Type 1 DiabetesNCT01178476
Prevention of Severe Hypoglycaemia With Hypo-Safe Hypoglycaemia Alarm Device
A study testing Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm device in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by UNEEG Medical A/S at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Hypoglycaemia is the most common acute complication in insulin-treated diabetes. The fear of hypoglycaemia discourages diabetic subjects from the attempt to maintain tight glycemic control, which in turn leads to increased diabetes related morbidity and mortality. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Nov 2009to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patient with type 1 diabetes for at least one year
- Age 18-70 years
- Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia as defined by
- A score of ≥4 on the Gold-scale (Appendix 8) or
- Two or more occasions of severe hypoglycaemia (need of help from third person) within the past 12 month
- Multiple injection insulin therapy or continuous insulin injection therapy
- For female participants: Not pregnant and, if child bearing potential, usage of reliable anti-contraceptive method during the study period
Who cannot join
- Severe cardiac disease
- History of myocardial infarction
- Cardiac arrhythmia
- Previous stroke or cerebral haemorrhage and any other structural cerebral disease
- Active cancer or cancer diagnosis within the past five years
- Uremia defined as s-creatinine above 3 times upper reference value
Show all 23Show fewer
- Liver disease defined as s-ALAT above 3 times upper reference interval
- Inability to understand the informed consent
- Epilepsy
- Use of antiepileptic drugs for any purposes
- Clinical important hearing impairment
- Use of active implantable medical device including
- Pacemaker and ICD-unit
- Cochlear implant
- Use of following drugs
- Chemotherapeutic drugs of any kind
- Methotrexate
- Third generation antipsychotic drugs (aripiprazole, quetiapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, paliperidone, risperidone, sertindole, amisulpride, olanzapine
- Abuse of alcohol (defined as consumption of > 250g alcohol (in Danish: 21 "genstande") per week or abuse of any other neuroactive substances
- Infection at the site of device-implantation
- Any hemorrhagic disease
- Diving (snorkel diving allowed) or parachute jumping
- Patients that are judged incapable of understanding the patient information or who are not capable of carrying through the investigation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Hypoglycaemia is the most common acute complication in insulin-treated diabetes. The fear of hypoglycaemia discourages diabetic subjects from the attempt to maintain tight glycemic control, which in turn leads to increased diabetes related morbidity and mortality.
Neuroglycopenic hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated diabetic patients is associated with characteristic changes in EEG with a decrease in alpha activity and an increase in delta and theta activity. We have recently demonstrated that hypoglycaemia-associated EEG-changes can be recorded from subcutaneously placed electrodes using an automated mathematical algorithm based on non-linear spectral analysis. Experimental findings hold promises that an alarm, given at the time of EEG-changes, can help the patients to avoid severe hypoglycaemia by ingestion of carbohydrate.
This is the first larger scale trial testing the clinical applicability of a hypoglycaemia-alarm based on real-time analysis of EEG-signals.
Read the detailed description
The near-normalization of glycemic control has become an established treatment goal in diabetes in order to reduce the risk of late complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular disease (1). However, the frequency of insulin-induced hypoglycaemia increases several-fold during intensified insulin therapy (2;3) and hypoglycaemia is the most common acute complication in insulin-treated diabetes. The fear of hypoglycaemia discourages diabetic subjects from the attempt to maintain tight glycemic control, which in turn leads to increased diabetes related morbidity and mortality (4;5). Symptoms of hypoglycaemia can be classified as autonomic (warning) symptoms caused by the release of catecholamines and neuroglycopenic symptoms caused by the lack of glucose supply to the brain. Symptoms of hypoglycaemia may be compromised at night-time (nocturnal asymptomatic hypoglycaemia) due to impaired glucose counterregulatory response by adrenaline and glucagon. Some 25% of patients with type 1 diabetes suffer from unawareness in various degrees increasing with long diabetes duration and tight glycemic control (4;6;7).
Several studies have evaluated the potential use of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) as hypoglycaemia alarms but so far failed to show reduction in the frequency of severe hypoglycaemia (8;9). Although the technology is continuously being improved it is still associated with a number of problems (10). The technique is rather imprecise, particularly in the lower range of glucose measurements, and only about 33% of hypoglycemic events were detected in a larger clinical trial (11). The accuracy of the reading is reduced when rapid changes in blood glucose occur (12). There is a significant and variable delay from the change in blood glucose to the change in the interstitial compartment ranging from 4 - 10 minutes (13) and the catheters are rather costly and must be replaced every 72 hours.
