Anemia, NeoplasmsNCT01168349
An Observational Study of NeoRecormon (Epoetin Beta) in Cancer Patients With Anemia (FAST)
An observational study of Anemia, Neoplasms, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This observational study will evaluate the clinical benefit of NeoRecormon (epoetin beta) in daily routine practice in cancer patients with anemia. Data will be collected from patients who are receiving chemotherapy for a solid tumor or hematological malignancy. Patients will be followed for 28 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia, Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- epoetin beta [NeoRecormon]
- How many people
- 1,060 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Anemic cancer patients receiving NeoRecormon (epoetin beta)
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
- Patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for a solid tumor, a hematological malignancy or an autograft for hematological malignancy
- Patients for whom treatment with epoetin beta is started at the inclusion visit
- Life expectancy >/=6 months according to the physician
- Patients accepting and able to complete a French written questionnaire about his/her professional and social activities at each visit
Who cannot join
- Patients who received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents treatment, or red blood cell transfusion within 4 weeks before enrollment
- Participation in a clinical trial in onco-hematology
- Patients with myelodysplasia
- Patients with more than one active malignancy at the time of enrollment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pharmaco-epidemiological Observational Study of the Clinical Benefit of NeoRecormon® in Cancer Patients With Anemia, According to Early Response to Treatment
This observational study will evaluate the clinical benefit of NeoRecormon (epoetin beta) in daily routine practice in cancer patients with anemia. Data will be collected from patients who are receiving chemotherapy for a solid tumor or hematological malignancy. Patients will be followed for 28 weeks.
- Conditions
- Anemia, Neoplasms
- Being tested
- epoetin beta [NeoRecormon]
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
epoetin beta [NeoRecormon]Drug
As prescribed by physician
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | Not described Receives: Drug: epoetin beta [NeoRecormon] |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Early Treatment Response: Day 28 to 42
Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of at least 1 gram/deciliter (g/dL), 4 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Measured: Day 28 to 42
Percentage of Participants With Early Treatment Response: Day 21 to 42
Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Measured: Day 21 to 42
Percentage of Participants With At Least 1 Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion
Participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 28
Mean Number of RBC Transfusions
Mean number of transfusion was based on the number of participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 28
Mean Number of RBC Units
Mean number of units was based on the number of participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 28
Time to First RBC Transfusions
Time to first RBC transfusion was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 28
Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS): Baseline
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Measured: Baseline
KPS: Week 4 to 6
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Measured: Week 4 to 6
KPS: Week 12 to 16
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Measured: Week 12 to 16
KPS: Week 24 to 28
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Measured: Week 24 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Professional Activity: Baseline
Percentage of participants with professional activity was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Professional activity was categorized as active; disability; no occupation; retired; sick leave; student, training; and unemployment.
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With At Least 1 Sick Leave
Sick leaves was described in active participants at inclusion (professional activity: active, in sick leave or unemployed participants).
Measured: Week 4 Up to Week 28
Mean Number of Days of Sick Leave
Sick leaves was described in active participants at inclusion (professional activity: active, in sick leave or unemployed participants).
Measured: Week 4 Up to Week 28
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Baseline
Self-administered questionnaire, work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Measured: Baseline
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 4 to 6
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Measured: Week 4 to 6
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 12 to 16
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Measured: Week 12 to 16
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 24 to 28
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Measured: Week 24 to 28
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 4 to 6
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4 to 6
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 12 to 16
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 to 16
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 24 to 28
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
Measured: Baseline, Week 24 to 28
Secondary outcomes (12)
Mean Starting Dose of NeoRecormon® Injection
Dose of NeoRecormon® injection was measured in international units/kilograms/weeks (IU/kg/weeks).
