AsthmaPhase 3NCT01172808
Evaluation of Tiotropium 2.5 and 5 mcg Once Daily Delivered Via the Respimat® Inhaler Compared to Placebo and Salmeterol HydroFluoroAlkane (HFA) Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) (50 mcg Twice Daily) in Patient With Moderate Persistent Asthma I
A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium Respimat® low dose, tiotropium Respimat® high dose and 50 mcg salmeterol HFA MDI in people with Asthma, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 114 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2.5 and 5 mcg tiotropium over a 24-week treatment period as compared to placebo and salmeterol (50 mcg twice daily). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- tiotropium Respimat® low dose, tiotropium Respimat® high dose and 50 mcg salmeterol HFA MDI
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,071 participants
- Where
- 114 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2010to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients must sign and date an Informed Consent Form consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines and local legislation prior to participation in the trial (i.e. prior to any trial procedures, including any pre-trial washout of medications and medication restrictions for pulmonary function test at Visit 1).
- Male or female patients aged at least 18 years but not more than 75 years.
- All patients must have at least a 3 month history of asthma at the time of enrolment into the trial. The diagnosis should be confirmed at Visit 1 by fulfilling inclusion criterion 5.
- The initial diagnosis of asthma must have been made before the patient's age of 40.
- The diagnosis of asthma has to be confirmed at Visit 1 with a bronchodilator reversibility (15 minutes after 400 mcg salbutamol (albuterol)) resulting in a Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) increase of at least 12% and at least 200mL.
- All patients must have been on maintenance treatment with a medium, stable dose of inhaled corticosteroids for at least for 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
Show all 12Show fewer
- All patients must be symptomatic at Visit 1 (screening) and prior to randomisation at Visit 2 as defined by an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) mean score of at least 1.5.
- All patients must have a pre-bronchodilator FEV1 at least 60% and less than or equal to 90% of predicted normal at Visit 1.
- Variation of absolute FEV1 values of Visit 1 (pre-bronchodilator) as compared to Visit 2 (pre-dose) must be within ± 30%.
- Patients must be never-smokers or ex-smokers who stopped smoking at least one year prior to enrolment (Visit 0) and who have a smoking history of less than 10 pack years.
- Patients must be able to use the Respimat® inhaler and metered dose inhaler correctly.
- Patients must be able to perform all trial related procedures including technically acceptable pulmonary function tests and use of electronic diary/peak flow meter.
Who cannot join
- Patients with a significant disease other than asthma. A significant disease is defined as a disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, may (i) put the patient at risk because of participation in the trial, or (ii) influence the results of the trial, or (iii) cause concern regarding the patient's ability to participate in the trial.
- Patients with a clinically relevant abnormal screening (Visit 1) haematology or blood chemistry if the abnormality defines a significant disease as defined in exclusion criterion 1.
- Patients with a recent history (i.e. six months or less) of myocardial infarction.
- Patients who have been hospitalised for cardiac failure during the past year.
- Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or a change in drug therapy within the past year.
- Patients with lung diseases other than asthma (e.g. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)).
Show all 25Show fewer
- Patients with known active tuberculosis.
- Patients with malignancy for which the patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within the last five years. Patients with treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed.
- Patients who have undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of thoracotomy for other reasons should be evaluated as per exclusion criterion no. 1.
- Patients with significant alcohol or drug abuse within the past two years.
- Patients who are currently in a pulmonary rehabilitation program or have completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program in the 6 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening).
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), ethylenediamineteraacetic acid (EDTA), salmeterol xinafoate or any other components of the study medication delivery systems.
- Pregnant or nursing woman.
- Women of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control.
- Patients who have taken an investigational drug within four weeks prior to Visit 1.
- Patients who have been treated with beta-blocker medication within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period. Topical cardio-selective beta-blocker eye medications for non-narrow angle glaucoma are allowed.
- Patients who have been treated with the long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium (Spiriva®) within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
- Patients who have been treated with oral or patch beta-adrenergics within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the Screening period.
