MyelomaPhase 3IFM/DFCI2009NCT01191060
Study Comparing Conventional Dose Combination RVD to High-Dose Treatment With ASCT in the Initial Myeloma up to 65 Years
A Phase 3 study testing Lenalidomide, Bortezomib in people with Myeloma, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 68 sites in France.
Trial summary
Objective of this study is to determine if, in the era of novel drugs, high dose therapy (HDT) is still necessary in the initial management of multiple myeloma in younger patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Lenalidomide, Bortezomib
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 700 participants
- Where
- 68 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to 30 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- (with labs performed within 21 days of initiation of protocol therapy):
- Patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma based on International Myeloma Foundation 2003 Diagnostic Criteria.
- Patients must have symptomatic myeloma with myeloma-related organ damage.
- Patients must have myeloma that is measurable by either serum or urine evaluation of the monoclonal component or by assay of serum free light chains.
- Age between 18 and 65 years at the time of signing the informed consent document.
- ECOG performance status <2 (Karnofsky ≥ 60%)
- Negative HIV blood test
Who cannot join
- Participants must not have been treated with any prior systemic therapy for multiple myeloma. Treatment by localized radiotherapy is not an exclusion criterion if an interval of at least two weeks between the end of radiotherapy and initiation of protocol therapy entry in the study is observed. Similarly, the dose of corticosteroids received by the participant should not exceed the equivalent of 160 mg of dexamethasone over a two-week period before initiation of protocol therapy.
- Primary amyloidosis (AL) or myeloma complicated by amylosis.
- Participants may not be receiving any other study investigational agents.
- Participants with known brain metastases
- Poor tolerability or known allergy to any of the study drugs or compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to study agents
- Platelet count < 50,000/mm3 per µLwithin 21 days of initiation of protocol therapy. Transfusion within 7 days of screening is not allowed to meet platelet eligibility criteria.
Show all 18Show fewer
- ANC < 1,000 cells/mm3 within 21 days of initiation of protocol therapy. Growth factor within 7 days of screening is not allowed to meet ANC eligibility criteria.
- Hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dL within 21 days of initiation of protocol therapy. Transfusion may be used to meet hemoglobin eligibility criteria.
- Hepatic impairment, defined a bilirubin > 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) > 2 mg/dL (Patients with benign hyperbilirubinemia (e.g., Gilbert's syndrome) are eligible) and or AST (SGOT), or ALT (SGPT), or alkaline phosphatase > 2 x ULN
- Renal insufficiency, defined as serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dl and/or creatinine clearance < <40 60 ml/min (actual or calculated). The Cockgroft-Gault formula should be used for calculating creatinine clearance values, and may be located in Section 4.2
- Respiratory compromise, defined as ventilation tests and with DLCO < 50%
- Participant must not demonstrate with clinical signs of heart or coronary failure, or evidence of LVEF < 40%. Participant must not have with myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment or have New York Heart Association (NYHA Appendix VII) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities. Prior to study entry, any ECG abnormality at screening has to be documented by the investigator as not medically relevant.
- Intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active severe infection, known (active or not) infection with hepatitis B or C virus, poorly controlled diabetes, severe uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
- Participant with previous history of another malignant condition, except for basal cell carcinoma and stage I cervical cancer
- Female participant who is pregnant or breast-feeding
- Inability to comply with an anti-thrombotic treatment regimen
- Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy on clinical examination within 21 days of initiation of protocol therapy
- Mental illness likely to interfere with participation in the study and Adults under juridical protection
Trial locations and contacts
68 sites in 1 country.
