AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral NeuropathyPhase 4NCT01192113

Safety and Efficacy of Mecobalamin Injection in Peripheral Neuropathies Patients (Study JGAZSY091109)

A Phase 4 study testing Mecobalamin IV Injection, Mecobalamin IM injection and Mecobalamin IV or IM injection in people with Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Eisai Co., Ltd. at 24 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy in peripheral neuropathies patients treated with Mecobalamin Injection Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Neuropathy
What is being tested?
Mecobalamin IV Injection, Mecobalamin IM injection and Mecobalamin IV or IM injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,072 participants
Where
24 sitesChina
Study dates
Apr 2010to May 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of diabetes induced peripheral neuropathy, other peripheral neuropathies (Idiopathic, nutritional and metabolic nature of entrapment neuropathy).
  • Significant spontaneous pain and / or numbness and other symptoms of neuropathy. TSS (Total Symptom Score) >=7.5.
  • Participation in clinical trials voluntarily and signed informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy, preparation for pregnancy or breast-feeding women
  • Peripheral neuropathy caused by drugs, poisoning, cancer or genetic
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST): 2.0 times more than the upper limit of normal; Creatinine (Cr) 1.5 times above the upper limit of normal.
  • Serious organ disease or other serious primary disease merger, the mentally ill, poorly controlled hypertension (blood pressure more than 150/100 mmHg after using antihypertensive drugs)
  • Diagnosis of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, but has diabetes ketosis, ketoacidosis and severe infection within the past two weeks
  • Bleeding or bleeding tendency in 2 months
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Have allergy
  • Noncompliance or cannot meet those
  • Participation in other clinical trials in the last 3 months
  • Participant unsuitable to participate in this test as investigator considering

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 1 country.

24 sites in 1 country

China24 sites
  • The General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

  • The institute of rehabilitation medicine

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

  • The institute of rehabilitation medicine

    Beijing

  • Nanfang Hospital of Nanfang Medical Unversity

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

  • The 1st People Hospital of Guangzhou

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

  • The 1st Hospital of Anhui Medical University

    Hefei, Anhui

  • the 1st Hospital of Nanjing

    Nanjing, Jiangsu

  • Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Hospital of Jiangsu

    Nanjing, Jiangsu

  • the 1st Hospital affliated to Guangxi Medical University

    Nanning, Guangxi

  • Changhai Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality

  • Ruijing Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality

  • the 10th People Hospital of Shanghai

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality

  • the 10th People Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality

  • Rui Jin Hospital

    Shanghai

  • Shenzhen Hospital of Beijing University

    Shenzhen

  • The 3rd Hospital of Hebei Medical University

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei

  • the 2nd Hospital of Suzhou University

    Suzhou, Jiangsu

  • The 1st Center Hospital of Tianjin

    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality

  • the people Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei

  • Tongji Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei

  • Xiehe Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei

  • Subei People Hospital

    Yangzhou, Jiangsu

  • The 1st People Hospital of Yangzhou

    Yangzhou, Jiangsu

  • the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University

    Zhenjiang, Jiangsu

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: An Open-label, Randomized, Multi-center Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Peripheral Neuropathies Patients Treated With Mecobalamin Injection

This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy in peripheral neuropathies patients treated with Mecobalamin Injection

Being tested
Mecobalamin IV Injection, Mecobalamin IM injection, Mecobalamin IV or IM injection
Keywords
Mecobalamin, peripheral neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Diabetic Neuropathies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mecobalamin IV InjectionDrug

    Mecobalamin injection 0.5 mg/ ml administered as an intravenous (IV) injection 3 times a week for four weeks

  • Mecobalamin IM injectionDrug

    Mecobalamin injection 0.5 mg/ ml administered as an intramuscular (IM) injection 3 times a week for four weeks

  • Mecobalamin IV or IM injectionDrug

    Mecobalamin injection 0.5 mg/ ml administered as an IM or IV injection 3 times a week for four weeks

Study groups in NCT01192113
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (IV)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Mecobalamin IV Injection
Group B: Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (IM)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Mecobalamin IM injection
Group C: Idiopathic Peripheral NeuropathyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Mecobalamin IV or IM injection
Group D: Nutritional & Metabolic Peripheral NeuropathyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Mecobalamin IV or IM injection
Group E: Compression Peripheral NeuropathyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Mecobalamin IV or IM injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Value of the Peripheral Neuropathy Total Symptom Score (TSS) Compared to Baseline

    The TSS of peripheral neuropathy is used to score the intensity \& frequency of four symptoms in participants' feet/legs including: pain, burning sensation, numbness, and hypoesthesia. Frequency is ranked as asymptomatic, occasionally (2-3 times/ week), often (1-2 times/ day), \& continuous (nearly all day). Intensity is evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score: 0 (zero intensity)- 10 (max. intensity). Participants described intensity by marking the number corresponding to severity of symptom they felt in a 10 cm long straight line and investigators distinguished whether it was mild (score: 1-3), moderate (score: 4-6), or severe (score: 7-10). The total score of four symptoms was considered the TSS. Total scores ranged from 0-14.64 points, where 0 was lowest symptom score and 14.64 was most severe level of symptoms. Baseline (before treatment) scores were compared to scores after 4 weeks of treatment.