- Patients who have been treated with oral corticosteroids within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
- Patients who have been treated with anti-IgE antibodies, e.g. omalizumab (Xolair®), within 6 months prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
- Patients who have been treated with cromone within two weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
- Patients who have been treated with methylxanthines or phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors within two weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
- Patients who have been treated with other non-approved and according to international guidelines not recommended "experimental" drugs for routine asthma therapy within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
- Patients with any asthma exacerbation or any respiratory tract infection iin the four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
- Patients who have previously been randomised in this trial or in the respective twin trial (205.419) or are currently participating in another trial.
Trial locations and contacts
114 sites in 11 countries.
114 sites in 11 countries
Japan30 sites
205.418.81018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Adachi-ku, Tokyo
205.418.81030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ako, Hyogo
205.418.81001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
205.418.81005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo
205.418.81025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo
205.418.81015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fujioka, Gunma
205.418.81023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Himeji, Hyogo
205.418.81007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hitachi, Ibaraki
205.418.81009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Iwamizawa, Hokkaido
205.418.81028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kanazawa, Ishikawa
205.418.81011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kitakami, Iwate
205.418.81012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kitakami, Iwate
205.418.81031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koga, Ibaraki
205.418.81016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koganei, Tokyo
205.418.81006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Komaki, Aichi
205.418.81002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kunitachi, Tokyo
205.418.81004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mito, Ibaraki
205.418.81032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Osaka, Osaka
205.418.81019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ota-ku, Tokyo
205.418.81008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido
205.418.81013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sendai, Miyagi
205.418.81014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sendai, Miyagi
205.418.81026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo
205.418.81024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Takasaki, Gunma
205.418.81010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tomakomai, Hokkaido
205.418.81003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toshima-ku, Tokyo
205.418.81017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toshima-ku, Tokyo
205.418.81022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yao, Osaka
205.418.81020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa
205.418.81021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa
United States21 sites
205.418.01012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland
205.418.01006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bellevue, Nebraska
205.418.01016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Boys Town, Nebraska
205.418.01005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina
205.418.01004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
205.418.01007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas
205.418.01010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Easely, South Carolina
205.418.01020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Huntington Beach, California
205.418.01009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
205.418.01002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mission Viejo, California
205.418.01017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Normal, Illinois
205.418.01013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts
205.418.01015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts
205.418.01018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
205.418.01003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska
205.418.01014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Diego, California
205.418.01019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington
205.418.01008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
South Bend, Indiana
205.418.01001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington
205.418.01011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
205.418.01021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
China15 sites
205.418.86001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
205.418.86005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
205.418.86007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
205.418.86012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Beijing
205.418.86014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Changsha
205.418.86011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chengdu
205.418.86015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chengdu
205.418.86003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chongqing
205.418.86010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guangzhou
205.418.86013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kunming
205.418.86008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Qingdao
205.418.86002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shanghai
205.418.86004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shenyang
205.418.86009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shenyang
205.418.86006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Xi'an
India9 sites
205.418.91008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Banglore
205.418.91005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chennai
205.418.91004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coimbatore
205.418.91006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coimbatore
205.418.91003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hyderabad
205.418.91009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jaipur
205.418.91002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Nagpur
205.418.91007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pune
205.418.91010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pune
Latvia9 sites
205.418.37004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Daugavpils
205.418.37008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Preiļi
205.418.37001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Riga
205.418.37002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Riga
205.418.37005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Riga
205.418.37006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Riga
205.418.37007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Riga
205.418.37009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Riga
205.418.37003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ventspils
Russia8 sites
205.418.07007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gatchina (Leningradskaya Oblast)
205.418.07004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
205.418.07005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
205.418.07006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