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Starting Dose Between 360 and 540 IU/kg/Weeks
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Pre-specified Dose and Frequency of Injections
Pre-specified doses and frequency included; 20000 IU/week - Once a week (qw), 30000 IU/week -qw, 30000 IU/week - Twice a week (tw), 30000 IU/week - Once every 2 weeks (q2w), 40000 IU/week - qw, 60000 IU/week - qw, and other. Missing data were not reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous (SC) Route of Administration
Measured: Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Percentage of Participants With NeoRecormon® SC Injections at a Weekly Dose of 30000 IU
Measured: Baseline up to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Modifications of NeoRecormon® Regimen
All modifications were based on the change in frequency, route of administration or dose depending on the need for treatment adjustments according to Hb concentration. Percentage of participants with at least 1 modification in NeoRecormon® regimen was reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Temporary Discontinuation From NeoRecormon® Treatment
Percentage of participants with at least 1 temporary discontinuation was reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation From NeoRecormon® Treatment
Measured: Baseline up to Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 28
Relative Percent Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline Over the Study Period
Measured: Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Hb Concentration Within the Range of 10 to 12 g/dL
Measured: Baseline up to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Adequate Iron Status
Criteria for adequate iron status included serum ferritin greater than (>) 100 micrograms/liter (µg/L) and transferrin saturation (TSAT)> 20%.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Percentage of Participants With Vitamins Prescription
Measured: Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Anemia, NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,060 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01168349
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML22733
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2010
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pharmaco-epidemiological Observational Study of the Clinical Benefit of NeoRecormon® in Cancer Patients With Anemia, According to Early Response to Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01168349
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML22733
- Conditions
- Anemia, Neoplasms
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,060 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Oct 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This observational study will evaluate the clinical benefit of NeoRecormon (epoetin beta) in daily routine practice in cancer patients with anemia. Data will be collected from patients who are receiving chemotherapy for a solid tumor or hematological malignancy. Patients will be followed for 28 weeks.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | – | Drug: epoetin beta [NeoRecormon] |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Anemic cancer patients receiving NeoRecormon (epoetin beta)
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
- Patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for a solid tumor, a hematological malignancy or an autograft for hematological malignancy
- Patients for whom treatment with epoetin beta is started at the inclusion visit
- Life expectancy >/=6 months according to the physician
- Patients accepting and able to complete a French written questionnaire about his/her professional and social activities at each visit
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients who received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents treatment, or red blood cell transfusion within 4 weeks before enrollment
- Participation in a clinical trial in onco-hematology
- Patients with myelodysplasia
- Patients with more than one active malignancy at the time of enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| epoetin beta [NeoRecormon]As prescribed by physician | Drug | Cohort |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Early Treatment Response: Day 28 to 42
Time frame: Day 28 to 42
Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of at least 1 gram/deciliter (g/dL), 4 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Percentage of Participants With Early Treatment Response: Day 21 to 42
Time frame: Day 21 to 42
Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Percentage of Participants With At Least 1 Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28
Participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation.
Mean Number of RBC Transfusions
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28
Mean number of transfusion was based on the number of participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion.
Mean Number of RBC Units
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28
Mean number of units was based on the number of participants with at least 1 RBC transfusion.
Time to First RBC Transfusions
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28
Time to first RBC transfusion was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Early treatment response was defined as an increase of Hb concentration of at least 1 g/dL, 3 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used.
Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS): Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
KPS: Week 4 to 6
Time frame: Week 4 to 6
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
KPS: Week 12 to 16
Time frame: Week 12 to 16
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
KPS: Week 24 to 28
Time frame: Week 24 to 28
KPS was used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants were classified based on their functional impairment. An 11-level score, KPS score ranged between 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. KPS was based on the number of participants with early response.
Percentage of Participants With Professional Activity: Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of participants with professional activity was assessed based on the number of participants with early response or not at Day 21 to 42. Professional activity was categorized as active; disability; no occupation; retired; sick leave; student, training; and unemployment.
Percentage of Participants With At Least 1 Sick Leave
Time frame: Week 4 Up to Week 28
Sick leaves was described in active participants at inclusion (professional activity: active, in sick leave or unemployed participants).
Mean Number of Days of Sick Leave
Time frame: Week 4 Up to Week 28
Sick leaves was described in active participants at inclusion (professional activity: active, in sick leave or unemployed participants).
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Self-administered questionnaire, work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 4 to 6
Time frame: Week 4 to 6
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 12 to 16
Time frame: Week 12 to 16
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants With Current Employment at Week 24 to 28
Time frame: Week 24 to 28
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 1 asked participants to indicate if they were currently employed or working for pay (Yes or No). Data reported for the outcome included those who were employed.
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 4 to 6
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 to 6
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 12 to 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 to 16
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
Self-Reported Questionnaire: Change From Baseline on the Impact of Health on Regular Activities at Week 24 to 28
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 to 28
Self-administered questionnaire, WPAI questionnaire was used to assess work and activity impairment due to anemia in cancer participants in the last 7 days. The self-administered questionnaire consisted of 6 questions. It assessed amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to anemia in cancer participants. Question 6 asked participants to indicate how much their anemia affected their ability to do their regular daily activities such as housework, childcare, exercising, shopping, studying and so on, in the past 7 days on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing daily activities).
12 secondary outcomes
Mean Starting Dose of NeoRecormon® Injection
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Starting Dose Between 360 and 540 IU/kg/Weeks
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Pre-specified Dose and Frequency of Injections
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous (SC) Route of Administration
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Percentage of Participants With NeoRecormon® SC Injections at a Weekly Dose of 30000 IU
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Modifications of NeoRecormon® Regimen
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Temporary Discontinuation From NeoRecormon® Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation From NeoRecormon® Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 28
Relative Percent Change in Hb Concentration From Baseline Over the Study Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Hb Concentration Within the Range of 10 to 12 g/dL
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Adequate Iron Status
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Percentage of Participants With Vitamins Prescription
Time frame: Week 4 to 6, Week 12 to 16, Week 24 to 48
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Anemia, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Elritercept to Treat Anemia in Adults With Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Who Need Regular Blood Transfusions
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingObservational study
Cancer in Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes
Diamond Blackfan Anemia, Dyskeratosis Congenita
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anemia, Neoplasms, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Oct 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Early Treatment Response: Day 28 to 42 (time frame: Day 28 to 42). The study lists 20 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2015.