    Measured: Baseline & End of Week 4

  2. Rate of the Peripheral Neuropathy Total Symptom Score (TSS) Compared to Baseline

    TSS of peripheral neuropathy is used to score the intensity \& frequency of 4 symptoms in participants' feet/legs including: pain, burning sensation, numbness, hypoesthesia. Frequency is ranked as asymptomatic, occasionally (2-3 times/ week), often (1-2 times/ day), \& continuous (nearly all day). Intensity is evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score: 0 (zero intensity)- 10 (max. intensity). Participants described intensity by marking the number corresponding to severity of symptom they felt in a 10 cm long straight line and investigators distinguished whether it was mild (score: 1-3), moderate (score: 4-6), or severe (score: 7-10). The total score of four symptoms was considered the TSS. Total scores ranged from 0-14.64 points, where 0 was lowest symptom score and 14.64 was most severe level of symptoms. Baseline scores were compared to TSS decreasing rate after 4 weeks of treatment. Rate of TSS change = (TSS difference value/TSS before treatment)×100%.

    Measured: Baseline and End of Week 4

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Value of the Peripheral Neuropathy Total Symptom Score (TSS) Compared to Baseline

    The TSS of peripheral neuropathy is used to score the intensity \& frequency of four symptoms in participants' feet/legs including: pain, burning sensation, numbness, and hypoesthesia. Frequency is ranked as asymptomatic, occasionally (2-3 times/ week), often (1-2 times/ day), \& continuous (nearly all day). Intensity is evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score: 0 (zero intensity)- 10 (max. intensity). Participants described intensity by marking the number corresponding to severity of symptom they felt in a 10 cm long straight line and investigators distinguished whether it was mild (score: 1-3), moderate (score: 4-6), or severe (score: 7-10). The total score of four symptoms was considered the TSS. Total scores ranged from 0-14.64 points, where 0 was lowest symptom score and 14.64 was most severe level of symptoms. Baseline (before treatment) scores were compared to scores after 2 weeks of treatment.

    Measured: Baseline and End of Week 2

  2. Rate of the Peripheral Neuropathy Total Symptom Score (TSS) Compared to Baseline

    TSS of peripheral neuropathy is used to score the intensity/ frequency of 4 symptoms in participants' feet/legs including: pain, burning sensation, numbness, and hypoesthesia. Frequency is ranked as asymptomatic, occasionally (2-3 times/ week), often (1-2 times/ day), \& continuous (nearly all day). Intensity is evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score: 0 (zero intensity)- 10 (max. intensity). Participants described intensity by marking the number corresponding to severity of symptom they felt in a 10 cm long straight line and investigators distinguished whether it was mild (score: 1-3), moderate (score: 4-6), or severe (score: 7-10). The total score of four symptoms was considered the TSS. Total scores ranged from 0-14.64 points, where 0 was lowest symptom score and 14.64 was most severe level of symptoms. Baseline scores were compared to TSS decreasing rate after 2 weeks of treatment. Rate of TSS change = (TSS difference value/TSS before treatment)×100%.

    Measured: Baseline and End of Week 2

  3. Value of the Neural Injury Score of the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) Compared to Baseline

    The Neural Injury Score of the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) was scored based on the following examination items: muscle strength (including hip \& knee flexion/ extension \& remote foot dorsiflexion/ plantar flexion [scored as normal, 25% weak, 50% weak, 75% weak, and paralysis]), reflex (response at the quadriceps \& ankle [normal score=0, decreased score=1, absent score=2], and sensory (tested at the great toe; including touch pressure, pinprick ,vibration, and joint position [normal score=0, decreased score=1, absent score=2]). The Total NIS-LL score ranged from 0-8 points where a higher score means greater neural injury of the lower limbs. Baseline (before treatment) scores were compared to scores after 4 weeks of treatment.

    Measured: Baseline and End of Week 4

  4. Rate of the Neural Injury Score of the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) Compared to Baseline

    The Neural Injury Score of the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) was scored based on the following examination items: muscle strength (including hip \& knee flexion/ extension \& remote foot dorsiflexion/ plantar flexion [scored as normal, 25% weak, 50% weak, 75% weak, and paralysis]), reflex (response at the quadriceps \& ankle [normal score=0, decreased score=1, absent score=2], and sensory (tested at the great toe; including touch pressure, pinprick ,vibration, and joint position [normal score=0, decreased score=1, absent score=2]). The Total NIS-LL score ranged from 0-8 points where a higher score means greater neural injury of the lower limbs. Baseline (before treatment) scores were compared to scores after 4 weeks of treatment. Rate of NIS-LL change = (NIS-LL difference value/NIS-LL before treatment)×100%.

    Measured: Baseline and End of Week 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,072 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01192113
Sponsor's protocol ID
JGAZSY091109
Status last verified
Nov 2012
First submitted
26 Aug 2010
Last updated
7 Nov 2012
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Mecobalamin IV Injection, Mecobalamin IM injection and Mecobalamin IV or IM injection in people with Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Eisai Co., Ltd. at 24 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Value of the Peripheral Neuropathy Total Symptom Score (TSS) Compared to Baseline (time frame: Baseline & End of Week 4). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in