205.418.07008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
205.418.07001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
205.418.07002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
205.418.07003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
Poland6 sites
205.418.48006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Krakow
205.418.48001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lodz
205.418.48005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lodz
205.418.48002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ostrow Wielkopolska
205.418.48004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Poznan
205.418.48003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tczew
Brazil5 sites
205.418.55002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Juiz de Fora
205.418.55001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto Alegre
205.418.55004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto Alegre
205.418.55005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Porto Alegre
205.418.55003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rio de Janeiro - RJ
Guatemala5 sites
205.418.50203 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatelama City
205.418.50204 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatelmala City
205.418.50205 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatelmala City
205.418.50201 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
205.418.50202 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Guatemala City
Mexico3 sites
205.418.52002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Monterrey
205.418.52003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Zapopan
205.418.52001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Zona Río
Peru3 sites
205.418.51003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Callao
205.418.51001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lima
205.418.51002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lima
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution Delivered Via Respimat® Inhaler (2.5 and 5 µg Once Daily) Compared With Placebo and Salmeterol HFA MDI (50 µg Twice Daily) Over 24 Weeks in Moderate Persistent Asthma
The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2.5 and 5 mcg tiotropium over a 24-week treatment period as compared to placebo and salmeterol (50 mcg twice daily). Tiotropium inhalation solution delivered by the Respimat® inhaler will be examined on top of maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroid controller medication in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Efficacy and safety will be assessed by measuring effects on lung function, effects on asthma exacerbations, effects on quality of life, effects on asthma control, effects on health care resource utilisation, and number of adverse events.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- Placebo, tiotropium Respimat® low dose, tiotropium Respimat® high dose, 50 mcg salmeterol HFA MDI
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo that represents comparator
tiotropium Respimat® low doseDrug
IMP
PlaceboDrug
Placebo that represents comparator
PlaceboDrug
Placebo that represents comparator
tiotropium Respimat® high doseDrug
IMP
50 mcg salmeterol HFA MDIDrug
Active comparator
PlaceboDrug
Placebo that represents BI drug
PlaceboDrug
Placebo that represents BI drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium low dose | Experimental | Once daily, delivered with Respimat® inhaler (+ inhalation of placebo HFA MDI twice daily) Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: tiotropium Respimat® low dose |
| tiotropium high dose | Experimental | Once daily, delivered with Respimat® inhaler (+ inhalation of placebo HFA MDI twice daily) Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: tiotropium Respimat® high dose |
| 50 mcg salmeterol | Active comparator | Twice daily, delivered with HFA MDI (+ inhalation of placebo Respimat® inhaler once daily) Receives: Drug: 50 mcg salmeterol HFA MDI; Drug: Placebo |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Once daily, delivered with Respimat® inhaler + twice daily delivered with HFA MDI Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peak FEV1 Within 3 Hours Post-dose Response
Peak forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) response within 3 hours post-dose determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2). Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: 24 weeks
Trough FEV1 Response
Trough FEV1 response determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2). Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: 24 weeks
The Responder Rate as Assessed by the ACQ From the Two Twin Trials 205.419 (NCT01172821) and the Present 205.418 (NCT01172808)
The responder rate as assessed by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) determined at the end of the 24-week treatment period (on combined data from the two twin trials 205.418 (NCT01172808) and 205.419 (NCT01172821)). A patient was considered to be a responder if he or she was reported with an improvement (decrease) in the ACQ total score of at least 0.5 points.
The ACQ total score was calculated as the mean of the responses to 7 questions and was analysed as an absolute value. The score ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment).
Measured: 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (17)
Peak FVC Within 3 Hours Post-dose Response
Peak forced vital capacity (FVC) response within 3 hours post-dose determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2). Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: 24 weeks
Trough FVC Response
Trough FVC response determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2). Means are adjusted for treatment, country, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: 24 weeks
FEV1 Area Under Curve 0-3 Hours (AUC0-3h) Response
Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2) determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.
Measured: 24 weeks
FVC Area Under Curve 0-3 Hours (AUC0-3h) Response
Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2) determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Means are adjusted for treatment, country, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.
Measured: 24 weeks
Trough PEF Response
Trough peak expiratory flow (PEF) response determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2). Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: 24 weeks
Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQs)) Score
Total score from the Standardised Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(s)) determined at the end of 24-week treatment. The AQLQ(s) contains 32 questions, each question has a 7 point scale from 1 (highest intensity) till 7 (no symptoms). Total score was defined as the sum of all items divided by the number of items. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: 24 weeks
Total Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period
Control of asthma as assessed by the ACQ determined at the end of 24-week treatment. The ACQ contains 7 questions, each question has a 7 point scale from 0 (no symptoms) till 6 (highest intensity). Total score was defined as the sum of all items divided by the number of items. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: 24 weeks
The Responder Rate as Assessed by the ACQ
The responder rate as assessed by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) determined at the end of the 24-week treatment period. A patient was considered to be a responder if he or she was reported with an improvement (decrease) in ACQ total score of at least 0.5 points. The ACQ total score was calculated as the mean of the responses to 7 questions and was analysed as an absolute value. The score ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment).
