AzTrials
AzTrials

Conjunctival AutograftNCT01158014

Fibrin Glue vs. Suture in Pterygium Surgery

A study testing Fibrin Glue, Quixil and Suture in people with Conjunctival Autograft, run by Dr. Guy Ben-Simon, MD at 1 site in Israel.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The use of Fibrin glue to place conjunctival graft will be as effective as suturing the graft, but will require much less operative time and will be better tolerated by the patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Conjunctival Autograft
What is being tested?
Fibrin Glue, Quixil and Suture
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
Jan 2014to Jun 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • primary pterygium
  • healthy subject
  • ability to attend follow-up visits

Who cannot join

  • recurrent pterygium
  • underwent previous surgery / intervention to treat pterygium
  • ocular surface disease 0 minor

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Sheba_Medical_Center

    Ramat Gan, 52621

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Fibrin Glue vs. Vicryl Suture in Pterygium Surgery With Conjunctival Auto-graft

The use of Fibrin glue to place conjunctival graft will be as effective as suturing the graft, but will require much less operative time and will be better tolerated by the patients.

Read the detailed description

Pterygium surgery requires removal of the pterygia from cornea and conjunctiva and an additional technique to prevent recurrence which may be as high as 50%.

Suturing a conjunctival auto-graft has become one of the most popular and effective methods in preventing recurrence. However suturing requires long operative time (10-20 minutes with removal alone less than 5 minutes) and requires sutures removal after 1-2 weeks which is very inconvenient to the patient.

Using Fibrin Glue (Quixil) has been used in several places in pterygium surgery and we believe it will be as effective as suturing the graft, will use much less OR time (reduce surgery time from 40 minutes to 20-25 minutes) and will be less expensive since 2 ml glue (around 80US$) suffice for 10 cases, while one vicryl suture costs around 34 US$.

Being tested
Fibrin Glue, Quixil, Suture
Keywords
pterygium, conjunctival graft, recurrence, primary pterygium
Medical subject headings
Pterygium, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fibrin Glue, QuixilProcedure or surgery

    quixil 0.1 ml

  • SutureProcedure or surgery

    vicryl 10/0

Study groups in NCT01158014
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fibrin Glue, surgeryExperimentalConjunctival autograft will be glued using fibrin glue to pterygia bed after removal
Receives: Procedure: Fibrin Glue, Quixil
ControlActive comparatorConjunctival autograft will be sutured using 10/0 vicryl sutures to pterygia bed after removal
Receives: Procedure: Suture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pterygium recurrence

    Recurrence normally occurs 1-6 months after surgery. Success is achieved if ptergium does not recur after one year.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. operation time

    suturing a conjunctival graft takes 15-10 minutes while gluing only 5 minutes, we believe that by lowering OR time, total costs of surgery are less

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01158014
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHEBA-09-5033-GB-CTIL
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
4 Jul 2010
Last updated
8 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ratnalingam V, Eu AL, Ng GL, Taharin R, John E. Fibrin adhesive is better than sutures in pterygium surgery. Cornea. 2010 May;29(5):485-9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181c29696.

    PubMed 20308876
  • Por YM, Tan DT. Assessment of fibrin glue in pterygium surgery. Cornea. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a38fda.

    PubMed 19907303
  • Hall RC, Logan AJ, Wells AP. Comparison of fibrin glue with sutures for pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografts. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;37(6):584-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02105.x.

    PubMed 19702708

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fibrin Glue, Quixil and Suture in people with Conjunctival Autograft, run by Dr. Guy Ben-Simon, MD at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pterygium recurrence (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01158014, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in