AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainNCT01204892

Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Bilateral Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration

A study testing TAP Block and Local infiltration in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose if to find out if analgesia with bilateral ultrasound-guided Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block with Ropivacaine 0.5% is better than analgesia with local infiltration of trochar sites with Ropivacaine 0.5% in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
What is being tested?
TAP Block and Local infiltration
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2010to May 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient ages 18-64
  • American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status I, II or III
  • Inpatients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Ben Taub General Hospital

Who cannot join

  • Open cholecystectomy - excluded due to increased levels of pain in open procedures
  • Scheduled for ambulatory surgery
  • Renal dysfunction (Serum Cr > 1.2) - excluded due to potential altered metabolism of anesthetic and pain medications
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulation - increased risk of bleeding from nerve block injection
  • Allergy or contraindication to any of the study medications or anesthetic agents
  • Chronic opioid analgesic use at home - excluded due to potential difficulty in assessing pain caused by the procedure alone
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patient inability to properly describe postoperative pain to investigators (language barrier, dementia, delirium, psychiatric disorder)
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
  • Patient or surgeon refusal

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Ben Taub General Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients Receiving Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Transverse Abdominis Plane Block Compared With Local Anesthetic Infiltration of Trochar Insertion Sites With Ropivacaine 0.5%

The purpose if to find out if analgesia with bilateral ultrasound-guided Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block with Ropivacaine 0.5% is better than analgesia with local infiltration of trochar sites with Ropivacaine 0.5% in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Our hypothesis is that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bilateral TAP blocks will reduce postoperative pain scores when compared to conventional postoperative pain control with local infiltration of trochar insertion sites.

Read the detailed description

The purpose if to find out if analgesia with bilateral ultrasound-guided Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block with Ropivacaine 0.5% is better than analgesia with local infiltration of trochar sites with Ropivacaine 0.5% in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Our hypothesis is that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bilateral TAP blocks will reduce postoperative pain scores when compared to conventional postoperative pain control with local infiltration of trochar insertion sites.

Being tested
TAP Block, Local infiltration
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TAP BlockProcedure or surgery

    Patient will received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with total of 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% after induction of general anesthesia

  • Local infiltrationProcedure or surgery

    20 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% will be injected at port sites after induction of general anesthesia. 7 ml each for 10 mm ports, 3 ml each of 5 mm ports

Study groups in NCT01204892
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TAP BlockActive comparatorPatient will received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with total of 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% after induction of general anesthesia
Receives: Procedure: TAP Block
Local infiltrationActive comparator20 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% will be injected at port sites after induction of general anesthesia. 7 ml each for 10 mm ports, 3 ml each of 5 mm ports
Receives: Procedure: Local infiltration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain

    Pain scores on NAS scale (0-10) at the following times:

    Preop, Time 0, Time 1, Time 2, Time 4, Time 8, Time 12, Time 24

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. PONV (Postoperative nausea and vomiting)

    PONV events in first 24 hours

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Narcotics use

    Fentanyl, morphine, and hydrocodone/apap total for 24 hours

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01204892
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-27128
Status last verified
Jul 2012
First submitted
16 Sep 2010
Last updated
12 Jul 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing TAP Block and Local infiltration in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in