SchizophreniaPhase 4i-FANSNCT01207414
Switching to Iloperidone From Other Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia
A Phase 4 study testing iloperidone in people with Schizophrenia, run by Novartis at 59 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Evaluate the clinical outcome of two switching strategies to iloperidone treatment in adult subjects with schizophrenia who require a change in their current antipsychotic treatment of risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole due to suboptimal efficacy and/or safety/tolerability reasons. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia
- What is being tested?
- iloperidone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 501 participants
- Where
- 59 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2010to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or females, 18 to 64 years of age, inclusive
- DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia
- Patients currently on an optimal in-label dose of one of the following permitted antipsychotic treatments for at least 30 days: risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole
- Efficacy Clinical Global Impression of Severity (E-CGI-S) of 4 or 5 or
- Not tolerating one of the permitted treatments and exhibits one of the allowable side-effects
Who cannot join
- Any other current Axis I disorder other than schizophrenia which is the focus of treatment;
- Acutely psychotic or patient's symptom severity requires hospitalization
- Patient with significant cardiovascular illness (myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia)
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
59 sites in 1 country.
59 sites in 1 country
United States59 sites
Albuquerque Neuroscience
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
Alexian Brothers Center for Mental Health
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005
Atlanta Center for Medical Research
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Comprehensive Neuroscience
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Community Clinical Research, Inc.
Austin, Texas, 78754
North Coast Clinical Trials
Beachwood, Ohio, 44122
Birmingham Psychiatry Pharmaceutical Studies, Inc.
Birmingham, Alabama, 35226
Neurobehavioral Medicine Group, Clinical Trials Division
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, 48302
Neurobehavioral Clinical Research
Canton, Ohio, 44718
Neurobehavioral Research
Cedarhurst, New York, 11516
Comprehensive Neuroscience
Cerritos, California, 90703
Carolina Clinical Trials
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407
Center for Emotional Fitness
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08002
Rush University Medical Center, Treatment Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
ATP Clinical Research Center, Inc.
Costa Mesa, California, 92626
KRK Medical Research
Dallas, Texas, 75230
FutureSearch Trials
Dallas, Texas, 75231
InSite Clinical Research
DeSoto, Texas, 75115
Precise Research Centers
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232
Comprehensive Neuroscience
Fresh Meadows, New York, 11366
Collaborative Neuroscience Network
Garden Grove, California, 92845
Division of Psychiatry Research - Zucker Hills Hospital
Glen Oaks, New York, 11004
Bayou City Research Limited
Houston, Texas, 77007
Claghorn-Lesem Research Clinic, Inc
Houston, Texas, 77008
Mary Ann Knesevich, MD, PA
Irving, Texas, 75062
Amit K. Vijapura MD & Associates
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Apostle Clinical Trials, Inc.
Long Beach, California, 90813
Northwest Behavioral Research Center
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
AMR - Baber Research, Inc.
Naperville, Illinois, 60563
Pacific Health Systems
National City, California, 91950
The Hospital of Central Connecticut
New Britain, Connecticut, 06052
Scientific Clinical Research
North Miami, Florida, 33161
Midwest Center for Neurobehavioral Medicine
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, 60181
Pacific Research Partners
Oakland, California, 94612
Excell Research, Inc.
Oceanside, California, 92056
IPS Research Company
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
SP Research, PLLC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
University of California, Irvine
Orange, California, 92868
Belmont Center for Comprehensive Treatment
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19131
CRI Worldwide, LLC - Kirkbride Division
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19139
InSite Clinical Research
Plano, Texas, 75074
Finger Lakes Clinical Research
Rochester, New York, 14618
Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine
Rochester Hills, Michigan, 48307
St. Charles Psychiatric Associates - Midwest Research Group
Saint Charles, Missouri, 63301
CNRI San Diego
San Diego, California, 92102
Affiliated Research Institute
San Diego, California, 92108
Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92108
Neuropsychiatric Research Center of Orange County
Santa Ana, California, 92701
Louisiana Clinical Research
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71115
Carman Research
Smyrna, Georgia, 30080
Institute for Behavioral Medicine
Smyrna, Georgia, 30080
Frontier Institute
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Behavioral Medical Research
Staten Island, New York, 10305
Richmond Behavioral Associates
Staten Island, New York, 10312
Viking Clinical Research
Temecula, California, 92591
Collaborative Neuroscience
Torrance, California, 90502
Comprenhensive Neuroscience
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016
CRI World Wide Clinical Research Company
Willingboro, New Jersey, 08046
About this study
Official title: A 12-week, Randomized, Multi-center, Open-Label, Iloperidone, (12-24 mg/Day), Flexible Dose Study Assessing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Switch Approaches in Schizophrenia Patients Currently Receiving Risperidone, Olanzapine or Aripiprazole
Evaluate the clinical outcome of two switching strategies to iloperidone treatment in adult subjects with schizophrenia who require a change in their current antipsychotic treatment of risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole due to suboptimal efficacy and/or safety/tolerability reasons.
