AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT01193244

Study Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Orteronel and Prednisone in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 240 sites in 40 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in the treatment of men with progressive, chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
Orteronel and Prednisone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,560 participants
Where
240 sitesin 40 countries
Study dates
1 Oct 2010to 7 Apr 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Each patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
  • Voluntary written consent
  • Male patients 18 years or older
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma
  • Radiograph-documented metastatic disease
  • Progressive disease
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration
  • Either absence of pain or pain not requiring use of any opioid or narcotic analgesia in the 2 weeks prior to study entry
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
  • Even if surgically sterilized, patients must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR abstain from heterosexual intercourse
  • Meet screening laboratory values as specified in protocol
  • Stable medical condition

Who cannot join

  • Patients meeting any of the following exclusion criteria are not to be enrolled in the study:
  • Known hypersensitivity to orteronel, prednisone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue
  • Received prior therapy with orteronel, aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole or abiraterone
  • Received antiandrogen therapy within 6 weeks for bicalutamide and 4 weeks for all others prior to first dose of study drug
  • Continuous daily use of oral prednisone or oral dexamethasone for more than 14 days within 3 months prior to study
  • Received prior chemotherapy for prostate cancer with exception of neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy as part of initial primary treatment for local disease that was completed 2 or more years prior to screening
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Exposure to radioisotope therapy within 4 weeks of receiving first dose of study drug; exposure to external beam radiation within 2 weeks of start of screening until receiving the first dose of study drug
  • Documented central nervous system metastases
  • Treatment with any investigational compound within 30 days prior to first dose of study drug
  • Current spinal cord compression, bilateral hydronephrosis or current bladder neck outlet obstruction
  • Diagnosis or treatment of another malignancy within 2 years preceding first dose of study drug except nonmelanoma skin cancer or in situ malignancy completely resected
  • Uncontrolled cardiovascular condition as specified in study protocol
  • Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with protocol
  • Uncontrolled nausea, vomiting or diarrhea
  • Known gastrointestinal disease or procedure that could interfere with oral absorption or tolerance of orteronel

Trial locations and contacts

240 sites in 40 countries.

240 sites in 40 countries

United States48 sites
  • Study site

    Amarillo, Texas

  • Study site

    Anchorage, Alaska

  • Study site

    Aurora, Colorado

  • Study site

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Study site

    Bedford, Texas

  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Chattanooga, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Columbia, Missouri

  • Study site

    Columbia, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Corinth, Mississippi

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Deerfield Beach, Florida

  • Study site

    Denton, Texas

  • Study site

    Denver, Colorado

  • Study site

    Duarte, California

  • Study site

    Duluth, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Durham, North Carolina

  • Study site

    East Syracuse, New York

  • Study site

    Fort Myers, Florida

  • Study site

    Hackensack, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Hershey, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Highland, California

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Study site

    Jefferson City, Missouri

  • Study site

    Jeffersonville, Indiana

  • Study site

    Kansas City, Kansas

  • Study site

    Kettering, Ohio

  • Study site

    Lancaster, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Lansing, Michigan

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Study site

    New Orleans, Louisiana

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Norfolk, Virginia

  • Study site

    Omaha, Nebraska

  • Study site

    Orange, California

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Piitsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Port Saint Lucie, Florida

