AzTrials
AzTrials

Pupil Dilation Prior to Cataract Surgery In-patientNCT01169688

Preoperative Cataract Pupillary Dilation: Inpatient At The Ambulatory Surgery Center vs Outpatient Dilation Prior To Arrival At The Ambulatory Surgery Center

A study testing Pupil dilation with phenylephrine 10% vs cyclopentolate 2% in people with Pupil Dilation Prior to Cataract Surgery In-patient and Pupil Dilation Prior to Cataract Surgery Out-patient, run by Northwest Kansas Surgery Center.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was done to compare efficacy, safety and efficiencies of various methods of pupil dilation prior to cataract surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Pupil dilation with phenylephrine 10% vs cyclopentolate 2%
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2007to Apr 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ability to self administer eye or have a helper for the task of administering eye drops.
  • Ability to follow and eye drop administration schedule.
  • No noted ocular abnormalities.
  • Bilateral cataract surgery anticipated.

Who cannot join

  • Inability to self administer eye drops or have assistance with eye drop administration.
  • Health problems that would contraindicate self administration of dilating eye drops such as poor cardiovascular or respiratory status.

About this study

Official title: Preoperative Cataract Pupillary Dilation: Inpatient vs Outpatient

This study was done to compare efficacy, safety and efficiencies of various methods of pupil dilation prior to cataract surgery.

Being tested
Pupil dilation with phenylephrine 10% vs cyclopentolate 2%
Keywords
Cataract Surgery, Pupillary Dilation
Medical subject headings
Mydriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pupil dilation with phenylephrine 10% vs cyclopentolate 2%Other

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2007
  3. Primary completionApr 2008
  4. Study completionApr 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01169688
Sponsor's protocol ID
NWKSC_2007_01
Status last verified
Dec 2007
First submitted
22 Jul 2010
Last updated
26 Jul 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pupil dilation with phenylephrine 10% vs cyclopentolate 2% in people with Pupil Dilation Prior to Cataract Surgery In-patient and Pupil Dilation Prior to Cataract Surgery Out-patient, run by Northwest Kansas Surgery Center.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in