AzTrials
AzTrials

Aplastic AnemiaPhase 1/2NCT01187017

A Pilot Study of Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide in Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia

A Phase 1/2 study testing Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine in people with Aplastic Anemia and Neutropenia, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) can lead to problems with bone marrow health and result in low blood cell counts, which require frequent transfusions. Standard initial treatment for SAA involves injections of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine (CsA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aplastic Anemia, Neutropenia, Pancytopenia
What is being tested?
Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2010to Jul 2012
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of Fanconi anemia
  • Cardiac ejection fraction < 30 percent (evaluated by ECHO)
  • Evidence of a clonal hematologic bone marrow disorder on cytogenetics. Patients with the presence of trisomy 8, loss of Y or del(20q) will not be excluded in the absence of dysplastic changes in the marrow. Patients with very severe neutropenia (ANC < 200 /microL) will not be excluded initially if cytogenetics are not available or pending. If evidence of a clonal disorder is later identified, the patient will go off study)
  • Prior immunosuppressive therapy with high dose Cy
  • Infection not adequately controlled with appropriate therapy
  • Serologic evidence of HIV infection
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Moribund status or concurrent hepatic, renal, cardiac, neurologic, pulmonary, infectious, or metabolic disease of such severity that it would preclude the patient's ability to tolerate protocol therapy, or that death within 30 days is likely
  • Subjects with cancer who are on active chemotherapeutic treatment or who take drugs with hematological effects
  • Current pregnancy or unwillingness to take oral contraceptives or refrain from pregnancy if of childbearing potential
  • Not able to understand the investigational nature of the study or to give informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892

Other trials in United States

About this study

Background:

  • Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) can lead to problems with bone marrow health and result in low blood cell counts, which require frequent transfusions. Standard initial treatment for SAA involves injections of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine (CsA). Patients with SAA who do not respond to initial treatment with ATG (refractory) have a high risk of dying without additional treatment. In these cases, for those who do not have a matched bone marrow transplant donor there is no well-defined standard therapy. In our experience with patients who do not respond to horse ATG + CsA, only about one-third of patients who are re-treated with rabbit ATG + CsA improve. Experience with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of refractory severe aplastic anemia suggests that this drug is able to improve blood counts in about 50% of cases. However, the cyclophosphamide regimen has been associated with a significant infection risk (mostly caused by fungus) in studies conducted over 10 years ago due to the lowering of the white blood cell levels.
  • Better antibiotic drugs against fungus have been developed and are widely used to treat patients who have low white blood cell counts and are at risk of developing infections. In SAA patients in particular, these newer antibiotics have had a large impact in preventing and treating fungus infections. Researchers are revisiting the use of cyclophosphamide at lower doses to minimize its side effects given in combination with another immune suppressant, fludarabine.
Read more

Objectives:

  • To determine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in treating severe aplastic anemia that has not responded to initial treatments.
Read the detailed description

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure disorder characterized by pancytopenia and a hypocellular bone marrow. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the opportunity for cure in 70 percent of patients, but most patients are not suitable candidates for this treatment modality due to advanced age, comorbidities or lack of a histocompatible donor. For these patients, comparable long-term survival is attainable with immunosuppressive treatment (IST) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA). However, approximately 1/3 of patients do not show blood count improvement after ATG/CsA and are considered to have refractory disease. Furthermore, analysis of our own extensive clinical data suggests that poor blood count responses to a single course of ATG (nonrobust responders), even when transfusion-independence is achieved, predicts a markedly worse prognosis compared to those who achieve a robust hematologic improvement (protocol 90-H-0146) .

In patients who are refractory to horse ATG (h-ATG) and do not have a histocompatible sibling, alternative donor (AD) HSCT or a repeat course of IST are options. Registry data suggests that outcome for AD HSCT in SAA is not as favorable compared to a matched sibling HSCT with long-term survival at about 40-50 percent and a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease. However, in recent smaller retrospective studies survival after AD HSCT in children rivals that of a sibling transplant when an unrelated donor who matches in 10 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) loci (matched unrelated donor) is available. With repeat IST, response rates with rabbit anti-thymocyte has varied from 22 percent up to 77 percent. Our experience in refractory SAA (protocol 03-H-0249) is that rabbit ATG + CsA and alemtuzumab are equally efficacious as salvage therapies, with a response rate of about 30 percent for each treatment. For the 20-30 percent of patients who remain refractory after 2 courses of treatment, further courses of IST have been of limited value with responses observed only occasionally. In addition, efforts to improve initial IST in treatment-na ve patients (addition of mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus) have not yielded promising regimens with activity in SAA (protocols 00-H-0032, 03-H-0193, and 06-H-0034). Therefore, novel regimens are needed to improve outcomes in SAA for those without a histocompatible sibling, which encompass the majority of patients with this disease.

