AzTrials
AzTrials

Aplastic AnemiaPhase 1/2NCT01193283

Cyclophosphamide Plus Cyclosporine in Treatment-Naive Severe Aplastic Anemia

A Phase 1/2 study testing Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporine in people with Aplastic Anemia and Neutropenia, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) can lead to problems with bone marrow health and result in low blood cell counts, which require frequent transfusions. Standard treatment for SAA involves injections of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine (CsA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aplastic Anemia, Neutropenia, Pancytopenia
What is being tested?
Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2010to Sep 2014
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Severe aplastic anemia characterized by:
  • Bone marrow cellularity less than 30 percent (excluding lymphocytes)
  • AND
  • At least two of the following:
  • Absolute neutrophil count less than 500/ microL
  • Platelet count less than 20,000/ microL
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Absolute reticulocyte count less than 60,000/ microL
  • Age greater than or equal to 2 years old
  • Weight greater than or equal to 12 kg

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of Fanconi anemia
  • Cardiac ejection fraction less than 30 percent (evaluated by ECHO)
  • Evidence of a clonal hematologic bone marrow disorder on cytogenetics. Patients with the presence of trisomy 8, loss of Y or del(20q) will not be excluded in the absence of dysplastic changes in the marrow. Patients with very severe neutropenia (ANC less than 200 /microL) will not be excluded initially if cytogenetics are not available or pending. If evidence of a clonal disorder is later identified, the patient will go off study.
  • Prior immunosuppressive therapy with high dose Cy or ATG
  • Infection not adequately controlled with appropriate therapy
  • Serologic evidence of HIV infection
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Moribund status or concurrent hepatic, renal, cardiac, neurologic, pulmonary, infectious, or metabolic disease of such severity that it would preclude the patient s ability to tolerate protocol therapy, or that death within 30 days is likely
  • Subjects with cancer who are not considered cured, are on active chemotherapeutic treatment or who take drugs with hematological effects
  • Current pregnancy or unwillingness to take oral contraceptives or refrain from pregnancy if of childbearing potential
  • Not able to understand the investigational nature of the study or to give informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892

Other trials in United States

About this study

Background:

  • Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) can lead to problems with bone marrow health and result in low blood cell counts, which require frequent transfusions. Standard treatment for SAA involves injections of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine (CsA). This regimen has been shown to improve the blood counts in about two-thirds of patients. However, the ATG/CsA regimen has the following limitations: (a) the disease can come back (relapse) in about one-third of patients who improve initially; and (b) in about 10% to 15% of cases, certain types of bone marrow cancer (such as myelodysplasia and leukemia) can develop (called evolution). Experience with other drugs in SAA such as cyclophosphamide suggests that similar response rates to ATG/CsA can be achieved with a lower risk of relapse and clonal evolution. However, cyclophosphamide was found to have significant side effects in SAA when investigated over 10 years ago due to increase risk of fungal infections.
  • Better antibiotic drugs against fungus have been developed and are widely used to treat patients who have low white blood cell counts and are at risk of developing infections. In SAA patients in particular, these newer antibiotics have had a large impact in preventing and treating fungus infections. Researchers are revisiting the use of cyclophosphamide in SAA treatment, and plan to give a lower dose of CsA in combination with the immune-suppressing drug cyclophosphamide, as well as antibiotics to protect against infections, as a possible treatment for the disease.
Read more

Objectives:

  • To determine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine in treating severe aplastic anemia that has not been treated with immunosuppressive therapy.
Read the detailed description

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure disorder characterized by pancytopenia and a hypocellular bone marrow. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the opportunity for cure in 70 percent of patients, but most patients are not suitable candidates for this treatment modality due to advanced age, comorbidities or lack of a histocompatible donor. For these patients, comparable long-term survival is attainable with immunosuppressive treatment (IST) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA). However, approximately 1/3 of patients do not show blood count improvement after ATG/CsA and are considered to have refractory disease. Furthermore, analysis of our own extensive clinical data suggests that poor blood count responses to a single course of ATG (non-robust responders), even when transfusion-independence is achieved, predicts a markedly worse prognosis compared to those who achieve a robust hematologic improvement (protocol 90-H-0146).

The current limitations of IST in SAA are: 1) the majority of the responses observed following initial h-ATG/CsA are partial with only a few patients achieving normal blood counts; 2) 1/3 of patients are refractory to initial h-ATG/CsA; 3) hematologic relapses occur in 35 percent of responders following initial response to h-ATG/CsA; 4) among relapsed patients chronic use of CsA is not infrequent which often leads to toxicities from the long term exposure to this drug (especially in older patients); 5) and clonal evolution is still observed in 10-15 percent of patients. Efforts to improve initial IST in treatment-naive patients with the addition of mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus to standard h-ATG/CsA or use of lymphocytotoxic agents such as r-ATG/CsA or alemtuzumab have not yielded the expected better outcomes when compared to standard h-ATG/CsA (protocols 00-H-0032, 03-H-0193, and 06-H-0034). Because the majority of SAA patients in the US and worldwide are treated with IST due to lack of an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor or inaccessibility to transplant, novel regimens are needed to overcome the current limitations of IST in SAA. Towards the goal of addressing these limitations we are proposing a regimen of cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus low dose CsA.

