AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal CancerPhase 3NCT01186081

Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative Radiotherapy and Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Based on the potential advantaged of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and oral fluoropyrimidine, the investigators planned a prospective randomized phase III trial which compares preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with conventional radiation schedule and oral fluoropyrimidine to establish… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Rectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and Postoperative chemoradiotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Mar 2004to Aug 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma
  • Tumor located below 10 cm from the anal verge
  • Clinical stage T3 or potentially resectable T4, or N+ on endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT)
  • Patients must be > 18 years and < 76 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Adequate bone marrow reserve
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Adequate renal function
  • Adequate liver function
  • Signed informed consent prior to randomization

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of distant metastasis
  • Previous history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • History of malignancy during recent 5 years other than skin cancer
  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Familial history of colorectal cancer

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Based on the potential advantaged of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and oral fluoropyrimidine, the investigators planned a prospective randomized phase III trial which compares preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with conventional radiation schedule and oral fluoropyrimidine to establish new standard neo-adjuvant therapy regimen in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

Although there have been no confirmative data which favored preoperative chemoradiotherapy, preoperative chemoradiation have many theoretical advantage compared with postoperative one. Preoperative radiotherapy with intensive short course regimen showed significant improvement in local control even with TME, but there has been no large prospective randomized trial which proved the efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy compared with the standard postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Although the final result of the German Trial may give the answer for this question, there has been no randomized controlled trial which investigated the efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy using oral fluoropyrimidine which have many theoretical and clinical advantages mentioned above; the German Trial used 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU. The investigators think that preoperative chemoradiotherapy with oral capecitabine could be new standard regimen in locally advanced rectal cancer, but this regimen must be compared with the standard postoperative chemoradiotherapy through well designed prospective randomized trial. Based on the potential advantaged of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and oral fluoropyrimidine, the investigators planned prospective randomized phase III trial which compares preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with conventional radiation schedule and oral fluoropyrimidine to establish new standard neo-adjuvant therapy regimen in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Being tested
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, Postoperative chemoradiotherapy
Keywords
Rectal cancer, Preoperative CCRT, Postoperative CCRT, Capecitabine
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Preoperative chemoradiotherapyRadiation

    Also called Preoperative CCRT

    Preoperative chemoradiation with conventional radiotherapy (46 Gy in 23 fractions to the whole pelvis followed by a boost dose of 4 Gy in 2 fractions) and oral fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice per day without weekend breaks during whole radiotherapy period)

  • Postoperative chemoradiotherapyRadiation

    Also called Postoperative CCRT

    Postoperative radiotherapy with conventional radiation schedule (50 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole pelvis) and oral fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice per day without weekend breaks during whole radiotherapy period)

Study groups in NCT01186081
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Preoperative chemoradiotherapyExperimentalPreoperative chemoradiotherapy with conventional radiation schedule and oral fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine)
Receives: Radiation: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy
Postoperative chemoradiotherapyActive comparatorPostoperative chemoradiotherapy with conventional radiation schedule and oral fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine)
Receives: Radiation: Postoperative chemoradiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease-free survival

    Measured: Three year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Overall survival

    Measured: Three year

  2. Local relapse-free survival

    Measured: Three year

  3. Sphincter preservation rate

    Measured: Three year

  4. Treatment related toxicities

    Measured: Three year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2004
  3. Primary completionApr 2009
  4. Study completionAug 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
240 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01186081
Sponsor's protocol ID
AMC Rectal Pre Vs Post 2004
Status last verified
Aug 2010
First submitted
18 Aug 2010
Last updated
23 Aug 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disease-free survival (time frame: Three year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in