Persistent Allergic AsthmaPhase 3NCT01202903
Omalizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Allergic Asthma Not Adequately Controlled Despite GINA (2009) Step 4 Therapy
A Phase 3 study testing Omalizumab in people with Persistent Allergic Asthma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 39 sites in China.
Trial summary
This study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of omalizumab, compared to placebo in 18 to 75 year old Chinese patients with moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma who have inadequate asthma control despite treatment according to GINA (2009) Step 4 therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Persistent Allergic Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Omalizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 616 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Sep 2010to Oct 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Met study drug-dosing table eligibility criteria (serum baseline total IgE level ≥ 30 to ≤ 700 IU/mL and body weight > 20 kg and ≤ 150 kg)
- Diagnosed with asthma ≥ 1 year duration at Screening, and a history of asthma that is not adequately controlled with GINA (2009) Step 4 therapy
- Received medium-to-high dose inhaled corticosteroid > 500 µg Beclomethasone Diproprionate (BDP), or equivalent plus regularly inhaled LABA, either separately or in combination, for at least 8 weeks prior to screening
- Met specific asthma exacerbations eligibility criteria prior to the screening period
- Exhibited inadequate symptom control as demonstrated by specific criteria (in keeping with GINA 2009 guidelines)
- Positive skin prick test to at least one perennial aeroallergen documented by a historical test within 12 months prior to screening, or at Visit 1
- FEV1 ≥ 40% and < 80% of the predicted normal value for the patient (using local standards), after withholding bronchodilators at Visit 2
Who cannot join
- Used other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer. For biological agent-based investigational drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, at least six months will need to have passed between the last administration of the drug and the patient's Screening Visit.
- History of malignancy
- History of allergies and diseases that could interfere with the analyses
- Clinically significant abnormality on a 12-lead ECG recorded at Visit 1
- Elevated IgE levels for reasons other than allergy
- Current smokers, or a former smoker with a smoking history of > 10 pack-years. A former smoker must have abstained for a minimum of 12 months before randomization
Show all 9Show fewer
- Receiving specific medications
- Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities (not associated with the study indication) at Visit 1
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 1 country.
39 sites in 1 country
China39 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100023
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, Beijing Municipality
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100029
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100034
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100050
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100088
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100730
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing
Novartis Investigative Site
Changchun, Jilin, 130041
Novartis Investigative Site
Changsha, Hunan, 410003
Novartis Investigative Site
Changsha, Hunan, 410008
Novartis Investigative Site
Changsha, Hunan, 410011
Novartis Investigative Site
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, 400037
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, 400038
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, 400042
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510030
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, 510080
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanning, Guangxi, 530021
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, 200025
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, 200032
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, 200233
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, 200433
Novartis Investigative Site
Shengyang, Liaoning, 110016
Novartis Investigative Site
Shenyang, Liaoning
Novartis Investigative Site
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000
Novartis Investigative Site
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004
Novartis Investigative Site
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006
Novartis Investigative Site
Wuhan, Hubei, 430022
Novartis Investigative Site
Wuhan, Hubei, 430070
Novartis Investigative Site
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032
Novartis Investigative Site
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710038
Novartis Investigative Site
Xian, Shanxi, 710004
About this study
Official title: A 24-week, Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebocontrolled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study of Xolair® (Omalizumab) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Allergic Asthma Who Remain Not Adequately Controlled Despite GINA (2009) Step 4 Therapy
This study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of omalizumab, compared to placebo in 18 to 75 year old Chinese patients with moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma who have inadequate asthma control despite treatment according to GINA (2009) Step 4 therapy.
- Conditions
- Persistent Allergic Asthma
- Being tested
- Omalizumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- omalizumab, asthma, immunoglobulin E, IgE
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OmalizumabDrug
The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) omalizumab was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection.
PlaceboDrug
The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) placebo was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Experimental | Omalizumab was supplied as lyophilized, sterile powder in a single-use, 5 mL vial that was designed to deliver 150 mg of omalizumab for subcutaneous administration upon reconstitution with 1.4 mL sterile water for injection. The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) omalizumab was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection. Receives: Drug: Omalizumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | The placebo was the same mixture of inactive excipients, in quality and quantity, as those used for the drug product. The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) placebo was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Following the 24-week Treatment Period
A Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) meter was distributed to patients at Visit 1, to be used to measure PEF twice-daily as directed. During the Screening and Treatment Periods, PEF was measured in the morning and evening every day. the morning PEF was performed within 15 minutes after waking, and the evening PEF approximately 12 hours later. Patients were encouraged to perform morning and evening PEF measurements before the use of any LABA or rescue medication. The highest of 3 values was recorded as the daily personal best. The personal best was used to calculate the mean morning PEF and mean evening PEF value collected between assessment Visits LS Mean of change from baseline in mean morning PEF is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline mean morning PEF as covariates.
Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change From Baseline in Mean Evening PEF (L/Min) Following 24-week Treatment
A Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) meter was distributed to patients at Visit 1, to be used to measure PEF twice-daily as directed. During the Screening and Treatment Periods, PEF was measured in the morning and evening every day. the morning PEF was performed within 15 minutes after waking, and the evening PEF approximately 12 hours later. Patients were encouraged to perform morning and evening PEF measurements before the use of any LABA or rescue medication. The highest of 3 values was recorded as the daily personal best. The personal best was used to calculate the mean morning PEF and mean evening PEF value collected between assessment Visits. LS Mean of change from baseline in mean morning PEF is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline mean morning PEF as covariates.
Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in % Predicted FEV1 Following 24-week Treatment
Spirometry was used at defined time points throughout the study to assess the clinical status of patients and to capture the following variables: forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1 percent predicted, forced vital capacity (FVC) and the FEV1/FVC ratio. During the Screening assessment, spirometry was performed pre- and post-bronchodilator administration to assess reversibility. During the treatment period (including prerandomization assessments on Day 1), spirometry was performed after withholding bronchodilators. The results of spirometry were required to meet the ATS/ERS criteria for acceptability and repeatability. Acceptability criteria were applied before repeatability was determined. LS Mean of change from baseline in % predicted FEV1 is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline % predicted FEV1 as covariates.
Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in AQLQ Score Following 24-week Treatment
The standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQs)), was used to assess the patients' asthma-related quality of life. There are 32 questions in the AQLQ and they are in 4 domains (symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental exposure). Each question was answered on a 7 point scale (1-totally limited/problems all the time, 7-not at all limited/no problems). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses, and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains (a minimum domain / overall score of 1 = Severely impaired whereas a maximum domain / overall score of 7 = not impaired at all). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Measured: 24 weeks
Percentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 Point Improvement From Baseline in AQLQ Overall Score Following 24-week Treatment
The standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQs)), was used to assess the patients' asthma-related quality of life. There are 32 questions in the AQLQ and they are in 4 domains (symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental exposure). Each question was answered on a 7 point scale (1-totally limited/problems all the time, 7-not at all limited/no problems). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses, and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains (a minimum domain / overall score of 1 = Severely impaired whereas a maximum domain / overall score of 7 = not impaired at all). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Measured: 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in ACQ Score Following 24-week Treatment
The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a questionnaire consisting of 7 questions assessing symptoms, airway caliber and rescue β2-agonist use. One value representing overall asthma control on that occasion was calculated. Decrease in scores of 0.5 or higher between ACQ assessments are considered clinically meaningful. The ACQ was completed by the patient at the Investigator's site at Visit 2 (Week 1, pre-dose), Visit 6 (after completion of 16 weeks of treatment) and at the End of Study/Early Termination visit. LS Mean of change from baseline in ACQ score is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline ACQ score as covariates. Score 0= totally controlled, 6= extremely poorly controlled
Measured: 24 weeks
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 0.5 or 0.75 Point Improvement in the ACQ Score at Week 24
The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a questionnaire consisting of 7 questions assessing symptoms, airway caliber and rescue β2-agonist use. One value representing overall asthma control on that occasion was calculated. Decrease in scores of 0.5 or higher between ACQ assessments are considered clinically meaningful. The ACQ was completed by the patient at the Investigator's site at Visit 2 (Week 1, pre-dose), Visit 6 (after completion of 16 weeks of treatment) and at the End of Study/Early Termination visit. Only patients with no more than 1 item missing are included, and the missing item was imputed by interpolation
Measured: 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Scores Following 24-week Treatment
Total asthma symptom score was derived for each day as the total of the morning (scale 0-1), daytime (scale 0-4) and nocturnal (scale 0-4) scores with a max score of 9. The mean score across the 28 days prior to the week 24 assessment visit was used to calculate a change from baseline. Analysis of total asthma symptom score was performed using ANCOVA model and Van-Elteren test. LS Mean of change from baseline in mean asthma symptom score is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, smoking status, center grouping, and baseline mean asthma symptom scores as covariates. Decrease of score on change from baseline means improvement of asthma symptom control.
Measured: 24 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Investigator and Patient Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) at Weeks 16 and 24
The global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) is an assessment of asthma symptom control and overall response to asthma treatment. The evaluation was performed by both investigator and patient, each using the same 5 point scale. The GETE scale ranges were as follows: excellent, good, moderate, poor and worsening. A good or excellent response on the 5 point scale indicated that a patient had responded to treatment. 1=excellent 2=good 3=moderate 4=poor 5= worsening. Responder is defined as the patient who achieved an excellent or good response. Non-responder isdefined as the patient who achieved a moderate or poor or worsening response.
