AzTrials
AzTrials

CIRRHOSISNCT01165073

Short Term Feeding for Asian Patients With Liver Cirrhosis

A study testing Osmolite and B.C.A.A. and Normal oral intake & supplementation if necessary in people with CIRRHOSIS, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The benefits of short-term naso-gastric feeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis remain uncertain. This was a randomised study comparing naso-gastric feeding and oral feeding in Asian patients with cirrhosis who were admitted to hospital for decompensation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
CIRRHOSIS
What is being tested?
Osmolite and B.C.A.A. and Normal oral intake & supplementation if necessary
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteMalaysia
Study dates
Mar 2008to May 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with decompensated cirrhosis of any etiology.

Who cannot join

  • Advanced hepatic encephalopathy,
  • Variceal bleeding,
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malaysia1 site
  • University of Malaya Medical Centre

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100

Other trials in Malaysia

About this study

Official title: Short Term Feeding for Hospitalised Asian Patients With Liver Cirrhosis - a Randomised Trial of Naso-gastric vs Oral Feeding

The benefits of short-term naso-gastric feeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis remain uncertain. This was a randomised study comparing naso-gastric feeding and oral feeding in Asian patients with cirrhosis who were admitted to hospital for decompensation.

Read the detailed description

Consecutive patients with decompensated cirrhosis who fitted the inclusion criteria, will be randomised to either naso-gastric or oral feeding. Total feeding will be for 2 weeks only. Following intervention specific nutritional and liver-related parameters will be measured during the 2 weeks and up to 6 weeks later. Comparison between both groups will then be made.

Conditions
CIRRHOSIS
Being tested
Osmolite and B.C.A.A., Normal oral intake & supplementation if necessary
Keywords
Cirrhosis, Malnutrition, Enteral nutrition
Medical subject headings
Fibrosis, Malnutrition

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Osmolite and B.C.A.A.Dietary supplement

    Also called Enteral supplementation

    Feeding inserted into enteral tubes

  • Normal oral intake & supplementation if necessaryDietary supplement

    Also called Enteral supplementation

    Enteral nutrition

Study groups in NCT01165073
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Naso-gastric tube feedingExperimentalNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Osmolite and B.C.A.A.
Oral feedingActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Normal oral intake & supplementation if necessary

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement in Child-Pugh score

    Change in the Child-Pugh score, assessing liver damage in cirrhosis

    Measured: Up to 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Improvement in nutritional parameters

    Improvement in nutritional anthropometry and assessment tool markers after intervention

    Measured: up to 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionMay 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01165073
Sponsor's protocol ID
NGVOC1
Status last verified
Jul 2010
First submitted
16 Jul 2010
Last updated
1 Mar 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Cabre E, Gonzalez-Huix F, Abad-Lacruz A, Esteve M, Acero D, Fernandez-Banares F, Xiol X, Gassull MA. Effect of total enteral nutrition on the short-term outcome of severely malnourished cirrhotics. A randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 1990 Mar;98(3):715-20. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90293-a.

    PubMed 2105256
  • Campillo B, Richardet JP, Bories PN. Enteral nutrition in severely malnourished and anorectic cirrhotic patients in clinical practice. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005 Jun-Jul;29(6-7):645-51. doi: 10.1016/s0399-8320(05)82150-5.

    PubMed 16141996
  • Campillo B, Richardet JP, Scherman E, Bories PN. Evaluation of nutritional practice in hospitalized cirrhotic patients: results of a prospective study. Nutrition. 2003 Jun;19(6):515-21. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(02)01071-7.

    PubMed 12781851
  • Kondrup J, Muller MJ. Energy and protein requirements of patients with chronic liver disease. J Hepatol. 1997 Jul;27(1):239-47. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80308-x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 9252101
  • Plauth M, Merli M, Kondrup J, Weimann A, Ferenci P, Muller MJ; ESPEN Consensus Group. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition in liver disease and transplantation. Clin Nutr. 1997 Apr;16(2):43-55. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(97)80022-2. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16844569
  • Alvares-da-Silva MR, Reverbel da Silveira T. Comparison between handgrip strength, subjective global assessment, and prognostic nutritional index in assessing malnutrition and predicting clinical outcome in cirrhotic outpatients. Nutrition. 2005 Feb;21(2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.02.002.

    PubMed 15723736

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Osmolite and B.C.A.A. and Normal oral intake & supplementation if necessary in people with CIRRHOSIS, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement in Child-Pugh score (time frame: Up to 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01165073, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in