AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyPhase 3NCT01190137

Study Comparing Two Isoforms of Vitamin D Supplements for Infants

A Phase 3 study testing Cholecalciferol (D3) or ergocalciferol (D2) in people with Healthy, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There are two different types of vitamin D - vitamin D3 (animal source) and vitamin D2 (plant source). Almost all the usual vitamin D preparations for infants available in Canadian pharmacies contain vitamin D3 which may not be suitable for families who avoid animal products for social or religious reasons. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 6 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Cholecalciferol (D3) or ergocalciferol (D2)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Mar 2010to Dec 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 6 weeks
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy, singleton term infants of appropriate for gestational age, according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) growth charts based on weight at birth between 5th and 95th percentiles for sex
  • Born to healthy breastfeeding women
  • Exclusively breast fed infants from birth, according to WHO definition: breast milk, expressed breast milk, vitamins, minerals and medicine but not including water, breast milk substitutes, other liquids and solid foods.

Who cannot join

  • Infants of mothers with a history of gestational diabetes or hypertension in pregnancy; chronic alcohol use; malabsorption syndromes (Celiac disease, Crohn's, etc.), due to malabsorption of fat soluble vitamins
  • Mothers taking any medications that can affect vitamin D metabolism (anticonvulsants and corticosteroids)
  • Mothers taking ≥ 2,000 IU/d of vitamin D from supplementation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Mary Emily Clinical Nutrition Research Unit

    Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, H9X 3V9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Bio-equivalency Study of the Effects of Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3 Supplements on 25-hydroxyvitamin D Levels in Exclusively Breast Fed Canadian Infants

There are two different types of vitamin D - vitamin D3 (animal source) and vitamin D2 (plant source). Almost all the usual vitamin D preparations for infants available in Canadian pharmacies contain vitamin D3 which may not be suitable for families who avoid animal products for social or religious reasons. The purpose of this study is to learn more about the two forms of vitamin D and if blood levels of vitamin D are similar in infants after taking them. Forty-eight breastfed infants will be randomly assigned to 400 IU of either vitamin D2 or D3 supplement for 3 months starting at 1 month of age. The difference in blood vitamin D levels, after 3 months of supplementation, between the two groups will help determine if the two supplements are equal.

Read the detailed description

Vitamin D is important to develop strong bones and teeth as well as to prevent rickets, a childhood bone disease in which the bones get very soft and bend. the investigators know that vitamin D can be produced by cells in our skin during sunny months of the year but there is a concern about the safety of sun exposure in infants. As well breast milk contains very little vitamin D. It is for this reason that Health Canada recommends all breast fed babies should receive 400 IU of vitamin D per day. There are two different types of vitamin D - vitamin D3 (animal source) and vitamin D2 (plant source). Standard infant preparations in Canada tend to be in the vitamin D3 form. To date, there is insufficient information to judge the equivalency of 400 IU of vitamin D2 and D3 given daily in very young Canadian infants. In view of over 1 million Canadian families practicing vegetarianism, this would appear to be an important and not yet answered question. The investigators cannot extrapolate from the adult data because the infant physiology is immature relative to adults and absorption, especially of fat soluble vitamins differs. This area needs to be better evaluated to emphasize the optimal isoform of vitamin D during infancy necessary for the development of adequate bone mass.

This study aims to compare the relative ability of equal daily intakes of vitamin D2 and D3, amounts (400 IU/d) currently recommended by Health Canada, to support circulating 25(OH)D concentrations after 3 months of supplementation in breastfed newborns. In particular, whether both supplements are equally effective in their ability to achieve and sustain optimal plasma 25(OH)D concentrations, defined as 25(OH)D values between 75-225 nmol/L.

Design: Randomized clinical trial in which 48, 1 month old infants, will be randomized to either the vitamin D2 or D3 isoform at the standard of care dosage (400 IU daily) for 3 months; a sufficient time to observe a change of vitamin D status ascribed to the supplement. Infant physiology is immature and evolving and the time to stabilize 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) is approximately 3 weeks (half-life). Supplements will be double blinded to participants, investigators and all staff.

Recruitment: Infants will be recruited from 1 large primary care center located in the greater Montreal area. The goal is for infants to begin the study at 4 weeks of age but a range of +/- 2 weeks. Rolling recruitment over a 9 months period with a 3 month follow-up for all beginning in May 2010. This covers both the synthesizing and non synthesizing periods of vitamin D. This age group has been selected (first month of life) since vitamin D stores transferred from the mother begin to decrease owing to the 15 to 30 day half life of 25(OH)D. After this point, infants need a source of vitamin D other than breast milk or sunshine. Because the majority of Canadian infants are now breastfed for at least 3-6 months of age the first 4 months of life appear to be an important time frame to examine the relative potency of the 2 isoforms.