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Being tested
- iloperidone
- Keywords
- Schizophrenia, iloperidone, switch, gradual switch, immediate switch
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iloperidoneDrug
Also called Fanapt™
Iloperidone tablets supplied at doses of 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg and 12 mg to achieve a target dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| iloperidone gradual switch | Experimental | Participants taking risperidone, olanzapine or aripiprazole gradually decreased the dose they were taking: 50% of original dose on Day 1, 25% of original dose after the first week and the total discontinuation of the drug after the second week.
On Day 1 participants began taking iloperidone orally twice a day (bid) in the morning and in the evening beginning at a dose of 1 mg and increasing to 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg, and 12 mg bid on consecutive days over a 7-day period to achieve a total dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: iloperidone |
| iloperidone immediate switch | Experimental | Participants taking risperidone, olanzapine or aripiprazole discontinued the drug immediately.
On Day 1 participants began taking iloperidone orally twice a day (bid) in the morning and in the evening beginning at a dose of 1 mg and increasing to 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg, and 12 mg bid on consecutive days over a 7-day period to achieve a total dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: iloperidone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Change (I-CGI-C) at Week 12
The I-CGI-C at Week 12 was the overall impression of medically qualified raters using three separate Clinical Global Impression of Change scales: efficacy (E-CGI-C); safety and tolerability (ST-CGI-S); and overall severity (I-CGI-S) combined for a total score. The I-CGI-C scale ranged from 1 to 7 with lower scores indicating improvement (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved), higher scores indicating worsening (5=minimally worse, 6= much worse, 7=very much worse), and a score of 4 indicating no change.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) at Week 12
The TSQM consisted of 14 questions about the patient's satisfaction with the drug in 4 domains: Effectiveness [3 questions scored as 1(extremely dissatisfied) to 7(extremely satisfied)], Side Effects [question 4 scored as 0(no) or 1(yes);question 5 scored as 1(extremely bothersome) to 5(not at all bothersome);questions 6 - 8 scored as 1(a great deal) to 5(not at all)], Convenience [questions 9 and 10 scored as 1(extremely difficult) to 7 (extremely easy);question 11 scored as 1(extremely inconvenient) to 5 (extremely convenient)] and Global Satisfaction [question 12 scored as 1(not at all confident) to 7(extremely confident);question 13 scored as 1(not at all certain) to 5(extremely certain);question 14 scored as 1(extremely dissatisfied) to 5(extremely satisfied)]. The scores of each of the domains were added together and an algorithm used to create a score of 0 to 100. Higher scores for each domain indicate a better outcome. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events or Death
Adverse event are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptoms, sign (including an abnormal lab finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or if present at baseline appear to worsen.
Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization , cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgments of the investigators represent significant hazards.
Additional information about adverse events can be found in the Adverse Event section.
