AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerExciteNCT01186367

Trial Comparing the Effects of Linear Versus Nonlinear Aerobic Training in Women With Operable Breast Cancer

A study testing Linear Aerobic Training, Nonlinear Aerobic Training and Progressive Stretching in people with Breast Cancer, run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of 3 different approaches to exercise training in women with early stage breast cancer who have completed all primary treatments (except hormone therapy, if appropriate). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 80 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Linear Aerobic Training, Nonlinear Aerobic Training and Progressive Stretching
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
174 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
11 Nov 2010to 17 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 45-80 years
  • Female
  • Has been diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer
  • Post-menopausal, defined as :
  • Age ≥ 45 with no menses for at least 2 years
  • Chemically induced menopause through ovarian suppression, as determined by the primary oncologist
Show all 23Show fewer
  • An interval of at least one year, but no more than five years, following the full completion of primary therapy for malignant disease. Primary therapy is defined as:
  • Surgery plus radiation
  • Surgery plus chemotherapy
  • Surgery plus trastuzumab
  • Surgery plus hormone therapy Note: For patients who receive hormone therapy following surgery, the definition of one-year post-completion of therapy is defined by the surgery date. Patients who are currently receiving hormone therapy are eligible for enrollment.
  • Weight of < 205 kgs
  • ECOG status of 0 or 1
  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
  • Performing less than 150 minutes of structured moderate-intensity or strenuous intensity exercise per week.
  • Exercise intolerance defined by a VO2peak below that predicted for sedentary age and sex-matched individuals as defined in Appendix H.
  • Willing to be randomized to one of the study arms
  • Able to complete an acceptable baseline CPET, in the absence of high risk ECG findings or other inappropriate response to exercise as determined by the investigator.
  • Able to achieve an acceptable peak baseline CPET, as defined by any of the following criteria:
  • Achieving a plateau in oxygen consumption, concurrent with an increase in power output;
  • A respiratory exchange ratio ≥ 1.10;
  • Attainment of maximal predicted heart rate (HRmax) (i.e., within 10 bpm of age-predicted HRmax [HRmax = 220-Age[years]);
  • Volitional exhaustion, as measured by a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) ≥ 18 on the BORG scale.

Who cannot join

  • Any of the following absolute contraindications to cardiopulmonary exercise testing:
  • Acute myocardial infarction within 3-5 days of any planned study procedures;
  • Unstable angina;
  • Uncontrolled arrhythmia causing symptoms or hemodynamic compromise;
  • Recurrent syncope;
  • Active endocarditis;
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Acute myocarditis or pericarditis;
  • Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis;
  • Uncontrolled heart failure;
  • Acute pulmonary embolus or pulmonary infarction within 3 months of any planned study procedures
  • Thrombosis of lower extremities;
  • Suspected dissecting aneurysm;
  • Uncontrolled asthma;
  • Pulmonary edema;
  • Respiratory failure;
  • Acute non-cardiopulmonary disorders that may affect exercise performance or be aggravated by exercise (i.e., infection, renal failure, thyrotoxicosis);
  • Presence of any other concurrent, actively treated malignancy
  • History of any other malignancy treated within the past 3 years (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
  • Presence of metastatic disease
  • Room air desaturation at rest ≤ 85%
  • Mental impairment leading to inability to cooperate
  • Any other condition or intercurrent illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the participant a poor candidate for the trial

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10065

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Exercise Intensity Trial (EXCITE): A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Linear Versus Nonlinear Aerobic Training in Women With Operable Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of 3 different approaches to exercise training in women with early stage breast cancer who have completed all primary treatments (except hormone therapy, if appropriate). Prior research in women with early stage breast cancer has shown that some treatments may have an adverse impact on physical fitness levels leading to feelings of fatigue and poor quality of life. Supervised exercise training has been shown to reduce some of these side-effects. However, all the exercise programs have followed essentially the same approach. This study is designed to see if a different approach to exercise training is more effective than the conventional approach currently in use.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Linear Aerobic Training, Nonlinear Aerobic Training, Progressive Stretching, Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), Blood draws
Keywords
breast cancer, Linear Versus Nonlinear Aerobic Training, 15-147
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Linear Aerobic TrainingBehavioural

    The 130-180 minutes/week will be achieved via either 3 to 4 individual aerobic training sessions at approximately 10 to 50 minutes per/session (± 10 minutes).

