AzTrials
AzTrials

Complicated GriefPhase 2HEALNCT01179568

A Study of Medication With or Without Psychotherapy for Complicated Grief

A Phase 2 study testing Citalopram and Complicated Grief Treatment in people with Complicated Grief and Bereavement, run by New York State Psychiatric Institute at 4 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The major goal of this 4-site, double blind, placebo-controlled intervention trial is to assess the efficacy of medication (Citalopram) alone or with psychotherapy (Complicated Grief Therapy) to treat the symptoms of complicated grief. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 95 years
Conditions the study is for
Complicated Grief, Bereavement
What is being tested?
Citalopram and Complicated Grief Treatment
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
395 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2010to Jul 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 95 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with Complicated Grief and this is the patient's most important (primary) problem
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Fluent in English
  • Willingness to have sessions audiotaped
  • Willingness to undergo random assignment

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of one or more of the following disorders: Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, current (past 6 months) substance abuse, Bipolar Disorder, current manic episode, Dementia
  • Pregnant or lactating women and women of childbearing potential not using medically accepted forms of contraception
  • Acute, unstable or severe medical illness such as (but not limited to) stroke, epilepsy, or other neurodegenerative disorders, metastatic or active cancer, hepatic disease, or primary renal disease requiring dialysis
  • Prior intolerance of citalopram
  • Pending or active disability claim or lawsuit related to the death

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • New York State Psychiatric Institute

    New York, New York, 10032

  • University of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • VASDHS / University of California San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92161

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Optimizing Treatment for Complicated Grief (Healing Emotions After Loss:HEAL)

The major goal of this 4-site, double blind, placebo-controlled intervention trial is to assess the efficacy of medication (Citalopram) alone or with psychotherapy (Complicated Grief Therapy) to treat the symptoms of complicated grief.

Read the detailed description

Complicated grief (CG) is a debilitating condition that is estimated to affect millions of people in the United States alone. We conducted the first randomized controlled study to address this condition (MH60783) and confirmed efficacy of a targeted psychotherapy, complicated grief treatment (CGT). Participants in our prior study continued stable antidepressant medication while receiving CGT or Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT). Individuals taking antidepressants had better outcome in both treatments, though CGT was superior to IPT when administered with (60% responders v. 40%) or without (42% v.19%) antidepressants. Studies of antidepressant medication alone have shown mixed results with SSRIs appearing to be promising. However, there has been no randomized controlled study of SSRIs for CG. Determining the efficacy of SSRI treatment for CG, when administered with and without CGT, is of great public health importance.

We assembled 4 groups of investigators with strong track records in bereavement research and extensive experience with intervention studies and multicenter projects, to conduct a study of citalopram (CIT) efficacy. We plan to enroll participants with a primary diagnosis of Complicated Grief and randomly assign them (n=480; 50 at Columbia) to receive treatment with CIT, Placebo (PBO), CIT + CGT or PBO + CGT over a period of approximately 16 weeks. We want to determine whether citalopram shows a better response than placebo, when administered either with or without CGT. We will also address the question of whether CIT performs as well when administered alone as it does when administered with CGT.

Being tested
Citalopram, Complicated Grief Treatment, Placebo
Keywords
Grief, Bereavement, Psychotherapy, Medication, Treatment study

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CitalopramDrug

    Also called Celexa

    16 weeks of medication provided flexibly up to 40 mg/day. Medication will be administered in a double-blind fashion.

  • Complicated Grief TreatmentBehavioural

    Also called CGT

    Complicated Grief Treatment (CGT) is a targeted psychotherapy for complicated grief. The treatment integrates principles, strategies and techniques from interpersonal psychotherapy, trauma-focused cognitive behavioral treatment and motivational interviewing. Treatment includes 16 sessions provided within 20 weeks.

  • PlaceboOther

    Also called Sugar pill

    16 weeks of daily inactive medication. It will be administered in a double-blind fashion.

Study groups in NCT01179568
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CGT with CitalopramActive comparatorTargeted psychotherapy for complicated grief will be combined with SSRI medication.
Receives: Drug: Citalopram; Behavioral: Complicated Grief Treatment
CitalopramActive comparatorCitalopram is an Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication. It will be combined with grief-focused clinical management.
Receives: Drug: Citalopram
Placebo (Sugar pill)Placebo comparatorInactive medication. It will be combined with grief-focused clinical management.
Receives: Other: Placebo
CGT with PlaceboActive comparatorThe targeted psychotherapy for complicated grief will be combined with inactive medication.
Receives: Behavioral: Complicated Grief Treatment; Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Responder Status Based on Complicated Grief Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

    Brief rating scale frequently used in clinical trials. For this study, version modified for complicated grief was be used. Response is defined as a score of 1(very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. The rating was done by an Independent Evaluator.

