PsoriasisNCT01155570
Special Investigation in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris and Psoriatic Arthritis (All Patients Investigation)
An observational study of Psoriasis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 634 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The survey will be conducted with regard to the following aspects of treatment with Humira (adalimumab) in patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis receiving this drug: unknown adverse drug reactions, especially clinically significant adverse reactions incidence and conditions of occurrence of adverse… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriasis
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 752 participants
- Where
- 634 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients who receive Humira for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris or psoriatic arthritis
Who may be able to join
- All patients who receive Humira for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris or psoriatic arthritis not responding to conventional treatment will be evaluated. Eligible patients should be
- those not responding to at least one type of conventional systemic treatment (including ultraviolet therapy) who have skin lesions involving 10% of body surface area or
- patients with intractable eruptions of joint signs/symptoms.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications according to the Package Insert include patients who have any of the following:
- serious infections
- tuberculosis
- a history of hypersensitivity to any ingredient of Humira
- demyelinating disease or a history of demyelinating disease
- congestive cardiac failure.
Trial locations and contacts
634 sites in 1 country.
300 sites in 1 country
Japan300 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41606
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41769
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41810
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56131
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56251
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56252
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56254
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56340
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60016
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 67150
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 68627
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41327
Aizu-Wakamatsu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41820
Akita
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41823
Akita
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41684
Amagasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41851
Amagasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41305
Anjo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41822
Aomori
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60012
Aomori
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 64811
Aomori
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41800
Asahikawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80887
Ashikaga
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80879
Ayabe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41207
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41247
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41258
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41260
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41263
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41485
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41821
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41927
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56127
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56224
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59995
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41893
Chūō
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41721
Ehime
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41724
Ehime
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41727
Ehime
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80873
Fujieda
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41287
Fujisawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41550
Fukui
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41693
Fukui
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41694
Fukui
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41697
Fukui
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41746
Fukui
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41805
Fukui
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41326
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41476
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41604
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41607
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41731
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41734
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41747
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41796
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41812
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56349
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56350
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59987
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59991
Fukuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41745
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41757
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41758
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41818
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41824
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41825
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56095
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56242
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56330
Fukushima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41301
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41302
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41306
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41309
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41322
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41774
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56103
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59989
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41830
Gunma
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56122
Gunma
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56123
Gunma
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56207
Gunma
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59986
Gunma
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59997
Gunma
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41828
Hakodate
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41303
Hamamatsu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41304
Hamamatsu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59992
Hamamatsu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80895
Hamamatsu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56135
Hannan
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56198
Higashihiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41748
Himeji
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41917
Himeji
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41668
Hirakata
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41915
Hirosaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41712
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41713
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41714
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41715
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41716
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41717
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41753
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41773
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41833
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41835
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56196
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56197
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56346
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56347
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59988
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59999
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60013
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60017
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60018
Hiroshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41827
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41829
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41832
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41837
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41838
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41842
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41844
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41847
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41852
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41929
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56109
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56206
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56327
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60014
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 64802
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 64813
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 67144
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 71456
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41481
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41683
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41687
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41691
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41750
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41771
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41846
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56142
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56143
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56144
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56146
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56342
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56343
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60015
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 67149
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41848
Ibaraki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41849
Ibaraki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41858
Ibaraki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41908
Ichikawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41293
Ichinomiya
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56229
Ichinomiya
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56333
Ichinomiya
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41696
Iijima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56137
Ikoma
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56226
Inabe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56120
Inashiki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80893
Inzai
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41740
Isahaya
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56230
Isesaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41330
Ishikawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41543
Ishikawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41695
Ishikawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41920
Ishikawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41889
Iwafune
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56348
Iwakuni
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80916
Iwakuni
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41704
Izumo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41719
Izumo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56195
Izumo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41294
Izunokuni
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41299
Izunokuni
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41300
Izunokuni
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60006
Jōetsu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41720
Kagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41725
Kagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56200
Kagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56201
Kagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41737
Kagoshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 67145
Kagoshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41283
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41284
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41451
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41452
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41815
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41854
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41856
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41862
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56098
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56250
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60011
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 64805
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 68629
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41699
Kanazawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41762
Kariya
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41461
Kashihara
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41486
Kashiwa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41482
Kawagoe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41484
Kawagoe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41784
Kawagoe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41279
Kawasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41280
Kawasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41281
Kawasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41282
Kawasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 71453
Kawasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80880
Kawasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41269
Kisarazu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41733
Kitakyushu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41735
Kitakyushu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 68626
Kitakyushu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 71454
Kitakyushu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80892
Kitakyushu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41471
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41472
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41544
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41686
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56090
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56145
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56264
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80874
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80883
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 80914
Kobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41480
Kochi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41548
Kochi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 89493
Kofu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60003
Komaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 67153
Komoro
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41817
Kōnan
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41798
Kōriyama
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41819
Kōriyama
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41262
Koshigaya
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 64808
Kōtari
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56263
Kudamatsu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56087
Kumamoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56351
Kumamoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41467
Kurashiki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41903
Kurashiki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41904
Kurashiki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41926
Kurashiki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60001
Kurashiki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41718
Kure
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41689
Kurobe
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41460
Kurume
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56202
Kurume
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41839
Kushiro
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41454
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41698
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41700
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41705
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41768
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41801
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41806
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41905
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41921
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56193
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56194
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56259
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56344
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60005
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 64807
Kyoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41831
Maebashi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41834
Maebashi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56121
Maebashi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 67263
Maebashi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59994
Maizuru
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41900
Matsumoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41901
Matsumoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41324
Matsuyama
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41723
Matsuyama
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41902
Matsuyama
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41308
Mie
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41749
Mie
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56208
Mie
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56255
Mie
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59996
Mie
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41608
Minato
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41794
Minato
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41760
Mito
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41855
Miyagi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41859
Miyagi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41861
Miyagi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41865
Miyagi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41871
Miyagi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56111
Miyagi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56112
Miyagi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56329
Miyagi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41475
Miyazaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41790
Miyazaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41791
Miyazaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41919
Miyazaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60021
Miyazaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41458
Morioka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41462
Nagakute
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41545
Nagakute
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41797
Nagano
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41863
Nagano
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41866
Nagano
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41870
Nagano
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56124
Nagano
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41464
Nagasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41728
Nagasaki
About this study
Official title: Special Investigation (All Cases Investigation in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris and Psoriatic Arthritis)
The survey will be conducted with regard to the following aspects of treatment with Humira (adalimumab) in patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis receiving this drug:
- unknown adverse drug reactions, especially clinically significant adverse reactions
- incidence and conditions of occurrence of adverse reactions in the clinical setting
- factors that may affect the safety and effectiveness of Humira.
Read the detailed description
This study was non-interventional, open-labeled, all-cases, central registration method, post marketing observational study in which Humira was prescribed for patients with psoriasis vulgaris and/or psoriatic arthritis in routine medical practice.
When investigators prescribed Humira to an eligible patient who provided informed consent, they filled out a registration form and send it to the registration center via postal mail. At the end of the 24-week observation period, an investigator filled out a case report form for each patient to describe the findings during the study period, and provided the completed form to medical representatives. Even if Humira treatment was for any reason discontinued, the investigators followed each such participant for 24 weeks after the first administration of Humira, and filled out a case report form for the participant at the end of the 24-week period.
Some participants entered this study from study NCT00647400 (M04-702), a Phase III extension study of Humira (adalimumab) in Japan.
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Keywords
- Psoriasis
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Humira | Humira 40 mg (marketed product) every other week (eow) for subcutaneous injection after initial dosage of 80 mg. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (SADRs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs
This study was mandated by the Japanese government as an approval condition for Humira in Japan; therefore, definitions of adverse events and seriousness criteria were applicable as specified in the Japanese local standard operating procedures, based on local Japanese regulations. ADRs were defined as adverse events for which the causal relationship with Humira was other than "not related" (ie, "probable," "possible," or "unclear"). The count of participants with AEs presented in this table includes serious and nonserious AEs. The count of participants with discontinuations due to AEs includes those who discontinued due to an AE plus other reasons. Please see Safety section for further details regarding adverse events.
