hernias, eliminates wound infection, and properly prevents scar tissue formation inside the abdominal cavity which way lead to ileus. The end result is a quicker discharge and a better cosmetic result.
It has been shown in numerous animal studies that NOTES is feasible and in recent years a rapidly increasing number of published patient series.
However, there is a risk of infection associated with accessing the abdominal cavity through a natural body opening, which initially is unclean and can not be disinfected in the same way as the skin of the abdominal wall.
Numerous microbiological pig studies have shown that there is transfer of bacteria from the body opening (i.e. mouth) to the abdominal cavity when performing NOTES, but this contamination have no correlation to infection after surgery, neither in terms of healing or survival.
It is unclear from the literature whether patients should be offered proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to reduce the acidity of the stomach before NOTES interventions. The rationale has been that such a treatment can make the gastric juices less acidic and thereby reduce the incidence of chemical peritonitis, which can occur when acidic juices flows from the stomach and into the abdominal cavity. It is known however that the acidic environment of the stomach provides a natural barrier for bacteria. Making the gastric juices less acidic could potentially increase the risk of bacterial peritonitis.
It is known that the bacterial content of the stomach is low due the acidic environment but bacteria passed down from the mouth and throat with the endoscope could potentially result in bacterial peritonitis.
That bacteria from the throat can lead to infections due to instrumentation is known from intensive care units. Ventilated patients may risk getting pneumonia with bacteria from the throat. Several studies have shown that using mouthwash with a chlorhexidine solution can reduce the risk of ventilator associated pneumonia.
Hypothesis:
Mouthwash with 2 cl 0,2% chlorhexidine solution before a gastroscopy reduces the bacterial content in cultures taken from the stomach and the endoscope after a gastroscopy.
Simultaneous PPI treatment gives higher bacterial counts in the cultures.
Detailed description
Background:
Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is a surgical technique that has been rapidly evolving over the last five years. The technique probably has a great potential in surgical gastroenterology, urology and gynaecology.
The technique is based on the idea of minimally invasive surgery. The human organism is affected by a stress response when exposed to surgery. This stress response can be minimized by reducing the size of the openings whereby the surgeon gains access to the organs. This affects how quickly a patient recovers after surgery and can be discharged and resumes daily life and work. The same principal have been responsible for the surgical evolution in the last 15-20 years where many procedures have gone from traditional open operations with large incisions in the abdominal wall to laparoscopic surgery with cameras through small holes in the abdominal wall.
The latest addition to minimal invasive surgery is NOTES. Here the surgeon gains access to the abdominal organs with flexible endoscopes through the body's natural openings i.e. the mouth and stomach. With this technique the surgeon avoids cutting through skin and muscle of the abdominal wall, thus minimizing the surgical stress response. This minimizes postoperative pain, the incidence of incisional hernias, eliminates wound infection, and properly prevents scar tissue formation inside the abdominal cavity which way lead to ileus. The end result is a quicker discharge and a better cosmetic result.
It has been shown in numerous animal studies that NOTES is feasible and in recent years a rapidly increasing number of published patient series.
However, there is a risk of infection associated with accessing the abdominal cavity through a natural body opening, which initially is unclean and can not be disinfected in the same way as the skin of the abdominal wall.
Numerous microbiological pig studies have shown that there is transfer of bacteria from the body opening (i.e. mouth) to the abdominal cavity when performing NOTES, but this contamination have no correlation to infection after surgery, neither in terms of healing or survival.
It is unclear from the literature whether patients should be offered proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to reduce the acidity of the stomach before NOTES interventions. The rationale has been that such a treatment can make the gastric juices less acidic and thereby reduce the incidence of chemical peritonitis, which can occur when acidic juices flows from the stomach and into the abdominal cavity. It is known however that the acidic environment of the stomach provides a natural barrier for bacteria. Making the gastric juices less acidic could potentially increase the risk of bacterial peritonitis.
It is known that the bacterial content of the stomach is low due the acidic environment but bacteria passed down from the mouth and throat with the endoscope could potentially result in bacterial peritonitis.
That bacteria from the throat can lead to infections due to instrumentation is known from intensive care units. Ventilated patients may risk getting pneumonia with bacteria from the throat. Several studies have shown that using mouthwash with a chlorhexidine solution can reduce the risk of ventilator associated pneumonia.
Hypothesis:
Mouthwash with 2 cl 0,2% chlorhexidine solution before a gastroscopy reduces the bacterial content in cultures taken from the stomach and the endoscope after a gastroscopy.
Simultaneous PPI treatment gives higher bacterial counts in the cultures.
Trial Participants:
Trial Participants will be recruited among patients referred to gastroscopy in an outpatient setting, at Herlev, Gentofte and Bispebjerg Hospital.
Participants must be over 18 years old regardless of gender. The participants are included after oral and written information about the trial and with written consent. The request for participation and written information about the trial is send to the patient by conventional mail. The oral information is given on the day of the gastroscopy. Inclusion in the trial has no consequences for the purpose of the gastroscopy, or on any further diagnostic procedures or treatments. Trial Participants may at any time withdraw from the trial without consequences.