Measured: 24 weeks
Mean Pre-dose Morning PEF (PEF a.m.) Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Weekly means obtained during the last 7 days before week 24 measured by patients at home using the AM3 device. Response was defined as change from baseline. Means are adjusted for treatment, country, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Mean Pre-dose Evening PEF (PEF p.m.) Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Weekly means obtained during the last 7 days before week 24 measured by patients at home using the AM3 device. Response was defined as change from baseline. Means are adjusted for treatment, country, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
PEF Variability
PEF daily variability was assesed by patients at home using the AM3 device. PEF variability is the absolute difference between morning and evening PEF value divided by their mean, based on the weekly mean response at week 24. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: Last 7 days before week 24 visit
Mean Pre-dose Morning FEV1 (FEV1 a.m.) Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Weekly means obtained during the last 7 days before week 24 measured by patients at home using the AM3 device. Response was defined as change from baseline. Means are adjusted for treatment, country, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Mean Pre-dose Evening FEV1 (FEV1 p.m.) Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Weekly means obtained during the last 7 days before week 24 measured by patients at home using the AM3 device. Response was defined as change from baseline. Means are adjusted for treatment, country, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication During the Entire 24-h Day Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Daily use of salbutamol (albuterol) rescue medication as needed during the entire study period. Weekly means obtained during the last 7 days before week 24 measured by patients at home using the AM3 device. Response was defined as change from baseline. Means are adjusted for treatment, country, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Measured: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Asthma Symptom-free Days Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Weekly means obtained during the last 7 days before week 24 measured by patients at home using the AM3 device. Response was defined as change from baseline. Means are adjusted for treatment, country, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week. An asthma symptom-free day was defined as a day with no reported symptoms and no use of rescue medication.
Measured: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Time to First Severe Asthma Exacerbation From the Two Twin Trials 205.419 (NCT01172821) and the Present 205.418 (NCT01172808)
Time to first severe asthma exacerbation during the 24-week treatment period on combined data from the two twin trials 205.418 (NCT01172808) and 205.419 (NCT01172821).
Measured: 24 weeks
Time to First Asthma Exacerbation From the Two Twin Trials 205.419 (NCT01172821) and the Present 205.418 (NCT01172808)
Time to first asthma exacerbation (including severe, non-severe; symptomatic, asymptomatic; i.e. any exacerbation) during the 24-week treatment period on combined data from the two twin trials 205.418 (NCT01172808) and 205.419 (NCT01172821)
Measured: 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2010
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 1,071 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01172808
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 205.418
- Other IDs
- 2009-018004-18, 2009
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2010
- Last updated
- 9 Jun 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Halpin DMG, Hamelmann EH, Frith PA, Moroni-Zentgraf PM, van Hecke B, Unseld A, Kerstjens HAM, Szefler SJ. Comparative Responses in Lung Function Measurements with Tiotropium in Adolescents and Adults, and Across Asthma Severities: A Post Hoc Analysis. Pulm Ther. 2020 Jun;6(1):131-140. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00113-w. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
PubMed 32180164Casale TB, Aalbers R, Bleecker ER, Meltzer EO, Zaremba-Pechmann L, de la Hoz A, Kerstjens HAM. Tiotropium Respimat(R) add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with symptomatic asthma improves clinical outcomes regardless of baseline characteristics. Respir Med. 2019 Oct-Nov;158:97-109. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
PubMed 31654891Halpin DMG, Meltzer EO, Pisternick-Ruf W, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Engel M, Zaremba-Pechmann L, Casale T, FitzGerald JM. Peak expiratory flow as an endpoint for clinical trials in asthma: a comparison with FEV1. Respir Res. 2019 Jul 18;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1119-6.