68 sites in 1 country
France68 sites
CH du Pays D'Aix
Aix-en-Provence, 13 616
CHRU - Hôpital Sud Amiens
Amiens, 80054
CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49033
Centre Hospitalier Argenteuil Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil, 95 100
Centre Hospitalier H.Duffaut
Avignon, 84902
Centre Hospitalier de la côte basque
Bayonne, 64109
Hôpital Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25030
Centre Hospitalier de Blois
Blois, 41016
Hôpital Avicenne
Bobigny, 93009
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Bordeaux, 33 300
Hôpital A.Morvan
Brest, 29609
CHU Caen Côte de Nacre
Caen, 14033
Centre François Baclesse
Caen, 14076
CH René Dubos
Cergy-Pontoise, 95303
Centre Hospitalier William Morey
Chalon-sur-Saône, 71 321
CH Chambéry
Chambéry, 73011
Hôpital Antoine Béclère
Clamart, 92 141
Hôpital d'instruction des armées Percy
Clamart, 92141
CHU d'Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Pole Santé République
Clermont-Ferrand, 63050
CH Louis Pasteur - Colmar
Colmar, 68024
CH Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, 91106
CHU Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94 010
CHRU Dijon
Dijon, 21000
Centre Hospitalier Général - Dunkerque
Dunkirk, 59 385
Hôpital A.Michallon
Grenoble, 38043
Centre hospitalier départemental - La Roche sur Yon cedex
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85025
CH de Chartres - Hôpital Louis Pasteur
Le Coudray, 26630
Centre Jean Bernard
Le Mans, 72000
Centre hospitalier Le Mans
Le Mans, 72037
CHRU - Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, 59037
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, 87042
Centre hospitalier Bodelio
Lorient, 56322
CHU - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13273
CH Meaux
Meaux, 77104
Hopital E Muller
Mulhouse, 68100
Hôpitaux de Brabois
Nancy, 54511
Centre Catherine de Sienne
Nantes, 44 202
CHRU - Hôtel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
Hôpital Archet 1
Nice, 06202
Hôpital de l'Archet
Nice, 06202
Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes Cédex 9, 30029
Institut Curie
Paris, 75005
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, 75014
Hôpital Saint-Louis
Paris, 75475
Hôpital St-Antoine
Paris, 75571
CH Saint Jean
Perpignan, 66046
CHRU - Hôpital du Haut Lévêque
Pessac, 33604
Centre Hospitalier Lyon sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
CHRU - Hôpital Jean Bernard
Poitiers, 86021
Centre Hospitalier de la région d'Annecy
Pringy, 74374
Hôpital R.Debré
Reims, 51092
CHRU - Hôpital de Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033
CHRU - Hôpital Sud
Rennes, 35056
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
Centre Hospitalier Yves le Foll
Saint-Brieuc, 22 027
Centre René Huguenin
Saint-Cloud, 92210
Centre Hospitalier Départemental - La réunion St Denis
Saint-Denis, 97 405
Groupe Hospitalier Sud Réunion
Saint-Pierre, 97448
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42 271
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091
University Hospital of Toulouse, Purpan
Toulouse, 31059 Cedex 9
CHRU - Hôpital Bretonneau
Tours, 37044
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Valence, 26953
CH Bretagne Atlantique Vannes et Auray
Vannes, 56017
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94 805
About this study
Official title: Randomized Study Comparing Conventional Dose Treatment Using a Combination of Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone to High-Dose Treatment With ASCT in the Initial Management of Myeloma in Patients up to 65 Years of Age
Objective of this study is to determine if, in the era of novel drugs, high dose therapy (HDT) is still necessary in the initial management of multiple myeloma in younger patients. HDT as compared to conventional dose treatment would be considered superior if it significantly prolongs Progression-free survival (by at least 9 months).
Read the detailed description
Study design Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study designed to evaluate the clinical benefit from the drug combination RVD without immediate high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by lenalidomide maintenance (Arm A) versus RVD plus HDT and PBSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance (Arm B).
