SchizophreniaPhase 4NCT01157351
15 Month Study for Adults Who Have Been Diagnosed With Schizophrenia and Incarcerated
A Phase 4 study testing paliperidone, risperidone and haloperidole in people with Schizophrenia, run by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC at 56 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The study will assess the use of paliperidone palmitate compared with oral antipsychotic treatment in delaying time to a protocol-defined treatment failure over 15 months, in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who have been incarcerated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia
- What is being tested?
- paliperidone, risperidone and haloperidole
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 56 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- May 2010to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be able to understand and sign the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)
- Must successfully answer all the questions on the Informed Consent quiz indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study
- Have a current diagnosis of schizophrenia
- Taking no more than 1 oral antipsychotic on the day before randomization
- Have been placed into custody at least twice with one of them leading to incarceration within the 24 months previous to study start, with the last release occurring within the 90 days before the first day of screening
- in the opinion of the investigator, may benefit from a change in their prior antipsychotic treatment
Show all 10Show fewer
- Have available a designated individual (eg, family member, case manager, significant other, probation/parole officer) who has knowledge of the patient and is generally aware of the patient's daily activities, and who agrees to let the study site personnel know of changes in the patients circumstances when the patient is not able to provide this information, ie, arrests, protocol-defined hospitalizations, emergency room visits, becoming homeless, etc.
- Have either an address or phone number where they can be reached, or be accessible to the designated individual
- Must agree to receive regular injections for 15 months if randomly assigned to the paliperidone palmitate treatment group, or continue with oral study medication treatment for 15 months if randomly assigned to the oral antipsychotic treatment group
- Women must be postmenopausal (for at least 2 years), surgically sterile (hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation, or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy), abstinent, or if sexually active, be practicing a highly effective method of birth control
Who cannot join
- Allergies, hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis-type reaction), or intolerance to risperidone or paliperidone
- Actively abusing intravenous drugs within the past 3 months or have an opiate dependence disorder
- Have a positive urine drug screen test for barbiturates, cocaine, amphetamines, or opiates at screening
- Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant
- Have received injectable antipsychotic treatment within 2 injection cycles prior to screening
- Received treatment with clozapine within 3 months of screening
- Are at a high risk of violence in the next 15 months, in the opinion of the investigator
- who have a history of sex offenses including felony sex offenses, child molestation
Trial locations and contacts
56 sites in 2 countries.
56 sites in 2 countries
United States55 sites
Study site
Allentown, Pennsylvania
Study site
Anaheim, California
Study site
Bothell, Washington
Study site
Buffalo, New York
Study site
Bullhead City, Arizona
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio
Study site
DeSoto, Texas
Study site
Escondido, California
Study site
Flowood, Mississippi
Study site
Glendale, California
Study site
Hoffman Estates, Illinois
Study site
Honolulu, Hawaii
Study site
Imperial, California
Study site
Irving, Texas
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Study site
Leesburg, Florida
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Long Beach, California
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Miami Gardens, Florida
Study site
Middleburg Heights, Ohio
Study site
Naperville, Illinois
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
National City, California
Study site
New Britain, Connecticut
Study site
New London, Connecticut
Study site
New Orleans, Louisiana
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Oakland, California
Study site
Oceanside, California
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska
Study site
Paramus, New Jersey
Study site
Pensacola, Florida
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Pico Rivera, California
Study site
Riverside, California
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Bernadino, California
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
San Fran Cisco, California
Study site
Shreveport, Louisiana
Study site
Spokane, Washington
Study site
Springfield, Illinois
Study site
Tamarac, Florida
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Tuscon, Arizona
Study site
Wharton, Texas
Study site
Wichita, Kansas
Study site
Willingboro, New Jersey
Study site
Willoughby, Ohio
Study site
Witchita, Kansas
About this study
Official title: A Fifteen-month, Prospective, Randomized, Active-controlled, Open-label, Flexible Dose Study of Paliperidone Palmitate Compared With Oral Antipsychotic Treatment in Delaying Time to Treatment Failure in Adults With Schizophrenia Who Have Been Incarcerated
The study will assess the use of paliperidone palmitate compared with oral antipsychotic treatment in delaying time to a protocol-defined treatment failure over 15 months, in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who have been incarcerated.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of paliperidone palmitate with oral antipsychotic treatment in delaying time to a protocol-defined treatment failure over 15 months, in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who have been incarcerated. Protocol-defined treatment failure is defined as arrest, psychiatric hospitalization, increase in psychiatric services to prevent imminent hospitalization, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to inadequate efficacy, treatment supplementation with another antipsychotic due to inadequate efficacy, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to safety or tolerability or completed suicide. Protocol was amended on March 15, 2011 to reflect changes in the inclusion/exclusion criteria as well as the study objectives. Patients will receive either paliperidone palmitate 78, 117, 156, or 234 mg monthly by injection for fifteen months OR oral aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, perphenazine, quetiapine, and risperidone at doses selected by the study doctor.
