AzTrials
AzTrials

Invasive AspergillosisNCT01176071

Correlation Between Circulating Galactomannan and Beta-D-glucan and Clinical Outcome of Invasive Aspergillosis

An observational study of Invasive Aspergillosis, run by University Hospital, Gasthuisberg.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators hypothesize that early galactomannan and beta-D-glucan features, namely the height of the initial value at the time of diagnosis and the subsequent rate of marker decay within the first week(s) following therapy (day 7, day 14) are important factors in predicting clinical outcome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Invasive Aspergillosis
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2010to Jan 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: hematology patients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis

Who may be able to join

  • proven or probable invasive aspergillosis with positive GM antigen test

Who cannot join

  • Seronegative aspergillosis

About this study

Official title: An Observational Assessment of the Correlation Between Circulating Galactomannan and Beta-D-glucan and Clinical Outcome in the Setting of Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients With an Underlying Hematological Disorder

The investigators hypothesize that early galactomannan and beta-D-glucan features, namely the height of the initial value at the time of diagnosis and the subsequent rate of marker decay within the first week(s) following therapy (day 7, day 14) are important factors in predicting clinical outcome.

Read the detailed description

A major challenge in the development of antifungal therapies for invasive fungal infections is the difficulty in assessing early treatment response and clinical prognosis. Mycological endpoints are often unreliable, reflected by the low sensitivity of fungal cultures to diagnose infection (20% for aspergillosis). Radiographic endpoints can be misleading, particularly when assessed early following treatment initiation. Clinical endpoints can be ambiguous indicators of treatment response, and generally include categorization of patient outcome as better, stable or worse. Furthermore, clinical assessments are likely confounded by the underlying diseases predisposing to fungal infection. Thus, a biomarker interposed between the initiation of antifungal therapy and patient outcome would bring much needed precision in the evaluation of novel antifungal drugs and thus serve as a valuable tool to guide decision-taking regarding ineffective treatments and dose selection in product development. The current absence of such biomarkers represents a critical capability gap. To date, only few studies have examined the prognostic value of fungal biomarkers in invasive aspergillosis on clinical outcome and have been limited by sample seize. To address this issue, the current study will examine the correlation between the fungal biomarkers galactomannan and beta-D-glucan with clinical outcome in invasive aspergillosis. The study will also incorporate C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, as they seem to be a useful surrogate marker of IL-6 production.

The investigator contains a sample database of 100+ patients with either probable or proven invasive aspergillosis for which daily marker levels and CRP (during the first two weeks of antifungal therapy) were measured and clinical assessment data at (2, 4 and ) 6 weeks post-treatment.

The study will evaluate whether serial serum measurements of galactomannan/beta-D-glucan during the first week(s) of antifungal therapy can distinguish between successful clinical outcome and failed clinical outcome at 6 weeks in patients with proven and probable invasive aspergillosis.

The study aims also at exploring various cut points for galactomannan/beta-D-glucan measurements at two weeks after initiation of antifungal therapy and at exploring the sensitivity and specificity for predicting clinical outcome at 6 and 12 weeks in patients with proven and probable invasive aspergillosis.

Keywords
galactomannan, beta-D-glucan, aspergillosis, outcome
Medical subject headings
Aspergillosis

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2010 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2011 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01176071
Sponsor's protocol ID
IISP 37367
Status last verified
Jul 2010
First submitted
4 Aug 2010
Last updated
5 Aug 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Invasive Aspergillosis, run by University Hospital, Gasthuisberg.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2010; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in