Invasive AspergillosisNCT01176071
Correlation Between Circulating Galactomannan and Beta-D-glucan and Clinical Outcome of Invasive Aspergillosis
An observational study of Invasive Aspergillosis, run by University Hospital, Gasthuisberg.
Trial summary
The investigators hypothesize that early galactomannan and beta-D-glucan features, namely the height of the initial value at the time of diagnosis and the subsequent rate of marker decay within the first week(s) following therapy (day 7, day 14) are important factors in predicting clinical outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Invasive Aspergillosis
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2010to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: hematology patients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis
Who may be able to join
- proven or probable invasive aspergillosis with positive GM antigen test
Who cannot join
- Seronegative aspergillosis
About this study
Official title: An Observational Assessment of the Correlation Between Circulating Galactomannan and Beta-D-glucan and Clinical Outcome in the Setting of Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients With an Underlying Hematological Disorder
The investigators hypothesize that early galactomannan and beta-D-glucan features, namely the height of the initial value at the time of diagnosis and the subsequent rate of marker decay within the first week(s) following therapy (day 7, day 14) are important factors in predicting clinical outcome.
Read the detailed description
A major challenge in the development of antifungal therapies for invasive fungal infections is the difficulty in assessing early treatment response and clinical prognosis. Mycological endpoints are often unreliable, reflected by the low sensitivity of fungal cultures to diagnose infection (20% for aspergillosis). Radiographic endpoints can be misleading, particularly when assessed early following treatment initiation. Clinical endpoints can be ambiguous indicators of treatment response, and generally include categorization of patient outcome as better, stable or worse. Furthermore, clinical assessments are likely confounded by the underlying diseases predisposing to fungal infection. Thus, a biomarker interposed between the initiation of antifungal therapy and patient outcome would bring much needed precision in the evaluation of novel antifungal drugs and thus serve as a valuable tool to guide decision-taking regarding ineffective treatments and dose selection in product development. The current absence of such biomarkers represents a critical capability gap. To date, only few studies have examined the prognostic value of fungal biomarkers in invasive aspergillosis on clinical outcome and have been limited by sample seize. To address this issue, the current study will examine the correlation between the fungal biomarkers galactomannan and beta-D-glucan with clinical outcome in invasive aspergillosis. The study will also incorporate C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, as they seem to be a useful surrogate marker of IL-6 production.
The investigator contains a sample database of 100+ patients with either probable or proven invasive aspergillosis for which daily marker levels and CRP (during the first two weeks of antifungal therapy) were measured and clinical assessment data at (2, 4 and ) 6 weeks post-treatment.
The study will evaluate whether serial serum measurements of galactomannan/beta-D-glucan during the first week(s) of antifungal therapy can distinguish between successful clinical outcome and failed clinical outcome at 6 weeks in patients with proven and probable invasive aspergillosis.
The study aims also at exploring various cut points for galactomannan/beta-D-glucan measurements at two weeks after initiation of antifungal therapy and at exploring the sensitivity and specificity for predicting clinical outcome at 6 and 12 weeks in patients with proven and probable invasive aspergillosis.
- Conditions
- Invasive Aspergillosis
- Keywords
- galactomannan, beta-D-glucan, aspergillosis, outcome
- Medical subject headings
- Aspergillosis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2010
- Primary completionDec 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Invasive AspergillosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Johan A Maertens, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, UZ Gasthuisberg Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01176071
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IISP 37367
- Status last verified
- Jul 2010
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2010
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Observational Assessment of the Correlation Between Circulating Galactomannan and Beta-D-glucan and Clinical Outcome in the Setting of Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients With an Underlying Hematological Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01176071
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IISP 37367
- Conditions
- Invasive Aspergillosis
- Keywords
- galactomannan, beta-D-glucan, aspergillosis, outcome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GasthuisbergUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators hypothesize that early galactomannan and beta-D-glucan features, namely the height of the initial value at the time of diagnosis and the subsequent rate of marker decay within the first week(s) following therapy (day 7, day 14) are important factors in predicting clinical outcome.
Detailed description
A major challenge in the development of antifungal therapies for invasive fungal infections is the difficulty in assessing early treatment response and clinical prognosis. Mycological endpoints are often unreliable, reflected by the low sensitivity of fungal cultures to diagnose infection (20% for aspergillosis). Radiographic endpoints can be misleading, particularly when assessed early following treatment initiation. Clinical endpoints can be ambiguous indicators of treatment response, and generally include categorization of patient outcome as better, stable or worse. Furthermore, clinical assessments are likely confounded by the underlying diseases predisposing to fungal infection. Thus, a biomarker interposed between the initiation of antifungal therapy and patient outcome would bring much needed precision in the evaluation of novel antifungal drugs and thus serve as a valuable tool to guide decision-taking regarding ineffective treatments and dose selection in product development. The current absence of such biomarkers represents a critical capability gap. To date, only few studies have examined the prognostic value of fungal biomarkers in invasive aspergillosis on clinical outcome and have been limited by sample seize. To address this issue, the current study will examine the correlation between the fungal biomarkers galactomannan and beta-D-glucan with clinical outcome in invasive aspergillosis. The study will also incorporate C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, as they seem to be a useful surrogate marker of IL-6 production.
The investigator contains a sample database of 100+ patients with either probable or proven invasive aspergillosis for which daily marker levels and CRP (during the first two weeks of antifungal therapy) were measured and clinical assessment data at (2, 4 and ) 6 weeks post-treatment.
The study will evaluate whether serial serum measurements of galactomannan/beta-D-glucan during the first week(s) of antifungal therapy can distinguish between successful clinical outcome and failed clinical outcome at 6 weeks in patients with proven and probable invasive aspergillosis.
The study aims also at exploring various cut points for galactomannan/beta-D-glucan measurements at two weeks after initiation of antifungal therapy and at exploring the sensitivity and specificity for predicting clinical outcome at 6 and 12 weeks in patients with proven and probable invasive aspergillosis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- hematology patients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- proven or probable invasive aspergillosis with positive GM antigen test
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Seronegative aspergillosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2010.
Related trials for Invasive Aspergillosis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Individuals With Immune System Problems That Lead to Fungal Infections
Chronic Mucocutaneous Candidiasis, Invasive Aspergillosis
RecruitingObservational study
Fungal Status and Prognosis in ABPA
ABPA, Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis
RecruitingObservational study
Derivation and Validation of the Fungal Pneumonia Assessment and Likelihood Predictor Score
Pneumonia, Fungal Pneumonia
RecruitingObservational study
A Cohort Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Biologics in Patients With ABPA
ABPA, Biologics
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Liver Cirrhosis Patients With Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis: in Depth Understanding Clinical Host Risk Factors
Liver Cirrhosis, Viral Pneumonia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Johan A Maertens, MD, PhD principal investigator
UZ Gasthuisberg Leuven
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Invasive Aspergillosis, run by University Hospital, Gasthuisberg.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2010; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.