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Sacramento, California

  • Study site

    Salt Lake City, Utah

  • Study site

    San Francisco, California

  • Study site

    Tualatin, Oregon

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Study site

    Tyler, Texas

Other trials in United States

Brazil21 sites
  • Study site

    Bairro Nazare - Salvador

  • Study site

    Barretos/sp

  • Study site

    Belo Horizonte

  • Study site

    Campinas

  • Study site

    Caxias do Sul

  • Study site

    Curitiba

  • Study site

    Fortaleza/ce

  • Study site

    Ijuí

  • Study site

    Joinville

  • Study site

    Lajeado - Rs

  • Study site

    Piracicaba - Sp

  • Study site

    Porto Alegre- Rs

  • Study site

    Porto Alegre/rs

  • Study site

    Ribeirao Preto - Sp

  • Study site

    Rio de Janeiro

  • Study site

    Rio de Janeiro Rj

  • Study site

    Santo André

  • Study site

    São José do Rio Preto

  • Study site

    São José dos Campos

  • Study site

    São Paulo

  • Study site

    Sorocaba - Sp

Other trials in Brazil

Japan18 sites
  • Study site

    Chiba

  • Study site

    Fukuoka

  • Study site

    Hamamatsu

  • Study site

    Hokkaido

  • Study site

    Kanazawa

  • Study site

    Kita-gun

  • Study site

    Maebashi

  • Study site

    Mito

  • Study site

    Osaka

  • Study site

    Sakura

  • Study site

    Sayama

  • Study site

    Sendai

  • Study site

    Shimizucho Sunto-gun

  • Study site

    Suntou-gun

  • Study site

    Tokyo

  • Study site

    Yamagata

  • Study site

    Yokohama

  • Study site

    Yufu

Other trials in Japan

France13 sites
  • Study site

    Angers

  • Study site

    Bordeaux

  • Study site

    Caen

  • Study site

    Créteil

  • Study site

    La Roche-sur-Yon

  • Study site

    Lyon

  • Study site

    Marseille

  • Study site

    Nancy

  • Study site

    Nantes

  • Study site

    Paris

  • Study site

    Poitiers

  • Study site

    Saint-Etienne

  • Study site

    Villejuif

Other trials in France

United Kingdom11 sites
  • Study site

    Aberdeen

  • Study site

    Belfast

  • Study site

    Bristol

  • Study site

    Cottingham

  • Study site

    Coventry

  • Study site

    Glasgow

  • Study site

    London

  • Study site

    Manchester

  • Study site

    Northwood

  • Study site

    Preston

  • Study site

    Southampton

Other trials in United Kingdom

Canada10 sites
  • Study site

    Burlington, Ontario

  • Study site

    Hamilton, Ontario

  • Study site

    Kelowna, British Columbia

  • Study site

    London, Ontario

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec

  • Study site

    Owen Sound, Ontario

  • Study site

    Pointe-Claire, Quebec

  • Study site

    Québec, Quebec

  • Study site

    Sherbrooke, Quebec

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

Germany9 sites
  • Study site

    Braunschweig

  • Study site

    Dresden

  • Study site

    Hamburg

  • Study site

    Hanover

  • Study site

    Kassel

  • Study site

    Kempen

  • Study site

    Nürtingen

  • Study site

    Tübingen

  • Study site

    Wuppertal

Other trials in Germany

Netherlands8 sites
  • Study site

    Amsterdam

  • Study site

    Arnhem

  • Study site

    Breda

  • Study site

    Eindhoven

  • Study site

    Heerlen

  • Study site

    Nieuwegein

  • Study site

    Nijmegen

  • Study site

    Rotterdam

Other trials in Netherlands

Australia7 sites
  • Study site

    Garran

  • Study site

    Hobart

  • Study site

    Kurralta Park

  • Study site

    Nedlands

  • Study site

    Perth

  • Study site

    Redcliffe

  • Study site

    Wodonga

Other trials in Australia

Israel7 sites
  • Study site

    Haifa

  • Study site

    Holon

  • Study site

    Jerusalem

  • Study site

    Petah Tikva

  • Study site

    Ramat Gan

  • Study site

    Tel Aviv

  • Study site

    Tsrifin

Other trials in Israel

Spain7 sites
  • Study site

    A Coruña

  • Study site

    Barcelona

  • Study site

    Madrid

  • Study site

    Majadahonda

  • Study site

    Pamplona

  • Study site

    Seville

  • Study site

    Valencia

Other trials in Spain

Belgium5 sites
  • Study site

    Edegem

  • Study site

    Hasselt

  • Study site

    Kortrijk

  • Study site

    Leuven

  • Study site

    Namur

Other trials in Belgium

Greece5 sites
  • Study site

    Athens

  • Study site

    Heraklion Crete

  • Study site

    Larissa

  • Study site

    Pátrai

  • Study site

    Thessaloniki

Other trials in Greece

New Zealand5 sites
  • Study site

    Auckland

  • Study site

    Christchurch

  • Study site

    Dunedin

  • Study site

    Takapuna

  • Study site

    Tauranga

Other trials in New Zealand

Chile4 sites
  • Study site

    Las Condes

  • Study site

    Santiago

  • Study site

    Temuco

  • Study site

