AzTrials
AzTrials

MalnutritionNCT01161342

Nutritional Status Among Older Adults. Risk Factors and Consequences of Malnutrition

An observational study of Malnutrition, run by Uppsala University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to estimate the prevalence of malnutrition among older adults admitted to hospital and to analyse predictive factors for malnutrition. Further, the aim was to analyse the association between nutritional status and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Malnutrition
How many people
1,771 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2008to May 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: The included sample comprised 1771 patients 65 years and older, consecutively admitted during fifteen months to two internal medicine wards (n = 706), two surgical wards (n = 681), and one orthopaedic ward (n = 384) at the Central hospital in Västerås, Sweden.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 65 years or older

Who cannot join

  • unable to communicate and no relative could anwer the questions (n = 356)
  • receiving palliative care (n = 44)
  • impossible to measure height or weight (n = 22)
  • miscellanious (n = 71)

About this study

The aim of the study is to estimate the prevalence of malnutrition among older adults admitted to hospital and to analyse predictive factors for malnutrition. Further, the aim was to analyse the association between nutritional status and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

The hypothesis is that malnourished patients have a higher mortality then well-nourished patients after three years.

Read the detailed description

The baseline survey was a cross-sectional study of 1771 patients aged ≥65 years who were admitted to hospital. Nutritional status was assessed using the MNA instrument, and possible risk factors associated with malnutrition were recorded during the hospital stay. All-cause mortality was followed up after median 3.5 years s in a cohort study of 1767 participants. Cause-specific mortality was followed up after median 4.7 years in a cohort of 1767 participants. Previous dietary intake in middle-aged and older adults was recorded at basline in 725 participants, who had their nutritional status assessed with the MNA when admitted to hospital 10 years later.

Conditions
Malnutrition
Keywords
Malnutrition, Aged, Aged 80 and over, Prevalence, Mortality
Medical subject headings
Malnutrition

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Nutritional status according to the screening instrument Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)

    [The 18 questions in the MNA instrument are weighted, and the threshold values of the instrument categorize patients into three nutritional status groups: well-nourished (MNA score 24-30), at risk of malnutrition (MNA score 17-23.5), or malnourished (MNA score <17).

    Measured: 30 minutes

  2. All-cause mortality

    Survival was calculated from the date of the MNA screening to the date of death.

    Measured: All-cause mortality was analyzed after median 3.5 years.

  3. Cause-specific mortality

    Survival was calculated from the date of the MNA screening to the date of cause-specific death.

    Measured: Cause-specific mortality was analyzed after median 4.7 years.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionMay 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,771 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01161342
Sponsor's protocol ID
LTV-1211142
Status last verified
May 2011
First submitted
12 Jul 2010
Last updated
26 Aug 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Malnutrition, run by Uppsala University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Nutritional status according to the screening instrument Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) (time frame: 30 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in