Measured: From study registration through Week 24
Physician's Global Assessment at Week 4
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the physician's evaluation of the participant. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories:
- 0 / Clear (plaque elevation=none, scaling=none, erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration);
- 1 / Minimal (plaque elevation=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin, scaling=surface dryness with some white coloration, erythema=up to moderate);
- 2 / Mild (plaque elevation=slight, scaling=fine, erythema=up to moderate);
- 3 / Moderate (plaque elevation=moderate, scaling=coarser, erythema=moderate);
- 4 / Severe (plaque elevation=marked, scaling=coarse, erythema=severe);
- 5 / Very Severe (plaque elevation=very marked, scaling=very coarse, erythema=very severe).
Measured: Week 4
Physician's Global Assessment At Week 8
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the physician's evaluation of the participant. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories:
- 0 / Clear (plaque elevation=none, scaling=none, erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration);
- 1 / Minimal (plaque elevation=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin, scaling=surface dryness with some white coloration, erythema=up to moderate);
- 2 / Mild (plaque elevation=slight, scaling=fine, erythema=up to moderate);
- 3 / Moderate (plaque elevation=moderate, scaling=coarser, erythema=moderate);
- 4 / Severe (plaque elevation=marked, scaling=coarse, erythema=severe);
- 5 / Very Severe (plaque elevation=very marked, scaling=very coarse, erythema=very severe).
Measured: Week 8
Physician's Global Assessment at Week 16
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the physician's evaluation of the participant. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories:
- 0 / Clear (plaque elevation=none, scaling=none, erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration);
- 1 / Minimal (plaque elevation=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin, scaling=surface dryness with some white coloration, erythema=up to moderate);
- 2 / Mild (plaque elevation=slight, scaling=fine, erythema=up to moderate);
- 3 / Moderate (plaque elevation=moderate, scaling=coarser, erythema=moderate);
- 4 / Severe (plaque elevation=marked, scaling=coarse, erythema=severe);
- 5 / Very Severe (plaque elevation=very marked, scaling=very coarse, erythema=very severe).
Measured: Week 16
Physician's Global Assessment at Week 24
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the physician's evaluation of the participant. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories:
- 0 / Clear (plaque elevation=none, scaling=none, erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration);
- 1 / Minimal (plaque elevation=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin, scaling=surface dryness with some white coloration, erythema=up to moderate);
- 2 / Mild (plaque elevation=slight, scaling=fine, erythema=up to moderate);
- 3 / Moderate (plaque elevation=moderate, scaling=coarser, erythema=moderate);
- 4 / Severe (plaque elevation=marked, scaling=coarse, erythema=severe);
- 5 / Very Severe (plaque elevation=very marked, scaling=very coarse, erythema=very severe).
Measured: Week 24
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 16
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis).
Measured: Week 16
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 24
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis).
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Week 16
PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0 (best) to 72 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 16 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Week 24
PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0 (best) to 72 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 24 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16
PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0 (best) to 72 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 16 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 24
PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0 (best) to 72 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 24 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Dermatology Life Quality Index at Week 16
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much (score of 3), a lot (score of 2), a little (score of 1), or not at all (score of 0). The DLQI score ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.
Measured: Week 16
Dermatology Life Quality Index at Week 24
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much (score of 3), a lot (score of 2), a little (score of 1), or not at all (score of 0). The DLQI score ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.
Measured: Week 24
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 4
Participants assessed their pain due to psoriatic arthritis in the past week, on a single-line Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 100 (pain as bad as it could be).
Measured: Week 4
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 16
Participants assessed their pain due to psoriatic arthritis in the past week, on a single-line Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 100 (pain as bad as it could be).
Measured: Week 16
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 24
Participants assessed their pain due to psoriatic arthritis in the past week, on a single-line Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 100 (pain as bad as it could be).
