Atrial FibrillationPhase 3PREVAILNCT01182441
Evaluation of the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy
A Phase 3 study testing WATCHMAN Device and Warfarin in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 41 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to provide additional information on the safety and efficacy of the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Technology. The purpose of the PREVAIL study was to confirm the efficacy endpoint as demonstrated in the PROTECT AF pivotal study and to further demonstrate that the WATCHMAN… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
- What is being tested?
- WATCHMAN Device and Warfarin
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 407 participants
- Where
- 41 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Nov 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Paroxysmal, persistent or permanent non-valvular AF
- Eligible for long-term warfarin therapy
- Eligible to come off warfarin therapy
- Calculated CHADS2 score of 2 or greater. Also patients with a CHADS2 score of 1 may be included if any of the following apply:
- Female age 75 or older
- Baseline LVEF ≥ 30 and < 35%
- Aged 65-74 and has diabetes or coronary artery disease
- Aged 65 or greater and has congestive heart failure
Who cannot join
- Contraindicated/allergic to aspirin
- Indicated for clopidogrel therapy or has taken clopidogrel within 7 days prior to enrollment
- History of atrial septal repair or has an ASD/PFO device
- Implanted mechanical valve prosthesis
- NYHA Class IV CHF
- Resting heart rate > 110 bpm
Show all 14Show fewer
- Participated previously in the PROTECT AF or CAP Registry studies
- Key Echo Exclusion Criteria:
- LVEF < 30%
- Existing pericardial effusion > 2mm
- High risk PFO
- Significant mitral valve stenosis
- Complex atheroma with mobile plaque of the descending aorta and/or aortic arch
- Cardiac tumor
Trial locations and contacts
41 sites in 1 country.
41 sites in 1 country
United States41 sites
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Zasa Clinical Research
Atlantis, Florida, 33462
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia
Austin, Texas, 78705
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Lahey Clinic
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805
Fletcher Allen
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
Lindner Clinical Trial Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75226
Iowa Heart Center
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631
North Shore University
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Mercy Gilbert Medical Center
Gilbert, Arizona, 85297
Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
St. Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Foundation for Cardiovascular Medicine
La Jolla, California, 92037
Scripps Green
La Jolla, California, 92037
Central Baptist Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Bryan LGH
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Baptist Hospital of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33176
St. Luke's Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
St. Thomas Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
Mt. Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Orange County Heart
Orange, California, 92868
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55902
William Beaumont
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Intermountain Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
St. John's Hospital / Pacific Heart
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Arizona Heart Rhythm Research Center
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104
St. John's Mercy
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Cardiology Associates of N. Mississippi
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Moffitt Heart & Vascular
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, 17043
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy
This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to provide additional information on the safety and efficacy of the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Technology. The purpose of the PREVAIL study was to confirm the efficacy endpoint as demonstrated in the PROTECT AF pivotal study and to further demonstrate that the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Technology is safe and effective in subjects with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who require anticoagulation therapy for potential thrombus formation.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
- Being tested
- WATCHMAN Device, Warfarin
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, stroke, TIA, trans ischemic attack, warfarin, Coumadin
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
WATCHMAN DeviceDevice
WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology
WarfarinDrug
Also called Coumadin
Warfarin dosage prescribed by study physician to adequately maintain an INR of 2.0-3.0
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| WATCHMAN | Experimental | Subjects assigned to receive the WATCHMAN device. Receives: Device: WATCHMAN Device |
| Warfarin | Active comparator | Subjects assigned to warfarin therapy. Receives: Drug: Warfarin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Safety Endpoint (Device Group Only)
7-Day procedure rate of death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism and complications requiring major cardiovascular or endovascular intervention.
Measured: 7-Day
Composite of Stroke, Systemic Embolism, and Death (Cardiovascular and Unknown)
The endpoint was analyzed using a Bayesian piecewise exponential model with the historical priors based on data from the previous pivotal study PROTECT AF. This was a non-inferiority design with comparison of rate ratio of 18-month event rates of the Device and Control groups. The 18-month rate represents the probability of an event occurring within 18 months, and the 18-month rate ratio is a mean of the rate ratios. The primary endpoint was based on a calculation of the probability of events at 18 months but the statistical piecewise hazards model does not require the observation of any subjects out to 18-months.
Measured: 18 month rate
Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism
Composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism excluding events that occurred in the first 7 days following randomization
Measured: Day 8 to 18-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionJan 2013
- Study completionNov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Scientific CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 407 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David R. Holmes, M.D., Principal investigator, Mayo ClinicVivek Y. Reddy, M.D., Principal investigator, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01182441
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CT1004
- Acronym
- PREVAIL
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2010
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dukkipati SR, Holmes DR Jr, Doshi SK, Kar S, Singh SM, Gibson D, Price MJ, Natale A, Mansour M, Sievert H, Houle VM, Allocco DJ, Reddy VY. Impact of Peridevice Leak on 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Aug 2;80(5):469-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.062.
