Lynch SyndromeNCT01199250
Biomarkers in Samples From Patients With Endometrial Cancer
An observational study of Lynch Syndrome and Recurrent Uterine Corpus Carcinoma, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research study is studying biomarkers in samples from patients with endometrial cancer. Studying samples from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about changes that occur in DNA and identify biomarkers related to cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Lynch Syndrome, Recurrent Uterine Corpus Carcinoma, Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to May 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with endometrial cancer
Who may be able to join
- Samples available from one of the following:
- GOG-0210
- Washington University School of Medicine Siteman Cancer Center
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Gynecologic Oncology Group
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103
About this study
Official title: Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Endometrial Cancer
This research study is studying biomarkers in samples from patients with endometrial cancer. Studying samples from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about changes that occur in DNA and identify biomarkers related to cancer.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Assess the frequency and spectrum of mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in low-, intermediate-, and/or high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer from GOG-0210. (Project 1) II. Determine the relationship between FGFR2 mutation and clinicopathologic variables including disease-free and overall survival in low-, intermediate-, and/or high-risk endometrial cancer from GOG-0210. (Project 1) III. Identify the cognate FGF ligands and receptors expressed in normal endometrium and endometrial cancers, and examine their expression on multiple tissue microarrays for GOG-0210 to determine their association with clinical outcome. (Project 1) IV. Identify epigenetic biomarkers (differential methylation of CpG island loci) associated with recurrence and disease progression in endometrioid endometrial cancer from Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM). (Project 2) V. Confirm epigenetic biomarkers (differential methylation of CpG island loci) associated with recurrent and disease progression in endometrioid endometrial cancer from GOG-0210. (Project 2) VI. Define the performance (sensitivity and specificity) of epigenetic biomarkers associated with recurrence and disease progression in endometrioid endometrial cancer from an independent cohort of cases from GOG-0210. (Project 2) VII. Develop a molecular screening regimen to compliment family history risk assessment to identify carriers of Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC)-related and other forms of inherited endometrial cancer from GOG-0210 that was not ascertained by family history. (Project 3) VIII. Estimate the prevalence of HNPCC-related and other forms of inherited endometrial cancer in GOG-0210. (Project 3) IX. Define the relationship between defective DNA mismatch repair and clinical and epidemiological factors in GOG-0210. (Project 3) X. Determine the clinicopathologic significance of mismatch-repair defects including associations with disease-free and overall survival in GOG-0210. (Project 3) XI. Assess expression of five candidate ERK1/2 substrates in the normal endometrium, primary endometrial cancers (from WUSM and GOG-0210) and endometrial cancer cell lines and determine if substrate phosphorylation is ERK-dependent. (Project 4) XII. Determine the relationship between ERK substrate-phosphorylation status and upstream ERK-signaling pathway activation in primary endometrial cancers from WUSM and GOG-0210. (Project 4 XIII. Determine the clinicopathologic significance of ERK substrate expression in primary endometrial cancers from WUSM and GOG-0210. (Project 4) XIV. Explore GSK3/3 inhibition as a therapeutic treatment of endometrial cancer and assess the role of inhibiting other ERK substrates in endometrial cell lines. (Project 4) XV. Explore the predictive and prognostic accuracy of a panel of single nucleotide polymorphisms alone and with informative clinical, surgical, and pathologic variables in a cohort of Caucasian women with stage IB or IC vs IIIC endometrioid endometrial cancer from WUSM and GOG-0210. (Project 5)
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
Previously collected samples are analyzed for biomarker and other laboratory analyses.
- Conditions
- Lynch Syndrome, Recurrent Uterine Corpus Carcinoma, Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer, Stage II Uterine Corpus Cancer, Stage III Uterine Corpus Cancer, Stage IV Uterine Corpus Cancer
- Being tested
- Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisOther
Correlative studies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Basic science (biomarker analysis) | Previously collected samples are analyzed for biomarker and other laboratory analyses. Receives: Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical sensitivity and specificity of epigenetic biomarkers in a cohort of blind samples (Project 2)
ROC curves used to describe the discriminatory characteristics of candidate biomarkers. From the competing risk model, the coefficients of the clinicopathological covariates and the hypermethylation levels of each biomarker will indicate the association of these factors with each of the four types of survivals. The significance of association will be indicated by P-values, and hazard rates will also be provided.