The EEG signal reflects the functional state and metabolism of the brain. The brain is almost totally dependent on a continuous supply of glucose, and when the glucose level is lower than the metabolic requirements of the brain, its function deteriorates. Neuroglycopenic hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated diabetic patients is associated with characteristic changes in EEG with a decrease in alpha activity and an increase in delta and theta activity (14-17). These changes are clearly seen at blood glucose ~2.0mmol/l (14;15) preceding the development of severe cognitive dysfunction (18). We have recently demonstrated that hypoglycaemia-associated EEG-changes can be recorded from subcutaneously placed electrodes using an automated mathematical algorithm based on non-linear spectral analysis and that EEG-changes above a predefined threshold can be demonstrated more than 10 minutes before development of severe hypoglycaemia in the majority of the patients (19). We found a very low rate of false alarms and no adverse reactions related to implantation of the electrodes. We have subsequently performed a number of studies with real-time alarms type 1 diabetes patients exposed to insulin induced hypoglycaemia. In these studies the patients were instructed to ingest carbohydrates when he/she heard the alarm sound. In three out of four cases the patients were able to do so, while a fourth patient did not spontaneously ingest the meal although, he was fully conscious and not clinically affect by the hypoglycaemia. These findings hold promises that an alarm, given at the time of EEG-changes, can help the patients to avoid severe hypoglycaemia by ingestion of carbohydrate.
For clinical applicability the device should be able to distinguish hypoglycaemia-induced EEG changes from noise, artefacts and physiological variations in the EEG including the low-frequency waves seen during sleep, with high sensitivity and specificity using a mathematical algorithm that classifies the EEG in real-time. There should be a "time-window" between hypoglycaemia-induced EEG changes and severe cognitive impairment. The device should be fully compatible with normal everyday activities. Thus, the device should be small, fully biocompatible and implantable, and the monitoring and processing unit should be small and have sufficient battery power.
This is the first larger scale trial testing the clinical applicability of a hypoglycaemia-alarm based on real-time analysis of EEG-signals.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Being tested
- Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm device
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm deviceDevice
An EEG based hypoglycemia alarm is tested against standard glucose measurement on the risk of severe hypoglycemia
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hyposafe Hypoglycemia alarm device | Experimental | EEG based hypoglycemia detection Receives: Device: Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm device |
| Regular glucose control | Active comparator | Regular glucose control group Receives: Device: Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The frequency of severe hypoglycaemia event
Measured: six months
Secondary outcomes (1)
The frequency of clinical hypoglycaemia (sensation of hypoglycaemia and BG<3.5mmol/l), biochemical hypoglycaemia (BG<3.5mmol/l), and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (waking up with a sensation of hypoglycaemia and BG<3.5mmol/l)
Measured: six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2009
- Primary completionJan 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 1 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UNEEG Medical A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Birger Thorsteinsson, MD., Principal investigator, Medical Department, Hillerød Sygehus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01178476
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hyposafe-hypo-02
- Status last verified
- Aug 2010
- First submitted
- 18 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention of Severe Hypoglycaemia With Hypo-Safe Hypoglycaemia Alarm Device
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01178476
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hyposafe-hypo-02
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UNEEG Medical A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2009
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypoglycaemia is the most common acute complication in insulin-treated diabetes. The fear of hypoglycaemia discourages diabetic subjects from the attempt to maintain tight glycemic control, which in turn leads to increased diabetes related morbidity and mortality.
Neuroglycopenic hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated diabetic patients is associated with characteristic changes in EEG with a decrease in alpha activity and an increase in delta and theta activity. We have recently demonstrated that hypoglycaemia-associated EEG-changes can be recorded from subcutaneously placed electrodes using an automated mathematical algorithm based on non-linear spectral analysis. Experimental findings hold promises that an alarm, given at the time of EEG-changes, can help the patients to avoid severe hypoglycaemia by ingestion of carbohydrate.
This is the first larger scale trial testing the clinical applicability of a hypoglycaemia-alarm based on real-time analysis of EEG-signals.
Detailed description
The near-normalization of glycemic control has become an established treatment goal in diabetes in order to reduce the risk of late complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular disease (1). However, the frequency of insulin-induced hypoglycaemia increases several-fold during intensified insulin therapy (2;3) and hypoglycaemia is the most common acute complication in insulin-treated diabetes. The fear of hypoglycaemia discourages diabetic subjects from the attempt to maintain tight glycemic control, which in turn leads to increased diabetes related morbidity and mortality (4;5). Symptoms of hypoglycaemia can be classified as autonomic (warning) symptoms caused by the release of catecholamines and neuroglycopenic symptoms caused by the lack of glucose supply to the brain. Symptoms of hypoglycaemia may be compromised at night-time (nocturnal asymptomatic hypoglycaemia) due to impaired glucose counterregulatory response by adrenaline and glucagon. Some 25% of patients with type 1 diabetes suffer from unawareness in various degrees increasing with long diabetes duration and tight glycemic control (4;6;7).