Method:
Included participants are randomized by drawing a random envelope with a continuous registration number containing information on whether the patient is allocated to the intervention or control group.
Enclosed in the envelope is a registration form where the following is recorded: sex, age, weight, height, indication for gastroscopy, number of instrumentations during gastroscopy, the use of rinse and suction, and PPI treatment.
Participants in the intervention group perform a mouthwash with 2 cl 0,2% chlorhexidine for 30 seconds immediately before the gastroscopy.
Participants in the control group perform no mouthwash before the gastroscopy.
The gastroscopy is performed in accordance with the indication.
A total of 2 culture samples will be taken from each participant. The culture samples are sent to the department of clinical microbiology, Herlev Hospital for cultivation, bacterial count and typing.
The first culture sample is taken by instilling 50ml sterile saline through the instrumentation channel with the gastroscope located in the fundus of the stomach . Approximately 10ml is aspirated through the same channel in the antrum of the stomach.
The second culture sample is taken from the gastroscope after the procedure by rinsing the instrumentation channel with sterile saline. A sample of approximately 10 ml is collected at the distal end of the gastroscope.
Samples are marked with the respective continuous registration numbers according to the randomization.
Side effects, discomfort and risks:
There are no side effects associated with the use chlorhexidine mouthwash.
There is some discomfort associated with the gastroscopy. This is not a result of participation in the trial.
Many patients feel slight discomfort when the gastroscope passes through the throat. The passage can stimulate the vomiting reflex. For this reason a gastroscopy is always performed with the patient in a left lateral position to ensure free airways. There may be mild soreness and irritation in the throat during and in the first few days after the gastroscopy.
The only discomfort that is directly linked to participation in the trial is the taste of chlorhexidine mouthwash for half of the participants.
There are no risks associated with participation in the trial, although there are some risks associated with the gastroscopy itself. These are bleeding from the stomach wall and perforation of the stomach or duodenum. These complications are very rare.
Ethics:
Since the participants are recruited after referral to gastroscopy from a general practitioner the indication for the gastroscopy has already been assessed and outweighs the above mentioned rare risks.
The only discomfort that is directly related to the trail is a brief sensation of bad taste in the mouth for half of the participants.
The results gained from the trial greatly overshadow the mild discomfort associated with the taste of chlorhexidine mouthwash.
Economy:
The above mentioned trial is a part of a PhD project which tries to bridge the gap between animal studies and the implementation of NOTES in daily clinical practice.
Salaries are funded through grants from the University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital Research Council and the Capitol Region of Denmark Research Foundation for Health Research. Operating costs are founded through grants from private foundations. There is no commercial interest in or support for the project.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine mouthwash | Active comparator | Other: ChlorhexidineParticipants randomized to chlorhexidine mouthwash prior to gastroscopy |
| No mouthwash | No intervention | –Mouthwash is not performed prior to gastroscopy as is the standard today. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult men and women over 18 years referred to gastroscopy in an outpatient setting.
- Danish speaking.
- Written informed consent after verbal and written information.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Feeding tube, or the use of a gastric or duodenal tube in the week prior to inclusion.
- Gastroscopy in the week prior to inclusion.
- Removable prosthetic teeth.
- Use of antiseptic mouthwash in the week prior to inclusion.
- Gastroenteroanastomosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ChlorhexidineMouthwash with a 0,2 % chlorhexidine solution for 30 seconds | Other | Chlorhexidine mouthwash |
Primary outcome
Quantification of culture samples
Time frame: 1 week
Bacterial count in the culture samples. Quantified with colony forming units (CFU).
2 secondary outcomes
The influence of PPI treatment on bacterial count
Time frame: 1 week
Bacteria species
Time frame: 1 week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2011.
Related trials for Gastroscopy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Efficacy and Safety of OsrhCT Before Upper Endoscopy on Improving Visualization of the Gastric Mucosa.
Gastric Mucosal Lesion
Active, not recruiting
Application of Remimazolam Combined With Esketamine in Painless Gastroscopy and Colonoscopy in Elderly Patients
Gastrointestinal Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Impact of Long-term High-risk Drinking on the Effective Dose of Osselidin
Sedation
Recruiting
Effect of Prolonged Fasting Time on Gastric Residual Volume in Patients Taking GLP1 Receptor Agonists
Upper Endoscopy, GLP1-R-related Disease
RecruitingObservational study
ENDoscopic Assessment in Acute PANcreatitis Study (ENDOPAN Study)
Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anders Meller Donatsky, MD principal investigator
Herlev Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterology
Jacob Rosenberg, MD DSc Prof study director
Herlev Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterology
Søren Meisner, MD study director
Bispebjerg Hospital, Department of surgical gastroenterology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Chlorhexidine in people with Gastroscopy, run by Herlev Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quantification of culture samples (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2011.