AzTrials
AzTrials

CandidiasisNCT01202253

Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease In The United Kingdom

An observational study of Candidiasis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to describe the real world effectiveness of anidulafungin in clinical practice in a large Liver Unit in the United Kingdom. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Candidiasis
What is being tested?
anidulafungin
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Feb 2011to May 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects admitted with candidiasis infections to the Liver Unit at King's College Hospital (United Kingdom) who are prescribed anidulafungin.

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects who have been prescribed anidulafungin between 1st July 2009 and 30th September 2010.
  • Patients admitted to specialist liver unit wards and the Liver Intensive Therapy Unit during this period

Who cannot join

  • Patients who participated in any interventional clinical trial during this episode of sepsis.
  • Patients who received anidulafungin for infection prophylaxis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    London, SE5 9RS

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Study To Describe The Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease At King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London

The purpose of this study is to describe the real world effectiveness of anidulafungin in clinical practice in a large Liver Unit in the United Kingdom.

Read the detailed description

All subjects that have been treated with Anidulafungin according to its licence during the period of July 2009 and September 2010 will be included.

Conditions
Candidiasis
Being tested
anidulafungin
Keywords
Ecalta, Eraxis, Candida, Candidemia, Systemic Candidiasis, ICU, Intensive Care Unit, Critical Care Unit
Medical subject headings
Candidiasis, Torulopsis, Candidemia, Systemic candidiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • anidulafunginDrug

    Also called ECALTA, ERAXIS

    A single 200 mg loading dose should be administered on Day 1, followed by 100 mg daily thereafter.

Study groups in NCT01202253
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AnidulafunginNot described
Receives: Drug: anidulafungin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Favorable Outcome

    Favorable outcome was defined as favorable clinical response and documented or presumed microbial eradication (two negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections or a successful clinical response without follow-up cultures for other infections). Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.

    Measured: Day 28 post-treatment

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Unfavorable Outcome

    Unfavorable outcome was defined as the need to change to another antifungal agent because of lack of clinical response or death due to the antifungal infection or microbiologic persistence of the fungus or superinfection with a new Candida, Aspergillus or other fungal strain occurring at least 3 days and up to 14 days of anidulafungin therapy, or a lack of follow up data about clinical and microbiologic responses at the end of anidulafungin therapy.

    Measured: Day 28 post-treatment

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to All Causes

    Death due to all causes included death attributable to fungal infection, death unrelated to fungal infection and death due to multiple causes.

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  3. Percentage of Participants With Death Attributable to Fungal Infection

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  4. Percentage of Participants With Death Unrelated to Fungal Infection

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  5. Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response

    Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.

    Measured: Day 28 post-treatment

  6. Percentage of Participants With Lack of Clinical Response

    Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.

    Measured: Day 28 post-treatment

  7. Percentage of Participants Requiring Change or Additional Antifungal Therapy

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  8. Percentage of Participants With Oral Antifungal Started to Complete Therapy

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  9. Percentage of Participants With Documented Eradication of Infecting Species

    Documented microbial eradication was defined as 2 negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Ultrasound Scan Results

    An ultrasound scan was performed and the resultant scan was reviewed for the presence of the infection as per investigator's discretion.

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  11. Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Results

    A CT scan was performed and the resultant scan was reviewed for the presence of the infection as per investigator's discretion.

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  12. Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at Initiation of Drug Therapy

    Percentage of participants with abnormal liver function results were based on 4 liver function variables- bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase. Normal reference ranges of these variables are: plasma bilirubin: 3-17 micromoles/L or 2.5-10 mg/L for adults; aspartate transaminase: 6-34 International Units/Liter (IU/L) for females and 8-40 IU/L for males; alkaline phosphatase: 5-38 IU/L for females and 10-50 IU/L for males; gamma glutamyl transferase: 7-32 IU/L for females and 11-50 IU/L for males. Upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline

  13. Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at End of Drug Therapy

    Percentage of participants with abnormal liver function results were based on 4 liver function variables- bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase. Normal reference ranges of these variables are: plasma bilirubin: 3-17 micromoles/L or 2.5-10 mg/L for adults; aspartate transaminase: 6-34 IU/L for females and 8-40 IU/L for males; alkaline phosphatase: 5-38 IU/L for females and 10-50 IU/L for males; gamma glutamyl transferase: 7-32 IU/L for females and 11-50 IU/L for males.

    Measured: Day 28 post-treatment

  14. Percentage of Participants With Liver Function Test Results at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy

    Percentage of participants with liver function test results at least twice the baseline value during period of drug therapy was calculated for the liver function variables, bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase.

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  15. Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  16. Percentage of Participants Admitted to Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)

    Measured: Baseline

  17. Duration of Stay at Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  18. Percentage of Participants With Absolute Neutrophil Count Less Than 500 Per Cubic Millimeter (/mm^3) and Greater Than or Equal to 500 /mm^3

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 and upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100, by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline

  19. Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Bacterial or Viral Infection

    Upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline

  20. Percentage of Participants Prescribed With Systemic Antifungal Within 30 Days Before Study Start

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline

  21. Dose Changes for Immunosuppressant Drugs

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  22. Percentage of Participants With Probable or Proven Fungal Infection at the Initiation of Drug Therapy

    Measured: Baseline

  23. Percentage of Participants With Documented Body Temperature Above 38.0 Degree Celsius or Below 36.0 Degree Celsius Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 and upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100, by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline

  24. Percentage of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure More Than 2 Standard Deviations Below the Mean for Age Recorded Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline

  25. Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Microbiological Analysis

    Infection sites included blood, chest, urinary tract, intra-abdominal, bile duct, liver, kidney, mouth and esophagus.

    Measured: Baseline

  26. Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Ultrasound Scan and Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan

    Measured: Baseline

  27. Infecting Organisms by Species

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 14 post-treatment

  28. Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Species

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

    Measured: Baseline

  29. Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Colonization Index

    Measured: Baseline

  30. Percentage of Participants With Other Prior Fungal Infection by Species and Colonization Index

    Measured: Baseline

  31. Number of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation

    Measured: Baseline

  32. Percentage of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation

    Measured: Baseline

  33. Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Loading Dose

    Measured: Day 1

  34. Percentage of Participants Who Received 100 mg Dose on Day 2

    Measured: Day 2

  35. Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Dose on Day 1 and 100 mg for All Subsequent Doses

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  36. Number of Participants With Other Dosing Patterns

    The other dosing patterns for anidulafungin included any dosing pattern different from 200 mg loading dose on Day 1 followed by 100 mg doses subsequently starting from Day 2.

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  37. Duration of Anidulafungin Therapy

    Measured: Baseline

  38. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a SAE: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  39. Percentage of Participants With One or More Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  40. Number of Participants With Different Types of Drug-related Serious Adverse Events

    Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01202253
Sponsor's protocol ID
A8851028
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
13 Sep 2010
Last updated
16 Apr 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Candidiasis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Outcome (time frame: Day 28 post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in