Renal TransplantPhase 4EVITANCT01169701
24 Months Follow-up, Two Arm Study to Compare the Cardiovascular Profile in a Regimen With Everolimus + Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) Versus (vs.) a Regimen of CNI+MPA in Maintenance Renal Transplant Recipients
A Phase 4 study testing Everolimus, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic acid (MPA) in people with Renal Transplant, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 9 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The objective of the study is to compare the cardiovascular profile of an everolimus and mycophenolic acid immunosuppressive regimen with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolic acid regimen in maintenance renal transplant patients Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Transplant
- What is being tested?
- Everolimus, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic acid (MPA)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Aug 2010to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Received kidney transplant > 6 months and < 3 years prior to study enrollment
- Receiving immunosuppressive regimen that includes tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid
- Between 18 and 70 years of age
- Willing to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients with an actual serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl and/or eGFR≤ 40 ml/min and/or proteinuria≥ 500mg/day
- Patients who suffered from severe humoral and/or cellular rejection (≥ BANFF IIb, recurrent acute rejection or steroid resistant acute rejection in the previous years
- Patients who have severe hypercholesterolemia (>350 mg/dL; >9 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (>500 mg/dL; >8.5 mmol/L). Patients with controlled hyperlipidemia are acceptable.
- Diabetic patients
- Woman of child-bearing potential who is planning to become pregnant or is pregnant and/or lactating who is unwilling to use effective means of contraception
- Presence of psychiatric illness (i.e., schizophrenia, major depression) that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with study requirements
- Any other medical condition that, in the opinion of the site investigator based on recall or chart review would interfere with completing the study
- Receiving any investigational drug or have received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to study enrollment
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
Spain9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08003
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08025
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28040
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28041
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, 29010
About this study
Official title: Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, 24 Months Follow-up, Two Arm Study to Compare the Efficacy of Everolimus in Improving the Cardiovascular Profile in a Regimen With Mycophenolic Acid vs. a Regimen of CNI+MPA in Maintenance Renal Transplant Recipients.
The objective of the study is to compare the cardiovascular profile of an everolimus and mycophenolic acid immunosuppressive regimen with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolic acid regimen in maintenance renal transplant patients
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant
- Being tested
- Everolimus, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolic acid (MPA)
- Keywords
- Renal transplant, everolimus, cardiovascular profile, CNI-free immunosuppression, left ventricular hypertrophy, biopsy proved acute rejection (BPAR)
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EverolimusDrug
Also called Certican®
Everolimus was supplied in boxes with 60 tablets. Available tablets: 1.0 mg, 0.5 mg and 0.25 mg.
TacrolimusDrug
Also called Prograf®, Advagraf®
Tacrolimus was administrated as Prograf® or Advagraf®, but could not be changed during study.
Mycophenolic acid (MPA)Drug
Also called Myfortic®, Cell-Cept®
Myfortic® (MFS) was given as 720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day. Cell-Cept® (MMF) was given as 1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tacrolimus | Active comparator | Participants continued with the same tacrolimus+Mycophenolic acid (MPA) (Myfortic® or Cell-Cept®) doses that were taken before study initiation (tacrolimus levels 4-7 ng/ml). Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) |
| Everolimus | Experimental | Participants received an initial dose (day 1) of Everolimus (EVL) 2mg at night and tacrolimus (if taking Prograf®, a full dose of Prograf® in the morning and a 50% dose of Prograf® at night; if taking Advagraf®, a 75% dose in the morning. On days 2 and 3, participants took EVL 2 mg twice daily (bid) without tacrolimus. On days 4 and 5, the EVL dose was adjusted and levels maintained between 5-8 ng/mL. Participants also continued with their MPA doses that were taken prior to study initiation. Receives: Drug: Everolimus; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)
Left ventricular hypertrophy grade was assessed by echocardiogram where the left ventricular mass index was calculated. The presence of LVM was defined as > 49.2 g/m^2.7 in men and >46.7 g/m^2.7 in women. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Month 24
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change From Baseline in Mean 24 Hour Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6, month 12, month 24
Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
Utilizing the SphygmoCor Device, ECG leads placed at the carotid and femoral arteries provided the measure of the pulse wave at that particular arterial location. The distance between the two vascular beds divided by the pulse wave time shift provided a measure of the pulse wave velocity.