Frequency and duration of follow up: Infants will be followed for 3 months with 2 visits, at baseline (~1 month) and the end of the study (~4 months). Visits will include anthropometric assessment and blood collection for the assessment of 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations. Bottles of supplement will be weighed upon receipt and return for compliance. As well, parents will be asked to self-report compliance at each visit. In order to encourage continued supplementation during the 3 month intervention, the investigators plan to a schedule a reminder phone call at approximately 1½ months post the baseline visit. Vitamin D supplementation of infants prior to the initial visit (birth to visit 1) will be documented, but considered as systematic error. Maternal baseline information will be collected at the first visit including demographics, ethnicity, pregnancy history and sun exposure during pregnancy. This data will be used to characterize the study population. At each visit, the health status and sun exposure and sunscreen use of the infants will be assessed. A computerized narrow band reflectometer will be utilized to measure skin pigmentation on unexposed skin of the inner upper arm and forehead. Procedures will be performed using guidelines established by the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. This test estimates melanin content of the skin which influences vitamin D status.

Sample procurement: At both visits, blood will be collected from infants using a capillary blood sample and from mothers by venipuncture. All samples will be taken between 8 and 10 am to control for diurnal variation. Approximately 1 ml of heparinized blood will be collected from infants via heel/finger prick and 5 ml from mothers.

Plasma 25(OH)D and PTH concentrations: Response to supplementation will be evaluated by the change in plasma 25(OH)D and PTH. Mothers 25(OH)D status will also be obtained to determine that both groups are similar as mother's vitamin D status can affect infant's vitamin stores and risk of hypovitaminosis. Mother's vitamin D status will also allow us to better establish total infant vitamin D exposure through maternal placental transfer of vitamin D. If there is no change, the proportion with 25(OH)D below target will be examined. Both vitamin D and PTH will be measured using an automated chemiluminescent assay system (Liaison, Diasorin). All analyses will be completed in a laboratory meeting the performance targets set by the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS).

Anthropometry: Infant's weight, length and head circumference will be taken at each visit. Gestational age will be documented from the vaccination booklet. Growth will be assessed using triplicate measurements of weight (to nearest g without clothing/diaper using a digital infant scale) and head circumference (to the nearest 0.1 cm using non-stretchable tape). Data will be expressed in absolute units and z-scores using data from the World Health Organization growth charts at each age. Mother's weight, height and body composition (% body fat using bioelectrical impendence will be measured to accurately describe the population.

Infant nutrition: Information of infant feeding status (exclusively, predominately breastfed or formula fed) will be collected at each visit as well as the reminder telephone call (approximately 1½ most post supplementation). If formula is consumed, information about specific amounts consumed, frequency, brands as well as additional multivitamins/minerals will also be collected.

Mother's nutrition: Mother's vitamin D intake from diet and supplements will be assessed during lactation using a 24 hour recall, using the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method for dietary recall, conducted with a registered dietitian at each visit. The correct assessment of 25(OH)D from dietary food records is limited as current food sources of vitamin D (such as fish) are consumed weekly or a few times/month. 24-hours recalls will likely miss important food sources thus, the Canadian adapted Harvard Food Frequency Questionnaire will be completed to assess last 3 months of usual food intake.

Safety: Participants found to be below the optimal range of vitamin D [25(OH)D ≤ 75 nmol/L, 30 ng/ml] or any value exceeding 225 nmol/L [90 ng/ml] after the 3-month supplementation period, upon participant consent, will be contacted and referred to their pediatrician for appropriate treatment. If permitted by the participant, the physician will be contacted directly with the results. Both maternal and infant 25(OH)D values collected at the visit 2 will be made available to all participants.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Cholecalciferol (D3) or ergocalciferol (D2)
Keywords
Optimal vitamin D status, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, Rickets and bone mineralization, Breast fed infants, Cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol
Medical subject headings
Rickets, Breast Feeding

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cholecalciferol (D3) or ergocalciferol (D2)Dietary supplement

    Also called Baby D Drops

    400 IU administered as 1 drop daily for 3 months

Study groups in NCT01190137
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
400 IU Vitamin D3Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (D3) or ergocalciferol (D2)
400 IU Vitamin D2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol (D3) or ergocalciferol (D2)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Equivalency of isoforms

    To compare the relative ability of daily oral supplementation of 400 IU in the form of vitamin D3 or D2 to achieve and sustain optimal plasma 25(OH)D concentrations, defined as 25(OH)D values between 75-225 nmol/L, in exclusively breastfed infants.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01190137
Sponsor's protocol ID
A09-M108-09A
Status last verified
Mar 2012
First submitted
26 Aug 2010
Last updated
2 Mar 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Huey SL, Acharya N, Silver A, Sheni R, Yu EA, Pena-Rosas JP, Mehta S. Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012875.pub2.

    PubMed 33305842
  • Gallo S, Phan A, Vanstone CA, Rodd C, Weiler HA. The change in plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D did not differ between breast-fed infants that received a daily supplement of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol for 3 months. J Nutr. 2013 Feb;143(2):148-53. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.167858. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

    PubMed 23256143

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cholecalciferol (D3) or ergocalciferol (D2) in people with Healthy, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Equivalency of isoforms (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01190137, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in