AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood Stem Cell Transplant FailureNCT01174277

Pilot Study: Patients With Chronic Active Graft Versus Host Disease That Have Failed or Not Tolerated Standard Therapy.

An observational study of Blood Stem Cell Transplant Failure and Graft Versus Host Disease, run by University of Kansas Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

By doing this study, researchers hope to understand the many changes that occur in the blood of people who have chronic GvHD. This may also help the researcher understand how ECP works and help guide therapy for patients who have chronic GvHD in the future. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 years and older
What is being tested?
Collection of blood sample
How many people
23 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2010to Feb 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who have undergone allogeneic HSCT and are being managed for chronic Graft versus Host Disease by the University of Kansas Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, and the Children's Mercy Hospital BMT program, will be invited to take part in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Allogeneic HSCT recipients who have chronic extensive GvHD and who have failed or have not been able to tolerate conventional therapy
  • Platelets ≥ 20,000 without transfusion support
  • Weight ≥ 15 kg.
  • Stated willingness to use contraception in women of childbearing potential

Who cannot join

  • Patients who may not be able to tolerate ECP
  • Patients who have received Rituximab monoclonal antibody therapy in the past 3 months
  • Patients with a known hypersensitivity to psoralens
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Patients who are unable to sign informed consent or who do not have a representative to give permission to participate

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Children's Mercy Hospital

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64108

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Immunological Changes in Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease Treated With Extracorporeal Photopheresis

By doing this study, researchers hope to understand the many changes that occur in the blood of people who have chronic GvHD. This may also help the researcher understand how ECP works and help guide therapy for patients who have chronic GvHD in the future.

Read the detailed description

The occurrence of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and its prevention/treatment induce further immunologic compromise. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) accounts for significant morbidity and mortality in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplants (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplants. The condition occurs as donor lymphocytes recognize the recipient's tissue as foreign and mount an inflammatory and destructive response in the recipient. GvHD has a predilection for epithelial tissues, especially skin, liver, and the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract. This can lead to severe skin lesions, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and liver failure. In addition, people with GvHD are especially susceptible to infection. Approximately 30-70% of people undergoing allogeneic HSCT for hematologic malignancies can anticipate experiencing acute and/or chronic GVHD. The physical consequences depend on the severity of GVHD, but moderate to severe organ system involvement is associated with substantial medical morbidity and mortality. The current standard of care treatment for patients with chronic graft-vs-host disease is steroid treatment with or without a calcineurin inhibitor. This treatment, while effective for some, does not control the chronic gvhd of all. The use of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) was developed in patients with several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, including scleroderma and rheumatoid arthritis. Successful use of ECP has also been reported in patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma, the Sezary syndrome variant, cardiac and lung transplant rejection and other T cell mediated/autoimmune and autoimmune diseases and even after facial transplantation. More recently, ECP has proven to be a highly effective useful tool in the treatment of GvHD.

The exact mechanism of action of ECP is unknown, but the principle of the process is to induce leucocyte apoptosis with UVA radiation after their exposure to psoralens, which are light sensitizers. These leukocytes are immediately re-infused into the patient, where they undergo early apoptosis. Following apoptosis, the leukocytes are engulfed by macrophage or other antigen-presenting cells, such as immature dendritic cells, in an anti-inflammatory cytokine environment. The anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion pattern, with a switch from TH1 to TH2 for CD4+ lymphocytes, and the engulfment by immature cells without co-stimulatory molecules induces anergy, by deleting effector T-cells that responded to the presented antigens. An increase in regulatory T-cells (T-regs) is also induced after ECP and may contribute to allograft acceptance by the recipient.

ECP has also been effective in treating solid organ transplant rejection and improving the course of various autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, and pemphigus vulgaris. Since the early 1990s, ECP has been investigated as a rescue immunotherapy for patients with steroid resistant acute and chronic GVHD. ECP is generally well tolerated and Phase II data have confirmed activity in more than 250 patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD.

ECP involves the isolation of peripheral blood buffy coat cells, ex vivo exposure of the cells to 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and ultraviolet-A radiation, and subsequent re-infusion of the treated cells to the patient. The combination of 8-MOP and PUVA results in DNA crosslinks and causes apoptosis. However, the direct induction of lymphocyte apoptosis is unlikely to account for the clinical efficacy of ECP given that less than 10% of circulating leukocytes are exposed to PUVA during ECP.

The mechanism of ECP beyond the effects of apoptosis induction is incompletely understood. Studies to date suggest that ECP in autoimmune conditions or GVHD stimulates anti-idiotypic responses against host tissue-reactive T cell clones, attenuates antigen-presenting function by type 2 dendritic cells, and induces anti-inflammatory cytokine responses. In addition, an important component of tolerance induction is thought to involve the expansion of Tregs that suppress alloreactive mechanisms.

ECP therapy has been studied in two well-defined minor MHC incompatible murine models of CD8+ or CD4+ T cell mediated GVHD. These studies showed that ECP treated cells could successfully reverse established GVHD by reducing allogeneic responses of donor effector T cells and generating FOXP3+ Tregs from donor cells that had not been directly exposed to PUVA, thereby ruling out a mechanistic role for direct apoptosis of effector cells. The increase in Tregs occurred early after the infusion of ECP treated cells, remained stable for several weeks, and was required to reduce GVHD and mortality after BMT. Correlative data in humans is preliminary, but one small case series has shown an increase in the percentage of functional Tregs after 6 ECP procedures from 8.9% to 29% of the total circulating CD4+ cells (p = .05). UVAR Photopheresis System (Therakos, Inc., Exton, PA, USA) was approved for ECP treatment of advanced cutaneous T cell lymphoma in 1988 by the Food and Drug Administration. In 2009 FDA approval was granted for this indication for the new Cellex machine.

Being tested
Collection of blood sample
Keywords
chronic graft versus host disease, transplant, stem cell
Medical subject headings
Graft vs Host Disease, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Collection of blood sampleOther

    Participation involves collection of blood sample at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 12 months regardless of whether or not patients continue on treatment.

Study groups in NCT01174277
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Collection of blood sampleBlood draw
Receives: Other: Collection of blood sample

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Determine effects of ECP using Cellex on T and B cell subsets and CD4+ cell differentiation

    Flow cytometry will be used to characterize T and B cell subsets in the blood of ECP patients. We will also isolate CD4+ T cells from ECP patients, stimulate the cells in culture, and measure proliferation and cytokine production. These assays will be performed prior to ECP therapy and at two, four and six months following ECP therapy.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To correlate the effects of ECP on immunologic parameters with clinical outcomes.

    We will measure serum levels of eight biomarkers known to correlate with GvHD and evaluate the patients for clinical signs of GvHD. The biomarkers and clinical signs will be correlated with the immunologic parameters described in the primary outcome measure.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2010
  3. Primary completionFeb 2016
  4. Study completionFeb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01174277
Sponsor's protocol ID
12179
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
27 Jul 2010
Last updated
10 Jan 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Blood Stem Cell Transplant Failure and Graft Versus Host Disease, run by University of Kansas Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Determine effects of ECP using Cellex on T and B cell subsets and CD4+ cell differentiation (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in