Measured: Week 24
Disease Activity Score 28-4, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 4
DAS28-4 (ESR) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Week 4
Disease Activity Score 28-4, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 16
DAS28-4 (ESR) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Week 16
Disease Activity Score 28-4, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 24
DAS28-4 (ESR) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Week 24
Disease Activity Score 28-4, C-reactive Protein (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 4
DAS28-4 (CRP) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Week 4
Disease Activity Score 28-4, C-reactive Protein (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 16
DAS28-4 (CRP) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Week 16
Disease Activity Score 28-4, C-reactive Protein (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 24
DAS28-4 (CRP) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (1)
Physician's Overall Response Rating At Week 24
Overall response rating, according to investigator's subjective clinical opinion. The level of overall improvement rating was categorized as "markedly improved," "improved," "not changed," or "not assessable," comparing clinical conditions at Week 24 or at discontinuation with Baseline conditions.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionJul 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 752 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yuji Yamaguchi, MD, Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01155570
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P12-077
- Status last verified
- Sep 2013
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Special Investigation (All Cases Investigation in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris and Psoriatic Arthritis)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01155570
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P12-077
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Keywords
- Psoriasis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 752 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Oct 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The survey will be conducted with regard to the following aspects of treatment with Humira (adalimumab) in patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis receiving this drug:
- unknown adverse drug reactions, especially clinically significant adverse reactions
- incidence and conditions of occurrence of adverse reactions in the clinical setting
- factors that may affect the safety and effectiveness of Humira.
Detailed description
This study was non-interventional, open-labeled, all-cases, central registration method, post marketing observational study in which Humira was prescribed for patients with psoriasis vulgaris and/or psoriatic arthritis in routine medical practice.
When investigators prescribed Humira to an eligible patient who provided informed consent, they filled out a registration form and send it to the registration center via postal mail. At the end of the 24-week observation period, an investigator filled out a case report form for each patient to describe the findings during the study period, and provided the completed form to medical representatives. Even if Humira treatment was for any reason discontinued, the investigators followed each such participant for 24 weeks after the first administration of Humira, and filled out a case report form for the participant at the end of the 24-week period.
Some participants entered this study from study NCT00647400 (M04-702), a Phase III extension study of Humira (adalimumab) in Japan.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Humira | – | –Humira 40 mg (marketed product) every other week (eow) for subcutaneous injection after initial dosage of 80 mg. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients who receive Humira for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris or psoriatic arthritis
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- All patients who receive Humira for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris or psoriatic arthritis not responding to conventional treatment will be evaluated. Eligible patients should be
- those not responding to at least one type of conventional systemic treatment (including ultraviolet therapy) who have skin lesions involving 10% of body surface area or
- patients with intractable eruptions of joint signs/symptoms.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Contraindications according to the Package Insert include patients who have any of the following:
- serious infections
- tuberculosis
- a history of hypersensitivity to any ingredient of Humira
- demyelinating disease or a history of demyelinating disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (SADRs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs
Time frame: From study registration through Week 24
This study was mandated by the Japanese government as an approval condition for Humira in Japan; therefore, definitions of adverse events and seriousness criteria were applicable as specified in the Japanese local standard operating procedures, based on local Japanese regulations. ADRs were defined as adverse events for which the causal relationship with Humira was other than "not related" (ie, "probable," "possible," or "unclear"). The count of participants with AEs presented in this table includes serious and nonserious AEs. The count of participants with discontinuations due to AEs includes those who discontinued due to an AE plus other reasons. Please see Safety section for further details regarding adverse events.
Physician's Global Assessment at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the physician's evaluation of the participant. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: * 0 / Clear (plaque elevation=none, scaling=none, erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration); * 1 / Minimal (plaque elevation=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin, scaling=surface dryness with some white coloration, erythema=up to moderate); * 2 / Mild (plaque elevation=slight, scaling=fine, erythema=up to moderate); * 3 / Moderate (plaque elevation=moderate, scaling=coarser, erythema=moderate); * 4 / Severe (plaque elevation=marked, scaling=coarse, erythema=severe); * 5 / Very Severe (plaque elevation=very marked, scaling=very coarse, erythema=very severe).
