AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical DystoniaNCT01180270

Static Graviceptive Functions in Patients With Cervical Dystonia (CD)

An observational study of Cervical Dystonia, run by Kirsten Elwischger at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this experimental pilot study is to test the effect of normalization of the head position on the sense of balance at patients with cervical dystonia under routine botulinum toxin treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Dystonia
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
Jun 2010to Jan 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: outpatient botulinum toxin clinic of the department of neurology, medical university of Vienna healthy subjects, residents of vienna

Who may be able to join

  • Idiopathic CD and willing to participate on the study,
  • Isolated laterocollis or laterocollis and torticollis with maximum of 15°rotation
  • Aged 18-80 years,
  • Under routine treatment with botulinum toxin

Who cannot join

  • Patients and Control
  • History of vestibular disorders
  • Patients
  • Torticollis with >15°rotation
  • Secondary CD (structural MRI lesions, Mb. Wilson)
  • Contraindication for intramuscular botulinum toxin therapy: bleeding disorder or anticoagulation therapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Department of neurology, Medical University of Vienna

    Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Experimental Pilot Trial Assessing Static Graviceptive Function in Patients With Cervical Dystonia

The purpose of this experimental pilot study is to test the effect of normalization of the head position on the sense of balance at patients with cervical dystonia under routine botulinum toxin treatment.

Read the detailed description

Background:

The pathophysiological mechanism of cervical dystonia remains unclear. Affection of static graviceptive function has been shown in these patients by measuring the Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV). Healthy subjects, tested with voluntary head tilt, would tilt SVV in the opposite direction of the head. (Müller "E" effect), whereas patients with cervical dystonia set SVV close to true upright with a minimal deviation toward head-tilt. The mechanism of this change in otolith activity in patients with cervical dystonia is still unknown. When treated with botulinum toxin, head deviation will be reversed during a period of approximate 6-9 weeks, with a first peak of action after approximate 3 weeks.

Aim

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of normalization of the head position under routine intramuscular botulinum toxin application in the cervical muscles (screening, 3 weeks and 9 weeks after injection) on static graviceptive function in patients with cervical dystonia.

Rationale

To our knowledge, the effect of botulinum toxin therapy on static otolith function in patients with cervical dystonia has never been evaluated. This study may provide new informations on the neural plasticity of the vestibular system and may contribute to the understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms of cervical dystonia. Accordingly, it may help developing new treatment strategies for this disease.

Primary hypothesis

There is a difference of at least 6 degrees in subjective visual vertical of patients with CD tested in habitual head position at study inclusion and 3 weeks after injection of Botulinum Toxin.

Study design

Subjective visual vertical will be tested in Patients with CD, who are pre-treated with botulinum toxin and show a good treatment response.

Patients SVV will be assessed before routine botulinum toxin injection (on day of injection), 3 and 9 weeks after injection. For control, SVV will be assessed in normal subjects.

SVV assessment

SVV will be performed by the patient and control while sitting upright in a dark room in different head positions, the head is fixed using a head holder.

In CD patients, SVV will be assessed in different head positions:

  1. the habitual head deviation (head deviation will be classified by Tsui score),
  2. head fixed in neutral head position (defined as 0° or no head rotation).
  3. ear deviated 15° and 30° to ipsilateral and contralateral side, respectively, starting at habitual head deviation

SVV in normal subject, with

  1. head fixed in neutral position (defined as 0° or no head rotation),
  2. ear deviated 30° to the left,
  3. ear deviated 30° to the right,
  4. ear deviated 15° to the left,
  5. ear deviated 15° to the right, will be assessed.
Keywords
Cervical dystonia, torticollis spasmodicus, botulinum toxin, Subjective visual vertical (SVV), SVV, static graviceptive function
Medical subject headings
Torticollis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01180270
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cervical dystoniapatients suffering from cervical dystonia under routine botulinum toxin treatment
healthy volunteerscontrol group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Subjective visual vertical (SVV), measured in degree (°)

    Assessment: sitting upright in dark room, head is fixed using a head holder with a strap and a neck rest covering the occiput and posterior neck. For deviation of head (0°, 15° and 30° to the left and right side), head holder can be rotated about its midpoint. In front of patient (distance of 100 cm) is dim light bar, which can be rotated about its midpoint by means of an electronic motor and a remote control device. Patients adjust bar for parallel alignment with the perceived gravitational vertical. The operator tilts the bar in a random order 18° from the physical vertical.

    Measured: screening

  2. SVV in degree (°)

    Assessment: sitting upright in dark room, head is fixed using a head holder with a strap and a neck rest covering the occiput and posterior neck. For deviation of head (0°, 15° and 30° to the left and right side), head holder can be rotated about its midpoint. In front of patient (distance of 100 cm) is dim light bar, which can be rotated about its midpoint by means of an electronic motor and a remote control device. Patients adjust bar for parallel alignment with the perceived gravitational vertical. The operator tilts the bar in a random order 18° from the physical vertical.

    Measured: 3 weeks after screeening

  3. SVV in degree (°)

    Assessment: sitting upright in dark room, head is fixed using a head holder with a strap and a neck rest covering the occiput and posterior neck. For deviation of head (0°, 15° and 30° to the left and right side), head holder can be rotated about its midpoint. In front of patient (distance of 100 cm) is dim light bar, which can be rotated about its midpoint by means of an electronic motor and a remote control device. Patients adjust bar for parallel alignment with the perceived gravitational vertical. The operator tilts the bar in a random order 18° from the physical vertical.

    Measured: 9 weeks after screening

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Degree of head deviation (°)

    head deviation of patients group in relaxed posture, measured in degrees (°)

    Measured: screening

  2. degree of head deviation (°)

    head deviation of patients group in relaxed posture, measured in degrees (°)

    Measured: 3 weeks after screening

  3. degree of head deviation (°)

    head deviation of patients group in relaxed posture, measured in degrees (°)

    Measured: 9 weeks after screening

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2012
  4. Study completionJan 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01180270
Sponsor's protocol ID
SVV_CD1
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
14 Jul 2010
Last updated
31 Jan 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Vacherot F, Vaugoyeau M, Mallau S, Soulayrol S, Assaiante C, Azulay JP. Postural control and sensory integration in cervical dystonia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 May;118(5):1019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.013. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

    PubMed 17383228
  • Bove M, Brichetto G, Abbruzzese G, Marchese R, Schieppati M. Neck proprioception and spatial orientation in cervical dystonia. Brain. 2004 Dec;127(Pt 12):2764-78. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh291. Epub 2004 Sep 8.

    PubMed 15355873

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cervical Dystonia, run by Kirsten Elwischger at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Subjective visual vertical (SVV), measured in degree (°) (time frame: screening). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01180270, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in