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Being tested
- paliperidone, risperidone, haloperidole, perphenazine, aripiprazole
- Keywords
- Schizophrenia, Risperidone, Risperdal, Paliperidone palmitate, Aripiprazole, Haloperidol, Olanzapine, Paliperidone, Perphenazine, Quetiapine
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
paliperidoneDrug
flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months
risperidoneDrug
flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months
haloperidoleDrug
flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months
perphenazineDrug
flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months
aripiprazoleDrug
flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months
quetiapineDrug
flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months
paliperidone palmitateDrug
78, 117, 156, or 234 mg monthly injection for 15 months
olanzapineDrug
flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 001 | Experimental | paliperidone palmitate 78 117 156 or 234 mg monthly injection for 15 months Receives: Drug: paliperidone palmitate |
| 002 | Active comparator | aripiprazole flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months Receives: Drug: aripiprazole |
| 003 | Active comparator | haloperidole flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months Receives: Drug: haloperidole |
| 004 | Active comparator | olanzapine flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months Receives: Drug: olanzapine |
| 005 | Active comparator | paliperidone flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months Receives: Drug: paliperidone |
| 006 | Active comparator | perphenazine flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months Receives: Drug: perphenazine |
| 007 | Active comparator | quetiapine flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months Receives: Drug: quetiapine |
| 008 | Active comparator | risperidone flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months Receives: Drug: risperidone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to First Treatment Failure
Time to first treatment failure was the time from participant randomization to the first treatment failure, which was a composite endpoint consisting of any of the following events: arrest/incarceration, psychiatric hospitalization, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to safety or tolerability, treatment supplementation with another antipsychotic due to inadequate efficacy, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to inadequate efficacy, increase in level of psychiatric services to prevent imminent psychiatric hospitalization, suicide. A Treatment Failure Event Monitoring Board (EMB), blinded to individual participant treatment assignment, determined the occurrence and date of the first treatment failure event.
Measured: From date of randomization up to Month 15
Percentage of Participants in Each Event Category of First Treatment Failure
First treatment failure was a composite endpoint consisting of any of the following events: arrest/incarceration, psychiatric hospitalization, discontinuation (D/C) of antipsychotic treatment due to safety or tolerability, treatment supplementation with another antipsychotic due to inadequate efficacy, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to inadequate efficacy, increase in level of psychiatric services to prevent imminent psychiatric hospitalization, suicide. A Treatment Failure Event Monitoring Board (EMB), blinded to individual participant treatment assignment, determined the occurrence and date of the first treatment failure event. Percentage of participants who experienced treatment failure due to any event and for each specific category of event were assessed.
Measured: From date of randomization up to Month 15
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to First Psychiatric Hospitalization or Arrest/Incarceration
A time to parameter looking only at 2 component events of treatment failure: arrest or incarceration, and psychiatric hospitalization. An arrest was defined as the taking of a participant into custody by legal authority, for any reason. Incarceration was defined as involuntary confinement by an officer of the law. Psychiatric hospitalization was an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization that occurred due to the participant's clinically significant worsening of symptoms of schizophrenia.
Measured: From date of randomization up to Month 15
Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score During Overall Treatment Duration
The PSP score assesses the degree of difficulty a participant exhibit over a 1 month period within 4 domains of behavior: a) socially useful activities, b) personal and social relationships, c) self-care, and d) disturbing and aggressive behavior. The investigators rate participants' degree of difficulty in each of the 4 domains using a 6-point Likert scale (from 0=absent to 5=very severe). The domain ratings were then transformed to PSP total score ranging from 1 to 100. Higher PSP total scores denote better functioning. A score between 71 and 100 represents normal to mild degree of dysfunction; a score between 31 and 70 represents varying degree of difficulty; and a score <=30 represents poor function that requires intensive supervision.
Measured: Baseline up to Month 15
Time to First Psychiatric Hospitalization
A time-to parameter looking only at 1 component event of treatment failure: psychiatric hospitalization. Time to first psychiatric hospitalization was admission date of the psychiatric hospitalization recorded in the "Assessment of Treatment Failure - Psychiatric Hospitalization."