    Valparaíso

Other trials in Chile

Finland4 sites
  • Study site

    Joensuu

  • Study site

    Oulu

  • Study site

    Seinäjoki

  • Study site

    Tampere

Other trials in Finland

Italy4 sites
  • Study site

    Aviano

  • Study site

    Novara

  • Study site

    Roma

  • Study site

    Torino

Other trials in Italy

Slovakia4 sites
  • Study site

    Nitra

  • Study site

    Prešov

  • Study site

    Trenčín

  • Study site

    Žilina

Other trials in Slovakia

South Africa4 sites
  • Study site

    Cape Town

  • Study site

    Durban

  • Study site

    George

  • Study site

    Port Elizabeth

Other trials in South Africa

Switzerland4 sites
  • Study site

    Aarau

  • Study site

    Lausanne

  • Study site

    Winterthur

  • Study site

    Zurich

Other trials in Switzerland

Ukraine4 sites
  • Study site

    Dnipropetrovsk

  • Study site

    Donetsk

  • Study site

    Kyiv

  • Study site

    Zaporizhzhya

Other trials in Ukraine

Austria3 sites
  • Study site

    Graz

  • Study site

    Linz

  • Study site

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Bulgaria3 sites
  • Study site

    Plovdiv

  • Study site

    Sofia

  • Study site

    Varna

Other trials in Bulgaria

Lithuania3 sites
  • Study site

    Kaunas

  • Study site

    Klaipėda

  • Study site

    Vilnius

Other trials in Lithuania

Mexico3 sites
  • Study site

    Durango Durango

  • Study site

    Mexico City Distrito Federal

  • Study site

    Zapopan Jalisco

Other trials in Mexico

Portugal3 sites
  • Study site

    Liepaja

  • Study site

    Lisbon

  • Study site

    Porto

Other trials in Portugal

Sweden3 sites
  • Study site

    Gothenburg

  • Study site

    Stockholm

  • Study site

    Uppsala

Other trials in Sweden

Czechia2 sites
  • Study site

    Hradec Králové

  • Study site

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

Hong Kong2 sites
  • Study site

    Kowloon

  • Study site

    Shatin

Other trials in Hong Kong

Ireland2 sites
  • Study site

    Dublin

  • Study site

    Galway

Other trials in Ireland

Poland2 sites
  • Study site

    Bielsko-Biala

  • Study site

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Romania2 sites
  • Study site

    Bucharest

  • Study site

    Cluj-Napoca

Other trials in Romania

Russia2 sites
  • Study site

    Moscow

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg

Other trials in Russia

Taiwan2 sites
  • Study site

    Taichung

  • Study site

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

Belarus1 site
  • Study site

    Minsk

Other trials in Belarus

Colombia1 site
  • Study site

    Cali

Other trials in Colombia

Latvia1 site
  • Study site

    Riga

Other trials in Latvia

Peru1 site
  • Study site

    Lima

Other trials in Peru

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Study site

    San Juan, PR

Other trials in Puerto Rico

Singapore1 site
  • Study site

    Singapore

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in the treatment of men with progressive, chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
Orteronel, Placebo, Prednisone
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OrteronelDrug

    Orteronel will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Patients will also receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and have a testosterone concentration of <50 ng/dL.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Additionally, all patients will receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and a testosterone concentration of <50 ng/dL.

  • PrednisoneDrug

    Prednisone will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Patients will also receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and have a testosterone concentration of <50 ng/dL.

Study groups in NCT01193244
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Orteronel + prednisoneExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Orteronel; Drug: Prednisone
Placebo + prednisonePlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Prednisone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

    rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first objective evidence of radiographic disease progression assessed by independent central radiology review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radionuclide bone scans at regularly scheduled visits. Radiographic disease progression in bone required a confirmatory scan. Radiographic disease progression in soft tissue did not require a confirmatory scan for purposes of analysis. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by independent central radiology review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease and Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines for bone disease. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were censored at their last assessment.