Measured: 1 month
Confirmation of CpG island loci frequently hypermethylated in EECs exhibiting recurrence (Project 2)
Proportion of methylated samples and 95% confidence interval calculated for each marker, recurrent and non-recurrent samples. Will determine statistical significance of mean difference in DMH methylation levels between methylated and non-methylated samples on basis of two-sided two sample t-tests or nonparametric Wilcoxon tests (if normality is in question). Binary methylation status tabulated with recurrence status to formulate 2 by 2 contingency table. Existence of significant association indicated by a <0.05 p-value from Chi-square test or Fisher test (in case of small counts).
Measured: 1 month
Development of a molecular screening regimen to compliment family history risk assessment for the detection of Lynch syndrome (Project 3)
Measured: 1 month
Expression of candidate ERK1/2 substrates in the normal endometrium, primary endometrial cancers and endometrial cancer cell lines dependence of substrate phosphorylation on ERK (Project 4)
Measured: 1 month
Frequency of Lynch syndrome-related endometrial cancer and relationships between inherited and acquired DNA mismatch repair defects and clinicopathologic variables (Project 3)
Measured: 1 month
GSK3β inhibition as a therapeutic treatment of endometrial cancer and role of inhibiting other ERK substrates in endometrial cancer cell lines (Project 4)
Measured: 1 month
Identification of cognate FGF ligands and receptors expressed in normal endometrium and endometrial cancers (Project 1)
Loss of expression or overexpression for each of FGFs/FGFRs will be described using contingency tables and the overall between-group differences will be compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. For each marker, the nuclear positivity and cytoplasmic positivity will be evaluated separately. Proportional hazards Cox models will be fitted for each FGFR receptor or FGF ligand to evaluate its effect on PFS, ECS, and OS. Multivariate Cox model will be developed while considering biomarkers that have shown trend of significance in univariate analyses (permuted p < 0.2).
Measured: 1 month
Identification of profiles of CpG island hypermethylation for stratifying subtypes of EECs (Project 2)
Descriptive statistics including mean, median and standard deviation will be summarized for the recurrent and non-recurrent groups across the 54 samples. Graphical presentation of the data will be provided by use of box-whisker plots and scatter plots.
Measured: 1 month
Predictive and prognostic accuracy of a panel of SNPs alone and with informative clinical, surgical, and pathologic variables in a cohort of Caucasian women with stage IB or IC vs IIIC endometrioid endometrial cancer from WUSM and GOG-0210 (Project 5)
Measured: 1 month
Relationship between ERK substrate phosphorylation status and upstream ERK signaling pathway activation in primary endometrial cancers and clinicopathologic significance of ERK substrate expression(Project 4)
The primary endpoints are protein amounts from quantitative Western blots and IHC-based ordinal scores describing intensity of staining and percentage of cells staining in the nucleus, cytoplasm and a combination of both locations.
Measured: 1 month
Relationship between inherited variation in the MLH1 DNA repair gene and somatic (acquired) inactivation of MLH1 in sporadic endometrial cancer (Project 3)
The primary association analysis for the case-control association study will be 2 x 2 contingency table analysis using chi squared tests. The allele frequency for each SNP will be compared for all cases and controls.