Measured: From date of randomization up to Month 15
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score During Overall Treatment Duration
The CGI-S rating scale was a 7-point global assessment of symptom severity with scores determined by clinician as follows: 1=Not ill, 2=Very Mild, 3= Mild, 4= Moderate, 5= Marked, 6= Severe, and 7= Extremely Severe. The higher the score the worse the illness.
Measured: Baseline up to Month 15
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2010
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01157351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR015625
- Other IDs
- R092670SCH3006
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 3 May 2010
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Lopena OJ, Alphs LD, Sajatovic M, Turkoz I, Sun L, Johnston KL, Sliwa JK, Najarian DM, Starr HL. Earlier Use of Long-Acting Injectable Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: An Integrated Patient-Level Post Hoc Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 25;84(6):23m14788. doi: 10.4088/JCP.23m14788.
PubMed 37756123Bell Lynum KS, Henderson DC, Wright HJ, Gogate JP, Kim E. Treatment Effect With Paliperidone Palmitate Compared With Oral Antipsychotics in Black/African American Patients With Schizophrenia and a History of Criminal Justice System Involvement: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PRIDE Study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 23;82(2):20m13356. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13356.
PubMed 33988924Alphs L, Mao L, Lynn Starr H, Benson C. A pragmatic analysis comparing once-monthly paliperidone palmitate versus daily oral antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016 Feb;170(2-3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
PubMed 26742509Alphs L, Bossie C, Mao L, Lee E, Starr HL. Treatment effect with paliperidone palmitate compared with oral antipsychotics in patients with recent-onset versus more chronic schizophrenia and a history of criminal justice system involvement. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;12(1):55-65. doi: 10.1111/eip.12271. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
PubMed 26403322Alphs L, Benson C, Cheshire-Kinney K, Lindenmayer JP, Mao L, Rodriguez SC, Starr HL. Real-world outcomes of paliperidone palmitate compared to daily oral antipsychotic therapy in schizophrenia: a randomized, open-label, review board-blinded 15-month study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 May;76(5):554-61. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09584.
PubMed 25938474Alphs L, Mao L, Rodriguez SC, Hulihan J, Starr HL. Design and rationale of the Paliperidone Palmitate Research in Demonstrating Effectiveness (PRIDE) study: a novel comparative trial of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate versus daily oral antipsychotic treatment for delaying time to treatment failure in persons with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;75(12):1388-93. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08965.
PubMed 25375367
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Fifteen-month, Prospective, Randomized, Active-controlled, Open-label, Flexible Dose Study of Paliperidone Palmitate Compared With Oral Antipsychotic Treatment in Delaying Time to Treatment Failure in Adults With Schizophrenia Who Have Been Incarcerated
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01157351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR015625
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Keywords
- Schizophrenia, Risperidone, Risperdal, Paliperidone palmitate, Aripiprazole, Haloperidol, Olanzapine, Paliperidone
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Dec 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will assess the use of paliperidone palmitate compared with oral antipsychotic treatment in delaying time to a protocol-defined treatment failure over 15 months, in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who have been incarcerated.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of paliperidone palmitate with oral antipsychotic treatment in delaying time to a protocol-defined treatment failure over 15 months, in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who have been incarcerated. Protocol-defined treatment failure is defined as arrest, psychiatric hospitalization, increase in psychiatric services to prevent imminent hospitalization, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to inadequate efficacy, treatment supplementation with another antipsychotic due to inadequate efficacy, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to safety or tolerability or completed suicide. Protocol was amended on March 15, 2011 to reflect changes in the inclusion/exclusion criteria as well as the study objectives. Patients will receive either paliperidone palmitate 78, 117, 156, or 234 mg monthly by injection for fifteen months OR oral aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, perphenazine, quetiapine, and risperidone at doses selected by the study doctor.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 001 | Experimental | Drug: paliperidone palmitatepaliperidone palmitate 78 117 156 or 234 mg monthly injection for 15 months |
| 002 | Active comparator | Drug: aripiprazolearipiprazole flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months |
| 003 | Active comparator | Drug: haloperidolehaloperidole flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months |
| 004 | Active comparator | Drug: olanzapineolanzapine flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months |
| 005 | Active comparator | Drug: paliperidonepaliperidone flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months |
| 006 | Active comparator | Drug: perphenazineperphenazine flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months |
| 007 | Active comparator | Drug: quetiapinequetiapine flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months |
| 008 | Active comparator | Drug: risperidonerisperidone flexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Must be able to understand and sign the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)
- Must successfully answer all the questions on the Informed Consent quiz indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study
- Have a current diagnosis of schizophrenia
- Taking no more than 1 oral antipsychotic on the day before randomization
- Have been placed into custody at least twice with one of them leading to incarceration within the 24 months previous to study start, with the last release occurring within the 90 days before the first day of screening
