Atrial FibrillationStar AF IINCT01203748
Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial - Star AF II Study
A study testing PVI + Lines ablation, PVI and PVI + CFE ablation in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This investigation is designed with the hypothesis that combined PV Antral Isolation and Ablation of Complex Fractionated Electrograms (PVI+CFE) approach will offer a higher success rate compared to the Wide Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation (PVI) approach and to the Combined PV Antral Isolation and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- PVI + Lines ablation, PVI and PVI + CFE ablation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 589 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Jan 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients age is18 years or greater;
- Patients undergoing a first-time ablation procedure for AF;
- Patients with persistent AF;
- Persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting > 7 days and less than 3 years.
- Patients with symptomatic AF that is refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic medication;
- At least one episode of persistent AF must have been documented by ECG, holter, loop recorder, telemetry, trans telephonic monitoring (TTM), or implantable device within last 2 years of enrollment in this investigation;
- Patients must be able and willing to provide written informed consent to participate in this investigation; and
- Patients must be willing and able to comply with all peri-ablation and follow-up requirements.
Who cannot join
- Patients with paroxysmal AF;
- Patients with long-standing persistent AF;
- Patients for whom cardioversion or sinus rhythm will never be attempted/pursued;
- Patients with AF felt to be secondary to an obvious reversible cause;
- Patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or coumadin or a direct thrombin inhibitor;
- Patients with left atrial size ≥ 60 mm (2D echocardiography, parasternal long axis view); and
- Patients who are pregnant.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
About this study
This investigation is designed with the hypothesis that combined PV Antral Isolation and Ablation of Complex Fractionated Electrograms (PVI+CFE) approach will offer a higher success rate compared to the Wide Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation (PVI) approach and to the Combined PV Antral Isolation and Empiric Linear Ablation (PVI+Lines) approach.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- PVI + Lines ablation, PVI, PVI + CFE ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PVI + Lines ablationProcedure or surgery
Pulmonary vein antrum isolation with additional linear ablation (mitral line and roof line)
PVIProcedure or surgery
Pulmonary vein antrum isolation
PVI + CFE ablationProcedure or surgery
Pulmonary vein antrum isolation with additional complex fractionated electrogram ablation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PVI + Lines Ablation | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: PVI + Lines ablation |
| PVI Ablation | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: PVI |
| PVI + CFE | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: PVI + CFE ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Freedom from AF
Freedom from documented AF episodes > 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedure with/without antiarrhythmic medications (AAD).
In the CT.gov website and in our protocol, we have stated the above primary endpoint (PE). This was the identical PE used in the original STAR AF I study. The intent of this PE was to present the success rates after both 1 procedure and after 2 procedures separately as was done in the original STAR AF I study. However, this is not entirely clear from the way the PE is stated. It may appear that our PE is the success rate after 2 procedures ("1 or 2" may imply "2"). Since our sample size calculation for the STAR AF II study was based on a single procedure success rate, the single procedure success rate with/without AAD will be used as the PE. The success rate after 2 procedures will be provided as the 1st. secondary endpoint. This clarification is done prior to locking the database and prior to any data analysis.
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (18)
Freedom from atrial arrhythmia
Freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia episodes > 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Measured: 18 months
Freedom from atrial flutter and AT
Freedom from documented atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia episodes > 30 seconds at 18 months after one and two procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Measured: 18 months
Freedom from documented or not atrial arrhythmia
Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia (documented or not) episodes > 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Measured: 18 months
Freedom from symptomatic AF
Freedom from symptomatic AF episodes > 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Measured: 18 months
Freedom from symptomatic atrial arrhythmia
Freedom from symptomatic atrial arrhythmia episodes > 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedures with/without antiarrhythmic medications
Measured: 18 months
Incidence of peri-procedural complications, including stroke, PV stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury and death
Incidence of peri-procedural complications, including stroke, PV stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury and death
Measured: 18 months
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time
Measured: 18 months
Number of repeat procedures
Number of repeat procedures
Measured: 18 months
Effect of each strategy on AF cycle length/regularity/termination
Effect of each strategy on AF cycle length/regularity/termination
Measured: 18 months
Relationship of acute termination of AF to long-term procedural outcome
Relationship of acute termination of AF to long-term procedural outcome
Measured: 18 months
Percentage achievement of complete linear block in linear ablation arm
Percentage achievement of complete linear block in linear ablation arm
Measured: 18 months
Effect of complete linear block on procedural outcome in linear ablation arm
Effect of complete linear block on procedural outcome in linear ablation arm
Measured: 18 months
Quality of life measurements (SF-36, EQ-5D and CCS SAF)
Quality of life measurements (SF-36, EQ-5D and CCS SAF) at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months after one and/or two ablation procedures
Measured: 18 MONTHS
Correlation of AF burden to symptoms and quality of life changes
Correlation of AF burden to symptoms and quality of life changes
Measured: 18 Months
Improvement in AF burden by > 90% post ablation procedure
Improvement in AF burden by > 90% post ablation procedure
Measured: 18 months
Relationship of ablating all atrial arrhythmias versus ablation of only targeted endpoints on long term outcome
Relationship of ablating all atrial arrhythmias versus ablation of only targeted endpoints on long term outcome
Measured: 18 months
Cut off of AF burden that affects the Quality of Life measurement
Cut off of AF burden that affects the Quality of Life measurement
Measured: 18 months
Evaluation of cost utility
Evaluation of cost utility
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionJan 2014
- Study completionJan 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 589 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Atul Verma, Dr., Principal investigator, Southlake Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01203748
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AF-09-102-ID-AB
- Acronym
- Star AF II
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Terricabras M, Mantovan R, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P, Verma A; Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial-Part II (STAR AF II) Investigators. Association Between Quality of Life and Procedural Outcome After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2025473. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25473.