  • Nonlinear Aerobic TrainingBehavioural

    The 130-180 minutes/week will be achieved via 3 to 4 individual aerobic training sessions at approximately 10 to 50 minutes/ per session (+/- 10 minutes).

  • Progressive StretchingBehavioural

    All sessions are required to be supervised. Duration of the stretching sessions is prescribed and implemented in accordance with standard stretching and flexibility training principles. This approach will be applied to guide each participant's prescribed stretching plan, with dose and scheduling modifications made by exercise physiologists, as required.

  • Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)Other

  • Blood drawsOther

    Complete blood count

Study groups in NCT01186367
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Linear Aerobic TrainingExperimentalThe ultimate goal is for participants to complete approximately 130-180 minutes/week of aerobic training, at 60% to 75 % of the individually determined exercise capacity (VO2peak), for 16 weeks. VO2peak will be determined by the second CPET performed at baseline.
Receives: Behavioral: Linear Aerobic Training; Other: Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET); Other: Blood draws
Nonlinear Aerobic TrainingExperimentalThe ultimate goal is for participants to complete approximately 130-180 minutes/week of aerobic training at 55% to 100% of the individually determined exercise capacity (VO2peak), for 16 weeks. VO2peak will be determined by the second CPET performed at Baseline and as well as the CPET performed at Midpoint.
Receives: Behavioral: Nonlinear Aerobic Training; Other: Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET); Other: Blood draws
Progressive Stretching Group (Attention control)ExperimentalThe ultimate goal for the progressive stretching program is 3 to 4 individual stretching sessions/week for 10 to 50 minutes per session (+/- 10 minutes).
Receives: Behavioral: Progressive Stretching; Other: Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET); Other: Blood draws

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.

    VO2 or peak oxygen consumption will be measured at Baseline

    Measured: Baseline

  2. To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.

    VO2 or peak oxygen consumption for nonlinear aerobic training will be measured at mid-point (8 weeks)

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.

    VO2 or peak oxygen consumption will be measured at post-intervention (16 weeks).

    Measured: 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Nov 2010
  3. Primary completion17 May 2023
  4. Study completion17 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
174 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01186367
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-147
Acronym
Excite
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
19 Aug 2010
Last updated
10 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Scott JM, Thomas SM, Peppercorn JM, Herndon JE 2nd, Douglas PS, Khouri MG, Dang CT, Yu AF, Catalina D, Ciolino C, Capaci C, Michalski MG, Eves ND, Jones LW. Effects of Exercise Therapy Dosing Schedule on Impaired Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2020 Feb 18;141(7):560-570. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043483. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

    PubMed 32065769
  • Scott JM, Lee J, Michalski MG, Batch K, Simpson AL, Peoples J, Lee CP, Harrison JN, Yu AF, Sasso JP, Dang C, Moskowitz CS, Jones LW, Eves ND. Mechanisms of Exercise Intolerance Across the Breast Cancer Continuum: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Apr 1;56(4):590-599. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003348. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

    PubMed 38485730
  • Michalski M, Rowed K, Lavery JA, Moskowitz CS, Capaci C, Stene G, Edvardsen E, Eves ND, Jones LW, Scott JM. Validity of Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer. JACC CardioOncol. 2022 Jun 21;4(2):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.05.003. eCollection 2022 Jun.

    PubMed 35818548
  • Jones LW, Douglas PS, Eves ND, Marcom PK, Kraus WE, Herndon JE 2nd, Inman BA, Allen JD, Peppercorn J. Rationale and design of the Exercise Intensity Trial (EXCITE): A randomized trial comparing the effects of moderate versus moderate to high-intensity aerobic training in women with operable breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010 Oct 6;10:531. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-531.

    PubMed 20925920

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Linear Aerobic Training, Nonlinear Aerobic Training and Progressive Stretching in people with Breast Cancer, run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 23 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption. (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01186367, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in