Cy has been proposed by the investigators at Johns Hopkins as an alternative IST regimen to h-ATG/CsA. In a pilot study, high dose Cy (200 mg/kg) yielded similar results to that observed for h-ATG/CsA. In a randomized study, at National Institute of Heart, Lung, and BIood (NHLBI), comparing high dose Cy (200 mg/kg) and h-ATG/CsA in treatment-na(SqrRoot) ve patients (protocol 97-H-0117), excess toxicity and deaths from invasive fungal infections were observed in the Cy arm which led to the discontinuation of this regimen. Recently reported long-term results from Johns Hopkins of 44 treatment-naive patients who received high dose Cy (200 mg/kg) as sole therapy for SAA showed that a greater number of complete responses were observed with few instances of relapse and clonal evolution noted with Cy when compared to h-ATG/CsA (historical comparison). In an accompanying editorial, the incidence of invasive fungal infections in this cohort were highlighted. Of note, antifungal prophylaxis against Aspergillus sp, the deadliest culprit when neutropenia is severe and prolonged, was not employed in the Hopkins high dose Cy protocol. In the Chinese experience, data presented in a recent meeting in Japan showed that lower doses of Cy (120 mg/kg) plus CsA achieved similar results reported by the Hopkins investigators with reduced toxicity. These data suggest that Cy has activity in SAA and could be a viable alternative to standard h-ATG/CsA if the immediate toxicities associated to prolonged neutropenia could be overcome.

In recent years we have observed a marked improvement in survival in our SAA patients especially among those who are non-responders to IST where pancytopenia remain persistent for months. A detailed analysis (shown in Section 2.4 Scientific and Clinical Justification of Protocol) showed that better antifungal supportive care in recent years contributed to a reduction of infection-related mortality in the months following IST among non-responders, who remain persistently neutropenic. This observation suggests that nowadays patients can be better supported through periods of neutropenia due to improved antifungal supportive care with agents that are better tolerated (compared to deoxycholate amphotericin B), retain a broad-spectrum of activity (especially against Aspergillus sp), and can be administered orally as an outpatient.

The fact that about one-third of initial refractory patients respond to retreatment and that late complications (relapse and clonal evolution) occur in about 40-50 percent of cases suggest that initial IST with h-ATG/CsA has important limitations. Therefore, we propose to investigate Cy + CsA as initial therapy in SAA. Our intention is not to recapitulate the high dose Cy regimen initially proposed by Hopkins (200 mg/kg) but instead, investigate lower doses proposed by the Chinese (120 mg/kg) in addition to low dose CsA (target therapeutic level 100 200 microg/L). The ability to better support patients during periods of neutropenia with better antifungals should allow for the immediate toxicity to be overcome and assess the activity of Cy in SAA.

The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Cy 120 mg/kg + low dose CsA (100 200 microg/L) in treatment-naive SAA. The primary endpoint will be hematologic response, defined as no longer meeting criteria for SAA, at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are relapse, robustness of hematologic recovery at 6 months, response at 3 months and 12 months, survival, clonal evolution to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), myelodysplasia and acute leukemia. The primary endpoint will be changes in absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, and reticulocyte count at 6 months. Secondary endpoints will include time to relapse, changes in cytogenetics, and time to death.

Keywords
Aplastic Anemia, Immunosuppression, T-Cells, Hematopoiesis, Autoimmunity, Severe Aplastic Anemia
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Aplastic, Neutropenia, Pancytopenia, Autoimmune Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called Cytoxan

    30 my/kg for 4 days

  • CyclosporineDrug

    Also called Gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune

    daily to a trough of 100 t0 200 ng/ml

Study groups in NCT01193283
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SAA hematologic responseExperimentalTreatment-naive severe aplastic anemia patients will receive a low dose of cyclophosphamide (120mg/kg) and low dose cyclosporine ( target therapeutic level of 100-200 micrograms per liter). Cyclophosphamide will be given once daily for 4 doses. Cyclosporine will be started after cyclophosphamide completion, cyclosporine will be given twice daily. The dosing will be modified to attain the therapeutic level.
Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Cyclosporine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Blood Counts and Adverse Event Profile After 6 Months of Treatment.

    The safety endpoint will be toxicity profile after 6 months of treatment. The efficacy endpoint is complete response rate at 6 months, with complete response defined as blood counts no longer meeting the standard criteria for severe pancytopenia in severe aplastic anemia.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2014
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01193283
Sponsor's protocol ID
100176
Other IDs
10-H-0176
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
31 Aug 2010
Last updated
22 May 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Rosenfeld S, Follmann D, Nunez O, Young NS. Antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine for severe aplastic anemia: association between hematologic response and long-term outcome. JAMA. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1130-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.9.1130.

    PubMed 12622583
  • Young NS, Calado RT, Scheinberg P. Current concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of aplastic anemia. Blood. 2006 Oct 15;108(8):2509-19. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-010777. Epub 2006 Jun 15.

    PubMed 16778145
  • Scheinberg P, Nunez O, Wu C, Young NS. Treatment of severe aplastic anaemia with combined immunosuppression: anti-thymocyte globulin, ciclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil. Br J Haematol. 2006 Jun;133(6):606-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06085.x.

    PubMed 16704434
  • Zaimoku Y, Patel BA, Adams SD, Shalhoub R, Groarke EM, Lee AAC, Kajigaya S, Feng X, Rios OJ, Eager H, Alemu L, Quinones Raffo D, Wu CO, Flegel WA, Young NS. HLA associations, somatic loss of HLA expression, and clinical outcomes in immune aplastic anemia. Blood. 2021 Dec 30;138(26):2799-2809. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021012895.

    PubMed 34724566
  • Scheinberg P, Townsley D, Dumitriu B, Scheinberg P, Weinstein B, Daphtary M, Rios O, Wu CO, Young NS. Moderate-dose cyclophosphamide for severe aplastic anemia has significant toxicity and does not prevent relapse and clonal evolution. Blood. 2014 Oct 30;124(18):2820-3. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-573642. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

    PubMed 25185712

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporine in people with Aplastic Anemia and Neutropenia, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Nov 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Blood Counts and Adverse Event Profile After 6 Months of Treatment. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01193283, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in