PubMed 33275151Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288.
PubMed 25946280Verma A, Sanders P, Macle L, Deisenhofer I, Morillo CA, Chen J, Jiang CY, Ernst S, Mantovan R. Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial-Part II (STAR AF II): design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2012 Jul;164(1):1-6.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.04.002.
PubMed 22795275
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial - Star AF II Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01203748
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Star AF II / AF-09-102-ID-AB
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 589 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This investigation is designed with the hypothesis that combined PV Antral Isolation and Ablation of Complex Fractionated Electrograms (PVI+CFE) approach will offer a higher success rate compared to the Wide Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation (PVI) approach and to the Combined PV Antral Isolation and Empiric Linear Ablation (PVI+Lines) approach.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PVI + Lines Ablation | Experimental | Procedure: PVI + Lines ablation |
| PVI Ablation | Active comparator | Procedure: PVI |
| PVI + CFE | Experimental | Procedure: PVI + CFE ablation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients age is18 years or greater;
- Patients undergoing a first-time ablation procedure for AF;
- Patients with persistent AF;
- Persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting > 7 days and less than 3 years.
- Patients with symptomatic AF that is refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic medication;
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with paroxysmal AF;
- Patients with long-standing persistent AF;
- Patients for whom cardioversion or sinus rhythm will never be attempted/pursued;
- Patients with AF felt to be secondary to an obvious reversible cause;
- Patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or coumadin or a direct thrombin inhibitor;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PVI + Lines ablationPulmonary vein antrum isolation with additional linear ablation (mitral line and roof line) | Procedure or surgery | PVI + Lines Ablation |
| PVIPulmonary vein antrum isolation | Procedure or surgery | PVI Ablation |
| PVI + CFE ablationPulmonary vein antrum isolation with additional complex fractionated electrogram ablation | Procedure or surgery | PVI + CFE |
Primary outcome
Freedom from AF
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from documented AF episodes > 30 seconds at 18 months after one or two ablation procedure with/without antiarrhythmic medications (AAD). In the CT.gov website and in our protocol, we have stated the above primary endpoint (PE). This was the identical PE used in the original STAR AF I study. The intent of this PE was to present the success rates after both 1 procedure and after 2 procedures separately as was done in the original STAR AF I study. However, this is not entirely clear from the way the PE is stated. It may appear that our PE is the success rate after 2 procedures ("1 or 2" may imply "2"). Since our sample size calculation for the STAR AF II study was based on a single procedure success rate, the single procedure success rate with/without AAD will be used as the PE. The success rate after 2 procedures will be provided as the 1st. secondary endpoint. This clarification is done prior to locking the database and prior to any data analysis.
18 secondary outcomes
Freedom from atrial arrhythmia
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from atrial flutter and AT
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from documented or not atrial arrhythmia
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from symptomatic AF
Time frame: 18 months
Freedom from symptomatic atrial arrhythmia
Time frame: 18 months
Incidence of peri-procedural complications, including stroke, PV stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury and death
Time frame: 18 months
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time
Time frame: 18 months
Number of repeat procedures
Time frame: 18 months
Effect of each strategy on AF cycle length/regularity/termination
Time frame: 18 months
Relationship of acute termination of AF to long-term procedural outcome
Time frame: 18 months
Percentage achievement of complete linear block in linear ablation arm
Time frame: 18 months
Effect of complete linear block on procedural outcome in linear ablation arm
Time frame: 18 months
Quality of life measurements (SF-36, EQ-5D and CCS SAF)
Time frame: 18 MONTHS
Correlation of AF burden to symptoms and quality of life changes
Time frame: 18 Months
Improvement in AF burden by > 90% post ablation procedure
Time frame: 18 months
Relationship of ablating all atrial arrhythmias versus ablation of only targeted endpoints on long term outcome
Time frame: 18 months
Cut off of AF burden that affects the Quality of Life measurement
Time frame: 18 months
Evaluation of cost utility
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33275151Terricabras M, Mantovan R, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P, Verma A; Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial-Part II (STAR AF II) Investigators. Association Between Quality of Life and Procedural Outcome After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2025473. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25473.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25946280Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22795275Verma A, Sanders P, Macle L, Deisenhofer I, Morillo CA, Chen J, Jiang CY, Ernst S, Mantovan R. Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial-Part II (STAR AF II): design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2012 Jul;164(1):1-6.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.04.002.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Atul Verma, Dr. principal investigator
Southlake Health
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PVI + Lines ablation, PVI and PVI + CFE ablation in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Australia, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Freedom from AF (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01203748, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2019.