Measured: 12 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Efficacy Clinical Global Impression of Severity (E-CGI-S) at Week 12
Medically qualified raters use the E-CGI-S scale at Baseline and Week 12 to assess the effectiveness of treatment by examining changes in positive symptoms [hallucinations (false perceptions), delusions (false beliefs), paranoia (unfounded distrust), conceptual disorganization (loosening of associations), or hostility], negative symptoms [apathy (lack of interest), avolition (lack of motivation), alogia (poverty of speech), and anhedonia (absence of pleasure)] and cognitive symptoms [concentration difficulties, difficulties with executive function (integrative reasoning), and illogical thinking] in the previous 7 days on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=normal, 2=borderline mentally ill, 3=mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5=markedly ill, 6=severely ill or 7=among the most extremely ill). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Safety and Tolerability Clinical Global Impression of Severity (ST-CGI-S) at Week 12
Medically qualified raters used the ST-CGI-S at Baseline and Week 12 to evaluate safety and tolerability in the previous 7 days on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=Normal-no symptoms, 2=borderline severity, 3=mild impairment, 4=moderate, 5=marked, 6=severe, 7=among the most severe.) A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Severity (I-CGI-S) at Week 12
I-CGI-S incorporated the overall, combined impression of illness severity based upon the E-CGI-S and ST-CGI-S. Medically qualified raters evaluated the patient's illness in the previous 7 days at Baseline and Week 12 on a scale of 1 to 7 (1=normal not at all ill, 2=borderline mental illness or impairment, 3=mildly ill or impaired, 4=moderately ill or impaired, 5=marked ill or impaired, 6= severely ill or impaired or 7=among the most extremely ill patients. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2010
- Primary completionJan 2012
- Study completionJan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 501 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marla Hochfeld, MD, MD, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01207414
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CILO522DUS01
- Acronym
- i-FANS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-week, Randomized, Multi-center, Open-Label, Iloperidone, (12-24 mg/Day), Flexible Dose Study Assessing Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Switch Approaches in Schizophrenia Patients Currently Receiving Risperidone, Olanzapine or Aripiprazole
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01207414
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- i-FANS / CILO522DUS01
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Keywords
- Schizophrenia, iloperidone, switch, gradual switch, immediate switch
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 501 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NovartisIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Mar 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluate the clinical outcome of two switching strategies to iloperidone treatment in adult subjects with schizophrenia who require a change in their current antipsychotic treatment of risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole due to suboptimal efficacy and/or safety/tolerability reasons.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| iloperidone gradual switch | Experimental | Drug: iloperidoneParticipants taking risperidone, olanzapine or aripiprazole gradually decreased the dose they were taking: 50% of original dose on Day 1, 25% of original dose after the first week and the total discontinuation of the drug after the second week. On Day 1 participants began taking iloperidone orally twice a day (bid) in the morning and in the evening beginning at a dose of 1 mg and increasing to 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg, and 12 mg bid on consecutive days over a 7-day period to achieve a total dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks. |
| iloperidone immediate switch | Experimental | Drug: iloperidoneParticipants taking risperidone, olanzapine or aripiprazole discontinued the drug immediately. On Day 1 participants began taking iloperidone orally twice a day (bid) in the morning and in the evening beginning at a dose of 1 mg and increasing to 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg, and 12 mg bid on consecutive days over a 7-day period to achieve a total dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Males or females, 18 to 64 years of age, inclusive
- DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia
- Patients currently on an optimal in-label dose of one of the following permitted antipsychotic treatments for at least 30 days: risperidone, olanzapine, or aripiprazole
- Efficacy Clinical Global Impression of Severity (E-CGI-S) of 4 or 5 or
- Not tolerating one of the permitted treatments and exhibits one of the allowable side-effects
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Any other current Axis I disorder other than schizophrenia which is the focus of treatment;
- Acutely psychotic or patient's symptom severity requires hospitalization
- Patient with significant cardiovascular illness (myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia)
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iloperidoneAlso: Fanapt™Iloperidone tablets supplied at doses of 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg, 10 mg and 12 mg to achieve a target dose of 12-24 mg/day for 12 weeks. | Drug | iloperidone gradual switch, iloperidone immediate switch |
Primary outcome
Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Change (I-CGI-C) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
The I-CGI-C at Week 12 was the overall impression of medically qualified raters using three separate Clinical Global Impression of Change scales: efficacy (E-CGI-C); safety and tolerability (ST-CGI-S); and overall severity (I-CGI-S) combined for a total score. The I-CGI-C scale ranged from 1 to 7 with lower scores indicating improvement (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved), higher scores indicating worsening (5=minimally worse, 6= much worse, 7=very much worse), and a score of 4 indicating no change.
5 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events or Death
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Efficacy Clinical Global Impression of Severity (E-CGI-S) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Safety and Tolerability Clinical Global Impression of Severity (ST-CGI-S) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Severity (I-CGI-S) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marla Hochfeld, MD, MD study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
59 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing iloperidone in people with Schizophrenia, run by Novartis at 59 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 59 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Mar 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Integrated Clinical Global Impression of Change (I-CGI-C) at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2013.