AzTrials
AzTrials

CandidemiaNCT01174147

A Laboratory-based Surveillance Study of Candida Bloodstream Infections (MK-0991-093)

An observational study of Candidemia, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the incidence rate of Candida blood stream infection (candidemia) among people hospitalized in participating medical centers in Brazil, and will assess the antifungal drug susceptibility patterns of Candida clinical isolates. No hypotheses will be tested in the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Candidemia
How many people
436 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2010to Nov 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult and pediatric patients hospitalized in participating medical centers (tertiary care hospitals) in Brazil

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalized in a participating medical center
  • Developed candidemia blood stream infection (confirmed by isolation of Candida species from blood culture)

Who cannot join

None listed.

About this study

Official title: Brazilian Network of Candidemia: a Laboratory-based Surveillance Study on Candida Bloodstream Infections in 10 Medical Centers

This study will evaluate the incidence rate of Candida blood stream infection (candidemia) among people hospitalized in participating medical centers in Brazil, and will assess the antifungal drug susceptibility patterns of Candida clinical isolates. No hypotheses will be tested in the study. Candida blood stream isolates collected from people hospitalized for any reason during the study period will be sent to a core mycology laboratory for antifungal drug susceptibility testing. All people who develop candidemia while hospitalized will be considered participants in the study.

Conditions
Candidemia
Medical subject headings
Candidemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01174147
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hospital Candida CasesPeople who developed a positive blood culture for Candida while hospitalized

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants with Candidemia per 1000 hospital admissions

    A candidemia case was defined as the first isolation of any Candida species from blood within a 30-day period during hospitalization. The incidence of candidemia was calculated as (number of participants / [number of total people hospitalized during the study period / 1000])

    Measured: Approximately 1 year

  2. Number of participants with Candidemia per 1000 patient-Days in hospital

    A candidemia case was defined as the first isolation of any Candida species from blood within a 30-day period during hospitalization. The incidence of candidemia was calculated as (number of participants / [number of total patient-days of hospitalization during the study period / 1000]).

    Measured: Approximately 1 year

  3. Percentage of Specific Candida Isolates Susceptible to Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole, Anidulafungin, and Caspofungin

    Candida bloodstream isolates were tested for susceptibility to antifungal drugs using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microbroth dilution method with final readings recorded after 24 hours. The susceptibility cutoffs for antifungal drugs except amphotericin B were from the CLSI M27-S4 Reference Supplement (December 2012). The susceptibility cutoff for amphotericin B was obtained from the published literature.

    Measured: Approximately 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2010
  3. Primary completionNov 2012
  4. Study completionNov 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
436 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01174147
Sponsor's protocol ID
0991-093
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
30 Jul 2010
Last updated
13 Oct 2016
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Candidemia, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants with Candidemia per 1000 hospital admissions (time frame: Approximately 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in