    Measured: Baseline until radiographic disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)

  2. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.

    Measured: Baseline until death (up to 4.7 years)

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 12

    The PSA50 is defined as a decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 12

    A favorable CTC count was defined as less than <5 counts per 7.5 milliliter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Time to Pain Progression

    Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was >=4 with a >=2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was >=4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was <=3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use. BPI-SF was an 11-item questionnaire, designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Total score ranged from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference.

    Measured: Baseline until End of treatment (EOT) (approximately up to 4.7 years)

  4. Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3

    Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 (Death) events=death related to an AE.

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

  6. Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

  7. Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

  8. Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

    ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50 percent of waking hours [hrs]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50 percent of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

  9. Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    Measured: Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)

  10. Worst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction

    Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in cardiac ejection fraction at any measured time point.

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)

  11. Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)

  12. Percentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE)

    Skeletal related (SRE) event is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence.

    Measured: Baseline up to EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

  13. Time to SRE

    Time to SRE is defined as the time from randomization to SRE, or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. SRE is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence.

    Measured: Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)

  14. Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study

    The PSA50 is defined as a decline of PSA by 50 percent from baseline.

    Measured: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37

  15. Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12

    The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

  16. Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study

    The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline.

    Measured: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37

  17. Time to PSA Progression

    Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25 percent and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, compared to baseline PSA.

    Measured: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.7 years)

  18. Time to Docetaxel Chemotherapy

    Time to docetaxel based chemotherapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of docetaxel based chemotherapy for prostate cancer, regardless of whether the participant received concurrent orteronel or not. Deaths due to disease progression prior to Docetaxel based chemotherapy were considered as events.

    Measured: Baseline until start of docetaxel chemotherapy (up to 4.7 years)

  19. Time to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy

    Time to subsequent antineoplastic therapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of any alternate antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer. Deaths due to disease progression prior to antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer are considered as events. Otherwise, time to next therapy is censored at the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive or the data cutoff date, whichever is earlier.

    Measured: Baseline until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (up to 4.7 years)

  20. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter or short axis of lymph nodes.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)

  21. Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status

    Global health status deterioration is defined as a drop greater than 16 points from the baseline assessment, confirmed at least 3 weeks later, on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) index after the score has been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions, where question 1 to 28 can be answered with 1: Not at all, 2: A little, 3: Quite a bit, 4: Very much and question 29 to 30 with 1: Very poor to 7: Excellent. For subscales a high score from 0-100 indicates: high global quality of life, high level of functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) or a high level of symptoms (fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, financial difficulties).

    Measured: Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Oct 2010
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2014
  4. Study completion7 Apr 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
1,560 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01193244
Sponsor's protocol ID
C21004
Other IDs
2010-018661-35, 0991413276, 10/H0406/75, U1111-1181-0387
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
31 Aug 2010
Last updated
17 May 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes

Publications

  • Heller G, McCormack R, Kheoh T, Molina A, Smith MR, Dreicer R, Saad F, de Wit R, Aftab DT, Hirmand M, Limon A, Fizazi K, Fleisher M, de Bono JS, Scher HI. Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 20;36(6):572-580. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2998. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

    PubMed 29272162
  • Suri A, Chapel S, Lu C, Venkatakrishnan K. Physiologically based and population PK modeling in optimizing drug development: A predict-learn-confirm analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;98(3):336-44. doi: 10.1002/cpt.155. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

    PubMed 26031410
  • Saad F, Fizazi K, Jinga V, Efstathiou E, Fong PC, Hart LL, Jones R, McDermott R, Wirth M, Suzuki K, MacLean DB, Wang L, Akaza H, Nelson J, Scher HI, Dreicer R, Webb IJ, de Wit R; ELM-PC 4 investigators. Orteronel plus prednisone in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ELM-PC 4): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):338-48. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70027-6. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

    PubMed 25701170

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Orteronel and Prednisone in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 240 sites in 40 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 240 sites in United States, Brazil, Japan, France, United Kingdom and 35 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) (time frame: Baseline until radiographic disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01193244, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in