Measured: Month 6, month 24
Percentage of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
The percentage of participants who experienced MACE were reported. MACE included acute myocardial infarction, insertion or replacement of implantable defibrillator, peripheral vascular disorders, congestive heart failure, coronary artery bypass, other events, percutaneous coronary intervention and stroke.
Measured: Month 24
Renal Function Measured by Serum Creatinine
Serum samples were collected to analyze serum creatinine.
Measured: Month 6, month 12, month 24
Renal Function as Measured by Creatinine Clearance
Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula.
Measured: Month 6, month 12, month 24
Renal Function as Measured by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
Estimated GFR was caluclated using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula.
Measured: Month 6, month 12, month 24
Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Troponin I and Collagen Type 1 C-telopeptide (ICTP)
Blood samples were collected to analyze Troponin I and collagen type 1 C-telopeptide (ICTP). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Blood samples were collected to analyze HbA1c. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Myeloperoxidase (MPO)
Blood samples were collected to analyze MPO. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Fraction (NT-proBNP)
Blood samples were collected to analyze NT-proBNP. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Type 1 Procollagen Amino-terminal-propeptide (PINP)
Blood samples were collected to analyze PCR. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers, C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Blood samples were collected to analyze CRP. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss, Death and Lost to Follow up
The incidence of BPAR, graft loss, death and lost to follow-up events was calculated using relative frequency.
Measured: Month 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2010
- Primary completionMar 2014
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal TransplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01169701
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRAD001AES07
- Other IDs
- 2009-013780-19, 2009
- Acronym
- EVITA
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2010
- Last updated
- 7 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Cruzado JM, Pascual J, Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Seron D, Diaz JM, Rengel M, Oppenheimer F, Hernandez D, Paravisini A, Saval N, Morales JM; Evita Study Group. Controlled randomized study comparing the cardiovascular profile of everolimus with tacrolimus in renal transplantation. Transpl Int. 2016 Dec;29(12):1317-1328. doi: 10.1111/tri.12862. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
PubMed 27648523
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, 24 Months Follow-up, Two Arm Study to Compare the Efficacy of Everolimus in Improving the Cardiovascular Profile in a Regimen With Mycophenolic Acid vs. a Regimen of CNI+MPA in Maintenance Renal Transplant Recipients.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01169701
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EVITA / CRAD001AES07
- Conditions
- Renal Transplant
- Keywords
- Renal transplant, everolimus, cardiovascular profile, CNI-free immunosuppression, left ventricular hypertrophy, biopsy proved acute rejection (BPAR)
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2010
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Apr 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the study is to compare the cardiovascular profile of an everolimus and mycophenolic acid immunosuppressive regimen with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolic acid regimen in maintenance renal transplant patients
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tacrolimus | Active comparator | Drug: Tacrolimus, Drug: Mycophenolic acid (MPA)Participants continued with the same tacrolimus+Mycophenolic acid (MPA) (Myfortic® or Cell-Cept®) doses that were taken before study initiation (tacrolimus levels 4-7 ng/ml). |
| Everolimus | Experimental | Drug: Everolimus, Drug: Tacrolimus, Drug: Mycophenolic acid (MPA)Participants received an initial dose (day 1) of Everolimus (EVL) 2mg at night and tacrolimus (if taking Prograf®, a full dose of Prograf® in the morning and a 50% dose of Prograf® at night; if taking Advagraf®, a 75% dose in the morning. On days 2 and 3, participants took EVL 2 mg twice daily (bid) without tacrolimus. On days 4 and 5, the EVL dose was adjusted and levels maintained between 5-8 ng/mL. Participants also continued with their MPA doses that were taken prior to study initiation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Received kidney transplant > 6 months and < 3 years prior to study enrollment
- Receiving immunosuppressive regimen that includes tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid
- Between 18 and 70 years of age
- Willing to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with an actual serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl and/or eGFR≤ 40 ml/min and/or proteinuria≥ 500mg/day
- Patients who suffered from severe humoral and/or cellular rejection (≥ BANFF IIb, recurrent acute rejection or steroid resistant acute rejection in the previous years
- Patients who have severe hypercholesterolemia (>350 mg/dL; >9 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (>500 mg/dL; >8.5 mmol/L). Patients with controlled hyperlipidemia are acceptable.