Measured: 1 month
Role of FGFR2 mutations in low, intermediate and high risk endometrial cancers (Project 1)
Clinical outcome in FGFR2 mutation carriers will be compared with survival for women with no mutations. Effect of the mutation over time using survival modeling also considered. OS and PFS described using Cox model. PFI time and ECS time described using competing risks model. Prognostic factors will be evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Variables associated with each primary endpoint (OS, DFS, PHI and ECS) at the 10% level on the basis of univariate models will be introduced in the multivariate models. Significance levels for all analyses will be set at a p-value of 0.05.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionMay 2019
- Study completionMay 2019
Why it stopped: Not a treatment/applicable clinical trial
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lynch SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paul Goodfellow, Principal investigator, Gynecologic Oncology Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01199250
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GOG-8020
- Other IDs
- NCI-2011-02868, GOG-8020, CDR0000684553, GOG-8020, GOG-8020, P50CA134254, R01CA071754, R21CA133295
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Endometrial Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01199250
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GOG-8020
- Conditions
- Lynch Syndrome, Recurrent Uterine Corpus Carcinoma, Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer, Stage II Uterine Corpus Cancer, Stage III Uterine Corpus Cancer, Stage IV Uterine Corpus Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Not a treatment/applicable clinical trial
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gynecologic Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research study is studying biomarkers in samples from patients with endometrial cancer. Studying samples from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about changes that occur in DNA and identify biomarkers related to cancer.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Assess the frequency and spectrum of mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in low-, intermediate-, and/or high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer from GOG-0210. (Project 1) II. Determine the relationship between FGFR2 mutation and clinicopathologic variables including disease-free and overall survival in low-, intermediate-, and/or high-risk endometrial cancer from GOG-0210. (Project 1) III. Identify the cognate FGF ligands and receptors expressed in normal endometrium and endometrial cancers, and examine their expression on multiple tissue microarrays for GOG-0210 to determine their association with clinical outcome. (Project 1) IV. Identify epigenetic biomarkers (differential methylation of CpG island loci) associated with recurrence and disease progression in endometrioid endometrial cancer from Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM). (Project 2) V. Confirm epigenetic biomarkers (differential methylation of CpG island loci) associated with recurrent and disease progression in endometrioid endometrial cancer from GOG-0210. (Project 2) VI. Define the performance (sensitivity and specificity) of epigenetic biomarkers associated with recurrence and disease progression in endometrioid endometrial cancer from an independent cohort of cases from GOG-0210. (Project 2) VII. Develop a molecular screening regimen to compliment family history risk assessment to identify carriers of Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC)-related and other forms of inherited endometrial cancer from GOG-0210 that was not ascertained by family history. (Project 3) VIII. Estimate the prevalence of HNPCC-related and other forms of inherited endometrial cancer in GOG-0210. (Project 3) IX. Define the relationship between defective DNA mismatch repair and clinical and epidemiological factors in GOG-0210. (Project 3) X. Determine the clinicopathologic significance of mismatch-repair defects including associations with disease-free and overall survival in GOG-0210. (Project 3) XI. Assess expression of five candidate ERK1/2 substrates in the normal endometrium, primary endometrial cancers (from WUSM and GOG-0210) and endometrial cancer cell lines and determine if substrate phosphorylation is ERK-dependent. (Project 4) XII. Determine the relationship between ERK substrate-phosphorylation status and upstream ERK-signaling pathway activation in primary endometrial cancers from WUSM and GOG-0210. (Project 4 XIII. Determine the clinicopathologic significance of ERK substrate expression in primary endometrial cancers from WUSM and GOG-0210. (Project 4) XIV. Explore GSK3/3 inhibition as a therapeutic treatment of endometrial cancer and assess the role of inhibiting other ERK substrates in endometrial cell lines. (Project 4) XV. Explore the predictive and prognostic accuracy of a panel of single nucleotide polymorphisms alone and with informative clinical, surgical, and pathologic variables in a cohort of Caucasian women with stage IB or IC vs IIIC endometrioid endometrial cancer from WUSM and GOG-0210. (Project 5)
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
Previously collected samples are analyzed for biomarker and other laboratory analyses.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Basic science (biomarker analysis) | – | Other: Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisPreviously collected samples are analyzed for biomarker and other laboratory analyses. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with endometrial cancer
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Samples available from one of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisCorrelative studies | Other | Basic science (biomarker analysis) |
Primary outcome
Clinical sensitivity and specificity of epigenetic biomarkers in a cohort of blind samples (Project 2)
Time frame: 1 month
ROC curves used to describe the discriminatory characteristics of candidate biomarkers. From the competing risk model, the coefficients of the clinicopathological covariates and the hypermethylation levels of each biomarker will indicate the association of these factors with each of the four types of survivals. The significance of association will be indicated by P-values, and hazard rates will also be provided.
Confirmation of CpG island loci frequently hypermethylated in EECs exhibiting recurrence (Project 2)
Time frame: 1 month
Proportion of methylated samples and 95% confidence interval calculated for each marker, recurrent and non-recurrent samples. Will determine statistical significance of mean difference in DMH methylation levels between methylated and non-methylated samples on basis of two-sided two sample t-tests or nonparametric Wilcoxon tests (if normality is in question). Binary methylation status tabulated with recurrence status to formulate 2 by 2 contingency table. Existence of significant association indicated by a <0.05 p-value from Chi-square test or Fisher test (in case of small counts).