    Measured: Weeks 12 and 20

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change From Baseline in Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG)

    The 19-item self-report instrument assesses symptoms of complicated grief. Responses on individual items are added up to a total score, which can range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating more intense symptoms. This scale has been utilized previously in treatment studies of CG. Additional times points include weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 40. For the pre-specified analyses we compared change in the ICG total score from baseline (calculated as baseline score minus week 12 score) for CIT vs PLA at week 12 (aim 1), based on the intention-to-treat principle including all randomized participants.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG)

    The 19-item self-report instrument assesses symptoms of complicated grief. Responses on individual items are added up to a total score, which can range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating more intense symptoms. This scale has been utilized previously in treatment studies of CG. Additional times points include weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 40. For the pre-specified analyses we compared change in the ICG total score from baseline (calculated as baseline score minus week 20 score) for CIT with CGT vs PLA with CGT (aim 2), and for CIT with CGT vs CIT (aim 3) based on the intention-to-treat principle including all randomized participants.

    Measured: Baseline and week 20

  3. Change From Baseline in Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

    The WSAS is a modification of a scale introduced by Hafner and Marks (1976), consisting of 0-8 point ratings of the extent to which symptoms interfere with five areas of daily functioning: work, home management, private leisure, social leisure, and family relationships. It is a well-validated, widely used self-report measure. Additional time points include weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 40. A total score calculated as a sum of all items (possible range 0-40) was used in the analyses with higher scores indicating more impairment. For the pre-specified analyses we compared change in the WSAS total score from baseline (calculated as baseline score minus week 12 score) for CIT vs PLA at week 12 (aim 1), based on the intention-to-treat principle including all randomized participants.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

    The WSAS is a modification of a scale introduced by Hafner and Marks (1976), consisting of 0-8 point ratings of the extent to which symptoms interfere with five areas of daily functioning: work, home management, private leisure, social leisure, and family relationships. It is a well-validated, widely used self-report measure. Additional time points include weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 40. A total score calculated as a sum of all items (possible range 0-40) was used in the analyses with higher scores indicating more impairment. For the pre-specified analyses we compared change in the WSAS total score from baseline (calculated as baseline score minus week 20 score) for CIT with CGT vs PLA with CGT (aim 2), and for CIT with CGT vs CIT (aim 3) based on the intention-to-treat principle including all randomized participants.

    Measured: Baseline and week 20

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionJul 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
395 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01179568
Sponsor's protocol ID
5971
Other IDs
R01MH060783
Acronym
HEAL
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
14 Jul 2010
Last updated
24 Jan 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Simon NM, Thompson EH, Pollack MH, Shear MK. Complicated grief: a case series using escitalopram. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;164(11):1760-1. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07050800. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17974946
  • Shear K, Frank E, Houck PR, Reynolds CF 3rd. Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2601-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2601.

    PubMed 15928281
  • Schwartz D, Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis. 1967 Aug;20(8):637-48. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4860352
  • Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1624-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624.

    PubMed 14506122
  • Jacobs SC, Nelson JC, Zisook S. Treating depressions of bereavement with antidepressants. A pilot study. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1987 Sep;10(3):501-10.

    PubMed 3684751
  • Shear MK. Clinical practice. Complicated grief. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):153-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1315618. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25564898
  • Calderon A, Irwin M, Simon NM, Shear MK, Mauro C, Zisook S, Reynolds CF 3rd, Malgaroli M. Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Dec 12:2024.12.11.24318861. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.11.24318861.

    PubMed 39711702
  • Na PJ, Adhikari S, Szuhany KL, Chen AZ, Suzuki RR, Malgaroli M, Robinaugh DJ, Bui E, Mauro C, Skritskaya NA, Lebowitz BD, Zisook S, Reynolds CF 3rd, Shear MK, Simon NM. Posttraumatic Distress Symptoms and Their Response to Treatment in Adults With Prolonged Grief Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 20;82(3):20m13576. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20m13576.

    PubMed 34000119
  • Zisook S, Shear MK, Reynolds CF, Simon NM, Mauro C, Skritskaya NA, Lebowitz B, Wang Y, Tal I, Glorioso D, Wetherell JL, Iglewicz A, Robinaugh D, Qiu X. Treatment of Complicated Grief in Survivors of Suicide Loss: A HEAL Report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Mar/Apr;79(2):17m11592. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11592.

    PubMed 29617064
  • Shear MK, Reynolds CF 3rd, Simon NM, Zisook S, Wang Y, Mauro C, Duan N, Lebowitz B, Skritskaya N. Optimizing Treatment of Complicated Grief: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 1;73(7):685-94. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0892.

    PubMed 27276373

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Citalopram and Complicated Grief Treatment in people with Complicated Grief and Bereavement, run by New York State Psychiatric Institute at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Responder Status Based on Complicated Grief Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale (time frame: Weeks 12 and 20). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01179568, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in