- Conditions
- Myeloma
- Being tested
- Lenalidomide, Bortezomib
- Keywords
- Progression free survival prolongation, Disease Progression, Overall survival
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Plasma Cell, Disease Progression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lenalidomide, BortezomibDrug
Also called Lenalidomide (REVLIMID®), Bortezomib (VELCADE®)
Lenalidomide/Bortézomib/Dexamethasone cycles:
Number of cycles: 8 cycles for arm A
Cycle length
Dosage:
- Lenalidomide: 25 mg/day on days 1-14 of each cycle
- Bortézomib: 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for 1 cycle of each cycle
Maintenance phase (12 months):
Cycle length: 28 days Dosage: Lenalidomide: 10 mg/day continuously for 28 days during 3 months and if the participant tolerates 10 mg/day without complication, a dose increase to 15 mg/day will be allowed
Lenalidomide, BortezomibDrug
Also called Lenalidomide (REVLIMID®), Bortézomib (VELCADE®)
Lenalidomide Bortezomib Dexamethasone cycles:
Number of cycles: 5 cycles for arm B
Cycle length
Dosage:
- Lenalidomide: 25 mg/day on days 1-14 of each cycle
- Bortézomib: 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for 1 cycle of each cycle
Maintenance phase (12 months):
Cycle length: 28 days Dosage: Lenalidomide: 10 mg/day continuously for 28 days during 3 months and if the participant tolerates 10 mg/day without complication, a dose increase to 15 mg/day will be allowed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| lenalidomide, bortezomib with ASCT | Experimental | RVD q 21 days (2 cycles) Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) using cyclophosphamide and GCSF (type Granocyte® or equivalent)
Autologous stem cell transplant:
Melphalan: infused over two days (day -2 and day -1) or as a single infusion (day-2) according to institutional practice Re-infusion of PBSCs RVD q 21 days (2 cycles) Maintenance Lenalidomide q28 days (12 months) Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib |
| lenalidomide, bortezomib without ASCT | Experimental | RVD q 21 days (2 cycles) Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) using cyclophosphamide and GCSF (type Granocyte® or equivalent) RVD q 21 days (5 cycles) Maintenance Lenalidomide q28 days (12 months) Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival
To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between the Arm A and Arm B up to 4 years or until progression
Measured: up to 4 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Response Rates
-Response rates (RR) between the two arms up to 4 years or until progression
Measured: up to 4 years
Time To Progression
Time to progression (TTP) between the two arms up to 4 years or until progression
Measured: up to 4 years
Toxicity comparison
Toxicity comparison between the two arms randomization up to 4 years or until progression
Measured: up to 4 years
Genetic prognostic groups definition
Genetic prognostic groups definition (evaluated by gene expression profiling-GEP) from randomization up to 4 years or until progression
Measured: up to 4 years
Best treatment examination in each GEP-defined prognostic group.
Best treatment examination in each GEP-defined prognostic group. from randomization up to 4 years or until progression
Measured: up to 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completion30 Nov 2018
- Study completion30 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Toulouse
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Celgene Corporation, Janssen-Cilag Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MICHEL ATTAL, MD PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital of Toulouse
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01191060
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 09 110 01
- Other IDs
- 2009-016871-32, 2009
- Acronym
- IFM/DFCI2009
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, Leleu X, Caillot D, Escoffre M, Arnulf B, Macro M, Belhadj K, Garderet L, Roussel M, Payen C, Mathiot C, Fermand JP, Meuleman N, Rollet S, Maglio ME, Zeytoonjian AA, Weller EA, Munshi N, Anderson KC, Richardson PG, Facon T, Avet-Loiseau H, Harousseau JL, Moreau P; IFM 2009 Study. Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1311-1320. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611750.
PubMed 28379796Rosinol L, Hebraud B, Oriol A, Colin AL, Rios Tamayo R, Hulin C, Blanchard MJ, Caillot D, Sureda A, Hernandez MT, Arnulf B, Mateos MV, Macro M, San-Miguel J, Belhadj K, Lahuerta JJ, Garelik MB, Blade J, Moreau P. Integrated analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone or bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone induction in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 2;13:1197340. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1197340. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 38023148Noori S, Wijnands C, Langerhorst P, Bonifay V, Stingl C, Touzeau C, Corre J, Perrot A, Moreau P, Caillon H, Luider TM, Dejoie T, Jacobs JFM, van Duijn MM. Dynamic monitoring of myeloma minimal residual disease with targeted mass spectrometry. Blood Cancer J. 2023 Feb 24;13(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00803-z. No abstract available.
PubMed 36828828Langerhorst P, Noori S, Zajec M, De Rijke YB, Gloerich J, van Gool AJ, Caillon H, Joosten I, Luider TM, Corre J, VanDuijn MM, Dejoie T, Jacobs JFM. Multiple Myeloma Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Targeted Mass Spectrometry in Blood vs Next-Generation Sequencing in Bone Marrow. Clin Chem. 2021 Nov 26;67(12):1689-1698. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab187.