- Diabetic patients
- Woman of child-bearing potential who is planning to become pregnant or is pregnant and/or lactating who is unwilling to use effective means of contraception
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EverolimusAlso: Certican®Everolimus was supplied in boxes with 60 tablets. Available tablets: 1.0 mg, 0.5 mg and 0.25 mg. | Drug | Everolimus |
| TacrolimusAlso: Prograf®, Advagraf®Tacrolimus was administrated as Prograf® or Advagraf®, but could not be changed during study. | Drug | Everolimus, Tacrolimus |
| Mycophenolic acid (MPA)Also: Myfortic®, Cell-Cept®Myfortic® (MFS) was given as 720-1440 mg/day or 360-1440 mg/day. Cell-Cept® (MMF) was given as 1000-2000 mg/day or 500-2000 mg/day. | Drug | Everolimus, Tacrolimus |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 24
Left ventricular hypertrophy grade was assessed by echocardiogram where the left ventricular mass index was calculated. The presence of LVM was defined as > 49.2 g/m^2.7 in men and >46.7 g/m^2.7 in women. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
13 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Mean 24 Hour Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, month 12, month 24
Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
Time frame: Month 6, month 24
Percentage of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Time frame: Month 24
Renal Function Measured by Serum Creatinine
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, month 24
Renal Function as Measured by Creatinine Clearance
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, month 24
Renal Function as Measured by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
Time frame: Month 6, month 12, month 24
Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Troponin I and Collagen Type 1 C-telopeptide (ICTP)
Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Myeloperoxidase (MPO)
Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Fraction (NT-proBNP)
Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in the Cardiovascular Biomarker, Type 1 Procollagen Amino-terminal-propeptide (PINP)
Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarkers, C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: Baseline, month 6, month 24
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), Graft Loss, Death and Lost to Follow up
Time frame: Month 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Dec 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27648523Cruzado JM, Pascual J, Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Seron D, Diaz JM, Rengel M, Oppenheimer F, Hernandez D, Paravisini A, Saval N, Morales JM; Evita Study Group. Controlled randomized study comparing the cardiovascular profile of everolimus with tacrolimus in renal transplantation. Transpl Int. 2016 Dec;29(12):1317-1328. doi: 10.1111/tri.12862. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
Related trials for Renal Transplant
RecruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Study of Letermovir (MK-8228) in Children and Adolescents Who Receive a Kidney Transplant (KT) (MK-8228-077)
Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis
Not yet recruiting
Bioimpedance and Multiparametric Ultrasound-Guided Fluid Management After Kidney Transplantation
Kidney Transplantation, Delayed Graft Function
Active, not recruiting
Leveraging Technology to Improve Medication Adherence in Youth With Kidney or Liver Transplant
Transplant;Failure,Kidney, Transplant; Failure, Liver
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Felzartamab Infusions in Adults With Kidney Transplants Who Have Late Isolated Microvascular Inflammation
Microvascular Inflammation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Sequential Daratumumab Followed by Telitacicept for the Treatment of ABMR After Kidney Transplantation-A Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Antibody-mediated Rejection, Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Everolimus, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic acid (MPA) in people with Renal Transplant, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 9 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) (time frame: Baseline, Month 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01169701, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2015.