The current limitations of IST in SAA are: 1) the majority of the responses observed following initial h-ATG/CsA are partial with only a few patients achieving normal blood counts; 2) 1/3 of patients are refractory to initial h-ATG/CsA; 3) response rate in these refractory patients who are retreated is only 30 percent; 4) hematologic relapses occur in 35 percent of responders following initial response to h-ATG/CsA; 5) among relapsed patients chronic use of CsA is not infrequent which often leads to toxicities from the long term exposure to this drug (especially in older patients); and 6) clonal evolution is still observed in 10-15% of patients. Towards the goal of addressing these limitations we are proposing a novel regimen of fludarabine (Flu) plus cyclophosphamide (Cy) in SAA patients refractory to horse ATG/CsA. The Hematology Branch has considerable experience with Flu/Cy as part of the condition regimen in allotransplantation protocols (protocols 99-H-0050, 97-H-0196, 99-H-0064, 99-H-0050, 97-H-0196, 02-H-0111, 01-H0162, 03-H-0192, 04-H-0112, 06-H-0248, 07-H-0136). In addition, this regimen has been incorporated into the NCI's Surgery Branch preparative regimen for autologous HSCT prior to infusion of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Flu/Cy is well tolerated and a potent immunosuppressive regimen that is not myeloablative. Therefore, we propose to investigate Flu/Cy to address the current limitations of IST in SAA.

The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Flu/Cy in refractory SAA. The primary endpoint will be hematologic response, defined as no longer meeting criteria for SAA, at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are relapse, robustness of hematologic recovery at 6 months, response at 3 months and 12 months, survival, clonal evolution to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), myelodysplasia and acute leukemia. The primary endpoint will be changes absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, and reticulocyte count at 6 months. Secondary endpoints will include time to relapse, changes in cytogenetics, and time to death.

Eligibility:

  • Individuals at least 2 years of age who have severe aplastic anemia that has not improved after treatment with horse ATG or both horse and rabbit ATG.

Design:

  • After initial screening, medical history, and blood tests, participants will be admitted to the inpatient unit at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.
  • Participants will receive 2 days of cyclophosphamide, followed by 5 days of fludarabine.
  • Participants will also receive antibiotics and other drugs to protect against bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. Participants will take these drugs regularly until their white blood cell counts improve.
  • After discharge from the clinical center, participants will have follow-up evaluations at 3 months, 6 months, and annually for 5 years. Evaluations will include blood samples and periodic bone marrow biopsies.
Keywords
Severe Aplastic Anemia, Aplastic Anemia, Immunosuppression, Immunosuppressive Therapy, T-Cells
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Aplastic, Neutropenia, Pancytopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01187017
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide in Participants with Severe Aplastic AnemiaExperimentalParticipants with Severe Aplastic Anemia will receive Fludarabine at 125 mg/m squared plus Cyclophosphamide at 60 mg/kg (Flu/Cy).
Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Fludarabine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Response Rate at 6 Months

    The primary objective is to assess hematologic response of Refractory Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) subjects to who have received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Subjects blood counts will be evaluated at 6 months to assess a hematologic response. The hematologic response will be defined as complete, partial or no response.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Number of Participants With Hematologic Response

    Number of participants with hematologic response at 3 and 12 months and yearly. The hematologic response will be defined as complete, partial or no response.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Number of Patients Who Experienced Disease Relapse

    Number of patients who relapsed who experienced disease relapse following Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide in Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Number of Participants With Clonal Evolution

    Number of participants with Severe Aplastic Anemia who received Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide that experienced Clonal Evolution to Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH), Myelodysplasia or Acute Leukemia.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Participant Survival Following Fludarabine/ Cyclophosphamide in Participants With Severe Aplastic Anemia

    Participant survival at 6 months following Fludarabine/ Cyclophosphamide in participants with Severe Aplastic Anemia

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2010
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01187017
Sponsor's protocol ID
100177
Other IDs
10-H-0177
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
20 Aug 2010
Last updated
2 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Rosenfeld S, Follmann D, Nunez O, Young NS. Antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine for severe aplastic anemia: association between hematologic response and long-term outcome. JAMA. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1130-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.9.1130.

    PubMed 12622583
  • Passweg JR, Perez WS, Eapen M, Camitta BM, Gluckman E, Hinterberger W, Hows JM, Marsh JC, Pasquini R, Schrezenmeier H, Socie G, Zhang MJ, Bredeson C. Bone marrow transplants from mismatched related and unrelated donors for severe aplastic anemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006 Apr;37(7):641-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705299.

    PubMed 16489361
  • Marsh JC, Hows JM, Bryett KA, Al-Hashimi S, Fairhead SM, Gordon-Smith EC. Survival after antilymphocyte globulin therapy for aplastic anemia depends on disease severity. Blood. 1987 Oct;70(4):1046-52.

    PubMed 3651599

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine in people with Aplastic Anemia and Neutropenia, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Mar 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Response Rate at 6 Months (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01187017, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in