Development of a molecular screening regimen to compliment family history risk assessment for the detection of Lynch syndrome (Project 3)
Time frame: 1 month
Expression of candidate ERK1/2 substrates in the normal endometrium, primary endometrial cancers and endometrial cancer cell lines dependence of substrate phosphorylation on ERK (Project 4)
Time frame: 1 month
Frequency of Lynch syndrome-related endometrial cancer and relationships between inherited and acquired DNA mismatch repair defects and clinicopathologic variables (Project 3)
Time frame: 1 month
GSK3β inhibition as a therapeutic treatment of endometrial cancer and role of inhibiting other ERK substrates in endometrial cancer cell lines (Project 4)
Time frame: 1 month
Identification of cognate FGF ligands and receptors expressed in normal endometrium and endometrial cancers (Project 1)
Time frame: 1 month
Loss of expression or overexpression for each of FGFs/FGFRs will be described using contingency tables and the overall between-group differences will be compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. For each marker, the nuclear positivity and cytoplasmic positivity will be evaluated separately. Proportional hazards Cox models will be fitted for each FGFR receptor or FGF ligand to evaluate its effect on PFS, ECS, and OS. Multivariate Cox model will be developed while considering biomarkers that have shown trend of significance in univariate analyses (permuted p < 0.2).
Identification of profiles of CpG island hypermethylation for stratifying subtypes of EECs (Project 2)
Time frame: 1 month
Descriptive statistics including mean, median and standard deviation will be summarized for the recurrent and non-recurrent groups across the 54 samples. Graphical presentation of the data will be provided by use of box-whisker plots and scatter plots.
Predictive and prognostic accuracy of a panel of SNPs alone and with informative clinical, surgical, and pathologic variables in a cohort of Caucasian women with stage IB or IC vs IIIC endometrioid endometrial cancer from WUSM and GOG-0210 (Project 5)
Time frame: 1 month
Relationship between ERK substrate phosphorylation status and upstream ERK signaling pathway activation in primary endometrial cancers and clinicopathologic significance of ERK substrate expression(Project 4)
Time frame: 1 month
The primary endpoints are protein amounts from quantitative Western blots and IHC-based ordinal scores describing intensity of staining and percentage of cells staining in the nucleus, cytoplasm and a combination of both locations.
Relationship between inherited variation in the MLH1 DNA repair gene and somatic (acquired) inactivation of MLH1 in sporadic endometrial cancer (Project 3)
Time frame: 1 month
The primary association analysis for the case-control association study will be 2 x 2 contingency table analysis using chi squared tests. The allele frequency for each SNP will be compared for all cases and controls.
Role of FGFR2 mutations in low, intermediate and high risk endometrial cancers (Project 1)
Time frame: 1 month
Clinical outcome in FGFR2 mutation carriers will be compared with survival for women with no mutations. Effect of the mutation over time using survival modeling also considered. OS and PFS described using Cox model. PFI time and ECS time described using competing risks model. Prognostic factors will be evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Variables associated with each primary endpoint (OS, DFS, PHI and ECS) at the 10% level on the basis of univariate models will be introduced in the multivariate models. Significance levels for all analyses will be set at a p-value of 0.05.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2024.
Related trials for Lynch Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase IIa Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial of Naproxen or Aspirin for Cancer Immune Interception in Lynch Syndrome
T Cells, Colorectal Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Atezolizumab in Treating Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer and Deficient DNA Mismatch Repair
Colon Adenocarcinoma, DNA Repair Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
The Cancer of the Pancreas Screening-5 CAPS5)Study
Pancreas Cancer, Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Protocol for Non-invasive Gynaecological Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome
Lynch Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Weight Management and Health Behavior Intervention in Lowering Cancer Risk for BRCA Positive and Lynch Syndrome Families
Hereditary Breast Carcinoma, Hereditary Ovarian Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Goodfellow principal investigator
Gynecologic Oncology Group
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lynch Syndrome and Recurrent Uterine Corpus Carcinoma, run by Gynecologic Oncology Group at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical sensitivity and specificity of epigenetic biomarkers in a cohort of blind samples (Project 2) (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.