AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionNCT01159704

Peer Leaders as HIV Risk Reduction Change Agents Among Injection Drug Users (IDUs) in Ukraine

A study testing Peer Education Model and HIV Counseling and Education Model in people with HIV Infection and HIV Risk Behaviors, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 3 sites in Ukraine.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Using a randomized clinical trial (RCT), this study is designed to assess the effectiveness of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) risk-reduction interventions targeting injection drug users (IDUs) in three Ukraine oblasts (regions). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
HIV Infection, HIV Risk Behaviors
What is being tested?
Peer Education Model and HIV Counseling and Education Model
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,304 participants
Where
3 sitesUkraine
Study dates
Jul 2010to Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • active drug injector
  • 16 years of age or older
  • not too intoxicated to give informed consent
  • not planning to leave the area in the next 6 months and no pending court date that might result in incarceration
  • agree to HIV testing and counseling
  • not involved in prior project research activities in teh previous 24 months
  • Indexes: must be able to recruit two eligible network members into the study
  • Network: agree to participate in five peer educator training sessions

Who cannot join

  • being too intoxicated at the time of the interview
  • impaired mentally due to physical or psychological problems to the point that they cannot voluntarily consent to participate in the study and/or respond to the interview
  • have a known reason why they will not be available for the intervention or the follow-up interview
  • have been involved in prior project research activities in the previous 24 months

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Ukraine3 sites
  • NGO

    Donetsk

  • NGO

    Nikolayev

  • NGO

    Odesa

Other trials in Ukraine

About this study

Using a randomized clinical trial (RCT), this study is designed to assess the effectiveness of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) risk-reduction interventions targeting injection drug users (IDUs) in three Ukraine oblasts (regions). The investigators propose to compare the effectiveness of a revised and updated manually-driven HIV testing and counseling intervention, the Counseling and Education (C \& E) model developed by NIDA, with the C \& E plus a manualized network intervention. At each site, Odessa, Donetsk and Nikolayev, 250 "index members" and 500 of their network members will be recruited through street outreach over a 32-month period and randomly assigned to C \& E alone or C \& E plus the network intervention. Participants will be tested for drug metabolites, interviewed using ACASI (Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing), and given a rapid test for HIV at baseline, 6 and 12-months. At six-months, network members will be asked to recruit two others they inject with but who are not in the study. Primary outcomes include knowledge, self-efficacy, injection and sex-related risk behavior reduction and partner disclosure among indexes and primary and secondary network members and intervention diffusion to secondary network members. The investigators hypothesize more positive and significant change, including injection and sex risk reduction, intervention diffusion, and partner disclosure, among indexes as well as first and second network members in the network plus C \& E arm compared to C \& E alone. Specific aims include:

  1. To compare the effectiveness of the C \& E alone with the additive effect of a network intervention plus C \& E in increasing knowledge about HIV and increasing self-efficacy to practice safer injection and sex-related behaviors among indexes, primary and secondary network members.
  2. To assess the effectiveness of the C \& E alone with the additive effect of a network intervention plus C \& E in reducing drug and sex risk behaviors among indexes, primary and secondary network members.
  3. To compare the extent of intervention diffusion to second wave network members in the two arms.
  4. To evaluate the extent of disclosure by HIV positive indexes and network members in the two arms
Being tested
Peer Education Model, HIV Counseling and Education Model
Keywords
HIV infection, Intervention, Risk-reduction, Injection drug users
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections, Risk Reduction Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peer Education ModelBehavioural

    The peer education intervention will be delivered by trained outreach workers in a group format with 8-10 indexes over five sessions spanning three weeks. The sessions will focus on knowledge of HIV transmission, self-efficacy and skills-building regarding HIV risk reduction, with an emphasis on the dissemination of such information and skills to network members.

  • HIV Counseling and Education ModelBehavioural

    The C \& E intervention is a manualized individual-level model consisting of two education and counseling sessions that "structurally bracket confidential HIV antibody screening."

Study groups in NCT01159704
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Network plus HIV Counseling&EducationExperimentalSocial network peer education model plus HIV testing and counseling; the C \& E intervention is a manualized individual-level model consisting of two education and counseling sessions that "structurally bracket confidential HIV antibody screening."
Receives: Behavioral: Peer Education Model; Behavioral: HIV Counseling and Education Model
HIV Counseling and Education (C&E) onlyActive comparatorHIV testing and counseling C\&E; the C \& E intervention is a manualized individual-level model consisting of two education and counseling sessions that "structurally bracket confidential HIV antibody screening."
Receives: Behavioral: HIV Counseling and Education Model

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. HIV Knowledge

    Measured: Follow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months

  2. Self-efficacy regarding HIV risk reduction

    Measured: Follow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months

  3. Injection risk behavior reduction

    Measured: Follow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months

  4. Sex-related risk behavior reduction

    Measured: Follow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months

  5. Intervention diffusion to secondary network members

    Measured: Follow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2010
  3. Primary completionNov 2015
  4. Study completionMar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,304 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01159704
Sponsor's protocol ID
09-0823
Other IDs
R01DA026739-01A1
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
8 Jul 2010
Last updated
19 Jun 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Booth RE, Davis JM, Dvoryak S, Brewster JT, Lisovska O, Strathdee SA, Latkin CA. HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2016 Oct;3(10):e482-9. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30040-6. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

    PubMed 27658879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Peer Education Model and HIV Counseling and Education Model in people with HIV Infection and HIV Risk Behaviors, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 3 sites in Ukraine.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Ukraine. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

HIV Knowledge (time frame: Follow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01159704, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in