Several studies have evaluated the potential use of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) as hypoglycaemia alarms but so far failed to show reduction in the frequency of severe hypoglycaemia (8;9). Although the technology is continuously being improved it is still associated with a number of problems (10). The technique is rather imprecise, particularly in the lower range of glucose measurements, and only about 33% of hypoglycemic events were detected in a larger clinical trial (11). The accuracy of the reading is reduced when rapid changes in blood glucose occur (12). There is a significant and variable delay from the change in blood glucose to the change in the interstitial compartment ranging from 4 - 10 minutes (13) and the catheters are rather costly and must be replaced every 72 hours.
The EEG signal reflects the functional state and metabolism of the brain. The brain is almost totally dependent on a continuous supply of glucose, and when the glucose level is lower than the metabolic requirements of the brain, its function deteriorates. Neuroglycopenic hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated diabetic patients is associated with characteristic changes in EEG with a decrease in alpha activity and an increase in delta and theta activity (14-17). These changes are clearly seen at blood glucose ~2.0mmol/l (14;15) preceding the development of severe cognitive dysfunction (18). We have recently demonstrated that hypoglycaemia-associated EEG-changes can be recorded from subcutaneously placed electrodes using an automated mathematical algorithm based on non-linear spectral analysis and that EEG-changes above a predefined threshold can be demonstrated more than 10 minutes before development of severe hypoglycaemia in the majority of the patients (19). We found a very low rate of false alarms and no adverse reactions related to implantation of the electrodes. We have subsequently performed a number of studies with real-time alarms type 1 diabetes patients exposed to insulin induced hypoglycaemia. In these studies the patients were instructed to ingest carbohydrates when he/she heard the alarm sound. In three out of four cases the patients were able to do so, while a fourth patient did not spontaneously ingest the meal although, he was fully conscious and not clinically affect by the hypoglycaemia. These findings hold promises that an alarm, given at the time of EEG-changes, can help the patients to avoid severe hypoglycaemia by ingestion of carbohydrate.
For clinical applicability the device should be able to distinguish hypoglycaemia-induced EEG changes from noise, artefacts and physiological variations in the EEG including the low-frequency waves seen during sleep, with high sensitivity and specificity using a mathematical algorithm that classifies the EEG in real-time. There should be a "time-window" between hypoglycaemia-induced EEG changes and severe cognitive impairment. The device should be fully compatible with normal everyday activities. Thus, the device should be small, fully biocompatible and implantable, and the monitoring and processing unit should be small and have sufficient battery power.
This is the first larger scale trial testing the clinical applicability of a hypoglycaemia-alarm based on real-time analysis of EEG-signals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hyposafe Hypoglycemia alarm device | Experimental | Device: Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm deviceEEG based hypoglycemia detection |
| Regular glucose control | Active comparator | Device: Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm deviceRegular glucose control group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Male and female patient with type 1 diabetes for at least one year
- Age 18-70 years
- Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia as defined by
- Multiple injection insulin therapy or continuous insulin injection therapy
- For female participants: Not pregnant and, if child bearing potential, usage of reliable anti-contraceptive method during the study period
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Severe cardiac disease
- Previous stroke or cerebral haemorrhage and any other structural cerebral disease
- Active cancer or cancer diagnosis within the past five years
- Uremia defined as s-creatinine above 3 times upper reference value
- Liver disease defined as s-ALAT above 3 times upper reference interval
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm deviceAn EEG based hypoglycemia alarm is tested against standard glucose measurement on the risk of severe hypoglycemia | Device | Hyposafe Hypoglycemia alarm device, Regular glucose control |
Primary outcome
The frequency of severe hypoglycaemia event
Time frame: six months
1 secondary outcome
The frequency of clinical hypoglycaemia (sensation of hypoglycaemia and BG<3.5mmol/l), biochemical hypoglycaemia (BG<3.5mmol/l), and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (waking up with a sensation of hypoglycaemia and BG<3.5mmol/l)
Time frame: six months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2014.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Birger Thorsteinsson, MD. principal investigator
Medical Department, Hillerød Sygehus
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hyposafe Hypoglycaemia alarm device in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by UNEEG Medical A/S at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The frequency of severe hypoglycaemia event (time frame: six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2014.