PubMed 34643690Samur MK, Aktas Samur A, Fulciniti M, Szalat R, Han T, Shammas M, Richardson P, Magrangeas F, Minvielle S, Corre J, Moreau P, Thakurta A, Anderson KC, Parmigiani G, Avet-Loiseau H, Munshi NC. Genome-Wide Somatic Alterations in Multiple Myeloma Reveal a Superior Outcome Group. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3107-3118. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00461. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
PubMed 32687451Roussel M, Hebraud B, Hulin C, Perrot A, Caillot D, Stoppa AM, Macro M, Escoffre M, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Karlin L, Garderet L, Facon T, Guo S, Weng J, Dhanasiri S, Leleu X, Moreau P, Attal M. Health-related quality of life results from the IFM 2009 trial: treatment with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Jun;61(6):1323-1333. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1719091. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
PubMed 32090636Dunavin NC, Wei L, Elder P, Phillips GS, Benson DM Jr, Hofmeister CC, Penza S, Greenfield C, Rose KS, Rieser G, Merritt L, Ketcham J, Heerema N, Byrd JC, Devine SM, Efebera YA. Early versus delayed autologous stem cell transplant in patients receiving novel therapies for multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 Aug;54(8):1658-64. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.751528. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
PubMed 23194056
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Study Comparing Conventional Dose Treatment Using a Combination of Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone to High-Dose Treatment With ASCT in the Initial Management of Myeloma in Patients up to 65 Years of Age
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01191060
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IFM/DFCI2009 / 09 110 01
- Conditions
- Myeloma
- Keywords
- Progression free survival prolongation, Disease Progression, Overall survival
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, ToulouseUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Celgene Corporation, Janssen-Cilag Ltd.
- Study start
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective of this study is to determine if, in the era of novel drugs, high dose therapy (HDT) is still necessary in the initial management of multiple myeloma in younger patients. HDT as compared to conventional dose treatment would be considered superior if it significantly prolongs Progression-free survival (by at least 9 months).
Detailed description
Study design Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study designed to evaluate the clinical benefit from the drug combination RVD without immediate high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by lenalidomide maintenance (Arm A) versus RVD plus HDT and PBSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance (Arm B).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| lenalidomide, bortezomib with ASCT | Experimental | Drug: Lenalidomide, BortezomibRVD q 21 days (2 cycles) Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) using cyclophosphamide and GCSF (type Granocyte® or equivalent) Autologous stem cell transplant: Melphalan: infused over two days (day -2 and day -1) or as a single infusion (day-2) according to institutional practice Re-infusion of PBSCs RVD q 21 days (2 cycles) Maintenance Lenalidomide q28 days (12 months) |
| lenalidomide, bortezomib without ASCT | Experimental | Drug: Lenalidomide, BortezomibRVD q 21 days (2 cycles) Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) using cyclophosphamide and GCSF (type Granocyte® or equivalent) RVD q 21 days (5 cycles) Maintenance Lenalidomide q28 days (12 months) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma based on International Myeloma Foundation 2003 Diagnostic Criteria.
- Patients must have symptomatic myeloma with myeloma-related organ damage.
- Patients must have myeloma that is measurable by either serum or urine evaluation of the monoclonal component or by assay of serum free light chains.
- Age between 18 and 65 years at the time of signing the informed consent document.
- ECOG performance status <2 (Karnofsky ≥ 60%)
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Participants must not have been treated with any prior systemic therapy for multiple myeloma. Treatment by localized radiotherapy is not an exclusion criterion if an interval of at least two weeks between the end of radiotherapy and initiation of protocol therapy entry in the study is observed. Similarly, the dose of corticosteroids received by the participant should not exceed the equivalent of 160 mg of dexamethasone over a two-week period before initiation of protocol therapy.
- Primary amyloidosis (AL) or myeloma complicated by amylosis.
- Participants may not be receiving any other study investigational agents.
- Participants with known brain metastases
- Poor tolerability or known allergy to any of the study drugs or compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to study agents
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide, BortezomibAlso: Lenalidomide (REVLIMID®), Bortezomib (VELCADE®)Lenalidomide/Bortézomib/Dexamethasone cycles: Number of cycles: 8 cycles for arm A Cycle length Dosage: * Lenalidomide: 25 mg/day on days 1-14 of each cycle * Bortézomib: 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for 1 cycle of each cycle Maintenance phase (12 months): Cycle length: 28 days Dosage: Lenalidomide: 10 mg/day continuously for 28 days during 3 months and if the participant tolerates 10 mg/day without complication, a dose increase to 15 mg/day will be allowed | Drug | lenalidomide, bortezomib without ASCT |
| Lenalidomide, BortezomibAlso: Lenalidomide (REVLIMID®), Bortézomib (VELCADE®)Lenalidomide Bortezomib Dexamethasone cycles: Number of cycles: 5 cycles for arm B Cycle length Dosage: * Lenalidomide: 25 mg/day on days 1-14 of each cycle * Bortézomib: 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for 1 cycle of each cycle Maintenance phase (12 months): Cycle length: 28 days Dosage: Lenalidomide: 10 mg/day continuously for 28 days during 3 months and if the participant tolerates 10 mg/day without complication, a dose increase to 15 mg/day will be allowed | Drug | lenalidomide, bortezomib with ASCT |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: up to 4 years
To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between the Arm A and Arm B up to 4 years or until progression
5 secondary outcomes
Response Rates
Time frame: up to 4 years
Time To Progression
Time frame: up to 4 years
Toxicity comparison
Time frame: up to 4 years
Genetic prognostic groups definition
Time frame: up to 4 years
Best treatment examination in each GEP-defined prognostic group.