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Allergies, hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis-type reaction), or intolerance to risperidone or paliperidone
- Actively abusing intravenous drugs within the past 3 months or have an opiate dependence disorder
- Have a positive urine drug screen test for barbiturates, cocaine, amphetamines, or opiates at screening
- Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant
- Have received injectable antipsychotic treatment within 2 injection cycles prior to screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| paliperidoneflexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months | Drug | 005 |
| risperidoneflexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months | Drug | 008 |
| haloperidoleflexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months | Drug | 003 |
| perphenazineflexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months | Drug | 006 |
| aripiprazoleflexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months | Drug | 002 |
| quetiapineflexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months | Drug | 007 |
| paliperidone palmitate78, 117, 156, or 234 mg monthly injection for 15 months | Drug | 001 |
| olanzapineflexible dosing as prescribed by the study doctor for 15 months | Drug | 004 |
Primary outcome
Time to First Treatment Failure
Time frame: From date of randomization up to Month 15
Time to first treatment failure was the time from participant randomization to the first treatment failure, which was a composite endpoint consisting of any of the following events: arrest/incarceration, psychiatric hospitalization, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to safety or tolerability, treatment supplementation with another antipsychotic due to inadequate efficacy, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to inadequate efficacy, increase in level of psychiatric services to prevent imminent psychiatric hospitalization, suicide. A Treatment Failure Event Monitoring Board (EMB), blinded to individual participant treatment assignment, determined the occurrence and date of the first treatment failure event.
Percentage of Participants in Each Event Category of First Treatment Failure
Time frame: From date of randomization up to Month 15
First treatment failure was a composite endpoint consisting of any of the following events: arrest/incarceration, psychiatric hospitalization, discontinuation (D/C) of antipsychotic treatment due to safety or tolerability, treatment supplementation with another antipsychotic due to inadequate efficacy, discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment due to inadequate efficacy, increase in level of psychiatric services to prevent imminent psychiatric hospitalization, suicide. A Treatment Failure Event Monitoring Board (EMB), blinded to individual participant treatment assignment, determined the occurrence and date of the first treatment failure event. Percentage of participants who experienced treatment failure due to any event and for each specific category of event were assessed.
4 secondary outcomes
Time to First Psychiatric Hospitalization or Arrest/Incarceration
Time frame: From date of randomization up to Month 15
Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score During Overall Treatment Duration
Time frame: Baseline up to Month 15
Time to First Psychiatric Hospitalization
Time frame: From date of randomization up to Month 15
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score During Overall Treatment Duration
Time frame: Baseline up to Month 15
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37756123Lopena OJ, Alphs LD, Sajatovic M, Turkoz I, Sun L, Johnston KL, Sliwa JK, Najarian DM, Starr HL. Earlier Use of Long-Acting Injectable Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: An Integrated Patient-Level Post Hoc Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 25;84(6):23m14788. doi: 10.4088/JCP.23m14788.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33988924Bell Lynum KS, Henderson DC, Wright HJ, Gogate JP, Kim E. Treatment Effect With Paliperidone Palmitate Compared With Oral Antipsychotics in Black/African American Patients With Schizophrenia and a History of Criminal Justice System Involvement: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PRIDE Study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 23;82(2):20m13356. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13356.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26742509Alphs L, Mao L, Lynn Starr H, Benson C. A pragmatic analysis comparing once-monthly paliperidone palmitate versus daily oral antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016 Feb;170(2-3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26403322Alphs L, Bossie C, Mao L, Lee E, Starr HL. Treatment effect with paliperidone palmitate compared with oral antipsychotics in patients with recent-onset versus more chronic schizophrenia and a history of criminal justice system involvement. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;12(1):55-65. doi: 10.1111/eip.12271. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25938474Alphs L, Benson C, Cheshire-Kinney K, Lindenmayer JP, Mao L, Rodriguez SC, Starr HL. Real-world outcomes of paliperidone palmitate compared to daily oral antipsychotic therapy in schizophrenia: a randomized, open-label, review board-blinded 15-month study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 May;76(5):554-61. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09584.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25375367Alphs L, Mao L, Rodriguez SC, Hulihan J, Starr HL. Design and rationale of the Paliperidone Palmitate Research in Demonstrating Effectiveness (PRIDE) study: a novel comparative trial of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate versus daily oral antipsychotic treatment for delaying time to treatment failure in persons with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;75(12):1388-93. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08965.
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
56 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing paliperidone, risperidone and haloperidole in people with Schizophrenia, run by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC at 56 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 56 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to First Treatment Failure (time frame: From date of randomization up to Month 15). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01157351, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2015.