Measured: 16 and 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Asthma Rescue Medication Following 24-week Treatment
Analysis of rescue medication use followed a similar method to that employed for total asthma symptom score. The mean number of puffs across the 28 days prior to the Week 24 assessment visit was used to calculate a change from baseline. LS Mean of change from baseline in mean number of puffs of asthma rescue medication is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, smoking status, center grouping, and baseline mean number of puffs of asthma rescue medication as covariates.
Measured: 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2010
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionOct 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Persistent Allergic AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 616 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01202903
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIGE025A2313
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Li J, Wang C, Liu C, Kang J, Kong L, Huang Y, Liu S, Huang M, Wang L, Fogel R, Jaumont X, Yang J, Zhong N. Efficacy predictors of omalizumab in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: Findings from a post-hoc analysis of a randomised phase III study. World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Nov 24;13(12):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100469. eCollection 2020 Dec.
PubMed 34611470
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 24-week, Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebocontrolled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study of Xolair® (Omalizumab) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Allergic Asthma Who Remain Not Adequately Controlled Despite GINA (2009) Step 4 Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01202903
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIGE025A2313
- Conditions
- Persistent Allergic Asthma
- Keywords
- omalizumab, asthma, immunoglobulin E, IgE
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 616 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc.
- Study start
- Sep 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Mar 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of omalizumab, compared to placebo in 18 to 75 year old Chinese patients with moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma who have inadequate asthma control despite treatment according to GINA (2009) Step 4 therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Experimental | Drug: OmalizumabOmalizumab was supplied as lyophilized, sterile powder in a single-use, 5 mL vial that was designed to deliver 150 mg of omalizumab for subcutaneous administration upon reconstitution with 1.4 mL sterile water for injection. The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) omalizumab was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboThe placebo was the same mixture of inactive excipients, in quality and quantity, as those used for the drug product. The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) placebo was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Met study drug-dosing table eligibility criteria (serum baseline total IgE level ≥ 30 to ≤ 700 IU/mL and body weight > 20 kg and ≤ 150 kg)
- Diagnosed with asthma ≥ 1 year duration at Screening, and a history of asthma that is not adequately controlled with GINA (2009) Step 4 therapy
- Received medium-to-high dose inhaled corticosteroid > 500 µg Beclomethasone Diproprionate (BDP), or equivalent plus regularly inhaled LABA, either separately or in combination, for at least 8 weeks prior to screening
- Met specific asthma exacerbations eligibility criteria prior to the screening period
- Exhibited inadequate symptom control as demonstrated by specific criteria (in keeping with GINA 2009 guidelines)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Used other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer. For biological agent-based investigational drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, at least six months will need to have passed between the last administration of the drug and the patient's Screening Visit.
- History of malignancy
- History of allergies and diseases that could interfere with the analyses
- Clinically significant abnormality on a 12-lead ECG recorded at Visit 1
- Elevated IgE levels for reasons other than allergy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OmalizumabThe minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) omalizumab was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection. | Drug | Omalizumab |
| PlaceboThe minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) placebo was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Following the 24-week Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks
A Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) meter was distributed to patients at Visit 1, to be used to measure PEF twice-daily as directed. During the Screening and Treatment Periods, PEF was measured in the morning and evening every day. the morning PEF was performed within 15 minutes after waking, and the evening PEF approximately 12 hours later. Patients were encouraged to perform morning and evening PEF measurements before the use of any LABA or rescue medication. The highest of 3 values was recorded as the daily personal best. The personal best was used to calculate the mean morning PEF and mean evening PEF value collected between assessment Visits LS Mean of change from baseline in mean morning PEF is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline mean morning PEF as covariates.
9 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Mean Evening PEF (L/Min) Following 24-week Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in % Predicted FEV1 Following 24-week Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in AQLQ Score Following 24-week Treatment
Time frame: 24 weeks
Percentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 Point Improvement From Baseline in AQLQ Overall Score Following 24-week Treatment
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in ACQ Score Following 24-week Treatment
Time frame: 24 weeks
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 0.5 or 0.75 Point Improvement in the ACQ Score at Week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Scores Following 24-week Treatment
Time frame: 24 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Investigator and Patient Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: 16 and 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Asthma Rescue Medication Following 24-week Treatment
Time frame: 24 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34611470Li J, Wang C, Liu C, Kang J, Kong L, Huang Y, Liu S, Huang M, Wang L, Fogel R, Jaumont X, Yang J, Zhong N. Efficacy predictors of omalizumab in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: Findings from a post-hoc analysis of a randomised phase III study. World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Nov 24;13(12):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100469. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Related trials for Persistent Allergic Asthma
RecruitingObservational study
Expression of TSLP Isoforms in Asthma
Asthma Atopic, Asthma Severe Persistent Uncontrolled
RecruitingPhase 2
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of LP-003 Injection in Allergic Asthma Patients
Allergic Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
39 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Omalizumab in people with Persistent Allergic Asthma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 39 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Following the 24-week Treatment Period (time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01202903, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2015.