Physician's Global Assessment At Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the physician's evaluation of the participant. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: * 0 / Clear (plaque elevation=none, scaling=none, erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration); * 1 / Minimal (plaque elevation=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin, scaling=surface dryness with some white coloration, erythema=up to moderate); * 2 / Mild (plaque elevation=slight, scaling=fine, erythema=up to moderate); * 3 / Moderate (plaque elevation=moderate, scaling=coarser, erythema=moderate); * 4 / Severe (plaque elevation=marked, scaling=coarse, erythema=severe); * 5 / Very Severe (plaque elevation=very marked, scaling=very coarse, erythema=very severe).
Physician's Global Assessment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the physician's evaluation of the participant. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: * 0 / Clear (plaque elevation=none, scaling=none, erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration); * 1 / Minimal (plaque elevation=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin, scaling=surface dryness with some white coloration, erythema=up to moderate); * 2 / Mild (plaque elevation=slight, scaling=fine, erythema=up to moderate); * 3 / Moderate (plaque elevation=moderate, scaling=coarser, erythema=moderate); * 4 / Severe (plaque elevation=marked, scaling=coarse, erythema=severe); * 5 / Very Severe (plaque elevation=very marked, scaling=very coarse, erythema=very severe).
Physician's Global Assessment at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the physician's evaluation of the participant. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: * 0 / Clear (plaque elevation=none, scaling=none, erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration); * 1 / Minimal (plaque elevation=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin, scaling=surface dryness with some white coloration, erythema=up to moderate); * 2 / Mild (plaque elevation=slight, scaling=fine, erythema=up to moderate); * 3 / Moderate (plaque elevation=moderate, scaling=coarser, erythema=moderate); * 4 / Severe (plaque elevation=marked, scaling=coarse, erythema=severe); * 5 / Very Severe (plaque elevation=very marked, scaling=very coarse, erythema=very severe).
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis).
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis).
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0 (best) to 72 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 16 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score.
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
PASI75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0 (best) to 72 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 24 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score.
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0 (best) to 72 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 16 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score.
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) score compared with the Baseline PASI score. PASI scores range from 0 (best) to 72 (worst), with the highest score representing complete erythroderma of the severest degree. The percent decrease in score is calculated as (Week 0 PASI score minus Week 24 PASI score) divided by Week 0 PASI score.
Dermatology Life Quality Index at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much (score of 3), a lot (score of 2), a little (score of 1), or not at all (score of 0). The DLQI score ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.
Dermatology Life Quality Index at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much (score of 3), a lot (score of 2), a little (score of 1), or not at all (score of 0). The DLQI score ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Participants assessed their pain due to psoriatic arthritis in the past week, on a single-line Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 100 (pain as bad as it could be).
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Participants assessed their pain due to psoriatic arthritis in the past week, on a single-line Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 100 (pain as bad as it could be).
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Participants assessed their pain due to psoriatic arthritis in the past week, on a single-line Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 100 (pain as bad as it could be).
Disease Activity Score 28-4, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
DAS28-4 (ESR) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Disease Activity Score 28-4, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
DAS28-4 (ESR) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Disease Activity Score 28-4, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DAS28-4 (ESR) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Disease Activity Score 28-4, C-reactive Protein (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
DAS28-4 (CRP) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Disease Activity Score 28-4, C-reactive Protein (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
DAS28-4 (CRP) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Disease Activity Score 28-4, C-reactive Protein (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DAS28-4 (CRP) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity via the visual analog scale (VAS). The calculated range of DAS28-4 is 0 to 10. A score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, a score of 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a score of 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and a score of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
1 secondary outcome
Physician's Overall Response Rating At Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yuji Yamaguchi, MD study director
AbbVie
634 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Psoriasis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 634 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 634 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (SADRs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs (time frame: From study registration through Week 24). The study lists 22 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2013.