Time frame: up to 4 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 28379796Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, Leleu X, Caillot D, Escoffre M, Arnulf B, Macro M, Belhadj K, Garderet L, Roussel M, Payen C, Mathiot C, Fermand JP, Meuleman N, Rollet S, Maglio ME, Zeytoonjian AA, Weller EA, Munshi N, Anderson KC, Richardson PG, Facon T, Avet-Loiseau H, Harousseau JL, Moreau P; IFM 2009 Study. Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1311-1320. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611750.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38023148Rosinol L, Hebraud B, Oriol A, Colin AL, Rios Tamayo R, Hulin C, Blanchard MJ, Caillot D, Sureda A, Hernandez MT, Arnulf B, Mateos MV, Macro M, San-Miguel J, Belhadj K, Lahuerta JJ, Garelik MB, Blade J, Moreau P. Integrated analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone or bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone induction in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 2;13:1197340. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1197340. eCollection 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36828828Noori S, Wijnands C, Langerhorst P, Bonifay V, Stingl C, Touzeau C, Corre J, Perrot A, Moreau P, Caillon H, Luider TM, Dejoie T, Jacobs JFM, van Duijn MM. Dynamic monitoring of myeloma minimal residual disease with targeted mass spectrometry. Blood Cancer J. 2023 Feb 24;13(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00803-z. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34643690Langerhorst P, Noori S, Zajec M, De Rijke YB, Gloerich J, van Gool AJ, Caillon H, Joosten I, Luider TM, Corre J, VanDuijn MM, Dejoie T, Jacobs JFM. Multiple Myeloma Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Targeted Mass Spectrometry in Blood vs Next-Generation Sequencing in Bone Marrow. Clin Chem. 2021 Nov 26;67(12):1689-1698. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab187.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32687451Samur MK, Aktas Samur A, Fulciniti M, Szalat R, Han T, Shammas M, Richardson P, Magrangeas F, Minvielle S, Corre J, Moreau P, Thakurta A, Anderson KC, Parmigiani G, Avet-Loiseau H, Munshi NC. Genome-Wide Somatic Alterations in Multiple Myeloma Reveal a Superior Outcome Group. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3107-3118. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00461. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32090636Roussel M, Hebraud B, Hulin C, Perrot A, Caillot D, Stoppa AM, Macro M, Escoffre M, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Karlin L, Garderet L, Facon T, Guo S, Weng J, Dhanasiri S, Leleu X, Moreau P, Attal M. Health-related quality of life results from the IFM 2009 trial: treatment with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Jun;61(6):1323-1333. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1719091. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23194056Dunavin NC, Wei L, Elder P, Phillips GS, Benson DM Jr, Hofmeister CC, Penza S, Greenfield C, Rose KS, Rieser G, Merritt L, Ketcham J, Heerema N, Byrd JC, Devine SM, Efebera YA. Early versus delayed autologous stem cell transplant in patients receiving novel therapies for multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 Aug;54(8):1658-64. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.751528. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
Related trials for Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cemsidomide + Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
AZD0305 as Monotherapy or in Combination With Anticancer Agents in Participants With Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of OPN-6602 in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Cemsidomide in Combination With Elranatamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Subjects
Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Active, not recruiting
Real World Treatment Experience of Patients With Breast, Lung, or GI Cancer or Multiple Myeloma Using Remote Symptom Monitoring
Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MICHEL ATTAL, MD PhD principal investigator
University Hospital of Toulouse
68 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lenalidomide, Bortezomib in people with Myeloma, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 68 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 68 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (time frame: up to 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01191060, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2026.