Endotracheal IntubationNCT01182740
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Success Rates Using Video Laryngoscopes in Entrapped Patients - a Manikin Study
An observational study of Endotracheal Intubation, run by University of Cologne at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The investigators will compare the success rates of endotracheal intubation in a simulated entrapped car accident victim (manikin) using different video laryngoscopes by experienced emergency physicians. The investigators hypothesized that video laryngoscopes may improve success rates. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Endotracheal Intubation
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Aug 2010to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: experienced emergency physicians
Who may be able to join
- experienced emergency physicians
Who cannot join
- no experience in out-of-hospital emergency medicine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The investigators will compare the success rates of endotracheal intubation in a simulated entrapped car accident victim (manikin) using different video laryngoscopes by experienced emergency physicians.
The investigators hypothesized that video laryngoscopes may improve success rates.
- Conditions
- Endotracheal Intubation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| glidescope | Not described | |
| storz c-mac | Not described | |
| mcgrath vl | Not described | |
| ambu pentax aws | Not described | |
| macintosh laryngoscope | Not described | |
| others | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
successful endotracheal intubation
We compare the success rates of endotracheal intubation with the different devices
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2010
- Study completionNov 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Endotracheal IntubationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cologne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01182740
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10-183
- Status last verified
- Aug 2010
- First submitted
- 13 Aug 2010
- Last updated
- 11 Nov 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Wetsch WA, Carlitscheck M, Spelten O, Teschendorf P, Hellmich M, Genzwurker HV, Hinkelbein J. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;28(12):849-58. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834c7c7f.
PubMed 21986981
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Nov 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Success Rates Using Video Laryngoscopes in Entrapped Patients - a Manikin Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01182740
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10-183
- Conditions
- Endotracheal Intubation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CologneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2010
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will compare the success rates of endotracheal intubation in a simulated entrapped car accident victim (manikin) using different video laryngoscopes by experienced emergency physicians.
The investigators hypothesized that video laryngoscopes may improve success rates.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| glidescope | – | – |
| storz c-mac | – | – |
| mcgrath vl | – | – |
| ambu pentax aws | – | – |
| macintosh laryngoscope | – | – |
| others | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- experienced emergency physicians
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- experienced emergency physicians
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- no experience in out-of-hospital emergency medicine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
successful endotracheal intubation
Time frame: 2 months
We compare the success rates of endotracheal intubation with the different devices
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Nov 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21986981Wetsch WA, Carlitscheck M, Spelten O, Teschendorf P, Hellmich M, Genzwurker HV, Hinkelbein J. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;28(12):849-58. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834c7c7f.
Related trials for Endotracheal Intubation
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Educational Intervention on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure
Intubation, Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Patient State Index at Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation Conditions
Anesthesia, Intubation, Endotracheal
Not yet recruiting
Establish Whether Hyperangulated Videolaryngoscopy (HAVL) Can be Used to Facilitate Tracheal Intubation Effectively and Safely in Unselected Adult Patients; Describe the Population in Whom HAVL Fails to Facilitate Tracheal Intubation Successfully, Identifying Any Contributory Characteristics.
Intubation Skill, Intubation Complications
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
REMIfentanil (2 vs. 4 mcg/kg) Facilitated Intubation Without Neuromuscular Blockade Versus Succinylcholine and Rocuronium With Sugammadex for Endotracheal Intubation in Spine Surgery Requiring Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring
Airway Management, Endotracheal Intubation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine for Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter During Craniotomy Intubation
Endotracheal Intubation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Endotracheal Intubation, run by University of Cologne at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
successful endotracheal intubation (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01182740, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2010; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.