PubMed 35902169Friedman DJ, Du C, Wang Y, Agarwal V, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA, Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Price MJ, Curtis JP, Freeman JV. Patient-Level Analysis of Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Practice Versus Clinical Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May 9;15(9):950-961. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.029.
PubMed 35512918Brouwer TF, Whang W, Kuroki K, Halperin JL, Reddy VY. Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL Studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(23):e013525. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013525. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
PubMed 31752643Price MJ, Reddy VY, Valderrabano M, Halperin JL, Gibson DN, Gordon N, Huber KC, Holmes DR Jr. Bleeding Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Long-Term Warfarin: A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the WATCHMAN Randomized Trial Experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1925-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
PubMed 26627989
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01182441
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREVAIL / CT1004
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, stroke, TIA, trans ischemic attack, warfarin, Coumadin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 407 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jul 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to provide additional information on the safety and efficacy of the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Technology. The purpose of the PREVAIL study was to confirm the efficacy endpoint as demonstrated in the PROTECT AF pivotal study and to further demonstrate that the WATCHMAN LAA Closure Technology is safe and effective in subjects with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who require anticoagulation therapy for potential thrombus formation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| WATCHMAN | Experimental | Device: WATCHMAN DeviceSubjects assigned to receive the WATCHMAN device. |
| Warfarin | Active comparator | Drug: WarfarinSubjects assigned to warfarin therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Paroxysmal, persistent or permanent non-valvular AF
- Eligible for long-term warfarin therapy
- Eligible to come off warfarin therapy
- Calculated CHADS2 score of 2 or greater. Also patients with a CHADS2 score of 1 may be included if any of the following apply:
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Contraindicated/allergic to aspirin
- Indicated for clopidogrel therapy or has taken clopidogrel within 7 days prior to enrollment
- History of atrial septal repair or has an ASD/PFO device
- Implanted mechanical valve prosthesis
- NYHA Class IV CHF
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| WATCHMAN DeviceWATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology | Device | WATCHMAN |
| WarfarinAlso: CoumadinWarfarin dosage prescribed by study physician to adequately maintain an INR of 2.0-3.0 | Drug | Warfarin |
Primary outcome
Primary Safety Endpoint (Device Group Only)
Time frame: 7-Day
7-Day procedure rate of death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism and complications requiring major cardiovascular or endovascular intervention.
Composite of Stroke, Systemic Embolism, and Death (Cardiovascular and Unknown)
Time frame: 18 month rate
The endpoint was analyzed using a Bayesian piecewise exponential model with the historical priors based on data from the previous pivotal study PROTECT AF. This was a non-inferiority design with comparison of rate ratio of 18-month event rates of the Device and Control groups. The 18-month rate represents the probability of an event occurring within 18 months, and the 18-month rate ratio is a mean of the rate ratios. The primary endpoint was based on a calculation of the probability of events at 18 months but the statistical piecewise hazards model does not require the observation of any subjects out to 18-months.
Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism
Time frame: Day 8 to 18-months
Composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism excluding events that occurred in the first 7 days following randomization
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35902169Dukkipati SR, Holmes DR Jr, Doshi SK, Kar S, Singh SM, Gibson D, Price MJ, Natale A, Mansour M, Sievert H, Houle VM, Allocco DJ, Reddy VY. Impact of Peridevice Leak on 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Aug 2;80(5):469-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.062.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35512918Friedman DJ, Du C, Wang Y, Agarwal V, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA, Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Price MJ, Curtis JP, Freeman JV. Patient-Level Analysis of Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Practice Versus Clinical Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May 9;15(9):950-961. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.02.029.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31752643Brouwer TF, Whang W, Kuroki K, Halperin JL, Reddy VY. Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL Studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 3;8(23):e013525. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013525. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26627989Price MJ, Reddy VY, Valderrabano M, Halperin JL, Gibson DN, Gordon N, Huber KC, Holmes DR Jr. Bleeding Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Long-Term Warfarin: A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the WATCHMAN Randomized Trial Experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1925-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Recruiting
Peer-Mentor Support for Vulnerable Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hummingbird ICE Study
ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
RecruitingPhase 3
Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Not yet recruiting
Partial Cardiac Denervation for Preventing Atrial Fibrillation After CABG
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David R. Holmes, M.D. principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
Vivek Y. Reddy, M.D. principal investigator
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
41 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing WATCHMAN Device and Warfarin in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 41 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 41 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jul 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Safety Endpoint (Device Group Only) (time frame: 7-Day). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01182441, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.