PubMed 31319851Casale TB, Bateman ED, Vandewalker M, Virchow JC, Schmidt H, Engel M, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Kerstjens HAM. Tiotropium Respimat Add-on Is Efficacious in Symptomatic Asthma, Independent of T2 Phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):923-935.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.037. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
PubMed 29174062Kerstjens HA, Casale TB, Bleecker ER, Meltzer EO, Pizzichini E, Schmidt O, Engel M, Bour L, Verkleij CB, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Bateman ED. Tiotropium or salmeterol as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for patients with moderate symptomatic asthma: two replicate, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, active-comparator, randomised trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 May;3(5):367-76. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00031-4. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
PubMed 25682232
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jun 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution Delivered Via Respimat® Inhaler (2.5 and 5 µg Once Daily) Compared With Placebo and Salmeterol HFA MDI (50 µg Twice Daily) Over 24 Weeks in Moderate Persistent Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01172808
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 205.418
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,071 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Study start
- Aug 2010
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Feb 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2.5 and 5 mcg tiotropium over a 24-week treatment period as compared to placebo and salmeterol (50 mcg twice daily). Tiotropium inhalation solution delivered by the Respimat® inhaler will be examined on top of maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroid controller medication in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Efficacy and safety will be assessed by measuring effects on lung function, effects on asthma exacerbations, effects on quality of life, effects on asthma control, effects on health care resource utilisation, and number of adverse events.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium low dose | Experimental | Drug: Placebo, Drug: tiotropium Respimat® low doseOnce daily, delivered with Respimat® inhaler (+ inhalation of placebo HFA MDI twice daily) |
| tiotropium high dose | Experimental | Drug: Placebo, Drug: tiotropium Respimat® high doseOnce daily, delivered with Respimat® inhaler (+ inhalation of placebo HFA MDI twice daily) |
| 50 mcg salmeterol | Active comparator | Drug: 50 mcg salmeterol HFA MDI, Drug: PlaceboTwice daily, delivered with HFA MDI (+ inhalation of placebo Respimat® inhaler once daily) |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboOnce daily, delivered with Respimat® inhaler + twice daily delivered with HFA MDI |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- All patients must sign and date an Informed Consent Form consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines and local legislation prior to participation in the trial (i.e. prior to any trial procedures, including any pre-trial washout of medications and medication restrictions for pulmonary function test at Visit 1).
- Male or female patients aged at least 18 years but not more than 75 years.
- All patients must have at least a 3 month history of asthma at the time of enrolment into the trial. The diagnosis should be confirmed at Visit 1 by fulfilling inclusion criterion 5.
- The initial diagnosis of asthma must have been made before the patient's age of 40.
- The diagnosis of asthma has to be confirmed at Visit 1 with a bronchodilator reversibility (15 minutes after 400 mcg salbutamol (albuterol)) resulting in a Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) increase of at least 12% and at least 200mL.
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Patients with a significant disease other than asthma. A significant disease is defined as a disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, may (i) put the patient at risk because of participation in the trial, or (ii) influence the results of the trial, or (iii) cause concern regarding the patient's ability to participate in the trial.
- Patients with a clinically relevant abnormal screening (Visit 1) haematology or blood chemistry if the abnormality defines a significant disease as defined in exclusion criterion 1.
- Patients with a recent history (i.e. six months or less) of myocardial infarction.
- Patients who have been hospitalised for cardiac failure during the past year.
- Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or a change in drug therapy within the past year.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboPlacebo that represents comparator | Drug | tiotropium low dose |
| tiotropium Respimat® low doseIMP | Drug | tiotropium low dose |
| PlaceboPlacebo that represents comparator | Drug | placebo |
| PlaceboPlacebo that represents comparator | Drug | tiotropium high dose |
| tiotropium Respimat® high doseIMP | Drug | tiotropium high dose |
| 50 mcg salmeterol HFA MDIActive comparator | Drug | 50 mcg salmeterol |
| PlaceboPlacebo that represents BI drug | Drug | placebo |
| PlaceboPlacebo that represents BI drug | Drug | 50 mcg salmeterol |
Primary outcome
Peak FEV1 Within 3 Hours Post-dose Response
Time frame: 24 weeks
Peak forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) response within 3 hours post-dose determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2). Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
Trough FEV1 Response
Time frame: 24 weeks
Trough FEV1 response determined at the end of the 24-week treatment. Response was defined as change from baseline (10 minutes before the first dose of trial medication at visit 2). Means are adjusted for treatment, centre, week, baseline, treatment by week, and baseline by week.
The Responder Rate as Assessed by the ACQ From the Two Twin Trials 205.419 (NCT01172821) and the Present 205.418 (NCT01172808)
Time frame: 24 weeks
The responder rate as assessed by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) determined at the end of the 24-week treatment period (on combined data from the two twin trials 205.418 (NCT01172808) and 205.419 (NCT01172821)). A patient was considered to be a responder if he or she was reported with an improvement (decrease) in the ACQ total score of at least 0.5 points. The ACQ total score was calculated as the mean of the responses to 7 questions and was analysed as an absolute value. The score ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment).
17 secondary outcomes
Peak FVC Within 3 Hours Post-dose Response
Time frame: 24 weeks
Trough FVC Response
Time frame: 24 weeks
FEV1 Area Under Curve 0-3 Hours (AUC0-3h) Response
Time frame: 24 weeks
FVC Area Under Curve 0-3 Hours (AUC0-3h) Response
Time frame: 24 weeks
Trough PEF Response
Time frame: 24 weeks
Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQs)) Score
Time frame: 24 weeks
Total Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period
Time frame: 24 weeks
The Responder Rate as Assessed by the ACQ
Time frame: 24 weeks
Mean Pre-dose Morning PEF (PEF a.m.) Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Mean Pre-dose Evening PEF (PEF p.m.) Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
PEF Variability
Time frame: Last 7 days before week 24 visit
Mean Pre-dose Morning FEV1 (FEV1 a.m.) Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Mean Pre-dose Evening FEV1 (FEV1 p.m.) Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication During the Entire 24-h Day Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Asthma Symptom-free Days Based on the Weekly Mean Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and last 7 days before week 24 visit
Time to First Severe Asthma Exacerbation From the Two Twin Trials 205.419 (NCT01172821) and the Present 205.418 (NCT01172808)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Time to First Asthma Exacerbation From the Two Twin Trials 205.419 (NCT01172821) and the Present 205.418 (NCT01172808)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jun 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32180164Halpin DMG, Hamelmann EH, Frith PA, Moroni-Zentgraf PM, van Hecke B, Unseld A, Kerstjens HAM, Szefler SJ. Comparative Responses in Lung Function Measurements with Tiotropium in Adolescents and Adults, and Across Asthma Severities: A Post Hoc Analysis. Pulm Ther. 2020 Jun;6(1):131-140. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00113-w. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31654891Casale TB, Aalbers R, Bleecker ER, Meltzer EO, Zaremba-Pechmann L, de la Hoz A, Kerstjens HAM. Tiotropium Respimat(R) add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with symptomatic asthma improves clinical outcomes regardless of baseline characteristics. Respir Med. 2019 Oct-Nov;158:97-109. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31319851Halpin DMG, Meltzer EO, Pisternick-Ruf W, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Engel M, Zaremba-Pechmann L, Casale T, FitzGerald JM. Peak expiratory flow as an endpoint for clinical trials in asthma: a comparison with FEV1. Respir Res. 2019 Jul 18;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1119-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29174062Casale TB, Bateman ED, Vandewalker M, Virchow JC, Schmidt H, Engel M, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Kerstjens HAM. Tiotropium Respimat Add-on Is Efficacious in Symptomatic Asthma, Independent of T2 Phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):923-935.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.037. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25682232Kerstjens HA, Casale TB, Bleecker ER, Meltzer EO, Pizzichini E, Schmidt O, Engel M, Bour L, Verkleij CB, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Bateman ED. Tiotropium or salmeterol as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for patients with moderate symptomatic asthma: two replicate, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, active-comparator, randomised trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 May;3(5):367-76. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00031-4. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
114 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium Respimat® low dose, tiotropium Respimat® high dose and 50 mcg salmeterol HFA MDI in people with Asthma, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 114 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 114 sites in Japan, United States, China, India, Latvia and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Feb 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peak FEV1 Within 3 Hours Post-dose Response (time frame: 24 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01172808, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2014.